Gomes back home; family thanks Carter, State… and North Korea

by Robert Koehler on August 28, 2010

That Aijalon Gomes fellow is back in the United States. Hurray.

Anyway, his family released a statement, in which they thank Peanuts, the State Department, the Swedish embassy in Pyongyang and the North Koreans:

The family of Aijalon Gomes feels blessed today to be able to welcome Aijalon home and into the arms of all those who love him. This has been a long, dark, and difficult period — for Aijalon and for our family. We are grateful to all the people who made today possible.

First, we want to express heartfelt gratitude to former President Jimmy Carter and the staff of the Carter Center for taking on Aijalon’s release as a private humanitarian mission. Thank you, President Carter, for traveling to North Korea to bring Aijalon home.

Thank you to the government of North Korea for caring for Aijalon during his darkest days, then agreeing to release him on humanitarian grounds. And thank you to Swedish ambassador to North Korea Mats Foyer and the first secretary and deputy chief of mission at the Swedish embassy in North Korea, Johan Eidman, for graciously serving as the vitally important communication channel to Aijalon during his incarceration.

Alrighty then. You know, as much as some might find the perfunctory, “Sorry for causing the public concern” statements released by high-profile Koreans when they get caught doing something bad insincere, it would have been nice to have seen one here. Well, perhaps when Aijalon himself says something… but I won’t hold my breath.

Oh, here’s a depressing thought (from the first link):

Both Shawn Gomes and Milton McCarthy said their brother, who is not married, was the more “sophisticated” sibling in the family.

Well, let’s just pray none of them end up teaching in South Korea, either.

I can’t say I was Jack Pritchard’s biggest fan, but I’d buy him a beer for this (seriously, I would):

Pritchard said that Gomes was given too harsh a sentence, so it was the right thing to do to get him out. But he said Americans who illegally cross the border into North Korea put the United States in a position of diplomatic begging and give the North Koreans leverage they shouldn’t have. Gomes should have known he was going to be arrested and dealt with harshly, he said.

“What was going through his mind? He should have been under no illusion as to what the consequences were going to be. . .Step up and take responsibility, Mr. Gomes.”

Pritchard also seems to think Peanuts got snubbed by Kim Jong-il as a way of enacting a penalty on the United States:

“Carter must be seething with embarassment,” said Pritchard. “The intent was to exact a penalty from the United States and simply say, ‘You guys disrespect our laws and you want us to release [Gomes] after he has been found guilty . . . Here is the penalty.”

If true, it shows the depth to which North Korea is ignorant of international practice, which, as you know, is to give visiting foreign heads of state a standing ovation in your national parliament after their citizens — or millions of them — disrespect your laws. But that is neither here nor there: Inje University professor Kim Yeon-cheol told the Hankyoreh that if Carter had brought with him some new US policy towards North Korea or a personal message from President Obama, Kim naturally would have met him, but with no movement from the United States, a meeting would have been burdensome for Kim. Of course, perhaps Kim was just trying to avoid the Jimmy Carter Curse: Peanuts met South Korean President Park Chung-hee in 1979 and North Korean leader Kim Il-sung in 1994 — both men were dead within the year.

One last thing about Carter. From One Free Korea:

I can’t resist making one more observation, and it is this: who else has noticed that the ex-”human rights president,” one who was so concerned about Park Chong Hee’s authoritarianism that he almost pulled U.S. forces out of Korea, never quite summons the principle to call for the closure of North Korea’s peace forests? Or that Carter’s ostentatious and smug brand of religious faith never translates into a call to end North Korea’s persecution of Christians?

PS: It’s interesting to note that in visiting China, not only did Kim snub Carter, but if Kim did get to meet Chinese leader Hu Jintao yesterday — as some are reporting — that, too, might have gone against protocol by forcing Hu to go to Changchun — albeit a lovely city, I’m told — to meet with Kim at his hotel.

Something else, too. It’s being widely reported that Kim’s visit is to seek Chinese approval of his son, Kim Jong-un, as successor to the family business. Now, I don’t really doubt that it this stage in North Korea’s decline, Pyongyang is very dependent on Chinese largess for the regime’s survival. Still, it seems to me odd — given Pyongyang’s nationalist rhetoric — that Kim would seemingly resurrect the old Joseon practice of Korea seeking Chinese approval of Korean kings, a practice — while mostly ceremonial — still symbolized Korea’s relationship as a tributary of China. If I were a South Korean leader, I’d be very worried about what that means.

{ 12 comments… read them below or add one }

1 seouldout August 28, 2010 at 5:00 pm

Pity for KJI that brother Billy ain’t alive. I’m sure KJI would have stuck around Pyongyang to party w/ him. For what it’s worth America elected the wrong Carter.

2 R. Elgin August 28, 2010 at 10:27 pm

As per Reuters, on a tangently related theme:

China is lobbying neighbours to sign up to a road map for renewed nuclear disarmament talks with North Korea, whose leader Kim Jong-il is visiting China amid conciliatory words and threats of “holy war.”

Is anyone really going to go for this Chinese-sponsored terrorism strip tease again!? I really hope all parties simply let the North Koreans rot in solitude.

I appreciate the South Korean response (from the article): “We don’t want to restart six-party talks for the sake of talks,” the South Korean diplomatic source said. “North Korea should change its attitude and show seriousness in de-nuclearising.”

3 Zhang Fei August 29, 2010 at 4:55 am

I think China could definitely end up absorbing North Korea. A simple opening up of the North Korean economy would lead to a massive boom. China’s primary worry would be war with South Korea, but I really don’t see South Korea going to war with China over its annexation of North Korea – my impression is that East Asia, in general, and South Korea, in particular, is thoroughly cowed by Chinese economic and military power. I also have to question whether Uncle Sam will participate in a war of choice (with Korean unification as its objective) initiated by South Korea to evict the Chinese from the Korean peninsula.

4 Zhang Fei August 29, 2010 at 4:58 am

By the way, keeping puppet kings around until formal annexation is an ancient Chinese (and in fact, global) tradition.

5 baduk August 29, 2010 at 5:03 am

Zhang Fei,
Why absorb, when you can pretend to be an independent state and play goodcop-badcop. That is what China has been doing with NK.

China is evil. Beating up on Tibetians.

The evil empire will fall.

6 baduk August 29, 2010 at 5:06 am

Don’t knock Jimmy. He is the second most admired president in my book next to FDR.

Jimm taught Bible class every Sunday while he was the Presidante of the UNITED STATE of AMERICA, the wealthiest and the most powerful country in the world. Despite his busy schedule, every Sunday he prayed with little children and taught them about God’s kingdom.

Jimmy was real.

7 Acropolis7 August 29, 2010 at 6:16 am

Shh Baduk , us fundalmentist conservatives don’t want to here about people actually practicing Christianity, we just like to bash people over the head with a book that we dont even understand and claim that we know whats right. Those heathen Liberals like Peanut do not understand our unique position of being right all the time!– j/k conservatives.

8 dokdoforever August 29, 2010 at 6:27 am

The US should announce a new policy regarding reckless citizens who insist on illegally entering N Korea – they have to stay there for at least a year before we send Carter, Clinton or Bush to bail them out.

9 Arghaeri August 29, 2010 at 11:13 am

Only a year!!!

And why not de-rate the visiting celebs, surely KJI would be happy with Paris Hilton, or maybe the finalist of Pop Idol.

10 R. Elgin August 29, 2010 at 12:34 pm

I say the U.S. should line up actors who have played the president in movies and send them instead. Dealing with North Korea is such an act of pretension as it is it should be treated as such.

11 Hamilton August 29, 2010 at 2:13 pm

I think we should ear-mark some of the stimulus money to place signs in English every 100meters along the Chinese-NK border. “The US is not responsible for your incarceration in the DPRK.”

12 Jim_Kim August 29, 2010 at 11:20 pm

I think that US should have a Nork style immigration policy. You cross illegally – you are doing hard, unpaid labor.

I am kidding, kind of.

Previous post:

Next post: