Defamation is a problem for many in Korea, whose enforcement (or lack of enforcement) quite often infringes upon free speech, if not democracy itself. The Wall Street Journal has a good, short piece on this issue here.
Apparently, he was reported to be in the vicinity of the Blue House but there is some disagreement with this sighting and there are concerns that more than this man may be missing. If you spot him, please call the Segye Ilbo, since they have invested some effort in locating this fellow.
Cheong Wa Dae really, really doesn’t like leaks:
The prosecution on Thursday questioned police Superintendent Park Gwan-cheon and conducted raids in the expanding investigation surrounding former presidential aide Chung Yoon-hoi.
Park, who served on Cheong Wa Dae’s team dealing with discipline within the civil service until February, is accused of having leaked reports regarding Chung to the media.
The memo at the center of “Memogate,” if true, confirms suspicion that a small cabol of advisors—and in the case of Chung, a guy without even an official position—are calling the shots at Cheong Wa Dae:
Disclosures by Jo and Chung offer a glimpse into the political intrigue allegedly going on inside the Blue House. Jo’s allegation that Park’s three closest secretaries were involved in government personnel appointments has brought to the fore what has long been suspected ― that the three wield great power and influence in the Blue House. Chung’s shifting comments on whether he was in contact with the presidential secretaries cast doubt on his claim that the leaked document is false. The Segye Ilbo, citing the leaked document, reported that Chung met with presidential secretaries to plot an ouster of Chief of Staff Kim Ki-choon and that the group met regularly to discuss state and Blue House affairs.
The aspect of this mess I find most interesting is how Cheong Wa Dae is—well, to be perfectly accurate, eight Cheong Wa Dae officials are—going after the Segye Ilbo, which quoted the leaked report, for libel. This, naturally enough, has the press worried, with the Hankyoreh condemning the move in rather strident language:
Park’s views on the media are positively dangerous. At the meeting on Dec. 1, she railed at the Segye Ilbo newspaper for “reporting things that they could have confirmed or denied with the least effort without even contacting the people involved.” But the problem is that this isn’t a case where the “least effort” could clear things up. The prosecutors may take these people at their word when they say “not me,” but the media won’t. What’s “abnormal” is a country whose presidential office dismisses a document that it produced itself as a “tabloid sheet.” Reporting on a Blue House report is a perfectly natural part of fulfilling the mission of the media. What kind of shameless president gets angry at the newspapers instead of blaming herself for leaving her country in this abnormal state?
Mind you, it’s not just the lefties at the Hankyoreh who are concerned. In an editorial, the Chosun Ilbo also asked why a newspaper company should be charged with libel and condemned by the president for quoting a document—a document registered as a public record, mind you—written by somebody at Cheong Wa Dae and leaked by somebody at Cheong Wa Dae.
With the prosecutors now looking into the report, we should get an idea of just how much of it is true. And to be fair to Cheong Wa Dae, this isn’t the first time shadowy individuals have been suspected of having undue influence over a Korean administration, nor is Park the only elected leader in the Free World being accused of overzealously reacting to leaks.
Anyway, I can understand going after the leaker in the name of maintaining official discipline, even if Park might be accused of some hypocrisy in this regard, but unless the prosecutors turn up something we don’t know about yet, I can’t see how going after the press is going to help her administration in the long run.
A court has convicted two NIS (National Intelligence Service) counterintelligence officials of fabricating Chinese government documents to build a spy case against a refugee from North Korea. An excellent article by Choe Sang-hun is to be found here. The judge, Kim Woo-soo said:
(the agents) seriously obstructed the function of the criminal justice of the country, . . . they betrayed the trust the people placed in the National Intelligence Service when it gave it both power and responsibility.
This decision comes after so many mistakes from this agency and an administration that is not intent upon fixing them, though there is much said about such.
Seoul’s mayor and popular pick among pundits for presidential candidate in 2017 Park Won-soon came out in support of legalizing gay marriage. In an interview with the San Francisco Examiner published last Sunday, Park voiced his personal support for gay rights and hopes that Korea would become the first Asian country to legalize same-sex marriage.
“I personally agree with the rights of homosexuals,” Park said. “But the Protestant churches are very powerful in Korea. It isn’t easy for politicians. It’s in the hands of activists to expand the universal concept of human rights to include homosexuals. Once they persuade the people, the politicians will follow. It’s in process now.”
When asked whether Taiwan would be the first Asian country to legalize same-sex marriage since Taiwanese legislature currently has a bill under consideration, Park answered, “I hope Korea will be the first. Many homosexual couples in Korea are already together. They are not legally accepted yet, but I believe the Korean Constitution allows it. We are guaranteed the right to the pursuit of happiness. Of course, there may be different interpretations to what that pursuit means.”
If Park is indeed considering a run for the presidency, his support for same-sex marriage could prove politically risky. According to the Wall Street Journal, “the vast majority of South Koreans have negative attitudes against gay people, let alone same-sex marriage….” A poll conducted last year by the Asan Institute for Policy Studies showed that 21.5% of the 1,500 adults surveyed said “they had little or no objections to homosexuality, while only a quarter said they supported gay marriage.” The results were polarized by age: a majority of those over 50 said they had “negative views towards homosexuality”, a majority of those under 40 were supportive of gay rights, and respondents in their 40s were almost evenly split in their views of homosexuality.
Park Won-soon, 58, was expelled as a freshman from SNU for his participation in a pro-democracy demonstration and made his bones as a civil rights attorney. When the subject of South Korea’s prosecution and jailing of Jehovah’s Witnesses who refuse to perform compulsory military service came up, Park said “alternative civilian service for Jehovah’s Witnesses would be acceptable.”
According to an official at the mayor’s office, the interview took place during the mayor’s trip to California last month.
After the electioneering done under the auspices of Won Sei-hoon (former head of the National Intelligence Service), where millions of tweets flooded twitter-space in a deliberate attempt to influence the presidential election in South Korea, Won has received a two and a half sentence – suspended.
According to a report by Yonhap News, “While the Seoul District Court decided he had ordered agents to post politically sensitive comments, it ruled there was not enough evidence to prove he directly sought to influence the outcome of the presidential ballot” – believe it or not. (cite)
According to the JoongAng:
The court, however, rejected the prosecution’s argument that Won violated the election law by ordering a systematic operation to influence domestic politics.
“No evidence was presented that Won made a direct order to the National Intelligence Service agents to influence the presidential election,” the court said. It also said the team’s operation was part of the agency’s routine activities.
The court said Won had a heavy responsibility as head of the NIS to protect the agency’s political neutrality and prevent its agents from meddling in politics. He, therefore, deserves severe criticism for promoting government policies while trying to smear opposition political parties, the court said. . . the court wrote “Won did not plan the operation with a purpose and he merely followed past practices.” (cite)
The court’s “get-out-of-jail-free” card was given to Won after he left prison for serving 14 months of a two year sentence for graft.
Two other former senior officials of the spy agency who had been indicted on similar charges were each sentenced to a year in prison on Thursday, but their sentences were also suspended. Both the prosecutors and the defendants have a week to appeal the verdicts. (cite)
So who is responsible for running a subversive campaign against the Republic of Korea, if it wasn’t the DPRK and it was not Won’s boss (the president)?
Kim Young-Oh is hungry but more sad than hungry.
Mr. Kim lost his 16-year-old daughter to the Sewol Ferry disaster and he collapsed from his hunger protest last Friday and has been hospitalized.
Mr. Kim was demanding that a fully independent investigator be assigned to the Sewol case instead of a government-connected prosecutor. A bill has been proposed but rejected because a government-connected prosecutor is a problem for many because there has been a profound and long-held distrust of the government under the majority Saenuri Party, which has had a troubled history of manipulating events at the expense of the public’s trust. Because of the reluctance of the ruling party to give such powers over to a non-aligned prosecutor, – citing constitutional problems as being the reason – Mr. Kim decided to fast.
Along with Mr. Kim’s fast, an all too common problem has been demonstrated, once again and that is a major problem of not just Korean politics but of most two-party political systems.
The real problem is a political system that is so degraded that it is suffering under a “false dilemma” – also known as “black-and-white thinking”. Such an inflexible mindset is best exemplified in a two-party political system, which produces a either-or way of voting. Due to the bi-polar (black or white) mentality of the political system in South Korea, many Koreans have assumed that:
Mr. Kim is a likely a bad man, that wants money, that failed to be a good parent and is probably a Communist and wants to wrench control of the country from the ruling party
OR . . .
Mr. Kim is a victim of the corruption of the ruling party that controls the government (at this moment) and is a hero that can help end the unjust rule of corrupt conservative politicians.
Actually, Mr. Kim is neither A or B.
There are several aspects to this situation.
Since the Sewol disaster, the NPAD faction and other supposed civic groups have offered their assistance to the parents of the kids that perished from the disaster, using it partly for their political agenda. According to one parent, many did not want such help from the start:
Another father of a victim said some family members did not want left-wing activists helping them, as it compromised their political neutrality. “Some of us didn’t want to mingle with them, but at that time we were office workers who didn’t know how to speak up for ourselves,” he said. “So I thought we needed their support.” (cite)
The NPAD has also begun a boycott of government, bringing most legislative activity to a halt since this seems to be one of their areas of expertise.
Then there is that HUMONGOUS problem of credibility (sabotaging a prosecutor general, NIS-generated electioneering, etc.) , which the Saenuri-Hanara Dang/Administration has lacked, except in parts of the country where they enjoy an older constituency that vote out of that false dilemma thinking called regionalism. I had a conversation with a fellow (over 50) in Daegu recently where he said he believed that Mr. Kim was a contemptible fellow, who was holding out for more money. To this self-described Saenuri supporter, it was all about money since there could not possibly be any other reason for Mr. Kim’s fast.
Very black-and-white in Daegu.
Meanwhile, many Koreans, that are against the Saenuri Dang feel that the ruling party does not want a truely independant investigation because of so much corruption tied to the ferry owner and people higher up in the ruling party. The government’s citing constitutional problems as being the reason why independant investigators can not be allowed is seen by many as being a “false choice” or “a deliberate attempt to eliminate several options that may occupy the middle ground on an issue”.
As for Mr. Kim? – he has said that “I have a headache. I have a headache because of politicians in South Korea, . . . We want to find why more than 300 people died unfairly. We want to clarify this and hold a person in charge accountable”. He does not want money – he wants accountability so that his daughter’s short life and death will not have been in vain.
When there is such a firmly encamped case of the false dilemma, there can be parity only after much struggle since this way of thinking quickly becomes a device of the few that manipulate the many for gain, for example, currently there is an “ice-bucket challenge” that has become a popular way to raise the awareness of Lou Gehrig’s disease – a disease that can strike anyone no matter which political party they belong to. The challenge is “to promote awareness of the disease amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and encourage donations to research” . . .
However . . .
Both Rep. Park Jie-won of the opposition New Politics Alliance for Democracy (NPAD) and Saenuri Chairman Kim Moo-sung have both taken the challenge not so much to donate money to fighting ALS but as a tool for political means, as per Kim Moo-sung’s statement “Please persuade hawkish lawmakers [within the NPAD] after sorting out your thoughts with some cold water” followed by Park Jie-won’s comment “Though I participated [in the charity event] there are still people gravely concerned over the passage of the Sewol law and who are still waiting for the return of their loved ones. I hope that ice bucket challenge and the Sewol bucket challenge will go together”.
I give you a visual example of the false dilemma on ice.
Yoon Yeo-joon also sees all of this as well but, like him, we are left without a ready solution. IMHO, the change will have to come from the people – without the aid of any current party and in a manner that can not be co-opted. That will take time and probably something unforeseen.
The Park administration is angry at a Japanese newspaper and is threatening them with prosecution under the dreaded Korean defamation law.
The Japanese newspaper, Sankei Shimbun, posted an article “President Park Geun-hye, missing on the day of the ferry’s sinking … With whom did she meet at the time?” whose sources mention a Chosun Ilbo column that put forward the notion that the president was having a meeting, of a personal nature, with a Saenuri Dang member, who was also married (cite).
Mind you, I have no interest in anyone’s personal affairs, especially since it has no bearing upon any important issues, however, I do note one thing – isn’t it more than a little rich that one of the sources, mentioned by the Japanese newspaper, was the Chosun Ilbo, the same newspaper that interfered in the political process here, accusing (defaming) then Prosecutor General Chae Dong-Wook with marital infidelity?. . . and the news leak to the Chosun Ilbo about General Prosecutor Chae was a Blue House aide.
Naturally, the local editor of the Japanese newspaper is to blame for repeating this defamation.
Despite public anger at the government’s handling of the Sewol disaster and President Park’s approval ratings faltering, the ruling party won—and won big—in yesterday’s by-election, winning in 11 of 15 races, including all but one seat in the greater Seoul area.
This gives the Saenuri Party an absolute majority in the 300-seat National Assembly and leaves a lot of observers—me included—scratching their heads.
The biggest surprise of the day happened in Suncheon/Gokseong, where the Saenuri Party’s Lee Jung-hyun became the first conservative in over two decades to win in Gwangju/Jeollanam-do:
The most unexpected outcome came from a race in Suncheon and Gokseong in South Jeolla, where former senior presidential secretary Lee Jung-hyun of the Saenuri defeated NPAD candidate Suh Gab-won, a loyalist to former President Roh Moo-hyun. Lee’s victory marked the first time for 26 years that a conservative party candidate was elected in South Jeolla, a traditional opposition stronghold, and is seen as a meaningful step in breaking the thick layer of regionalism in Korean politics.
For Lee, three times are a charm:
His victory came after two previous failed attempts in the province. In the 2004 general election, he received a miniscule 1.03% of the vote but surprised political observers in 2012 by garnering 39.7%.
For those keeping score at home, it’s only been 18 years since a conservative won in Jeollabuk-do—Kang Hyun-wook won in one of Gunsan’s electoral districts in 1996.
The National Assembly also welcomes back Na Kyung-won, whose fortunes look better than they did when she lost to Park Won-soon in the Seoul’s mayor race in 2011, and a damn sight better than when she dropped out of the 2012 general election after it turned out her husband—a judge—had asked another judge to indict a netizen on charges of defaming his wife (to be fair to Na, she was the victim of some pretty bad defaming in the Seoul race, albeit at the hands of folk not related to this case).
Yonhap basically says this was an election the Saenuri couldn’t win and the NPAD couldn’t lose… and yet they did. The news agency blames the opposition for opting to run on the Sewol tragedy rather than, say, present any meaningful policy alternatives. If you read Korean, the Chosun Ilbo’s editorial lists pretty much everything the opposition did wrong. It’s not pretty—my personal favorite is the opposition playing up conspiracy theories regarding the corpse of Yoo Byung-eun.
Anyway, the NPAD’s two co-heads, Ahn Cheol-soo and Kim Han-gil, are resigning, as is the party’s entire supreme council.
President Xi of the People’s Republic of China, and a large entourage of Chinese businessmen (Alibaba, Baidu), are currently visiting South Korea. The PRC is hoping for improved business ties but this time, there is, IMHO, the possibility of a sea change on the Korean peninsula.
Why and how?
China wants to change that status quo – they want to do so through money and through a redefinition of regional security – without American influence.
First, in business, China is proposing the foundation of a $50 billion “Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank”, first proposed by President Xi in October 2013, during a tour of Southeast Asia. This bank would have the PRC holding a fifty-percent stake in this bank and has hinted at benefits to those nations that participate and Xi’s visit to Seoul, currently under way is very much about the benefits to South Korea. (we will get to what South Korea might actually want from joining this venture shortly). South Korea has expressed an intent to become an offshore trading centre in Chinese currency (renminbi) and this current meeting is expected to address this as well.
For South Korea, this is useful and important since South Korea’s two-way trade with China was $229 billion last year, exceeding the combined value of South Korea’s trade with the U.S. and Japan. Xi told reporters after the 2013 summit that the two countries will strive to boost their trade to top $300 billion (cite). This trade has been hampered by the fact that both countries transactions have been based in US Dollars (because the Yuan and Won are not directly traded) which costs more and reflects the indirect influence of things American in Asia. A statement from South Korea’s finance ministry and central bank said the South Korean won will become directly exchangeable with the yuan, joining major currencies such as the U.S. dollar, Japanese yen and euro that are convertible with the Chinese currency. The decision also makes the yuan only the second currency after the U.S. dollar that is directly convertible with the won. (cite)
China has also given consent to South Korea’s investment of tens of billions of yuan (billions of USD) in Chinese bonds and stocks. The PRC Government is encouraging businesses to invest in Korea as well. Chinese investors are highly interested in cultural content, software and real estate development, thus would explain the drive by the Korean side to have Chinese investment in the so far failed Saemangeum Project (cite) or the attempt at luring Chinese investment in the Yeosu – Dadohae Haesang National Park area, as well as some yet to be announced projects.
There is also the issue of the recent Conference on Interaction and Confidence Building Measures in Asia (CICA) and the PRCs desire to exclude powers – such as the U.S. – from regional security, suggesting an arrangement, guided by the PRC that is more than a little reminiscent of the Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere plan of Showa Japanese origin. As reported in The Diplomat:
Xi called for the creation of a “new regional security cooperation architecture.” He proposed that CICA become “a security dialogue and cooperation platform” for all of Asia, from which countries can explore the possibility of creating a regional security framework. He further indicated that China would take a leading role in exploring the creation of a “code of conduct for regional security and [an] Asian security partnership program.”
In promoting China’s vision for a new regional security framework, Xi took specific aim at the basis for the current status quo: military alliances. Xi tied such alliances to “the outdated thinking of [the] Cold War.” “We cannot just have security for one or a few countries while leaving the rest insecure,” Xi said. “A military alliance which is targeted at a third party is not conducive to common regional security.” Xi in turn offered an alternative vision for Asia, one based on an all-inclusive regional security framework rather than individual alliances with external actors like the United States.” (cite )
The real horse dealing that is not hinted at in the Korean press (which has been very quiet yet unmistakably pro-Chinese) is how will the PRC, under Xi, will resolve the issue of reunification between the two Koreas. The South Korean Government reportedly wants substantial help from Xi for making reunification a reality – in both financial aid and in the momentum that can only come from the DPRK’s only substantial supporter. Though many believe that the PRC will likely not destabilize the DPRK, if the ROK buys into the Chinese sphere of financial and political influence, rejects the American presence in the region and further guarantees their responsibility in dealing with the potential North Korean refugee problem, I honestly don’t see how a belligerent DPRK could possibly avoid change and reunification with the southern half since it would be a matter of survival to do so.
I suppose this is logical; solving Korea’s problem long-standing problem with the north and the cost of unification, while resulting in the exit of America’s influence in Korea and pushing the US further out of the region and likely gaining more support for the egregious regional claims made by the PRC. There is little America can do about this too, since the Chinese have the means to deliver the reality of unification to South Korea and whereas the U.S. can not.
Looking into a Sino-Korean future; also worrisome is the shortage of personnel to staff the larger Korean projects and the increased likelihood that more Chinese will see living and working in Korea as business ties and opportunities grow in the future. What impact this will have on Korean society remains to be seen and considering the tremendous potential influx of money into Korea, the Korea of fifty years from now will likely be a very different one from what we observe today in terms of world view and its relationship with Europe and the US. Some may even talk about Korea as being a Chinese colony, wistfully remembering the days when their elders talked about how Korea was really an American colony.
Is there really anything anyone can say about this?
President Park Geun-hye on Thursday retained Prime Minister Chung Hong-won, a sign that underscores the difficulty in finding a qualified nominee for the country’s No. 2 job.
Chung offered to quit in April following a deadly ferry disaster, but Park turned down his resignation offer and asked him to keep his job, said Yoon Doo-hyun, the senior presidential press secretary.
Park took the step as she “could not leave the situation as it is” at a time when the country is divided over a series of issues exposed by the process leading to a parliamentary confirmation hearing, said Yoon.
Over 50 million people in a country that leans markedly center-right, and Park can’t find a half-way decent suit to fill the PM position?
And in case you’ve forgotten how we got to this point:
Park Geun-hye sacks one PM, appoints a new one — he pulls out; Park appoints a new PM, he pulls out too — original PM then stays in the job.
— James Pearson (@pearswick) June 26, 2014
To help resolve the manpower problem, Park is bringing back a presidential secretary position in charge of personnel management; the position had been done away with by President Lee. There’s a lot of politicking and attempted blame-shifting going on, too, particularly by the right, which would like this to be about anything else BUT President Park’s questionable personnel choices.
Social media, meanwhile, is expressing its frustration with this fiasco. These tweets by Chin Jung-kwon sums up the “WTF” mood best:
통치인지 개그인지… 어처구니가 옶네요. 해도 해도 너무 하는 거 아닙니까?
— jungkwon chin (@unheim) June 26, 2014
이로써 세월호 참사에 대해 아무도 책임을 지지 않게 됐습니다.
— jungkwon chin (@unheim) June 26, 2014
Moon Chang-keuk is hanging them up after all:
South Korea’s prime minister nominee withdrew his name Tuesday amid mounting criticism of his alleged pro-Japanese views, in what is seen as a fresh blow to President Park Geun-hye’s efforts to contain the fallout from a deadly ferry sinking.
“I agree with President Park Geun-hye’s words that she would reform the root of this nation,” Moon said in a hurriedly called press conference held at a government building near the presidential office. “I also wanted to contribute with the little strength I have to (Park’s) words that she would lead the divided nation to unity and reconciliation.
“However, following my nomination as prime minister, this nation fell into greater confrontation and division. It worried me that this kind of situation would become a stumbling block to the president’s future running of state affairs.”
With Moon out of the way, I’d say attention is about to focus on Chung Sung-keun, President Park’s nominee for minister of culture, sports and tourism. Noted legal scholar and SNU professor Cho Guk is accusing the former TV news anchor and Arirang TV CEO of tweeting that Cho, Father Park Chang-shin of the Catholic Priests’ Association for Justice, writer Gong Ji-yeong and Kim Yong-min should go and live in North Korea. A list of some of his better tweets can be found here.
With the Ahn Dae-hee nomination not working out, President Park nominated former JoongAng Ilbo editor-in-chief Moon Chang-geuk for the prime minister’s spot.
I guess she’s a fan of the Yoon Chang-jung school of political inclusiveness. Now, to be fair, this is a guy who is unlikely to get busted in the states playing grab-ass with the staff, and he appears to have little in the way of personal wealth, which I suppose is a positive in this political climate. Here’s how Cheong Wa Dae describes him:
When announcing the nominations, Blue House spokesperson Min Kyung-wook called Moon “a committed and upright journalist who has brought objective criticism and rational alternatives to his efforts to set right the mistaken practices and longstanding vices of South Korean society.”
Now, this is how his own political friends describe him:
“He grew up in a Christian family in Pyongan Province [in today’s North Korea], so he’s staunchly conservative,” said a political veteran who is close to Moon. “His columns, and everything else he writes, are like ultra-right-wing cudgels.”
Another acquaintance from the ruling Saenuri Party (NFP) expressed confidence that Moon would work “with a sense of ethics and conviction,” but worried, “He may be too conservative to be the right person for bridging divisions and achieving unity.”
“He’s also not especially sociable, so there could end up being communication problems if he finds himself under attack from the opposition, such as during parliamentary questioning,” the acquaintance added.
So, basically he’s an old, right-wing Christian curmudgeon. Great.
Giving evidence to this is KBS, which showed video of a lecture Moon gave at a Church in Yongsan in 2011 in which he said Japanese colonialism was “God’s will,” suggesting that the Korean people needed a trial after idling away 500 years under the “Yi Dynasty” (and I’ll let your Korean friends explain to you the connotation of the term “Yi Dynasty,” or 이조).
He also said the division of Korea was God’s will, saying had God given Koreans full independence, the communists would have taken over the entire place. Oh, and that Koreans are lazy and lack self-reliance. Lots of fun stuff in that last link, BTW, if you read Korean. The Chosun Ilbo, quoting NoCut News, notes that he also told university students that Korea needn’t get an apology for the Comfort Women from Japan, and that Korea should no longer bring up the compensation issue.
He thinks President Park is God’s will, too:
However, the nominee changed his stance on Park after she was elected president in December 2012, calling her victory “God’s choice.”
“What if the election produced an opposite result? Her election is like a guardian angel showing up and saving the protagonist in danger,” he said in a Dec. 24, 2012 editorial.
On a positive note, I’ll grant that the guy has a set of brass balls. When Yonhap cornered him this morning to ask if planned to issue an apology, he responded by asking what he should apologize for. I also think the shinny dome is rather dashing.
The stakes at Geumsuwon, suspected hideout of Yoo Byoung-eun, grew significantly higher over the weekend, and the prosecutor’s office went all in.
A senior prosecutor involved in the case told the JoongAng Ilbo that “We gave the Yoo family another chance because they have their rights as citizens. But we will have custody of him within this week no matter what.”
If the prosecutor’s office had hoped to buy the pot, members of the Evangelical Baptist Church called: “ ‘Be prepared for bloodshed. Things cannot get worse. We will protect with our lives. In case of bloodshed, the prosecution will be responsible. If we lose the church, we lose everything,’ they shouted, punching the air with their fists.”
I would expect such words from the sect members. The prosecutor’s office, however, should not engage in table talk. Setting the stage for the final showdown later in the week, the prosecutor’s office is expected to ask for and obtain an arrest warrant for Yoo Tuesday.
Rather than noting the parallels to Waco, I hope the Korean authorities remain mindful of two key differences: those holed up inside the compound do not have firearms and do not represent a threat to themselves or those outside the compound.
The Korean authorities seem to have misplayed their superior hand. Doubling down on their mistakes, the Korean authorities frittered away their biggest chip, time. By setting an end of week deadline, they bet all on this round, alerted and mobilized the sect’s members, and maybe even sent a cut and run signal to Yoo Byung-eun.
I’ve been to the sect’s Geumsuwon complex twice, today and Thursday last week. Today, I observed many more people behind the compound’s main gate and blocking the main driveway. I noticed a police presence of three squad cars, if the one squad car with two sleeping police officers (I took a photo) counts. I witnessed increased traffic, which went unchecked by Korean authorities, in and out the main gate and several large trucks capable of carrying several days’ provisions for the several hundred visible behind the main gate.
I spoke to several sect members and one member in depth. She emphasized the environmentalism as one of the sect’s core beliefs. “Hannah” self-identified the sect as “Christian fundamentalists” and believers in “the truth”. She repeatedly talked about the corruption in the Korean government and judicial system, that Yoo Byoung-eun would not be treated fairly, and that the sect’s membership were protecting the land. She motioned toward the long, uncut grass and specifically pointed out the tall-stalked dandelion heads that had turned to parachute balls, which means that they were ripe for children to pluck and scatter to the breeze to the chagrin of grandfathers everywhere. Hannah never referred to “Mr. Yoo” as a minister or religious leader. She said that the sect was without ministers and that all males, she specifically and without prompt excluded women, were welcome to speak before the congregation.
Since my visit last Thursday and keeping with their environmentalism, the sect provided a dual male/female portapotty for the convenience of the media. I spoke to a reporter from Channel A who said that the sect had cared for the media members’ overnight comfort. From the north perimeter, I could see at least three of the oft-mentioned subway cars behind the trees. Both the north and south perimeters had more members watching from make-shift guard houses than had been visible on Thursday. The north perimeter had razor wire, which if I judge by the weathering was not new and seemed to present more of their intentions to non-scheduled visitors than an effective deterrent to anyone who really wanted to enter the compound.
The sect members seemed to be of two simultaneously conflicting and irreconcilable minds: one moment they spoke to me of the impending and perhaps concluding confrontation and the next they gave me organic candy and invited my family and me to the compound anytime.
I texted Hannah my email address and offered her the opportunity to publish an unedited message to the English speaking foreign community, and she texted back, “Follow ur heart “
The president has announced that she will disband the Coast Guard over their failure to carry out their mandate.
Reportedly, the current Coast Guard is shaped more for patrol duties with little experience in maritime emergencies (cite).
This will be replaced by a new organization that can better respond to disasters. I wonder who will be left with the task of hunting down the Chinese pirate fleet and if they will be sinking ships instead? (The pirate fleet photo set)