The Marmot's Hole

Korea... in Blog Format

Search results: "libel" (page 1 of 2)

An NIS Link to the “Character Assassination & Libel” of Chae Dong-wook?

prosecutedThe JoongAng Ilbo reports that the very source of the leaked information regarding Chae Dong-wook, and the alleged son that caused his disgrace and subsequent resignation, came from an official working within the Seocho District Office that was a former aid of Won Sei-hoon, indicted director of the spy agency.  Won Sei-hoon is the one and the same NIS head that has been charged with running the online smear campaign against the Opposition Party candidate. (cite)  The information was used by the Chosun Ilbo in a thinly disguised bit of libel that had the effect of derailing Choe’s ongoing investigation into the electioneering activities of the NIS.

The Seocho District Office official, named “Cho”, had accessed the records of Chae Dong-wook several months in advance as well as being directly connected to former NIS director Won:

. . . Cho, 53, is known to be close to Won, who appointed him as his administrative secretary when he was the public administration and security minister in 2008 under the Lee Myung-bak administration. Cho followed Won to the NIS and moved to the Seocho District Office after Won’s stint as NIS chief ended in January this year.

The prosecutor’s office seems to have done some excellent work, as of late, especially when they are motivated by injustices committed against the function of their office, however this leaves us with the question of just who ordered Won to do what he did and why?

Character Assignation & Libel – A Disturbing Trend in Korean News Reporting – Part 2

prosecutedAs many know, the law, regarding libel and slander in South Korea is a problem for many, even if what has been said or printed is true.  One well known infamous instance of the libel law at work was the case of Michael Breen, the author, who was sued by Samsung for penning an obvious bit of satire.

Satire, however, takes on a whole new angle when one of the big three newspapers in South Korea prints a “satirical” letter about a public figure that refers to one of the other big newspaper’s libelous attack on the same figure.

Choi Yeong-hae (최영해) an editorial writer at the DongA Ilbo wrote just such a libelous editorial, in the form of a fictitious letter from Prosecutor General Chae Dong-wook’s alleged middle-school son, that could very easily become a target of  litigation.  What is interesting is that while Breen’s satire was mild by all reasonable accounts and not intended to have social or political effects, Choi’s letter is clearly more cogent as libel, in comparison and deliberate in its intent to focus public interest upon the PG’s integrity instead of the reasons behind the libelous attack upon the Prosecutor’s Office in the first place:

DongA Ilbo newspaper on Tuesday ran a sarcastic editorial on the love child allegations of Prosecutor General Chae Dong-wook, who was accused by Chosun Ilbo of having a child through an extramarital affair.
Choi Yeong-hae, an editorial writer for the influential paper, wrote a fictional letter to Chae as the prosecutor’s alleged 11-year-old son. In the letter, “Chae’s son” asks him why people are telling the boy that Chae is not his father. . . . Critics bashed Choi for writing a baseless editorial speculating that all the allegations against Chae were true.
“I am appalled at the fact that such gibberish survived to be published in the morning edition. In a paper where numerous people spend hours fixing the smallest of typos, did that look okay? The newspaper itself is a problem,” wrote one Twitter user.
Others expressed disgust at the editorial supposedly using an 11-year-old child to attack someone out of political interest.
“It is grotesque. The absurdity of substituting an editorial for fiction and the childish nature of the ‘literary imagination,’ and the viciousness of using a fifth-grader as a tool for political feud is all combined,” said social critic and Dongyang University professor Chin Jung-kwon. (link)

The Chosun Ilbo’s libelous attack upon the Prosecutor General Chae has grown into the sort of intrigue and yellow journalism that one would expect in the UK, only this one has serious political consequences since this case apparently is the result of the PG’s investigation and prosecution of the NIS for interfering in the last presidential election.

What quite a few people would like to avoid mentioning is that this case is not about a “love-child” or a vetted prosecutor but the motivation for launching a campaign of libel from sources of trusted public new organizations that should be above acting as agents for certain political elements in South Korea.  Very little mention is made of the fact that the Chosun Ilbo obtained information about the 11-year-old boy, and his mother, that was illegally obtained for the review of the paper’s editors.

While Breen’s criminal libel case went to trial and was thrown out by the judge on the grounds that there was “no victim.”, there is clearly a victim here in that this sort of “satire” does affect the lives of the 11-year-old boy and his mother, not to mention the work of the Prosecutor’s Office in upholding the law in South Korea.  The examples set by the editors of the Chosun Ilbo and DongA Ilbo are of a wholly different category of libel and “satire” than Breen’s case and more menacing. Koreans may no longer worry about police kicking down their doors at night and being hauled away to an uncertain end, however libel seems to be the newest weapon of choice for those with influence in the press.

Character Assassination & Libel – A Disturbing Trend in Korean News Reporting?

prosecutedMost people have heard the phrase about hammering down the nail that sticks out.

What happens when the offending nail is the chief prosecutor for the nation?

Prosecutor General Chae Dong-wook has just now been accused in the leading conservative newspaper, the Chosun Ilbo, of fathering a son, out of wedlock. Why would this be newsworthy, if true? To discredit a prosecutor that has had the temerity to question the role of the NIS in illegally exerting influence in the last presidential election?

Possible but, according to one article in the MK Business News, Prosecutor General Chae is also the man responsible for going after the illegal stash of money that Chun Doo-hwan had hidden away within his family circle:

. . . the prosecution (Chae) armed with the `Act on collecting Chun Doo-hwan’s punitive fine’ and public support ultimately led the Chun family to unveil a plan to pay the remaining fines by intimidating that the Chun family would all be subject to prosecution.
After the related ruling came out in 1997, the task has faced many bumpy roads. The issue of fine collection has resurfaced after Prosecutor General Chae Dong-wook took office. (link)

Could this mean that Prosecutor General Chae has been overzealous in his role as chief prosecutor and has made certain old-school power brokers angry by directly threatening their interests?

I certainly can not answer the question,  but it is interesting that Prosecutor Chae has demanded a retraction from the Chosun Ilbo and has announced that he is willing to take a DNA test to prove that he is not the father of the child in question. Chae also is to demand a correction from the Chosun Ilbo for incorrect, if not libelous reporting.

I would ask – though we are still trying to determine who is responsible when a government agency (NIS) interferes in an election, who is responsible when a newspaper decides to discredit a prosecutor who is trying to do his job for the welfare of the nation?


It is now Chief Prosecutor Chae’s turn to embarrass the Chosun Ilbo and maybe, some other unknown member of the current administration:

. . . “We decided to file a lawsuit because the Chosun hasn’t taken any action, even though we asked them on Monday to publish a correction,” said Koo Bon-seon, the spokesman of the Supreme Prosecutors’ Office. “To resolve the matter, we decided to take the issue directly to court instead of going through the Press Arbitration Commission.”

. . . The Chosun Ilbo’s Sept. 6 edition mentioned the boy’s certificate of family relationship, his residence address and the specific date that he left Korea for schooling in New York. A later edition claimed that school records named the boy’s father,” two Democratic Party legislators said at a press conference. “That information can’t be obtained without cooperation from government officials. Handing over such information to another person is subject to criminal punishment”. (link)

Considering his personal character and drive, maybe Chae Dong-wook should run for president, in the future.


Chief General Prosecutor Chae has resigned his position stating that he would continue his suit against the Chosun Ilbo:

Today, I am relieving myself of the heavy responsibility of prosecutor general . . . ” (link)

According to Yonhap News:

. . . The resignation came shortly after the justice minister ordered an inspection of the case, saying there was an “urgent need to promote stability of the prosecution office and to reveal the truth as soon as possible.”

It marked the first time that a justice minister has ordered an inspection into the country’s top prosecutor over a scandal involving a personal matter.

Perhaps the justice minister’s unprecedented entrance into this affair was a sign from the highest levels of government that it was time for General Prosecutor Chae to leave.  Though I am not a fan of the Korea Times, their comments on the tactics of the Ministry of Justice is telling:

. . . quite a few Koreans suspect this might be a joint scheme of those in the core of power and the conservative newspaper to drive out this disobedient prosecution head.
The seed for his resignation after just five months in office was sown when he first caused friction with Cheong Wa Dae over the prosecution of state spies who allegedly meddled in elections. Chae pushed ahead with indicting a former head of the National Intelligence Service (NIS), in defiance of opposition from justice ministry, for directing NIS agents to conduct a smear campaign against opposition candidates in last year’s presidential election.
When Chae initially pushed back outside pressure by volunteering to take a genetic test and prove the Chosun Ilbo story wrong, the power elite seems to have decided to use the “inspection card,” depriving Chae of his authority and making the prosecution dysfunctional. Otherwise, it is hard to understand why the justice minister couldn’t wait until how the proposed DNA test pans out.
This page, along with most other Koreans, hope these presumptions are wrong, as we don’t want to see the nation’s democracy go back decades ago to when leaders used the state spy agency for political maneuvering. For any faithful news watchers, it was evident that the NIS, to get out of the biggest crisis the state spy agency is in because of unwarranted meddling in domestic politics, has made a series of “revelations,” ranging from the disclosure of the records of the 2007 inter-Korean summit to the latest spy ring accidents involving a leftist lawmaker.
It is also hard not to point out, as one in the same profession, the way the Chosun Ilbo reported this case: the self-imposed most influential paper neither provided any plausible grounds for its allegation nor confirmed its contents before reporting, let alone giving Chae an opportunity for a counterargument, like some irresponsible tabloids.
Two of the biggest victims of this third-rate drama will be the mother and son, whose private lives have been brutally exposed to the public gaze. It is another sad reminder of how the institutions of political power, including arrogant media outlets, can trample on basic rights of powerless individuals to pursue quiet lives ― and the urgent need to reform these agencies by the people’s power. (link)


Now President Park has refused to accept the resignation of Prosecutor General Chae Dong-wook, a senior official said Sunday:

 . . . “The resignation has not been accepted,” senior presidential press secretary Lee Jung-hyun told reporters. “Revealing the true should come first.” . . . A presidential aide also said that Chae’s case is not about the prosecution’s independence, but about ethics of a public official. (link)

The presidential aide completely missed the point of this issue, which is not about the PG’s ethics or independence – which were never in question before he investigated the NIS – but why has this libel been printed in a major newspaper with ties to the Saenuri Dang, at this very time?

The deputy chief of the internal inspectors’ office, Kim Yun-sang, also resigned Saturday in protest of the justice minister’s order that an outside prosecutor be named to investigate Chae.  The Deputy Chief is also quoted as criticizing the Minister:

. . . He is a bad leader who has completely failed to fight against political influences, and who failed to protect the chief of the senior investigations agency. It is also insane that the ministry didn’t consider using the prosecution’s own inspection headquarters for this work. I heard about the investigation from the news media, not from the ministry or from the prosecution organization. Such a process is unacceptable and doesn’t usually occur. (link)

 This is still unfolding and will be interesting to see just how the President plays this issue now since too many people are not going to let this issue and the NIS affair die quietly.

Nation Cannot Be Subject of Libel Suit: NHRCK

This is heartening: from the Korea Times:

The human rights commission concluded that the nation cannot be the subject of a libel suit.

In September of 2009, the National Intelligence Service (NIS) filed a defamation suit against human rights lawyer, Park Won-soon for damaging the reputation of the “state,” making the nation the plaintiff.

The National Human Rights Commission of Korea (NHRCK) reached a conclusion that the state cannot be defamed and be the main body of a libel case in an inside report, Sunday.

What’s next? Blood libel?

Cartoonist Lee Won-bok, who has published a popular series of comic books (one of which I own) that teaches young people about different countries, has done a three-part series on the United States. Reading the Chosun piece on it, however, I was more than a little struck by this:

Seemingly conscious of growing anti-American feelings and public demand to take a new approach to a long-time alliance with the U.S., Lee is very careful in analyzing the U.S. in the book. “I tried to exclude my personal views of the United States as much as I could. In the case of the Iraq War, rather than focusing on the war itself, I tried to provide a big framework for American foreign policy through such things as analyzing U.S. strategy in the Middle East and the influence of Jews behind those policies.”

One can only wonder if the Jews will get the same treatment the Japanese (who were invariably portrayed as short and bucktoothed in the book I have) get — I can just imagine Lee drawing frames of hook-nosed Jews in yarmulkes counting diamonds in New York while plotting the deaths of little Iraqi children in Falluja.

No mention was made in the piece of the role of the Masons, Illuminati or Knights Templar play in U.S. foreign policy.

Current Bias in South Korean Art, Education & News

Prison, artwork, media bias & control . . .

A court in Seoul has handed down a 12-year sentence to Kim ki-jong for his assault on American Ambassador Mark Lippart back in March. The prosecutors originally asked for 15 years though both the prosecution and defence will have a week to determine if they wish to appeal the decision. (cite)

attack_artMeanwhile . . .

I like looking at art but, hey, isn’t putting up a painting showing Kim Ki-jong attacking Mark Lippart a bit risqué? a branch of the Seoul Museum of Art (SeMA) in southwestern Seoul recently displayed the above painting, by Hong Sung-dam and has decided to take it down after reports in local media about the work being more a political endorsement of violence than merely art. The inscription in the art work is as follows:

I have felt despair about these problems for a long time. However, I’ve kept my mouth shut about the despair. On the other hand, Kim Ki-jong expressed it with a knife, though it was just a fruit knife.

The artist takes great liberties with reality. Even Kim Ki-jong, during questioning by the police, stated that “South Korea is a semi-colony of the U.S. and that North Korea has an independent, self-reliant government” and shortly after his arrest, Kim shouted that the U.S.-South Korea war games were an obstacle against a Korean unification” (cite). Imagine that – truth takes a very long holiday, it seems. If I were the ambassador, I might buy this work and hang it somewhere as a part of his tenure, in this space and time. Then again, he could just let his basset hound have a go at it.

Historical revisionism and who(?) audits the auditors

Ten education superintendents on Tuesday released statements opposing state-authored history textbooks in response to a government plan to standardize them. (cite) This controversy has been around for some time, even before 2013 when material in some history textbooks approved by the National Institute of Korean History were deemed controversial.

Currently, Minister of Education Hwang Woo-yea “has insisted that history education be standardized and consistent”. Even Saenuri Party Chairman Kim Moo-sung commented, on September 2 of this year, that neutral state-authored history books, based on facts, were needed to prevent confusion among students.

The real question is whose version of history is going to be told and how will it be told.

As in the recent debate over displaying the Confederate battle flag in America, what is taught as history also reflects a societies’ values.  A good question that should be asked and answered is how can the mutual histories of the ROK and DPRK be narrated so as to best serve the interests of all Koreans. Reunification will take place and a mutual history that preserves the dignity of both groups will be an important and positive step in the right direction, even if some viewpoints are difficult for Saenuri legislators and North Koreans to comprehend.

Almost simultaneously, the Saenuri Dang has also decided to go after the major internet portals in South Korea, accusing them of lacking both professionalism and being biased. Per the JoongAng Ilbo:

The Saenuri Party said changing how portals handle news will be a key issue for this year’s audit of state affairs. (The National Assembly will begin an audit), under the order of Chairman Kim Moo-sung, vowed to scrutinize the nation’s largest web portals, such as Naver and Daum.
“Precious news articles produced by genuine journalists and the media autonomy are being distorted by the power of giant Internet portal sites,” (claimed) Rep. Lee Jae-young, who was recently appointed to head the ruling party’s think tank, the Yeouido Institute. (cite)

Why would Lee Jae-young feel this way?

According to research piece performed by Choi Hyung-woo from the School of Communications at Sogang University (Big data analysis of mobile news main pages of portal sites), after analyzing the headlines of 50,236 news postings, Choi determined that both Naver and Daum “had more content using negative expressions about the Blue House and Park Geun-hye administration than content using positive expressions“.

<Spit coffee on screen here>

The report also said Chairman Moon Jae-in of the NPAD was featured on the main pages of the portals more frequently than Saenuri Chairman Kim (Jealousy?). While 153 articles on the main pages were about Moon, 101 were about Kim, the report said. “Portal sites are not media companies, but they are deciding which articles from which media will be put on the main pages and how high they will be positioned in the layouts,” Rep. Lee said. “They are also editing the headlines. This is a de facto act of journalism, and this a serious issue.” the portals have no oversight or limits. “To ensure the independence of the media, conglomerates are only allowed to own certain stakes in broadcasters and newspapers, but portals are performing the role of the media, and conglomerates own them 100 percent. This is a serious issue. . . Portals have absolute influence over society, particularly the young, and it is unacceptable for them to distribute distorted information (information that makes Saenuri Dang look bad).”

So, here is the really funny part: if Daum and Naver are producing articles that are more negative towards Saenuri Dang, and Saenuri Dang representatives are in a position to audit Daum and Naver, isn’t this also a conflict of interest on the part of Saenuri politicians who have a vested interest in such an audit, especially just months in advance of general elections? Who audits the Saenuri Dang when they actively support the activities of the NIS electioneering and after the libellous slander used in the Chosun Ilbo – a notorious agent for Saenuri Dang interests – against the Prosecutor General’s Office, how can the public trust any audit performed by Saenuri Dang members? When Park Guen-hye said “They (DPRK) don’t have to come to the South, but they can always create social confusion and manipulate public opinion using cyberspace” (cite) was she referring to Daum and Naver!?
How is it that business leaders in large companies like Naver and Daum could possibly act as a proxy for DPRK concerns?
Are all media companies that criticize the Saenuri Dang working for the DPRK!?

Considering its claims, I think the Saenuri Dang has much to account for itself.

Ruthless-Non-Jewish Samsung Wins

Samsung has won the merger war:

. . . C&T shareholders approved the contested merger, with almost 70% voting in favour. (Earlier in the day Cheil’s shareholders had voted unanimously to pass the bid.) (cite)

Samsung did everything it could do to win:

Watermelons and walnut cakes were hand-delivered to shareholders’ homes; text messages implored them to toe the line. Solemn front-page advertisements, which ran in almost every local newspaper this week, put forward an “earnest plea to shareholders.

however, nothing stays the same:

Whatever the legal outcome, Elliott’s continuing defiance will be an irritant to Samsung and the Lee family. Its protest—a rare challenge by a foreign activist fund to South Korea’s biggest business group—has stirred public debate in the country about its corporate-governance standards, at a time when disenchantment with the families that own its large corporations, or chaebol, is growing. Local minority shareholders have rallied in online communities over the past six weeks. Many hoped C&T’s biggest single investor, South Korea’s National Pension Service (NPS), would oppose the bid—just as it did recently with a similar in-house merger at another chaebol, SK Telecom. However, the NPS appears to have cast its vote in favour this time.

Other “ants” or smaller shareholders, such as Grace Jeon had plenty to say about the merger:

Grace Jeon, a 53-year-old freelancer from the city of Ilsan, is one of those shareholders (ants). . . Ms. Jeon said in an interview ahead of the vote that she planned to oppose the merger, which she called an attempt to push through family succession over the best interests of small shareholders.
“This merger is for Lee Jae-yong, by Lee Jae-yong and of Lee Jae-yong,” she said in an interview, referring to the 47 year-old son of Samsung chairman Lee Kun-hee. She added that foreign shareholders deserve the same rights. (cite)

One commenter in the Economist article raised issues with how Samsung had conducted its campaign, based on what amounts to Samsung’s sponsored libel against Elliot Partners and Jews, in general:

The ugliness is, in part, that Samsung resorted to blunt hateful Jew-hating cartoons posted on C&T’s own website depicting Elliott’s Jewish CEO as a vulture. And Samsung refused to acknowledge, let alone stop this until a NY Observer story was picked up by the AP and spread around the world. Only then did the company issue a standard retraction. Samsung also appears to be behind a campaign pushed by a company called Mediapen whose former head and large shareholder is a deputy minister in the South Korean government, which included their own materials and enlisted columnists and TV to write about “ruthless” Jewish money. This campaign includes saying that Jewish “money” controls Institutional Shareholder Services Inc., a US shareholder advisory service – which conveniently of course ignores the fact that the Korea Corporate Governance Service advised against the deal.
So the lesson for me, other than not buying Samsung products, is that the Lee family is ruthless though they are not Jewish.

Of course I really hope the commenter is not living in Korea since he might have a problem with such a litigious and ruthless-non-Jewish company as Samsung.


S.Korea pension advisory committee says regrets being bypassed on Samsung:

The advisory committee on Friday requested that the fund
revise its internal rules and regulations to minimise potential
controversy on future decisions, without elaborating further.

Would they have recommended against this merger since the board had already made up their minds before the vote?

Having the Intellegence to Know When to Slap the Right Hand

tricky handsThe Bible speaks of the “left hand not knowing what the right hand is doing” and when applicable to a government, this is usually bad news since it could imply a “deep government” that exerts undue control over a democratic process.

President Cristina Fernández de Kirchner of Argentina has announced plans to disband Argentina’s intelligence agency after the suicide (murder) of prosecutor Alberto Nisman – hours before he had been due to testify against senior government officials about the government cover-up of Iran’s role in a bombing that took place in 1994 (cite).

President Kirchner was quoted:

“I have prepared a bill to reform the intelligence service,” President Fernandez said, adding that she wanted the proposal to be discussed at an urgent session of Congress. “The plan is to dissolve the Intelligence Secretariat and create a Federal Intelligence Agency,” she said that a new leadership should be chosen by a president but would be subject to a Senate approval. (cite)
“Combating impunity has been a priority of my government,” she added. She further stated that the existing intellegence service “has not served the national interests”.

Considering the heavy-handed direct interference of the NIS (1, 2, 3)  and the CIA (torture instead of gathering actual information) in their respective governments, the undue political interference in the Prosecutor’s Office in Seoul, and the use of these intellegence services to further the political aims of a select group of politicians, it is past time to make a greater committment to our respective societies’s democracy and make these agencies anew.

Shhhhhhh . . .

gagConsidering the current concern with satire and free speech, Hyung-Jin Kim’s (AP) article on Shin Eun-mi, the Korean-American woman that has been accused of saying nice things about the DPRK, is a recent report concerning the National Security Act, free speech in South Korea and the politically inspired abuse of such in South Korea.

Shin Eun-mi is due to voluntarily leave today (?) after the Prosecutor’s Office issued a request to have her deported from South Korea today, due to her praise of the DPRK. The Prosecutor’s Office has also requested that she be barred from returning to South Korea for five years and that she be required to apply for a visa to return after that time, even though US citizens do not need a visa to visit South Korea (link). Shin Eun-mi’s “praise” has been construed as being a violation of the controversial National Security Act (an abbreviated translation of it is here). This has also not been the first time a foreign national has been expelled from South Korea for expressing pro-DPRK views – last year, a Chinese student was expelled for such for “suspicions of ‘aiding the enemy'”. (link) The National Security Act has long been a means by which critics of the ROK Government and DPRK supporters, both, have been prosecuted and imprisoned for up to seven years.

This issue illustrates the political intolerance that has characterized the current administration in squashing not only those that say good things about the DPRK but those that criticize the politicians in power and those that would expose the majority party’s incidences of violating the law though means of illegally manipulating government agencies, such as the NIS, or the use of media allies to help thwart investigation into their own violations of law.
Even the closest ally of South Korea thinks that the South Korean Government has gone too far in suppressing what most Americans would consider to be a freedom of speech issue:

. . . In a rare note of criticism of a key ally, State Department spokeswoman Jen Psaki said that despite South Korea’s generally strong record on human rights, the (South Korean) security law limits freedom of expression and restricts access to the Internet.

A fair description about the current state of South Korean politics and its effect upon free speech and political commentary, by Jamie Doucette and Se-Woong Koo, describes how the security act and government have grown bolder in using the issue of state security to supress those that would indulge their opinions:

. . . In this essay, we argue that this rhetorical shift has been accompanied by an expansion of what South Korean intellectuals term ‘politics by public security,’ a phrase used to describe the use of public security as a ground for stifling dissent and criticism. What is unique about the present moment is not simply the evocation of a threat to national security but the extent to which state agencies have been actively involved in this process, whether it be in the form of direct electoral interference, the leaking of confidential state documents, or the initiation of probes into prominent critics of the government from across the liberal-progressive opposition. In what follows, we examine the recent sequence of events from NIS electoral interference to the more recent move to disband the United Progressive Party in order to better understand distorting effects to Korean democracy brought about by this recent rhetorical shift and its intricate relation to ‘politics by public security.’

A link to this essay can be found here

Leaky Cheong Wa Dae

Cheong Wa Dae really, really doesn’t like leaks:

The prosecution on Thursday questioned police Superintendent Park Gwan-cheon and conducted raids in the expanding investigation surrounding former presidential aide Chung Yoon-hoi.

Park, who served on Cheong Wa Dae’s team dealing with discipline within the civil service until February, is accused of having leaked reports regarding Chung to the media.

The memo at the center of “Memogate,” if true, confirms suspicion that a small cabol of advisors—and in the case of Chung, a guy without even an official position—are calling the shots at Cheong Wa Dae:

Disclosures by Jo and Chung offer a glimpse into the political intrigue allegedly going on inside the Blue House. Jo’s allegation that Park’s three closest secretaries were involved in government personnel appointments has brought to the fore what has long been suspected ― that the three wield great power and influence in the Blue House. Chung’s shifting comments on whether he was in contact with the presidential secretaries cast doubt on his claim that the leaked document is false. The Segye Ilbo, citing the leaked document, reported that Chung met with presidential secretaries to plot an ouster of Chief of Staff Kim Ki-choon and that the group met regularly to discuss state and Blue House affairs.

The aspect of this mess I find most interesting is how Cheong Wa Dae is—well, to be perfectly accurate, eight Cheong Wa Dae officials are—going after the Segye Ilbo, which quoted the leaked report, for libel. This, naturally enough, has the press worried, with the Hankyoreh condemning the move in rather strident language:

Park’s views on the media are positively dangerous. At the meeting on Dec. 1, she railed at the Segye Ilbo newspaper for “reporting things that they could have confirmed or denied with the least effort without even contacting the people involved.” But the problem is that this isn’t a case where the “least effort” could clear things up. The prosecutors may take these people at their word when they say “not me,” but the media won’t. What’s “abnormal” is a country whose presidential office dismisses a document that it produced itself as a “tabloid sheet.” Reporting on a Blue House report is a perfectly natural part of fulfilling the mission of the media. What kind of shameless president gets angry at the newspapers instead of blaming herself for leaving her country in this abnormal state?

Mind you, it’s not just the lefties at the Hankyoreh who are concerned. In an editorial, the Chosun Ilbo also asked why a newspaper company should be charged with libel and condemned by the president for quoting a document—a document registered as a public record, mind you—written by somebody at Cheong Wa Dae and leaked by somebody at Cheong Wa Dae.

With the prosecutors now looking into the report, we should get an idea of just how much of it is true. And to be fair to Cheong Wa Dae, this isn’t the first time shadowy individuals have been suspected of having undue influence over a Korean administration, nor is Park the only elected leader in the Free World being accused of overzealously reacting to leaks.

Anyway, I can understand going after the leaker in the name of maintaining official discipline, even if Park might be accused of some hypocrisy in this regard, but unless the prosecutors turn up something we don’t know about yet, I can’t see how going after the press is going to help her administration in the long run.

Postlude – A Debt Is Paid – in 100won Coins

After  the electioneering done under the auspices of Won Sei-hoon (former head of the National Intelligence Service), where millions of tweets flooded twitter-space in a deliberate attempt to influence the presidential election in South Korea, Won has received a two and a half sentence – suspended.

According to a report by Yonhap News, “While the Seoul District Court decided he had ordered agents to post politically sensitive comments, it ruled there was not enough evidence to prove he directly sought to influence the outcome of the presidential ballot” – believe it or not. (cite)

According to the JoongAng:

The court, however, rejected the prosecution’s argument that Won violated the election law by ordering a systematic operation to influence domestic politics.
“No evidence was presented that Won made a direct order to the National Intelligence Service agents to influence the presidential election,” the court said. It also said the team’s operation was part of the agency’s routine activities.

The court said Won had a heavy responsibility as head of the NIS to protect the agency’s political neutrality and prevent its agents from meddling in politics. He, therefore, deserves severe criticism for promoting government policies while trying to smear opposition political parties, the court said. . . the court wrote “Won did not plan the operation with a purpose and he merely followed past practices.” (cite)

The court’s “get-out-of-jail-free” card was given to Won after he left prison for serving 14 months of a two year sentence for graft.

Two other former senior officials of the spy agency who had been indicted on similar charges were each sentenced to a year in prison on Thursday, but their sentences were also suspended. Both the prosecutors and the defendants have a week to appeal the verdicts. (cite)

So who is responsible for running a subversive campaign against the Republic of Korea, if it wasn’t the DPRK and it was not Won’s boss (the president)?

The Blue House! – Step by Step, Inch by Inch . . .

Like an old American Vaudeville gag routine – with each step and turn, each tick of the tock from the clock on the wall, someone is going to get burned and it looks like it may be someone from the Blue House that was found to be behind the Chosun Ilbo’s libelous attack on former General Prosecutor Chae in an illegal bid to stop the investigation into the NIS electioneering.

Seeing how Saenuri Dang is looking more and more like they are going to be found behind this case, maybe Chae can give them tips on how to deal with bad publicity.



More on the duplicity of a “Blue House Staff member”:

Seocho District official Cho Lee-je claimed that he exchanged six text messages with a Blue House staffer, in which the presidential office worker requested that he illegally access the personal information of a 54-year-old woman and her 11-year-old son – the alleged paramour and illegitimate son of former Prosecutor-General Chae Dong-wook.  . . (Cho’s) remarks are a direct contradiction to the presidential office’s initial claim that no one on its staff ever made such a request.

The Kim Jin-Tae Test


There must be lots of sunspot activity or some other quirky action as of late because there has been a remarkable occurrence of people named “Kim Jin-Tae” in the news this last month.

As a test of our reader’s perception (and maybe taste), we would like for you to pick which Jin-Tae is which.
Your choices are as follows: one Kim Jin-Tae is a great rapper (Verbal Jint) that has just quit his radio show so as to work on his next recording project (good luck to him), another Kim Jin-Tae is an experienced prosecutor, with Blue House connections, that was picked by the president to become the new Prosecutor General, replacing Prosecutor General Chae Dong-wook, who was defamed by his own party for daring to investigate the electioneering of the NIS in last year’s elections.  Another Kim Jin-Tae is a Saenuri lawmaker and Blue House aide that made the news when he threatened to make Korean protestors in Paris “pay a steep price” for their protestations against the current President Park.  Maybe that is political slang for “I’ll break your legs”, but then this Kim Jin-Tae was probably teasing since he is a politician and not a real gangster.  Finally, one of our Kim Jin-Tae’s is actually wearing a clever Kim Jin-Tae disguise but maintains an active interest in conservative political think tanks, Twitter and massage parlors.

Good luck matching your Kim Jin-Tae(s).

A Gentlemen’s Spanking Club?

justice spanking

Just when the chain of libel, reprimand and punishment was thought to have played out at the Seoul Central District Prosecutors Office, the senior prosecutor who sacked the prosecutor investigating the NIS agents that were involved in electioneering activities has sacked himself.

A senior prosecutor accused of exerting political pressure on a junior prosecutor investigating the spy agency’s election interference scandal tendered his resignation yesterday despite the prosecution’s official announcement that he did nothing wrong . . . Cho’s resignation came less than an hour after a junior prosecutor faced suspension for refusing to follow his directions of ordering arrests of National Intelligence Service agents outside the chain of command. (cite)

Senior Prosecutor Cho’s decision is based upon the actions of his subordinate prosecutor’s (Yoon Seok-yeol) decision to not follow procedure by warning the very people he would be raiding or arresting first since he was concerned that this could cause a rush to destroy or hide evidence (cite). Now, Yoon Seok-yeol, head of the Yeoju Branch of the Suwon District Prosecutors’ Office will be indefinitely suspended for doing his job a little too well, all in the name of internal procedure. (cite)
All this probably would not have happened if the office of General Prosecutor were not subject to political pressure from the members of the majority political group that has a vested interest in what gets investigated.  This is a primary concern since illegal actions, instigated by group members, can remain unchecked and unpunished due to interference:

. . . The prosecution also said that they could not reveal the truth about whether Cho indeed pressured Yoon not to arrest the NIS agents because of political reasons. . . Allegedly, at a private dinner, Cho told Yun, “If we arrest the NIS agents, it would help the [opposition] Democratic Party,” and “Do that [arrest them] after I resign.” (cite)

The President has promised corrective action, in a vague sort of manner, regarding this issue (taken from the JoongAng Ilbo):

. . . (I will) “strictly” investigate the allegations (electioneering, etc., etc.) and promised that anyone found guilty will be punished . . . With only two months left in this year, it is very regrettable that urgent state affairs tied to past political issues remain pending, . . . as the prime minister emphasized days earlier, I will make sure various charges now in court and under investigation are clarified according to the law.

Though the president says she “did not personally do anything to arouse suspicions,” she can certainly choose what to see or what not to see since one can not be held accountable for what they don’t see or say.  I believe that this is a major distinction between criminal activities and political solutions and, since she is a politician, she will surely keep looking until she finds nothing.

Senior Prosecutor Sacks Prosecutor Investigating NIS Agents

The special investigation into NIS electioneering has taken yet another twist.  The senior prosecutor in the Office of the Prosecutor has dismissed Yoon Seok-yeol, the chief prosecutor of the special investigation team looking into the National Intelligence Service’s (NIS) alleged interference in the 2012 presidential election.  This came shortly after the prosecutor arrested three NIS agents that were implicated in an attempt to unduly influence the last presidential election by using over 400 twitter accounts (cite).  There seems to be more concern that the NIS electioneering activity was far more extensive than originally thought:

. . . According to opposition officials, Yoon’s team suspected that the NIS under its former head Won Sei-hoon disseminated over 50,000 online comments on Twitter and other social network services to support the then ruling Saenuri Party candidate Park Geun-hye. (cite)

After Prosecutor General Chae Dong-wook was basically forced to quit by the libelous drive-by character assassination of the Chosun-Ilbo, the prosecutor that took over investigation of the NIS decided to proceed with the arrest and questioning of the NIS agents without the prior approval of his superior:

. . . the chief investigator (Yoon) did not trust the top brass when he decided to ignore the standard operating procedure (and arrest the NIS agents without telling his superior). Instead, he may have believed they would thwart his investigation into the spy agency’s alleged online smear campaign if he reported his plan to widen the investigation and arrest the three NIS officials. Their alleged use of Twitter in the campaign against the opposition candidate was a new finding from the investigation that had started several months before, but a news report (?) claimed that he did report his plan to a senior prosecutor in the line of command, and that he decided to take action on his own when the senior prosecutor continued to sit on his proposal to arrest the NIS officials. The chief investigator put his career as a prosecutor on the line when he decided to arrest the officials without obtaining official approval. If past experience is any guide, it seems to be a matter of time before he is pressured to resign as a prosecutor. (cite)

Kim Han-Gil Chairman of the Democratic Party has another theory why Yoon arrested the NIS agents without giving notice first:

. . . “Yoon believed that the NIS officials would destroy evidence if he gave prior notice to the agency, which sounds reasonable,” said Rep. Kim Han-gil, the DP chairman. “The Park government seems to be doing everything to cover up the truth.” (cite)

There is now concern that the Cyber Warfare Command – run by South Korean military – also engaged in pro-Saenuri Dang posting in an attempt to smear the DP candidate (cite).

You will notice the lack of Chosun Ilbo links on this matter as well because there are none. (update: now there is one after this thread was posted).



As per the JoongAng Ilbo today, this quote:

. . . “I told him that he must follow the legal procedure,” said Jo Yeong-gon, head of the Seoul Central District Prosecutors’ Office and Yun’s supervisor. . .“but he refused to do so and told me, ‘The Justice Ministry would never allow me to do that.’” (from phone interview)
The NIS protested the arrest of its agents to the prosecution. Yun finally released the three at about 9 p.m. on the day of the arrest, and was dismissed from his position as leader of the probe the following day.
“If a prosecutor ignores the procedures of notification to superiors, he could arrest whomever he wanted,” said Lee Jin-han, a senior prosecutor at the Seoul Central District Prosecutors’ Office. (cite)

Right . . .


The JoongAng Ilbo writes of Yoon’s motivations in not following strict procedure by warning suspects (NIS) that need to destroy evidence quickly before they are raided:

. . . Although Yun had an arrest warrant issued by a local court on Oct. 16, he apparently should have reported his arrest plan in advance to his superiors, the justice minister and the head of the Supreme Prosecutors’ Office. Under the current law, arrests of spy agency officials require that additional step, which Yun did not take, however, Yun claimed at the hearing yesterday that he did follow appropriate internal steps, alerting his superior, Jo Yeong-gon, the head of the Seoul District Prosecutors’ Office, of his plans.

“On Oct. 15, I visited [Jo’s house],” Yun said during his testimony. “I brought my report on the investigation and briefed [him on my plans].” Jo, who also testified at the hearing, denied that it was an official notification and claimed Yun authorized the arrests himself. “We just had a casual, private conversation,” Jo said. “It was not an official notification. We were just having dinner, [and then] Yun suddenly showed me his report. I just told him to ‘review’ the report and returned it.”

Yun went on to say that his investigation was under pressure from the beginning.“At the beginning of this investigation, I had [a lot of] trouble because of external pressure,” Yun refuted, without mentioning the parties responsible. When lawmakers asked whether Justice Minister Hwang Kyo-an was one of the people who exerted pressure on his investigation, Yun replied, “I think he was.” Yun also argued that Jo dissuaded him from arresting the NIS officials because he was afraid of being criticized by the ruling party (cite).

So what does it mean when even “talented” prosecutors feel they need to resort to unusual methods to do their job?

The Cyber Warfare Command (part of the South Korean military) appears to have been involved in the same twitter-gate activities, at the same time:

Democratic Party Representative Jin Sung-joon said yesterday in an MBC radio interview that his party had obtained additional evidence regarding the postings by the cyber unit officials, which he said the party will release if the military’s investigation proves inadequate.
“What has been revealed is just the tip of the iceberg,” said Jin. “The investigation will show that this is an organized incident,” he added, rather than individuals acting on their own to make political posts. “We have many materials to support this.” He claimed the DP’s evidence shows that the Cyber Command agents also “re-tweeted comments posted by the NIS agents.” (cite)

Meanwhile, all this talk of accountability and due process of law has fallen upon deaf ears since accountability could possibly threaten other things:

We have [been continually hovering] over the issue of the presidential election,” Saenuri Chairman Hwang Woo-yea, said. “We can’t do this anymore. We should move on to the politics for state affairs.”

Choe Sang-hun has added a related article, in the NY Times, about the Prosecutor’s Office raiding the South Korea’s Cyberwarfare Command on Tuesday due to four of its officials having posted political messages online last year:

Last week, opposition lawmakers alleged in the National Assembly that the military’s secretive Cyberwarfare Command had carried out a similar online campaign, separately or in coordination with the spy agency, to help sway public opinion in favor of Ms. Park before the Dec. 19 election. The Defense Ministry, On Tuesday, confirmed that four cyberwarfare officials had posted political messages, but it quoted them as saying they had acted on their own.

Of prosecutor Yoon, Choe notes that:

. . . Mr. Yoon was removed from the investigation last week after his team detained three intelligence agents and searched their homes. He said his team had collected more evidence of the spy agency’s online campaign: 55,700 messages, posted or reposted by intelligence agents, that praised Ms. Park or disparaged her opposition rivals ahead of the December election. One of them called Mr. Moon, the main opposition candidate, a “servant” of North Korea and Ahn Cheol-soo, an independent who supported Mr. Moon, “a woman in men’s clothes.”

As with Prosecutor General Chae, it seems that libel is an operational tactic for today’s leading political party, meanwhile Cho Young-Kon, head of the Seoul Central District Prosecutors’ Office, yesterday submitted a request to the Supreme Prosecutors’ Office to investigate him after a junior prosecutor who worked for him (Yoon) dropped the bombshell revelation about the investigation of the National Intelligence Service’s alleged online smear campaign against the losing candidate in last December’s election. (cite)

How can there ever be an investigation, such as this, if the very parties that are under investigation are in control of the government!?  As said one senior prosecutor about this conflict of interest, “When an issue is politically sensitive, the leader of an investigation always clashes with a high-ranking prosecutor who cares about its political impact,” (cite)

« Older posts

© 2015 The Marmot's Hole

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑