‘고통 준 세력 찾아내 큰 대가 치르게 할것’

by Robert Koehler on April 30, 2010

in Inter-Korean Issues, South Korea

Chief of Naval Operations Adm. Kim Sung-chan is clearly angry:

In a eulogy that followed, Adm. Kim Sung-chan, the Navy chief of staff, hailed the heroic endeavors of the Cheonan soldiers and vowed to take revenge on whomever attacked the ship.

“What happened on March 26 at Baengnyeong Island [near which the ship sank] should not have happened,” Kim read, his voice trembling.

The nation’s military leaders plus Gen. Walter Sharp, commander of the U.S. Combined Forces Command, were in attendance.

“We cannot and must not forgive this or forget this. Whoever caused our people great pains, we will not sit idly by. We will pursue [the responsible party] to the end and make it pay a huge price.

I actually tend to agree with the Hankyoreh that some of the reporting on Cheonan has been irresponsible, but it seems to me the Navy is certain this was no accident.

On a final note, while I’m not one to take joy in anything that happens at a funeral, I did feel some degree of satisfaction reading that the mother of one of the fallen, Senior Chief Petty Officer Min Pyeong-gi, harangued Democratic Labor Party chairman Kang “The Hanboked One” Ki-gap (can’t watch the video) — he who apparently thinks the Americans know what happened to the Cheonanafter the floral tribute:

After a floral tribute, the mother of the late Senior Chief Petty Officer Min Pyeong-gi approached the chairman of the progressive Democratic Labor Party, Kang Ki-kap, who was seated in the front row. She said, “North Koreans killed my son. Please, never say (we should assist North Korea),” and then collapsed.

She actually said a bit more than that.

{ 18 comments… read them below or add one }

1 slim April 30, 2010 at 5:46 am

Bravo to Min’s mother! Love to see PIX or video of that linked to the websites of every North Korea apologist on the planet.

2 R. Elgin April 30, 2010 at 9:25 am

Kang deserved every bit of that public rebuke too.
I don’t think the DLP could sponsor someone for dog catcher and win now.

3 lollabrats April 30, 2010 at 9:54 am

I can only hope this video goes viral…

4 seouldout April 30, 2010 at 9:55 am

Seems to me that rebuking Kang doesn’t go far enough. Much of Korea conveniently forgot NK’s malevolent acts, particularly KL flight 858, and double dealing. Cozying up to KJI, giving him mad money, and pouring him a snifter after snifter of cognac hasn’t accomplished much for South Korea, unless funding KJI’s nuclear development was Seoul’s goal too. At the very least Hyundai, Kim Dae Jung, officials of the Unification Ministry, the Kaesong investors, and all those Gumgang tourists need to exercise a bit of self reflection.

5 Left Flank April 30, 2010 at 11:07 am

Say what you will about just what the facts are – regardless of headlines, every story I read responsibly states that either a torpedo r a mine caused the sinking – how Seoul is trying to deflect this onto Pyongyang shows a bit of talent, but not much.

6 Yu Bum Suk April 30, 2010 at 11:17 am

If anything good comes of this it will be that people might just start to wake up to who the real enemy is.

7 milton April 30, 2010 at 11:37 am

I had goose bumps watching that video. I’m glad to see Kang Gi-gap get a very emotional, very public chewing-out. I especially liked when he tried to comfort the poor woman and got rebuked. Sadly, it has taken the murder of 46 of Korea’s finest for people to start coming to their senses.

One would think that as a practicing Catholic, Mr. Kang would have some compassion for the plight of his “brothers and sisters” north of the DMZ. Unfortunately, the only “brother” he seems to have compassion for is the one who needs it least.

On an aside, I once stood about 4 feet from Mr. Kang and I can report that he is very short. Probably no more than 5’5”. Hmmm…KJI is pretty short as well. Maybe that’s why Kang has so much love for him.

8 br April 30, 2010 at 2:13 pm

just noticed, nice & sensible touch at the top right corner of the blog, robert.

9 Hamilton April 30, 2010 at 3:34 pm

every story I read responsibly states that either a torpedo r a mine caused the sinking – how Seoul is trying to deflect this onto Pyongyang shows a bit of talent, but not much.

Interesting. Every reputable article I have read since the wreck was raised have ruled out a contact mine which reasonably led to the conclusion that it was a torpedo. I wouldn’t say Seoul is deflecting onto Pyongyang at all. Their submarines have been caught in South Korean waters many times, they have violated the NLL many times and lost several sea skirmishes for which they said they would have revenge.

A really skillful deflection which takes one heck of a suspension of disbelief is to attribute the torpedo to a US, Chinese, or South Korean Submarine. The usual South Korean useful idiots are trying that with not very good results.

The question to ask is who would gain from the sinking. North Korea does, they use it as leverage for negotiations and extortion as well as internal morale. South Korea does not, it highlights extreme weakness in detecting submarines and defending the ROK. The US doesn’t benefit since this has reinvigorated the anti-OPCON transition crowd. Also the chances of the US or SK leaking information is just too great. For China it would be a crap shoot that could go very wrong, they need a relatively quiet nK to enhance their role as negotiator/regional hegemon.

When every arrow (stated intent, capability, benefit, physical evidence collected to date) points to North Korea you just can’t stop the leftists from screaming conspiracy or coverup.

10 Hamilton April 30, 2010 at 3:36 pm

And I clearly don’t know how to use blockquotes.

11 lollabrats April 30, 2010 at 4:17 pm

“how Seoul is trying to deflect this onto Pyongyang shows a bit of talent, but not much.”
–Left Flank

Could you explain for us what you mean by this? Do you doubt that the DPRK attacked the ROK? What causes you to doubt? And why do you think that the ROK is trying to frame the DPRK?

12 hamel April 30, 2010 at 4:18 pm

Oh North Korea is the real enemy. And the DLP come off looking like fools for being so soft on them.

I will never forget seeing an interview some years ago on a Korean current affairs show (was it 그것이 알고 싶다?) about the South Korean sailors who were killed in 2002 in a clash with North Korea. Was it 6 or 8 of them? Anyway they spoke with the family members, who all were heartbroken that the SK government had not only ignored them, but disgraced their memory by not putting up any memorial.

One young widow had moved to New York illegally and was washing dishes in a Chinatown restaurant and living alone in a rented room. She was so hurt by the government’s treatment (in its efforts to “reconcile” with Pyongyang) that she vowed never to return.

If I remember correctly, there was a follow up on her story after LMB was made Prez. I think she returned to Seoul.

Let’s not forget those sailors either.

[A caveat, although I wish to remember the fallen, that doesn't necessarily mean I think it is wise to lash out against North Korea in a military strike - assuming that it is proven that Pyongyang was responsible, as looks increasingly likely.]

13 slim April 30, 2010 at 8:54 pm

How about this week’s open forum devoted to brainstorming creative and mostly non-military ways to make North Korea pay for this?

I believe it’s time to considering bringing about an end to the 62-year Frankenstein creation that is the DPRK.

14 cm May 1, 2010 at 1:21 am

President Lee Myung Bak in China, snubs North Korea’s Kim Young Nam.

http://news.chosun.com/site/data/html_dir/2010/04/30/2010043002235.html?Dep1=news&Dep2=top&Dep3=top

According to the picture and the story, Prez Lee totally ignored the North Korean leader. He didn’t say “hi” and he didn’t even look at the North Korean’s way.

15 yuna May 1, 2010 at 1:25 am

Funny that article – that must hurt a lot, somehow reminds me of a scenario of a girl ignoring someone she fancies, and telling her girlfriends, “I didn’t even look in his direction I’m sure he noticed. “

16 slim May 1, 2010 at 1:35 am

“somehow reminds me of a scenario of a girl ignoring someone she fancies, and telling her girlfriends, “I didn’t even look in his direction I’m sure he noticed. “

That would hold if it were Roh Moo-hyun or DJ doing the snubbing unlikely), but does not reflect LMB’s temperament or views.

LMB should have put an emptied glass, a half-eaten cocktail weenie and a mucus-filled, crumbled up napkin on KYN’s tray and said in the crudest banmal: “I’ll have another round, boy!”

17 yuna May 1, 2010 at 1:57 am

Still doesn’t take away from the feeling that one of 2MB’s posses told Chosun at a pyjama party or a pillow fight, from the tone and the content of the article.

18 cm May 1, 2010 at 3:12 am

Yuna, I think Lee Myung Bak was wrong in ignoring the North Korean entourage at the guest party in China. Lee shouldn’t have done that. That was terrible. He should have punched the lights out on Kim Young Nam.
Now that’s a satisfying revenge without causing a war in Korea.

Previous post:

Next post: