Myanmar and North Korea: An Association of Evil?

by robert neff on March 6, 2010

The increasing cooperation and friendship between North Korea and Myanmar has been the subject of this earlier posting and apparently the American government is becoming quite concerned.  According to the Washington Post (copied on the Journal Gazette) the Obama administration has begun an aggressive campaign to persuade Myanmar from purchasing North Korean weapons and technology.

Concerns about the relationship — which encompass the sale of small arms, missile components and technology possibly related to nuclear weapons — in part prompted the Obama administration in October to end the George W. Bush-era policy of isolating the military junta, said a senior State Department official, speaking on the condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the subject.

Chief amongst these concerns is obviously North Korea’s exportation of nuclear technology:

Underlining the administration’s concerns about Myanmar is a desire to avoid a repeat of events that unfolded in Syria in 2007. North Korea is thought to have helped Syria secretly build a nuclear reactor there capable of producing plutonium. The facility was reportedly only weeks or months away from being functional when Israeli warplanes bombed it in September of that year.

“The lesson here is the Syrian one,” said David Albright, president of the nongovernmental Institute for Science and International Security and an expert on nuclear proliferation. “That was such a massive intelligence failure. You can’t be sure that North Korea isn’t doing it someplace else. The U.S. government can’t afford to be blindsided again.”

Apparently Myanmar isn’t just relying upon North Korea to support its nuclear needs:

In a report Albright co-wrote in January, titled “Burma: A Nuclear Wannabe,” he outlined the case for concern about Myanmar’s relations with North Korea. First, Myanmar has signed a deal with Russia for the supply of a 10-megawatt thermal research reactor, although construction of the facility had not started as of September.

Second, although many claims from dissident groups about covert nuclear sites in Myanmar are still unverified, the report said that “there remain legitimate reasons to suspect the existence of undeclared nuclear activities in Myanmar, particularly in the context of North Korean cooperation.”

Of course human rights issues may hamper some of the United States’ increasing relations with Myanmar. According to WorldPress:

One woman’s story was particularly harrowing. “They raped us all without a second thought, until we finally escaped their drunken grasps. News spread quickly throughout my village. We received international attention when the BBC picked up the story. I had become a headline. The shame I brought to my family, my school, my village, was so difficult to bear. I wanted to forget, but no one would let me. I was caned by my teacher in front of the entire school before being expelled. Later, I was also expelled from my community for bringing shame upon it. Left without a home, a school, friends or a family, I was arrested by the police for ‘defaming’ the same soldiers who raped me.”

Other accounts of these assaults can be seen here.  Not only is Myanmar raping and imprisoning political opposition and undesirables – it is also accused of supplimenting its military with child-soldiers

Heisoo Shin said, “Burma is in violation of rights under treaties it has ratified such as the Convention on the Rights of the Child.” Burma’s army has been accused of recruiting child soldiers and using child labor by the United Nations and foreign governments.

Some are demanding that the United States take a firmer stance with Myanmar such as The Nation.

{ 6 comments… read them below or add one }

1 R. Elgin March 6, 2010 at 5:30 pm

Also consider the South Korea/Myanmar connection in the recent past:

http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/03/24/the-korean-style-gas-face/

It’s a bit difficult to take a harder stance on such an atrocious regime when they are under the protective arm of their “big brother”, China.

2 WangKon936 March 6, 2010 at 6:04 pm

Ah… natural resources. It’s like a hot bod and a pretty face on a girl. Yes she may have a bitchy attitude and a man eater’s demeanor but you put up with it because of the hot bod and the pretty face.

3 R. Elgin March 7, 2010 at 12:57 pm

Funny thing, there is also this recent article in the NY TImes about sanctions against Iran and how the U.S. has a problem enforcing such sanctions:

One of the government’s most powerful tools, at least on paper, to influence the behavior of companies beyond the jurisdiction of the embargo is the Iran Sanctions Act, devised to punish foreign companies that invest more than $20 million in a given year to develop Iran’s oil and gas fields. But in the 14 years since the law was passed, the government has never enforced it, in part for fear of angering America’s allies.

That has given rise to situations like the one involving the South Korean engineering giant <b<Daelim Industrial, which in 2007 won a $700 million contract to upgrade an Iranian oil refinery.

According to the Congressional Research Service, the deal appeared to violate the Iran Sanctions Act, meaning Daelim could have faced a range of punishments, including denial of federal contracts. That is because the law covers not only direct investments, such as the purchase of shares and deals that yield royalties, but also contracts similar to Daelim’s to manage oil and gas development projects.

But in 2009 the United States Army awarded the company a $111 million contract to build housing in a military base in South Korea. Just months later, Daelim, which disputes that its contracts violated the letter of the law, announced a new $600 million deal to help develop the South Pars gas field in Iran.

Will anything happen to Daelim’s contracts with the U.S. because of this? Maybe not but there is bound to be some discussion about business and other things not public knowledge.

4 R. Elgin March 7, 2010 at 12:58 pm
5 gangpehmoderniste March 8, 2010 at 4:48 pm

More from the John Rambo franchise coming up

6 keius March 9, 2010 at 9:49 am

Let’s face facts here, the US takes the high road and talks righteous….but if it doesn’t directly impact our own interests, we’re not going to do squat about it. Talk is cheap and theres a reason the US isn’t as respected as it used to be. Unless they attack the US directly, all we’ll be doing is filing complaints :P

Previous post:

Next post: