Where are the strongest, bravest, most manly men in Korea?

by robert neff on November 20, 2008

“Where do we find the strongest, bravest, most manly Koreans?” According to an old editorial: ”It is in the north where they eat millet, potatoes, and wheat.”

This editorial took issue with Korea’s, and for that matter, much of Asia’s, dependency on rice.  According to the editorial, wheat was “perhaps the most wholesome article of food to be found in the world” whereas rice was one of the chief causes of indigestion, and the cultivation of it contributed to poor roads, as well as Korea’s failure to achieve enlightenment. Here is a quote:
“When we take into account these facts and also the inroads made upon the health of the people by the proximity to noisome paddy fields and by the almost invariable contamination of wells, we are constrained to believe that the exclusive user of rice is the most serious bar to what we may call the enlightenment of these people.”

I have copied the article in full below. However, before everyone starts screaming about how the whiteman, i.e., foreigner, had no knowledge of the true Korean situation and the special relationship of rice and Korea’s society, I wish to remind you who the most likely author of the article was — you can view the history of the paper here.

The article follows below:

 
Editorial: The westerner can scarcely consider it other than unfortunate that these eastern people use as the staple article of food a grain which requires so favorable conditions of climate for its growth as does rice. This grain forms the main article of food of much more than half the human race, and yet of all the cereals it requires the greatest care in the cultivation and suffers most from too much or too little rain. Not only must there be enough rain but it must come at a particular time or it is useless; then from the very position of the rice fields they are the first to suffer from freshets. When one takes into account the amount of time and care that are necessary in keeping the rice fields in the frequent manipulation of the growing grain, first in sowing, second in transplanting and third in cultivating, in the reaping which must be done by hand as the grain frequently stands ankle deep in water or at least mud which must for ever render the use of machinery impossible. When we take into account these facts and also the inroads made upon the health of the people by the proximity to noisome paddy fields and by the almost invariable contamination of wells, we are constrained to believe that the exclusive user of rice is the most serious bar to what we may call the enlightenment of these people. This may seem to be an extreme statement, but let us examine it a little more closely. We cannot be going far astray when we say that a third of the people of Korea are engaged in the cultivation of rice. Of course they cultivate other things too, but rice is the main object of their care. Now if we look at enlightened countries we will see that as fast as general culture and enlightenment have advanced the condition of the peasant has been ameliorated. Machinery has come in to supplement his labor and lighten him of some of his heaviest loads, consequently fewer people are required to carry on these lower forms of labor, produce has been cheaper and larger numbers of people have thus been given leisure to engage in pursuits of a higher order, but notice from the conditions above enumerated rice always has had and always will have to be raised by hand without the aid of machinery except perhaps in the process of threshing. There seems to be no hope of anything better for one third of the Korean people than to wade in paddy fields and breathe the miasmatic vapors which they exhale. Compare rice with wheat. The inner kernel is almost identically the same in each, pure starch; but while in the case of rice the husk is of such a nature that it can scarcely be eaten the inner husk of the wheat, when ground up with the kernel, makes perhaps the most wholesome article of food to be found in the world; for besides the starchy matter we find certain other ingredients, nitrogenous, mineral and other which make it by far more useful as a food stuff than rice. Then again see the contrast in the amount of labor. A farmer can plow a certain field in a day, he can spend one day in bringing fertilizer and day in sowing the wheat and then his work is all done until the time for reaping comes. To cultivate the same area in rice will require the labor of four men for at least fifteen times as many days, and in addition the hardier wheat is not anywhere nearly so dependent upon rain at stated times. In the time thus saved the farmer could busy himself in cattle or sheep raising, in silk culture, fruit culture, or in any one of a thousand other lucrative employments.
Let us next inquire as to the relation of the cost of rice to the rate of wages in Korea. A measure of rice today is worth fourteen cents silver, and will last one person two days. The average monthly wage in Korea is difficult to estimate but it cannot be far from five dollars for the great mass of the people. It appears then that $2.10, out of $5.00, goes for rice alone, or over two-fifths. That sum will buy forty pounds of American flour laid down in Seoul. This would give one and a third pounds for each Korean measure of flour, which is about what it would weigh, so we see that so far as quantity is concerned a Korean could live on American wheat as cheaply as on Korean rice. This becomes still more evident when we consider that a measure of rice when ground into flour will not till the measure. As to the nutriment to be gotten from the two grains there is probably little difference. It should be noted that indigestion is the most common of Korean complaints and it probably arises from the fact that rice if bolted rapidly is not readily digested unless it be cooked much more than Koreans are accustomed to cook it. It should be thoroughly masticated, but no one can watch a Korean eat rice and then aver that he masticates it all. If, then, a Korean could live on American wheat flour as cheaply as on his native rice, he should be able to live on his native wheat for half the sum at most. Notice again that he would have a more wholesome food than the bolted flour for he would have what we call graham flour which is confessedly more wholesome than the pure wheat flour.
We learn from a man who has traveled widely in Korea that in many places in Ham Kyung province in the north, wheat is raised instead of rice and that one man will easily raise thirty, forty, or fifty bags, and that these farmers are thoroughly well-to-do compared with the rice farmers.
It is a curious fact too that the provinces of Chulla and Kyung Sang are called the garden of Korea because of the great qualities of rice raised there and yet in truth they are the most poverty-stricken provinces in the land. Other causes are doubtless at work but we do not believe that the raising of rice will produce as much or as good food as wheat, nor as much revenue for the government.
Where do we find the strongest, bravest, most manly Koreans? It is in the north where they eat millet, potatoes and wheat. How is it in China? The best physiques are found in the north where one out of five can afford to eat rice.
One more consideration. Korea will never have good cart roads so long as they have to pass through rice growing districts. Japan may be cited as an argument to the contrary but even there one does not have to go far from the main lines of road before he finds himself in the mud. Rice fields are an enemy to drainage. It is a continual fight to keep the water from flowing away, and without good drainage good roads are impossible except at fabulous expense. We are not so rash as to think that any such revolution could be accomplished in this generation nor perhaps in the next but the time will certainly come sooner or later when nature will have to be wooed less arduously than she is when rice is the suit.

{ 25 comments… read them below or add one }

1 dda November 20, 2008 at 11:33 pm

Chulla? Kyung Sang?

2 dogbertt November 21, 2008 at 1:59 am

It’s one thing to be a “spelling Marshal Petain” when criticizing the misspelling of everyday English words by those who should know better (although, frankly, that shtick has grown exceedingly threadbare), but now the passive-aggressive criticism of the Romanization of Korean proper nouns that have been subject to myriad Romanization schemes over the centuries? Mon dieu!

The test should be this: does the reader clearly understand the meaning of “Kyung Sang” and “Chulla” in context? Can you honestly say that you do not?

3 robert neff November 21, 2008 at 2:27 am

What is worse……it was a direct quote from 110 years ago. I am not responsible for the spelling.

4 CactusMcHarris November 21, 2008 at 2:46 am

Whenever I see Cholla I don’t know whether to go into Hanthink or plantthink – cholla is also descriptive of a number of cacti species and yes, because it’s Spanish it’s pronounced ‘choyya’.

Personally, I could be a gentleman farmer in Chollanamdo raising cholla for fun and profit – it could produce fruit and a bug used in dying cloth. I don’t suppose the new government would do that for me, would it?

5 CactusMcHarris November 21, 2008 at 2:49 am

“Where do we find the strongest, bravest, most manly Koreans?” According to an old editorial: ”It is in the north where they eat millet, potatoes, and wheat.”

That’s assuming there’s anything like that in the northern provinces – what are they…Yanggangdo and Ragangdo? I would imagine they’re going to be suffering the most due to the impending winter famine.

6 admiral November 21, 2008 at 5:45 am

The strongest, bravest, most manly men…?

…the veterans who defend the MacArthur statue at Incheon.

7 adeptitus November 21, 2008 at 6:32 am

It wasn’t until the recent decades that most people in East Asia could eat white fluffy rice. Prior to then they ate a variety of grains, such as brown rice, millet, barley, wheat, corn, sorghum, oats, rye, beans, etc.

My father’s family was originally from Manchuria, they were wealthy business owners prior to WW2. He said they ate mixed grains in their youth and not white rice.

If you visit Chinese supermarkets today, you’d still find bags of the mixed grains. Some enterprising folks have been repackaging them as “organic health food”.

White rice is empty carbs. Rice producers prefer white rice because they can be stored longer. Brown rice with the “bran” can only be stored for up to 6 months, because of the oil in the bran layer. Milled long-grain white rice can be stored almost indefinitely in airtight containers (another food with nearly indefinite shelf life is honey).

Selling and eating white rice is a commercial decision, not based on nutrition. Same is true with white bread. We’ve made a lot of progress pushing white bread out of fashion — wonder bread closed shop in Southern California in 2007 because the consumers have leaned toward whole grain breads. But we haven’t done the same with rice yet.

8 Gillian November 21, 2008 at 6:39 am

Wow. That is an interesting read. Thanks for posting it! Could I ask where you found it?

9 Brendon Carr (Korea Law Blog) November 21, 2008 at 7:38 am

But, but… I thought Korea’s strongest, bravest, most manly men were in Super Junior.

10 Sperwer November 21, 2008 at 8:30 am

My bet is that this is from The Independent and, since it’s an editorial, it most likely was written by So Jae P’il or Yun Ch’i-ho; certainly the latter if the publication date was after So chose to go back into exile in the US after he was booted out of the position he held as an adviser to the Govt(at the same time as he published the paper) as the Min’s got back controland started to rollback theKabo Reforms. Politically correct scholars also would explain adoption of this sort of rhetoric by progressive Koreans, like So and Yun, as being a result of their “victimization” by the “hegemonic” “discourse” of the imperilaist West, see e.g., Alexis Dudden.

11 bumfromkorea November 21, 2008 at 8:38 am

But, but… I thought Korea’s strongest, bravest, most manly men were in Super Junior.

If that was true, then the “strongest, bravest, most manly” title rightfully belongs to the members of the Wonder Girls.

HI-YO!

12 thekorean November 21, 2008 at 8:55 am

I don’t know if the discourse was “hegemonic”, much less if Seo or Yun were “victims” of such discourse, but that type of discourse – pseudo-scientific racism – were the dominant discourse in “explaining” the racial disparity that led to disparity of wealth and power among countries/continents.

Interesting thing is that the progenitors of such discourse — most notably Germans — saw that theory run its course into disaster, and have totally abandoned it. However, many of the “victims” of such discourse — usually Asians and Africans — still subscribe to that vile theory.

13 wjk, 검은 머리 외국인 November 21, 2008 at 9:25 am

Korean gochu is number one.

14 madar November 21, 2008 at 9:47 am

Actually, I don’t think this is racist propaganda gone local. Historically you need to get a large percentage of workers off the farms and into other occupations to move from an agrarian society to an industrial one. All he is saying is than an easy way to do this is to move off of the cultivation of rice which is five times plus more labor intensive. It requires no innovative technology, and suddenly frees up labor for modernizing the country.

15 dokdoforever November 21, 2008 at 10:08 am

My guess is that this is from a western missionary in the early 1900s, but whoever it is – they’re way off base. Sure rice is labor intensive to plant, but it is also way way more productive a grain than wheat is, simply because one stalk of it has about ten times as many grains on it than rice does. In addition, the author forgets to mention all the work that goes into milling wheat. You can take a rice grain, boil it and eat it, but you have to mill wheat first. Europe happened to have mills to do that in the early 1900s, but if you didn’t have mills, you’d have to sit around pounding it with a mortar and pestle – backbreaking work.

Civilizations have given up wheat or barley and adopted rice – that’s what they did in Korea a thousand years ago or so, but no civilization known to man has given up rice for wheat. Why? Because it is so productive that it can support a whole lot more people than wheat can – which is why all the most populous nations of the world India, China, Japan, Indonesia, etc are all rice growers.

Industrialization is what put Europe ahead, not wheat.

On the other hand, some argue that the low population density (scarce labor) and hard work of wheat milling, plus feudal lords, helped bring about the first water mills, and that technology later turned out to be useful in furthering industrialization. In that case wheat could have been beneficial for progress, but for the opposite reasons, because it is in fact difficult to process, not easy as the author claims.

16 dokdoforever November 21, 2008 at 10:38 am

I meant to say.. one stalk of rice has “about ten times as many grains as wheat does”

17 Sonagi November 21, 2008 at 10:42 am

I recall reading in an anthropology book that traditional rice-growing cultures tended to show more gender equality than wheat-growing ones. The explanation was that rice cultivation can be done by hand or with a small animal like a water buffalo whereas wheat farming required the use of a large tilling equipment, which stronger men could handle better. Korea seems to fly in the face of this generalization, but prior to the official adoption of Confucianism as the state ideology, Korean women were as liberated as women anywhere.

Another perspective on grains comes from paleolithic diet advocates like Loren Cordain, who note that archaelogical evidence that human health declined for thousands of years after the introduction of agriculture. Bones indicate that people were smaller and more showed evidence of diseases. Today’s overpopulation is a consequence of agriculture. People get enough calories to survive but not enough nutrition to thrive as no grain, not wheat, rice, barley, or anything else, is rich in vitamins and minerals relative to calories. Paleos acknowledge that permanent human settlements made possible by agriculture have significantly hastened technological development.

18 Sperwer November 21, 2008 at 10:51 am

Interesting thing is that the progenitors of such discourse — most notably Germans

The “Germans” were not the “progenitors” of such discourse, although some Germans adopted and adapted the most repulsive sorts of the social darwinism that had its clearest roots in the work of Herbert Spencer and the eugenic theories of Francis Galton (Darwin’s cousin) (although it’s also implicit in the Hegelian view of history that provides the underpinning for so much Western thinking then and now) and made it the basis of the most reprehensible sorts of racism (see Fritz Stern’s book on the precursors of Nazi ideology: The Politics of Cultural Despair – a title that could usefully be cribbed for a book on Korea).

19 WangKon936 November 21, 2008 at 1:23 pm

Rice is the reason why Asians work so freak’in hard. If you ever tried farming it, you’d understand.

20 robert neff November 21, 2008 at 1:47 pm

#8 and #10

Yes, it was from The Independent (Korean) and I believe the writer, because of the date, was So Jae P’il. During this period he wrote several editorials encouraging Korea to change its agriculture and adapt more economical crops. He encouraged sheep raising, which was almost unheard of (King Kojong sent a steamer to China very often to bring back sheep to be used in sacrifices) and to the best of my knowledge wasn’t implemented until the English Gold Mines in northern Korea brought over a flock of several hundred sheep.

21 Sperwer November 21, 2008 at 2:24 pm

(King Kojong sent a steamer to China very often to bring back sheep to be used in sacrifices)

It would be interesting to know just how much Gojong, whose commitment to “modernization is often extolled by some Korean historians and historians manque, pissed away on nonsense like this. From perusing Yun’s diaries, it seems like the King’s indulgence in such frippery ate up a significant percentage of Korea’s then very meagre GDP.

22 Buynow November 21, 2008 at 6:44 pm

Civilizations have given up wheat or barley and adopted rice – that’s what they did in Korea a thousand years ago or so, but no civilization known to man has given up rice for wheat. Why? Because it is so productive that it can support a whole lot more people than wheat can – which is why all the most populous nations of the world India, China, Japan, Indonesia, etc are all rice growers.

=======

This may be true, but the factors affecting a switch are different to what they were 1000 years ago. We have mills now, and combine harvesters etc. There’s no shortage of labor in Korea, but the problem is that the labor it has is too expensive.
So, increasingly, what matters is how much cultivation can be automated. Wheat can be planted and harvested by machines, making big fields more efficient. It’s more difficult to process, but since we have machines to do it, that isn’t a big factor. It’s more difficult to grow rice in an automated way, especially since the size of fields is limited — paddy fields can’t be sloped, so they have to be staggered, and there are land ownership issues too. If rice remains labor intensive, it becomes increasingly inefficient.
Then again, when land is short (it is in Korea) then how much you get out per hectare becomes more important. Looking around, there don’t seem to be too many unused paddies, so maybe now is not the time to switch. But if the farmers continue to give up, and labor shortage becomes a bigger problem, then a switch might be a sensible option.

23 Jewook November 21, 2008 at 8:06 pm

Considering that these days Koreans eat less rice and more flour products, because our diet has become more westernized. I think it would more prudent for more Koreans farmers to switch over to wheat. But some farmers seem to stick to rice too stubbornly. I should hope they learn how to adapt to the changing times.

24 eujin November 21, 2008 at 9:46 pm

I’m still trying to figure out this efficiency and manpower business from the other thread. From the USA Rice Federation;

“Technological improvements have evolved over the years to make American rice production the most efficient and advanced in the world. New mechanization and techniques have helped the American rice farmer reduce the costly time spent in the field to only seven man-hours per acre. Some Asian countries continue to require 300 man-hours per acre.

From its meager beginnings in South Carolina, rice has become a major U.S. agricultural product. Nearly 90 percent of the rice consumed in the United States today is produced within its borders. Presently, the United States is the world’s most advanced and innovative rice producer. The United States is also one of the largest exporters of rice in the world, and is respected worldwide for its abundant production of high-quality rice.”

The average farm size in the US is about 450 acres. In Europe it’s about 50 acres. In Korea it is 3 acres. There are actually twice as many people farming in Korea compared to the US, but they are farming a much smaller area.

http://www.sussex.ac.uk/Units/PRU/farm_size.pdf

25 dokdoforever November 21, 2008 at 9:56 pm

Buynow – Korea may have modern machinery now, but it doesn’t have any more land than it used to – and wheat requires much more land to produce the same number of calories. Probably the most economically efficient outcome would be for Korea to further industrialize, and either import rice from Thailand, or buy Madagascar, as they’re doing now.

Previous post:

Next post: