Renaming the peaks of Dokdo

by Bobby McGill on October 28, 2012

in South Korea

From Yonhap:

According to the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs, the government has decided to rename Dongdo “Usanbong” and Seodo “Daehanbong,” and use the new names starting Monday in the country’s official maps, textbooks and Internet portals.

I don’t know if any consideration was given to English-speaking audiences, but switching from “Dongdo” to “Usanbong?” Good choice.

And names with “bong” in them will likely appeal to young Westerners.

 

{ 14 comments… read them below or add one }

1 Jakgani October 28, 2012 at 5:22 pm

The reason behind changing the names smells fishy to me.

2 gbnhj October 28, 2012 at 6:42 pm

I heard that, after this goes through, they’re planning to rename the fishing grounds surrounding Dokdo to The Bongwaters.

3 leguwan October 28, 2012 at 9:56 pm

Bong = Bonk to young Westerners??

4 Bobby McGill October 28, 2012 at 10:02 pm

I suppose if they have enough of the bong, the two words might likely be confused.

5 gbevers October 29, 2012 at 1:01 am

The name change makes sense, except that Dokdo was never called “Usando,” so the reason for calling one of the peaks “Usanbong” is totally bogus and designed to perpetuate a lie. The reason it makes sense is that Dokdo (Dok Island) is essentially two rocky islet peaks. If you are going to continue to call it “Dok Island,” then referring to the two islets as Dongdo (East Island) and Seodo (West Island) causes confusion because people might think there are three islands.

Actually, a better name than “Dokdo,” which means “Solitary Island,” would be “Ibongdo,” which means “Island of Two Peaks.”

6 Q October 29, 2012 at 7:21 am

Official map (地圖區域一覽圖) published in 1936 by government of Imperial Japan marked Dokdo in Chosun district (Korea):

http://news.nate.com/view/20121024n14227

Here is the map enlarged:

http://www.dokdohistory.com/data/board_10/106-1.JPG

7 Q October 29, 2012 at 7:44 am
8 tapadamornin October 29, 2012 at 10:17 am

That North Jersey article covered the overall story fairly well, but this doesn’t make any sense to me:

“Calls made to the Fort Lee-based Japanese-American Society of New Jersey about Friday’s incident were not answered Friday evening. But after police had taken the stake away as evidence, reaction by local officials and especially the Korean-American community was swift.”

Why would the Japanese-Americans care less what Japan as a country was doing? That’s like asking for a comment from the 442nd Infantry Regiment as to why the Japanese attacked Pearl Harbor. If the board planted at the memorial was the same as the one found in Korea, chances are it’s one of the Japanese conservatives doing it, and not an American.

9 tapadamornin October 29, 2012 at 10:21 am

Grammar fail:

“Japanese-Americans probably couldn’t care less what Japan as a country was doing.”

10 broona October 29, 2012 at 11:00 am

Usanbong sounds like umbrella bong. Hmmm.

11 genie222001 October 29, 2012 at 11:17 pm

Qwrote:
“Official map (地圖區域一覽圖) published in 1936 by government of Imperial Japan marked Dokdo in Chosun district (Korea)”.

This is BS. Korea was a part of Japan at that time, and Takeshima was a part of Shimane’s territory since 1905. The San Francisco Peace Treaty did not give Korea Takeshima. Keep in mind that Korea was liberated from Japanese rule only because the US defeated Japan in WWII. The US could allow Japan to keep Korea. You can’t ignore The San Francisco Peace Treaty.

12 Q October 30, 2012 at 1:46 am

The asshat who placed the stake at the Palisades Park was identified as the same nut, Suzuki Nobuyuki:

http://www.ytn.co.kr/_ln/0104_201210300000199170

13 Stereo October 30, 2012 at 9:12 pm

Q, do you think the “map” you linked has any influence over the title of the island?

It is not a map but a catalog of maps available for sale arranged in a map style. You can see the price of each map on it. If you had bought the map of Takeshima at that time, they would have sent you a map stating “Takeshima, Shimane Prefecture, Japan”.

Previous post:

Next post: