I hope that the ethnic/race bashing here stops. One should be able to discuss/debate things political, social, or cultural without resorting to that kind of crap.
I hope pawi’s recent silence represents a vacation or other activities and not any troubles with the Big Sur and other Bay Area wildfires I’ve been hearing about.
There’s been a bit of talk recently about Korea using the work ‘foreigner’ and how many foreign nationals and tourists find this word quaint and exclusive at best, rude and derogatory at worst.
How do you find the word 외국인 (foreigner)? Do you find it discriminatory? What word would you like to see it replaced with?
국제인 / 국제 사람 – International person
세계인 / 세계 사람 – Global person
양인 / 양 사람 – Foreign person
동양(인/사람) / 서양(인/사람) – Easterner / Westerner
인간 – Human
{insert country}게 한국인 – {Insert country}-Korean (for citizens/permanent residents of non-Korean ethnicity)
Or, would you prefer if they stop using labels completely?
Some Japanese edumacators want the local Koreans to know that Korea WASN’T a Japanese colony, after all. Glad we could clear *that* misunderstanding up.
“The head of the Shimonoseki city education board in Yamaguchi Prefecture has told officials of a Korean school that Japan’s 1910-1945 colonial rule of the Korean Peninsula ‘‘contradicts a historical fact,’’ the education board and the Korean school officials said Friday.”
It’s a rainy day and I’ve got a lot of time on my hands. I’ve been thinking about the limitations of Hangeul when it comes to words and sounds not naturally occurring in Korean. I started thinking about Katakana, Japan’s alphabet used primarily for non-Japanese words. I then thought about all the Korean characters, which were once part of Hangeul but have since been eliminated. There’s scores of them in all kinds of shapes and combinations on the scrap heap.
Why doesn’t Korea reinstate some of these obsolete Hangeul characters and use them for foreign sounds and when transcribing foreign words? Believe or not, there exists now obsolete Hangeul characters for sounds such as ‘v’ and ‘w’. Why doesn’t Korea bring some of these obsolete Hangeul off the bench and use them for words and sounds of foreign origin? It would have the advantage of introducing Koreans to these sounds are an earlier date and help their pronunciation of non-Korean words, bringing a pronunciation close to the ‘true’ pronunciation of the non-Korean word.
Here are some examples:
The word city comes out as shitty in Korean as the rule with Korean is that a sh sound always proceeds a ‘i (ee)’ vowel. How about using the unused ᄼ (s) character for situations as above using non-Korean words such as city.
Here are a couple of characters which used to be used for sounds of non-Korean origin: ㅱ (w), ㅿ (z) and ㆅ (x) – but I personally prefer using ᄽ for (x).
Some other characters that could be used for foreign sounds: ᅅ (soft ‘th’ sound as in ‘thin’), ᅆ (hard ‘th’ sound as in ‘thick’), ᄙ (‘English-sounding’ r as in ‘rooster’), ㅬ (‘English-sounding’ l as in ‘love’), ㅸ (English-sounding’ b as in ‘boy’), ㅹ (v), ᄤ (f).
ㆍ – could be placed below words of foreign origin which end with consonant sounds, which are currently limited by Hangeul’s need for a vowel to follow the consonant as in ‘mart’ 마트 which comes out as ‘marteu’. Instead, have the dot below the final ㅌ so the word is pronounced ‘mart’, similar to in English.
#18
LOL..I know why these Taiwanese fans reacted like that because of rumor last year that Yankee pitcher Wang has Korean ancestor. Totally fabricated story but Taiwaneses were pissed off anyway..
“Bad” is a subjective term. KFC is a franchised restaurant (I think Doosan still owns the Korea franchise), but its menu is not 100% identical around the world. The local KFC menu is adapted to suit Korean palates, while I imagine the KFC Famous Bowls are unique to America.
El Canguro: re-adding the old hangul characters is an interesting notion, however they might have been dropped in the first place because of the linguitic principle of “economy of speech” by which speakers in a homogeneous society such as Korea can take for granted that everyone understands the same communication with the omissions.
I can’t imagine Koreans voluntarily adding “L” and “R” characters to the language….
#6 Just keep it as 외국인. Much simpler and easier for everyone. Let’s face it, if you’re not from around these parts originally, then the term 외국인 is perfect. Is Korea going the way of the US with its PCness??? I look at it this way, I’m a 외국인 to Koreans until I open my mouth and engage them in conversation. After that, I’m no longer considered 외국. Simple enough. As far as the old linguistic characters… It could happen and I see great benefits, but look at how Korean students pronounce the same letters in English. A “v” is a “bwee” et al.
There’s been a bit of talk recently about Korea using the work ‘foreigner’ and how many foreign nationals and tourists find this word quaint and exclusive at best, rude and derogatory at worst.
How do you find the word 외국인 (foreigner)? Do you find it discriminatory? What word would you like to see it replaced with?
I liked it best when I had to queue at the ‘Alien’ sign at Kimpo Airport. And I recall my first ID (a booklet) also had ‘Alien’ on it.
Nevertheless, it’s the sentiment rather than the words that matter.
KFC is bad as in almost every branch seems to be poorly managed. There seems to be little quality control with the preparation and standing time for the burgers in particular.
My problem is not with the taste of the items on the menu. My problem is with the staff who seem to turn over every few weeks and the mechanical way in which customers are served. KFC at 서울대입구역 is particularly terrible.
It seems there are good KFC’s and bad KFC’s depending on which store you visit. However, more often than not the fries are cold, the cola is flat and the burgers are cold have a green tomato, tiny bit of soggy lettuce and taste like shit.
On the other hand. I enjoy the fires and quality of Popeyes. It’s shame tho coz it sucks when I know not to go anywhere near that Zinger I crave.
At least you have a KFC, Ryan. In my town here in Korea, there are no KFCs, Burger Kings, or Popeyes, and there is only one small McDonalds.
Imagine a city without Buger King, KFC, or Starbucks, but “dirt duck” (황토오리) restaurants every fifty feet. It’s a madhouse here.
I miss Incheon, which was a relatively large city with good public transportation and most of the comforts of home. Also, Incheon buses went straight, instead of zigzaging down every other block like the buses do where I am now.
The reality of “globalization” is that it is a continuous economic process driven both by fundamental economic policy changes by individual governments and by technological innovation… The fact that in the global IT services industry, for instance, Indian multinational companies such as TCS or Infosys are now — less than ten years after they first ventured outside India on any scale — competing head-on globally against established US and European multinational companies like IBM or SAP for high value-added service contracts is testament to the novelty, speed, and broad scope of today’s globalization.
However, the perception of “globalization” among the European public and certainly as expressed by many voters in America’s current election cycle is very different. Among large groups of the traditional middle classes on both sides of the Atlantic, “globalization” is rather perceived as a transfer of existing jobs, know-how, and wealth from developed countries to the new and rapidly growing economies, especially China and India. In other words, not an integrative process, which new participants join, but rather a zero-sum type process of transferring “opportunities for an economically secure life” from one part of the world to another.
In recent years numerous public polls have documented how public support for free trade has plummeted, especially in the United States… increasingly elections are won on outright “antiglobalization” platforms. This is a big change from the 1990s.
…Exponents of free trade and globalization, therefore, face a perennial political challenge of having to “sell a case” for a process of economic change that unambiguously enhances wealth and welfare in the aggregate, but one in which individual voter gains are small and very widely distributed, while potential losses are large and heavily concentrated.
Nowhere is this more pertinent than when the pros and cons of globalization are evaluated exclusively through the lenses of “jobs”; globalization is great if it creates jobs, and utterly unacceptable if it destroys them.
While certainly recurrent in Europe, too, this view is expressed most strongly during elections in the United States. And that is no coincidence. The relatively less comprehensive and largely employment-based social safety net in America — where employees’ pensions and especially healthcare coverage are dependent on having a job—makes this inevitable. The loss of a job in the United States can often have both quick and catastrophic consequences for individuals. Americans out of a job might suddenly find themselves without access to required medical treatments. Given Europe’s universal and overwhelmingly government administered healthcare systems, this type of destructive individual outcome potentially directly linked to globalization simply does not occur. Europe’s universal healthcare systems thus provide a crucial protection for individuals against some of the worst fallouts from globalization — a very personal safety net that remains missing in the United States….
I’m curious… The shipment that’s been killing time in cold storage should be out of inspection and into stores soon. But does anyone have any idea where it will be sold? The last time the big department stores tried peddling it, they were covered in excrement. Will the beef only go to small butcher shops? Will Costco push aside aussie beef to clear space for a proper amuhracan product? And, will the excrement fly again to impede purchases?
It’s common nowdays to see a Korean girl walking arm in arm with her whitey boyfriend. Usually that Korean girl would be pretty, sophiscated, well dressed, and wearing a miniskirt. On the other hand the white guy would be well…fat, balding, dressed like a bum, and in some cases look like he hasn’t had a shower for a week.
Talking to some of my Korean friends, it seems that they are somewhat puzzled that the above mentioned Korean girl would reject bad looking unkempt Korean guys but look the other way when it came to white guys.
Which begs the question. Is the pretty Korean girl’s willingness to look the other way because hanging around with a white guy will;
a) enable her to learn English
b) endow her with some sort of a lofty status among the girl crowd
c) give her unimaginable excitement thanks to the big stick?
Either way it looks like that some of those guys are being used by their Korean girlfriends.
My favorite part of #33 was ‘Usually that Korean girl would be pretty, sophiscated, well dressed, and wearing a miniskirt’. Frankly, if you’re looking at other people walking by long enough to determine that they’re not merely well-dressed, but well-dressed and sophisticated, then you’re not really looking so much as staring.
I don’t know what the heck a “gomigomi” is, and it blows my mind that there are six other gomigomis who ALSO have a youtube account, but Gomigomi7 has an amazing collection of old Korean TV commercials that he/she’s uploaded to youtube.
swlee is a troll, a third-rate one at that who can’t even provoke people’s thoughts. At least pawi has some intelligence. Who cares what name swlee uses. 똥 spelled as ddong still smells like poop.
41: Thanks roboseyo, you gave my gf some nostalgia… and I got to see some Korean icons before they were famous (esp. Lee Young Ae).
KFC in Australia is Delish! (better at stand alone stores rather than food courts).
Yeah, that one 서울대역 was bad..I once forgot how bad it was and went there again…no customers burger rack full…gee how long have they been sitting ther with lettuce and tomato making the chicken all soggy.
Lotteria takes the award for most amount of uneaten burgers piled up in the warmer for more thna an hour. I normally avoid it, but was anount to jump on a long bus ride and hadn’t eaten…oh it was shite.
gbevers…blessing in disguise there are no fast food traps in your town. You’ll appreciate good country korean food and enjoy your trips home all the more.
Robert K., could you explain what the “Search_____” box on your site searches for? I’ve typed in everything, commentators names, sentences from comments I liked, post titles, …. freaking nothing comes up.
What I want to do is search by commentator and by keyword. Is it possible?
Johnson – sorry if this is obvious: go to Google’s homepage, click on ‘Advanced Search’. Put in the commenter’s name and keywords, and in the bottom box ‘Search within site or domain’, enter rjkoehler.com.
For many years wandering gangs of Chinese and Korean bandits have ranged along the forest borders, keeping the natives in terror and exacting tribute from every caravan which passed through the territory under their control. If the tribute was not paid destruction was certain. The Japanese have now pretty well cleared the country of these marauders; but though few remain the fear of them, inbred in the peace-loving Koreans, will live for years to come.
It appears there were also benefits to Japanese rule.
Concerning #66: Do you mean my leaving on a crusade in support of pet hamsters?
A few months ago, someone from Korea’s Northeast Asia History Foundation called one of the professors at my university and asked if I was working here. The professor stopped me in hall and asked if it was true that I had written in support of Japan’s historical claim to Dokdo. I said that I had.
The professors at my current university are extremely nice, especially the guy who asked me about Dokdo, but the professors at my old university were nice, too, so I do not know what will happen at the end of my contract period.
Apparently, my current school had not heard of my Dokdo past, and since the question was not asked at my job interview, I did not mention it, either. If my school does not want to rehire me at the end of the year, I will probably leave Korea.
Gerry, why don’t you consider visiting Japan and trying your hand at teaching there? It is a good chance to learn Japanese, and you will find many similarities to Korean.
That being said, does anyone else find it interesting that:
* the won dropped like crazy in the immediate aftermath of the PD Diary broadcast: 1USD = 1003.70 KRW on April 29, the day of the broadcast, dropping to a 2008 low of 1049.50 just over a week later on May 8)?
* the won recovered appreciably at the end of May and beginning of June (reaching a high of 1 USD = 1016.50 KRW on June 3), right around the time the agriculture minister announced that his ministry planned to publish the beef import regulations in the government register despite the protests?
* the won tanked again as it became clear that the government would not be able to carry out its plan and would have to renegotiate the beef deal (drop to 1043.70 on June 13)?
* after a brief respite (reaching a high of 1021.50 on June 17), the won has continued its dive as it has become clear that not even a renegotiated beef deal giving Korea everything it asked for would satisfy the protesters?
All data from Google Finance; I highly suggest that everyone check out the graph and nota bene the strength of the won since Cows Gone Wild! got started.
Matt, one thing that is true of MANY (definitely not all) American English teachers in Korea is that they live there, enjoy some aspects of it, complain about it to EXCESS where they bitch up and down about everything Korean (including its history), go back to the US or to another country (where they can teach ESL), rave about the new country where they are teaching, and then ALWAYS coming back to Korea because they miss it so much. It’s a pattern I have seen often among many English teachers. Obviously there is something about Korea that draws them back.
I think everyone on this blog pretty much knows gbevers is passed the point of no return and cannot leave Korea….and if he does, he will have to be back to it within a few months. Yep, the very place (and people) he complains and negatively generalizes the most about…is the only place he can now live. That’s why over the years I have advised him to take it easy and not get so worked up about this and that in Korea’s history (and it wouldn’t be so bad if what he believed was even true) and just be more laidback and chill and enjoy Korea. Instead, like many ESL teachers (again, not all), he has to go on and on with generalizing words about the whole people like, “The problem with Koreans is that they are liars” or “Koreans need to know the truth of their history that they were allies of Japan” or “Koreans fought against the US in WWII.” It’s so obvious he is lashing out at Koreans and their history because of some perceived snub he got over the years in Korea and that this is the only way he can get back at them (which actually only backfires on him). I mean, if the stuff he said about Korea was even TRUE…..WHY SAY IT REPEATEDLY IN KOREA???? You’re not gonna win friends that way and are SURE to make enemies….no matter WHAT country you do this in. If I were to go to a country like Denmark and talk about how the Danes fought against the US on the side of Germany in WWII or that the Danes were liars or that Danes need to open their eyes and know the truth about how screwed up Danes are…..#1 would this help the Danes? and #2 would this help me as I live in Denmark?? The answer to both is no. So why would I do it? Gbevers, at least be like Matt or Ponta who do their anti-Korea blogging in another country.
But make no mistake about it….gbevers CANNOT leave Korea. I’ve met a few ESL teachers like him who complained up and down about everything in Korea….and they went on to Japan or to Europe, where they said life was better. But without exception, they DID return to Korea to live….permanently. Korea was too much a part of them. Seems nothing would satisfy them. Very sad. They couldn’t live with Korea but couldn’t live without it. For gbevers it’s that much worse since he’s spent DECADES in the Land of the Morning Calm.
PS I see through my tracer that someone from Australia looked at my blog today at an entry where I first linked to a certain anti-Korea site. Interesting.
Gbevers, say what you will. I only wish you the best in Korea, your home now and forever. Enjoy it. I am sure there are tons of people who would want to be in your shoes now. It’s a good place.
“…and people there don’t care about your private activities…”
Or so you think, Matt.
*Warning: Generalization impending*
Koreans (relative to Japanese) are noted for wearing their emotions on their sleeve and telling you what they think of you or your country. Many Japanese (sorry, but I am generalizing again), on the other hand, won’t tell you what they are thinking of you and your country and will smile to your face (especially if you’re a Westerner). And I don’t blame them. After all, they lost to the US (and the rest of the West even if those other countries played a negligent role in the fight against Japanese expansionism in WWII), so I understand why they kiss up to Westerners they way they do.
But gbevers would have to leave his home of several decades and adapt to another country, culture and language….only to find that he likes Korea more. That’s the pattern I have seen among Western people who complained about Korea, left it, then returned.
Since the following aside was brought up (#78 JK)…
“If I were to go to a country like Denmark and talk about how the Danes fought against the US on the side of Germany in WWII or that the Danes were liars or that Danes need to open their eyes and know the truth about how screwed up Danes are…..#1 would this help the Danes? and #2 would this help me as I live in Denmark?? The answer to both is no.”
The Danes (Danes) fought against the USSR in Frikorps Danmark and SS Nordland. The ones who did, around 10,000, were volunteers. The Danish Government did sign the Anti-Comitern Pact but there were no Danish army units involved fighting the USSR and Denmark did not declare war on the USSR (or the US). I don’t know of any Danish volunteers to fight the US. I’m sure there were some individuals, especially from Schleswig-Holstein. If you have information I’d be interested to hear.
Many Danes lie, although I’m struggling to think of an example that would particularly upset expats. I do think the Danes could do with a bit of eye-opening. With respect to the war people have been trying for years but most people aren’t interested (you could start, for example, with Sandi Toksvig’s rather rose-tinted version in Hitler’s Canary.) As for pointing out how screwed up the Danes are I’m all in favour. The Danes have become particularly adept recently at pointing out how screwed up others are, it would be good to see it going both ways.
So I think #1, it would help the Danes, especially if they listened, and #2, you’d probably find a number of people who were sympathetic if you tried, but many would just dismiss you as an apologist for extremism.
BTW, the above is in no way intended to reflect any opinion about gbevers and Korea.
“Many Japanese (sorry, but I am generalizing again), on the other hand, won’t tell you what they are thinking of you and your country and will smile to your face (especially if you’re a Westerner).”
It’s interesting…the only people from whom I have heard this stereotyping have been largely for the most part Korean. No Japanese person with whom I have spoken said that their culture values chicanery and deception. Whenever I mention this fact to Koreans, they always say, “No, don’t listen to Japanese. We know better about Japan than the Japanese themselves.”
How interesting (or arrogant) that Koreans claim to be more of an expert on another country’s culture than that country’s people themselves. I guess the next thing you know, Koreans will be saying they know more about America than Americans themselves…especially US Beef and how Americans always eat hamburgers or bread with every meal. Oops..what am I talking about? They already are claiming to be experts of our culture! Well, I guess if a Korean says it, it must be 100% accurate.
In any case, I think that Koreans may be confusing the entire “not wearing your emotions on your sleeve” with the western and first world concept of acting “mature” or having “tact”. I guess in Korea, crying and screaming whenever one doesn’t get one’s way…or shouting angrily and screaming in public when one is angered is considered normal and admirable. Unfortunately, in western and I guess in Japanese society too, displaying emotion without consideration of others is behavior reserved for children under the age of 5 years. We learn that a big part of acting as a mature adult is having tact and learning to control one’s emotional outbursts.
I guess Korean culture finds the act of middle age men screaming and shouting like lunatics whenever someone walks in front of them without bowing to be noble.
I wouldn’t pick on the Danes. The French, now, they actually fought U.S. and British forces in North Africa, thus giving them the singular distinction of having surrendered to both sides in WWII.
“It’s interesting…the only people from whom I have heard this stereotyping have been largely for the most part Korean.”
Really? I have heard this from many an American (and that means white and black and not just Americans of Korean descent like myself) who have had interaction with the Japanese.
“No Japanese person with whom I have spoken said that their culture values chicanery and deception.”
I never used the words chicanery or deception. Hm. Talk about spin on your part.
“Whenever I mention this fact to Koreans, they always say, ‘No, don’t listen to Japanese. We know better about Japan than the Japanese themselves.’
But as I have pointed out, I am an American, and I know many other Americans (both white and black) who at one point lived in Japan who have said the same thing. Okay, you may want to call me “Korean” because ethnically I am….but surely you won’t count my white and black American friends as Korean!
“How interesting (or arrogant) that Koreans claim to be more of an expert on another country’s culture than that country’s people themselves.”
Is this any more arrogant than a white expat or a Japanese claiming to be more an expert of Korea and Korea’s history than the country’s people themselves? I don’t think so.
“I guess the next thing you know, Koreans will be saying they know more about America than Americans themselves…especially US Beef and how Americans always eat hamburgers or bread with every meal. Oops..what am I talking about? They already are claiming to be experts of our culture! Well, I guess if a Korean says it, it must be 100% accurate.”
Not sure what Koreans in Korea has to do with what I just wrote. After all, I am an American, born and raised. So do I have the right to make my own assessment of Korean and Japanese culture based on my own interactions with Korean and Japanese people? Can I express my opinions? Matt (a guy of European descent) did about Korean culture. Can I not about the Japanese (even if I am of Korean descent)? PRETTY PLEASE????
“In any case, I think that Koreans may be confusing the entire ‘not wearing your emotions on your sleeve’ with the western and first world concept of acting ‘mature’ or having ‘tact’. I guess in Korea, crying and screaming whenever one doesn’t get one’s way…or shouting angrily and screaming in public when one is angered is considered normal and admirable. Unfortunately, in western and I guess in Japanese society too, displaying emotion without consideration of others is behavior reserved for children under the age of 5 years. We learn that a big part of acting as a mature adult is having tact and learning to control one’s emotional outbursts.”
Hm, so I suppose you count the Scotts and Irish as “crying and screaming whenever one doesn’t get one’s way or shouting angrily and screaming” while the poker-faced English are “mature” or having “tact”, eh? Actually by English standards, many Americans are viewed and categorized in the same way you just did the Koreans, namely “crying and screaming whenever one doesn’t get one’s way.” I simply call it cultural relativism. I personally would rather deal with a person who will tell me how it is to my face (so I can give him back just as good) rather than have experiences like I did in Japan when a Japanese was too scared to say “no” to my polite request to show me something on a tour….only to found out that person was not able to do so. I said as politely as I could, “You could have just said no PRIOR to us coming all this way. We wouldn’t have come here if you had said we couldn’t see that particular site because that was the reason we agreed to come to this particular city.” You may call his weak behavior “mature” or “having tact”, but by American standards, that kind of behavior was just plain wrong. But…OH MY! Am I, an American (of Korean descent at that) allowed to say that???? The horror or me making an assessment of Japanese culture!
JK: “Is this any more arrogant than a white expat or a Japanese claiming to be more an expert of Korea and Korea’s history than the country’s people themselves? I don’t think so.”
First, I would advise you to drop the word “white” from your arguments. Gratuitous discrimination along racial lines only serves to weaken your objectivity and therefore your argument.
Second, with regard to the above-stated claim, I fail to see the line of reasoning. Are you asserting that nationality determines expertise? Are you equating expertise with arrogance in the event that a non-national commands greater expertise than the average national?
The self-sabatage apparent in these arguments is that they attempt to argue from exclusivity, which effectively invalidates the argument you are putting forth.
Why is it that people like #87 who make rather harsh assessments of Japan and the Japanese here seem to be Americans, Australians, or Canadians of Korean descent? Correct me if I’m wrong.
Go to a China centric site (I was moderator to one) and you’ll see the exact same thing from Chinese Americans, Canadians, Australians and Singaporeans.
@89:
“First, I would advise you to drop the word ‘white’ from your arguments. Gratuitous discrimination along racial lines only serves to weaken your objectivity and therefore your argument.
Fine. Let’s say “Westerners of European descent” as opposed to “white.” Happy?
“Second, with regard to the above-stated claim, I fail to see the line of reasoning.”
Well let me explain it slowly and methodically to you now.
Matt made his implied assertion about Koreans and Japanese in #81. I made a replyin #83 as to why I thought his assertions were incorrect. Then someone under the id KSPark commented in #85 that “Koreans” do this, and “Koreans” do that based on what I, an American, wrote. I then gave my reply that whereas blogs like this are populated with commenters who make generalizing remarks about Koreans (which aren’t necessarily wrong nor are they always right) that a person being KOREAN or of Korean descent should not be held against him when making a comment about Japanese, or any other, culture ESPECIALLY in light of the fact that people who make generalizing comments about Korean culture often are “Westerners of European descent” or are Japanese. How are the comments about Koreans, be they positive or negative, from a Japanese or a “Westerner of European descent” any better or worse than comments about the Japanese from an American (me) who happens to be of Korean descent? THAT was my point. I saw a hypocrisy in the comment by the person going under the id “HSPark.”
“Are you asserting that nationality determines expertise?”
Not at all. Once again, read HSPark’s remark and my rebuttal….and do so objectively please.
“Are you equating expertise with arrogance in the event that a non-national commands greater expertise than the average national?”
Not at all, once again. In fact I am saying that I have as much right as anyone else to make a comment on another culture that is not my own EVEN IF I HAPPEN TO BE OF KOREAN DESCENT. Why is my right to make a comment about another culture suspect because I happen to be of Korean descent? Since you seem to be sensitive to racial references, I would think you would support me on this. Read over HSPark’s remark that made a remark about “Koreans” in reply to my remark, which in turn was merely a reply to Matt’s remark which DID make a comparison of Koreans and Japanese. (BTW, I don’t believe Matt is of Korean descent yet no one questioned his right to make a comment about Koreans, even though he is usually wrong).
“The self-sabatage apparent in these arguments is that they attempt to argue from exclusivity, which effectively invalidates the argument you are putting forth.”
The word is “sabotage” I believe. If you would actually READ over all the comments and not do so selectively, you would see that I am NOT arguing from exclusivity at all. Hence my argument is not at all invalidated.
#91
Then there must be some sort of racial/ethnic prejudice that’s behind them. Except for Singapore, where it’s basically a Chinese state and was occupied by Japan during WWII.
“Why is it that people like #87 who make rather harsh assessments of Japan and the Japanese here seem to be Americans, Australians, or Canadians of Korean descent? Correct me if I’m wrong.”
Okay, you’re wrong. I’ve heard this from plenty of Americans of European and African descent as well.
You’d be suprised how western in mind-set a lot of Singaporeans are. It was just a lump of rock before it was a British colony after all.
The first fault in your quick analysis is that while is it true that Singapore was occupied by Imperial Japan, so was Manchuria and large parts of coastal China, all parts of today’s PRC. Japanese occupation of coastal, central and southern China was pretty brutal by most western and Chinese accounts. That’s one of the reasons why the Americans stopped selling oil and scap metal to Imperial Japan. Japanese soliders bayoneting unarmed civilians didn’t play well in movie news reels in the U.S.
My friend, who is of Manchurian heritage, is not enamored with the Japan of that era either as they evicted his grandfather from his land. I’m not too happy with the Japanese of that time period as well since my grandmother had scars from her encounter with Japanese police who were breaking up some type of patriotic protest.
Your belief that it may be some sort of racial/ethnic prejudice is oversimplistic. Nothing comes about from a vacuum.
#95
What do WWII conducts have to do with cultural/ethnic assessments of modern Japanese like the one JK is engaging now, or the claims of cultural suzerainty by the Koreans (and the Chinese) over the Japanese that I often see here? I think they’re misplacing their grief.
You say you have met plenty of black and western friends/associates who have repeated the same mantra that Koreans and Chinese have about Japanese people. I am willing to bet almost all of your “friends” are probably biased to Korea.
On the other hand, none of the black, white and western people I have met said anything remotely close to what you have repeated. Furthermore, I know tons of non-Asian people who have no previous bias to any country in Asia, and they have all said that they would much rather lose a wallet full of money on a train in Japan than lose a pack of cigarettes in Korea since in Korea, the chances of it coming back to you are zero. So what does that prove?
Thus, you know 50 white/black/hispanic people who agree with you. I know 50 white/black/hispanic people…who is right? This argument means nothing and your attempt to use your own personal experiences to somehow prove that the Korean-American view of Japan is more valid than an actual Japanese person’s view holds as much water as a sand sifter.
Sorry..but my experiences have shown that on internet sites or in general, the only people who bring up WWII era regarding their assessment of modern Japan are Korean or Chinese-Americans. I have yet to find a single white European-American or black person under the age of 70 to bring up WWII regarding their assessment of Japan. It really is sort of embarrassing though when we are out on business lunches with the engineers and managers visiting from our offices in Japan, and the only person out of our group of 20 who always brings up WWII in a pleasant discussion about the current sales of Sony Playstation or how the cherry blossoms are doing this year in Japan is that Korean-American dufus with a chip on his shoulder. To this day, I have never seen a single white, black, hispanic, or Arabic-descent person ever initiate such a tactless maneuver in front of others…only Korean-Americans.
On the other hand, I will agree with you somewhat regarding the testiness of Scotch-Irish people compared to their blander English counterparts. However, that is a weak example compared to Koreans because I found that the stereotype of Scots/Irish being more fiery than their English counterparts is more or less just that…a stereotype. Most Scotts and Irishmen with whom I have had the pleasure to converse have been quite on the mellow side. On the other hand, the temper-tantrum prone, yelling and screaming at the drop of hat behavior by Koreans seems almost impossible to notice even for a tourist within just one week stay of Korea.
The story you have about the tour guide in Japan is quite interesting, because I have a very similar experience in both Korea and Japan during my stay in those two countries.
I found out that in Japan, whenever I asked a taxi driver if he know how to get to a place with which he was not faimliar, he would basically flat out apologize and say “No, I am sorry, I cannot. It would be better if you ask at the station, etc.” I appreciated his honesty.
On the other hand, in Korea, regardless of whether or not they would actually know how to get to a certain place, Korean taxi drivers would always tell me, “No problem! Get in! I take you!”. Then, being the gullible foreign tourist that I am, I would spend the next hour in this taxi while the driver is driving around in circles calling his friend at the sauna or his brother in law at the room salon asking for directions meanwhile racking up a huge fare for me. This happened to me so many times, and on the last time, it pissed me off so much I flat out demanded why the driver told me he could take me somewhere of which he clearly did not know the whereabouts? His answer was not surprising…”I cannot afford to turn away a potential customer.”
Even at the expense of inconveniencing a customer? Please.
No… not WWII. Remember, Japanese imperial ambitions in China and Korean started way before 1939 or 1941. It’s really events that happened during the Showa and Taishō Emperors’ reign.
Any ways, assertions of cultural/ethnic suzerainty by Chinese and Korean netziens are often clumsy and poorly executed. However, using events from the misty past to make a present day point isn’t an exclusive Chinese or Korean thing. Japan justified their invasions and colonizations of Korea on the Nihon Shoki’s legendary account of Jingu’s invasions into southern Korea. Many Japanese nationalists still accept Jingu’s accounts as historical, despite the fact that most modern historians (both Japanese and non-Japanese) do not today.
I agree with you. I am pretty sure that Hideki Tojo is not responsible for designing Pokemon or the latest hip clothing lines coming from Japan (A Bathing Ape, Youji Yamamoto, etc.). Nor do I think that any of the designers at Samsung are worshippers of Cho Seung Hui, whose influence would be more expected given how recent his claim to “fame” is.
Thus, there is no need to mention any of those bad seeds when talking about either country.
So far, however, I am really impressed and totally surprised that the Korean public has managed to keep the US Beef import fiasco separate from Nogunri, the Korean War, or Ohno (I guess that has finally been laid to rest? If so..congratulations Korean)
“Thus, there is no need to mention any of those bad seeds when talking about either country.”
Unless you are speaking from ignorance, there is no logical way you can compare Hideki Tojo to Cho Seung Hui. Tojo was in a position to dictate policy and government direction, Cho was most certainly not. Cho, since he was not in any position of power (thank goodness) was only responsible for his own actions whereas Tojo was responsible for the actions of his government, which is why he was hanged as a war criminal. I have no idea why he has been deified at Yasukuni…
Anyhoo, JK probably has a point (although he stated it in reverse) about the different perceptions of Japanese by Americans on the one hand and Chinese and Koreans on the other: America beat Japan soundly, so can Americans can afford to have a gracious attitude toward Japanese (note how this changed a bit in the ’80s when many Americans felt threatened by Japan economically). In contrast, Chinese and Koreans have not experienced a decisive victory over Japan in centuries, although both are convinced they deserve one. This fuels their need to bad-mouth Japan and Japanese while glorifying themselves.
My point was not trying to ascertain whether or not a given icon of either country was in a position of power. My point was that it would be wrong to just pick either of those icons and ascribe either to be a representative icon of each’s nationality. In that respect, Cho Seung Hui is fair game. If that example does not fit well, Kim Jong Il could easily fill in for Cho.
With comments like your last paragraph in #99, I cannot help but feel that you come across as this smug, condescending, sniffing person with your nose in the air. The same with your comments to me, which I shall now address.
“Hmm..you have your experiences, I have mine.”
Indeed. And I’ll never forget mine, that’s for sure.
“You say you have met plenty of black and western friends/associates who have repeated the same mantra that Koreans and Chinese have about Japanese people. I am willing to bet almost all of your ‘friends’ are probably biased to Korea.”
First of all, no need to put quotes around the word “friend.” They were and are my friends. You are already questioning me that they were friends and that lives up to the image I have of you as this very smug, arrogant person. Why continue to foster that image? And btw, by “Western” I guess you mean white?
As for being “biased to Korea”, what exactly does that mean? There were a LOT of things these friends of mine of European and African descent did not like about Korea…a LOT. I never heard so much complaining (and maybe a lot of it was justified) from them about the way they got elbowed in a crowd or how people didn’t say excuse me or how there wasn’t a snow plow going regularly through the roads when it snowed, etc. My African-American friends talked about all the gaping they got in Korea on the subways. Then many of them got the chance to go to Japan to live for a while. While they said they didn’t get gaped at hardly as much (actually no one would even look at them on a subway, which they liked) they still experienced racism in Japan. And the one common observation many of them said about the Japanese was that they didn’t really know what the person really thought about them….because they always had that smile on their faces. Some of them found out that while many Japanese would smile to their faces that they weren’t exactly their biggest fans and would even talk smack about them behind their backs to other Japanese. They said that at least with Koreans they encountered, they knew where they stood…and they liked this better.
Let me say personally that I was treated quite well by a few strangers I encountered in Japan, especially when I was lost. I will always be grateful to them. But yes, I did experience my frustrations, too, that still get me mad to think about (I mean REALLY mad). The necessity for this group think and all drove me nuts (like you wouldn’t believe), and it did get in the way of my travel plans where someone had promised to take me somewhere but at the last minute backed out of it because this other group of friends showed up and wanted to go elsewhere – so I went alone to where we had both originally planned to go. The Japanese person felt guilty for backing out of the promise with me….but that person still felt it more important to preserve the group dynamics despite the promise made to me several days before. And while Koreans can place importance on groups, too, many seem to have enough independence to do their own thing, too, in order to keep their commitments.
“On the other hand, I will agree with you somewhat regarding the testiness of Scotch-Irish people compared to their blander English counterparts. However, that is a weak example compared to Koreans because I found that the stereotype of Scots/Irish being more fiery than their English counterparts is more or less just that…a stereotype.”
First of all, you imply I presented this description as a negative…but I LIKE dealing with Scotts and Irish. You often get more straight dealing and no BS. Anyway, I stand by what I said.
“Most Scotts and Irishmen with whom I have had the pleasure to converse have been quite on the mellow side. On the other hand, the temper-tantrum prone, yelling and screaming at the drop of hat behavior by Koreans seems almost impossible to notice even for a tourist within just one week stay of Korea.”
Actually, I find Koreans to be a pretty patient people but who express their anger in a way that may not be to your liking but is what it is the way the Scotts and Irish and Italians are what they are. But the way you label it as “temper-tantrum prone, yelling and screaming at the drop of a hat behavior” is in itself also a stereotype that I do not support. Personally, I seem to get along fine with people in Korea the way you may get along fine with people in Europe. The difference is I don’t bitch up and down about the culture and people of certain countries in Europe using the most negative terms possible. Your choice to use such words and to attempt to condescendingly dismiss my observations and slam an entire race of people reflects badly on you and makes you look less than objective. I mean look at your own words to me in #85.
Regarding your taxi experience, what can I say? I am sure it happened to you and that was unfortunate. The same thing happened to me here in Washington, DC late at night. What, should I make an assessment of the American character based on it?
“It really is sort of embarrassing though when we are out on business lunches with the engineers and managers visiting from our offices in Japan, and the only person out of our group of 20 who always brings up WWII in a pleasant discussion about the current sales of Sony Playstation or how the cherry blossoms are doing this year in Japan is that Korean-American dufus with a chip on his shoulder.”
I know of no Korean-American that would bring up WWII with Japanese guests. As for the cherry blossoms reference, where is the offense? Here in DC that is a natural topic to come up in April….even if there are no Japanese around.
“To this day, I have never seen a single white, black, hispanic, or Arabic-descent person ever initiate such a tactless maneuver in front of others…only Korean-Americans.”
Well, that has not been my experience, and I interact with Asian-American, as well as FOB, groups all the time in DC (those of Chinese, Japanese, Philipino, Vietnamese descent). Everyone seemed to get along fine and no mention was ever made to any Japanese by any Korean-American about WWII.
BTW, do you want me to list all the offenses I’ve witnessed committed by white folks here in the greater DC area against ethnic minorities? I could give you a LONG list. But you won’t hear my slamming all white people either. Maybe you can learn from this, HSPark.
“Fine. Let’s say “Westerners of European descent” as opposed to “white.” Happy?”
No. The validity of a person’s statement should be evaluated on content rather than in terms of his racial heritage, just as I support your statement that “my right to make a comment about another culture (should not be) suspect because I happen to be of Korean descent.”
European descent is just another code word for “white” really. Do I really need to remind people that this is the 21st century, and the general social consensus is that we need to be post-racial?
Yes, people often generalize about “Koreans”, “Americans,” etc., and yes, it is often done in a hurtful, goading manner. Although we may be post-racial, we are not yet post-national or post-cultural.
One of the other posters here, who is also Korean American, made the suggestion that the commonality in American culture might be summarized as “arrogant,” “bad food”, etc. This is an example of hasty generalizations based entirely on sterotyping and/or personal prejudice. Similarly I have heard some Americans (regardless of race) stereotype Europeans as arrogant, and the English as having bad food, etc. The stereotypes are false and can be experienced as false as one gets acquainted with French people.
OK, so sterotyping on all sides is deplorable. That said, let me state what I see as the crux of the issue.
A common experience among foreign residents in Korea is frustration, anger and caustic criticism. Some indeed acquire antipathy. Where does this come from? In affirming your perception that this anti-Korean sentiment is quite pervasive among foreign residents, wouldn’t the next logical step be to analyze how it is that is that it becomes so pervasive?
Surely, the vast majority of foreign residents know precious little about the country before arriving, and it follows that they wouldn’t live here if they harbored prejudices from the start. It therefore follows that this antipathy is not innate, but acquired in the course of the expatriates’ experiences in Korea.
So rather than simply accepting a facile explanation and writing it off as racial or cultural prejudice, when surely any observer of American culture would know better, wouldn’t it be logical to engage in a bit of introspection and discovery to understand exactly what it is in the experience of the expat that so often causes antipathy?
I leave the question to you. Perhaps a constructive dialogue can yet develop but I’m afraid that for this to happen, everyone needs to get past racial and cultural stereotypes and discuss the question in a mutually respectful way. Or we can continue to attribute this unfortunate situation to peoples’ race, gender or culture and therefore perpetuate and compound the problem.
In other words, if we care how we are perceived and want to know why we are so perceived, wouldn’t it be more constructive to inquire, rather than deny?
Even if Japanese nationalists back in the colonial period did use Jingu’s campaign story or any other obscure myth to claim suzerainty over Korea, that’s not happening now, so you bringing up that story now seems irrelevant. What is the present-day point you can achieve from that story?
“So far, however, I am really impressed and totally surprised that the Korean public has managed to keep the US Beef import fiasco separate from Nogunri, the Korean War, or Ohno”
Is that your perception of the situation? Do you honestly fail to see the linkage?
Listen, why are you trying to make this a white against minorities thing? You seem very adamant in trying to make a statement about European racism compared with Korean or Japanese racism.
OK fine..you had white or African friends who said that they encountered some Japanese who had a smile on their face but did not say anything to them. From my perspective, I know way many more Koreans who have done that….will act cordial and everything in front of foreigners. However, as soon as the door shuts, then the “true face” of the Korean character comes out along with the racial epithets of “kamdoongi”, “yangnom seki”, “jjanke”, etc. And mind you, this in normal everyday conversation among people who were supposedly “mature” and “educated”. Needless to say, when I and my other non-Korean associates found out about this appalling behavior, we were shocked. In Taiwan, Japan, Hong Kong, or any country in Europe, N. America, etc..if a person did this, they would be looked upon as having absolutely no sense of tact and manners, let alone being too much of a coward to say it their faces. In any of the other countries, calling someone a racial epithets is not looked upon as being a “good thing” because someone is being honest. Its actually looked upon as “barbaric” and indicative of low education, low class, and stupidity. I guess Koreans think of this “honesty” and insulting people whenever they feel slighted as being a good thing. Thank God, the rest of the world does not subscribe to this same standard. Also, another thing that my non-Korean colleagues also remarked was that of all the countries in Asia to which they have travelled, none has ever had a language filled with so many bigoted terms and insults for other nationalities as Korean. This speaks volumes about the Korean national mindset.
Also, you seem to think that Europeans are tempter-tantrum prone and willing to issue death threats at any Olympic athlete that beats one of their own countrymen for a continuous 3 years after the event occurred. Well, I guess you can believe what you want to, but for some reason, I feel that there are more people here who are willing to bet that Koreans are more prone to that behavior…perhaps because it really did happen in Korea with a certain short track skater from the US. Have yet to see an actual real example of white people in N. America or Europe doing the same. Oh, but I have heard countless accounts about how Europeans and N. Americans in DC are “likely” to react in the same way from the mouths of K-Americans…but not a single actual recorded incident. Funny how that works.
Anyways, this debate is getting pointless because for each example of how people in Japan, Europe, or whites in DC are offensive, I can come up with an equal or higher number of counter examples for Koreans committing offensive acts. What’s your end purpose?
I am glad that you interact well with Asian-American, as well as FOB, groups all the time in DC (those of Chinese, Japanese, Korean, Philipino, Vietnamese descent). All the more power to you.
“Anyways, this debate is getting pointless because for each example of how people in Japan, Europe, or whites in DC are offensive, I can come up with an equal or higher number of counter examples for Koreans committing offensive acts. What’s your end purpose?”
I have often pondered about why people sometimes accuse one another of harboring certain feelings and motives when the logical thing to do would be to simply ask them what they are really thinking?
Why don’t we just clear up all the misunderstandings and ask everyone what their end purpose is in the dialogue?
Wow, this tirade sounds familiar. HSPark reminds me a lot of a guy who went on these anti-Korea tirades back in the old days of the Korea Times and Korea Herald discussion boards like back in 1999 and 2000….who made up several ids, some white American, some black American, one was an Englishman, one was a Japanese-American engineer who cried out for calm and racial tolerance….even to his other online IDs, some even Korean, each posting a different story about how cowardly and evil and racist Koreans were. One id was a Korean woman suffering from an abusive relationship with her Korean husband. It was only after we did an IP comparison that we realized it was all the same person. And the language….pretty distinct and distinguishable. I remmeber one of the aliases did complain about Korean arrogance and racism saying he had heard Koreans using the terms ‘kamdoongi’, ‘yangnom seki’, ‘jjanke’, etc. And this latest prolific tirade by HSPark does sound eerily familiar…. He went by several ids. We simply referred to him as “Feng.”
Anyway, on to your comment to me.
“Listen, why are you trying to make this a white against minorities thing?”
I am not. What I am pointing out is that while a person could make a generalizing (and irresponsible) comment about white people and their racism based on several incidences that took place here in the greater Washington DC area, I won’t do that….and maybe you could learn a lesson from it and quit making these generalized statements when you say, “Koreans do this” or “Koreans do that” or “Koreans are racist”, etc.
I don’t approve of racial epithets by ANYONE. I don’t approve of white people in northern VA going “Oh-sohhh!” when passing by an Asian person minding his own business. (BTW, ever notice that when you talk smack back to these people and insult them and say things about their mother that they don’t want to get into a physical fight??)
“I am glad that you interact well with Asian-American, as well as FOB, groups all the time in DC (those of Chinese, Japanese, Korean, Philipino, Vietnamese descent). All the more power to you.”
Well I am glad, too. But the POINT of why I brought it up was that some Korean-American is, for sure, going to say something tactless in front of a Japanese guest about WWII, which I assured you didn’t happen around any of my Korean-American and Japanese-American friends.
104 (Mizar5), you bring up a very interesting point.
What’s interesting is that Korea seems to be a nation to which foreigners will go and live a couple of years, and end up leaving hating the country and its people even more than prior to arriving for the first time.
Usually, with other countries, it’s the opposite. Westerners might have negative feelings about China, Philippines, Japan, or Vietnam but after living in those countries for a while and experiencing real people instead of myths propagated by anti-Chinese/Japanese/Vietnamese propagandists (such as some of the kyopo posters in here) they develop a liking to their host countries which they carry over even upon returning to their home countries.
On the other hand, foreigners go to Korea with positive anticipation and high expectations because prior to going, all they hear from Koreans is that “Korea is the best country in the world” or “Koreans are the most physically attractive people in Asia”, or “Koreans are inherently good, peaceful, and never will cheat. Only Chinese and Japanese are cruel and dishonest.” Thus, many of them go to Korea expecting a real heavenly treat with lots of positive feelings about Korea.
Unfortunately, after arriving in Korea and spending enough time there to discover the truth of Korea’s real face, these foreigner undergo a drastic change. They witness first hand the bigotry, selfishness of the “me first”-ism ruling the country, childish arrogance, disregard for consideration of the non-Korean point of view. As a result, foreigners feel cheated and betrayed and end up with feelings of contempt and disdain for Korea even though they came without any. It’s the opposite of what happens to foreigners when they travel to other Asian countries.
Thus, when foreigners bring up this very interesting and valid point on internet discussion boards like this, the first reaction by Korean-Americans and Koreans always seems to be that of defensiveness consisting of “I have experienced the same bad things in your country so don’t say anything bad about Korea” or “You have some nerve trying to hold Korea to the same standard of western countries when we have our own special standard.” The point is that the Koreans and kyopos always an excuse. On the other hand, one response you will never hear from is the expected mature reply of “Hmm…it’s obvious that many foreigners seem to have difficulties and express frustration at alot of aspects of Korean culture and society. I wonder why that is? Maybe we should take a deeper self-retrospective analysis of ourselves to find out what we can do to improve this situation.”
Rest assured, I am not this “ghost poster” of which you seem to have recurring nightmares. He does seem interesting though that he could pose as a Korean woman in an abusive relationship. That’s creativity there. LOL. BTW, why do you call this nemesis of yours “Feng”? Isn’t that a Chinese name?
Also, if you think that Koreans do not use the words “kamdoongi” or “jjanke” or “kojengi” regularly..you seriously are out of touch.
Oh yeah, and Feng, back in the old days of 1999 and 2000 used to talk about how Koreans proclaimed themselves to be superior to the Japanese and Chinese (and he seemed fluent in both the Japanese and Chinese languages). Another common reference he would use sarcastically was “5000 year history…”
I guess if someone like me is still hitting Korea blogs after almost ten years, it should be no surprise that Feng would as well.
For the people who don’t want to read through the long posts above, here’s the summary:
Anything you can generalize, I can generalize better. I can generalize anything better than you.
No you can’t!
Yes I can!
No you can’t!
Yes I can!
It’s just back and forth of ‘Koreans are [insert characteristics]‘ vs. ‘Whites are [insert characteristics]‘. Nothing too much significant going on here, folks.
I saw a Korean international student shoving a black guy for looking at his girlfriend (turned out she wasn’t) funny. On the same day, a K-i student friend of mine had a good time hanging out with a Mexican dude with a Korean girlfriend (who we knew).
What does this anecdote tell you? That Koreans hate black people but likes Mexicans? That Korean guys are chauvinistically protective of ‘their’ women when it comes to blacks but not Mexicans?
Actually, it can tell you jack shit about Koreans, KAms, or [insert color] Americans because it’s a bloody anecdote. Personal observations, no matter how long and extensive, cannot be used to conclude anything about an entire society. If I did that, America would be a racist, equal-opportunity-driven country full of incredibly compassionate, sympathetic assholes who desire diversity and understanding while hating non-white people.
Well, quite a laundry list you got there. I think you generalize expats too much. From my experience, I wouldn’t say every last one of them go back to their home countries hating Korea more. That just runs the risk of painting with a brush too broad, doesn’t it?
I would say that people who have spent some time in Korea come back with a stronger opinion on the country. A stronger love or a stronger hate for it. I’d also say, even if they come back with their neutrality intact, they still have a stronger opinion on their home countries. This one young lady’s opinion an example.
Using netizen’s comments as an informal poll somehow reflecting reality is flawed. Just ask Ron Paul.
“Anything you can generalize, I can generalize better. I can generalize anything better than you…Personal observations, no matter how long and extensive, cannot be used to conclude anything about an entire society.”
That’s a pretty broad generalization. The above fallacy is called petitio principii or begging the question, in which the proposition to be proved is assumed implicitly or explicitly in one of the premises.
In fact, if reasonable inferences could not be drawn from observations, there would be no scientific method. Inductive inference is the very method of science. A theory is proposed based on multiple observations, usually observations carried out with great care, using measurement. The theory is then tested many times, by independent investigators, using their own multiple observations. If the theory proves correct to within the accuracy of those observations, then it is provisionally accepted. Any scientific theory is subject to additional testing, and may be modified or overthrown based on additional evidence.
With regard to logic, the process by which a conclusion is inferred from multiple observations is inductive reasoning. The conclusion may be correct or incorrect, or partially correct, or correct to within a certain degree of accuracy, or correct in certain situations.
“If that example does not fit well, Kim Jong Il could easily fill in for Cho.”
KJI’s butchery did not extend beyond the 38th parallel or the Tumen and Yalu rivers. Tojo’s butchery… well… covered a greater geographic area and was againt people who were never under (or cared to be under) Imperial Japanese jurisdiction.
“Even if Japanese nationalists back in the colonial period did use Jingu’s campaign… to claim suzerainty over Korea, that’s not happening now.”
Japanese nationalists are keeping that one in the vault just in case they need it. They don’t need it now, so they are not using it. Most Japanese still see her as a historical figure. Japanese schools certainly teach that. It isn’t too much of a jump to say that she conquered southern Korea if and when Japan desires to think about inter island expansion.
“Japanese nationalists are keeping that one in the vault just in case they need it. They don’t need it now, so they are not using it”
I see. So again, does your Korean-American background somehow give you the innate ability to read the minds of these people? Or I don’t know..maybe you are like Hunter S. Thompson and practiced gonzo journalism. I guess you are trying to make us believe that you and these nationalists probably hung out with each other everyday for the past couple of years and your theory is a result of collected conversations?
Methinks that most likely you are pulling this thought from that golden bible of Korean Kyopos “Stuff that Korean-Americans Know About Japanese Without Having to Provie Proof That Even Japanese Don’t Know Themselves”?
“Most Japanese still see her as a historical figure. Japanese schools certainly teach that.”
Hmm…so can you please provide a link or any statement that proves that Japanese schools teach this as part of a curriculum? Otherwise, I am afraid that your claim will have to be classified as one of the millions of other that come from that kyopo bible “Stuff that Korean-Americans Know About Japanese Without Having to Provie Proof That Even Japanese Don’t Know Themselves”.
I am thinking of perhaps creating a Korean version called “Stuff that Waegookins Know About Korea Better Than Koreans and Korean-Americans Even Without Having to Provide Proof.” In it, will be mention about how Korean schools teach their students how Koreans are descended from a Bear God, how Koreans teach their children in schools that they invented the wheel, gunpowder, air, water, Chinese characters, about how Koreans all believe that Confucius was Korean, about how Koreans believe that Michael Jordan and Albert Einstein are actually Korean.
Yep…just because I heard this from my Chinese and ESL-Teacher friends, it makes it absolutely 100% true. No need to provide evidence or fact when it comes to generalizations about Korea…we are above having to provide evidence. Providing evidence is so…oh, what’s the word..”western.” Why do we have to bother to provide evidence or facts? Just yell loud enough and enough times, and eventually it becomes the truth. At least in Korea, that’s how it’s done.
@#116
Except that the observations themselves are inadequate in the situation. Ever been irritated in your life? How true or scientific would it be if I happened to see you when you were irritated and I decided ‘Man, that dude got some issues.’?
I’m sure (or hoping, for their sake) that neither of the two have been observing the same people or observing the same group of people no smaller than defined by race or nationality (which would be ridiculously broad as you suggested above). Even then, the assertions that states ‘Koreans are [blank]‘ or ‘Whites are [blank]‘ are at fault because it fails to consider other possibilities of causality.
In short, unless JK or HSPark has consistently observed a population of whites/Koreans with control (variables that need to be controlled, btw, would be impossibly numerous), both are pulling things out of their asses.
A kid that went to the same high school with me called all Asian kids at school ‘Ching-Chongs’(guys) and ‘Ching-Changs’(girls). But my observation of his behavior cannot possibly represent American or even Arizonan society.
While volunteering, I’ve seen quite a number of amazingly heartwarming incidences of charity, compassion, etc. But it would be foolish of me to use that as the characteristics of Americans or Arizonans.
Hence, personal observations pertaining to people (perhaps I should’ve included this) means jack shit if you’re trying to draw a conclusion to the entire society. People are way more complex than just a couple of throw-away sentences.
Well, quite a laundry list you got there. I think you generalize expats too much…I would say that people who have spent some time in Korea come back with a stronger opinion on the country. A stronger love or a stronger hate for it.
Not that you meant to imply a 50/50 split in that love and hate, but it kinda sounds that way. Mizar5 was just building on his previous observation:
Do foreigners dislike Korea? Many do. Many do fervently. These are the ones who have lived there and know it firsthand. Odd, people don’t often feel this way about other nations. Korea is in this way unique – it alienates rather than endears. http://www.rjkoehler.com/2008/06/10/million-man-headache/#comment-160399
…and it looks like HSPark had a whole laundry list of agreement. I’ll also echo the assumption that prior to arriving in Korea, we western whities know NOTHING about the place, and have little or no bias toward Korea, either positive or negative.
bumfrom Korea: “Except that the observations themselves are inadequate in the situation. Ever been irritated in your life? How true or scientific would it be if I happened to see you when you were irritated and I decided ‘Man, that dude got some issues.’?”
Fallacious comparison. You would be observing just a single aspect of my personality. As opposed to living in the midst of a culture, experiencing it intimately for a number of years.
“In short, unless JK or HSPark has consistently observed a population of whites/Koreans with control (variables that need to be controlled, btw, would be impossibly numerous), both are pulling things out of their asses.”
Agreed. The controls you speak of in the realm of social interaction are such things as openmindednes, empathy. objectivivity, observation, fact checking, interaction, discussion, inductive reasoning and critical analysis.
What is problematic is the “ugly” tourists or visitors who assiduosly quarantine themselves from the culture at lodge, view things from a narrow, solipsistic perspective, and interpret their observations in a manner aimed at justifying beliefs. These people cannot be reasoned with because they are stuck in a belief system that walls them off from reality.
JK, people in Japan people really don’t care about your personal activities. You can be a lecturer or professor in a university, and take positions on political subjects and conduct personal research without the fear of firing. This is not a generalization, it is a fact.
Koreans in the meantime cannot handle it when foreigners refuse to validate their beliefs.
To give an example of tolerant Japan, there is the case of Pak Il. He is a zainichi Korean (a Korean citizen) and frequently appears on Japanese TV and forcefully presents the Korean point of view. He is a professor at a Japanese university, and is able to make statements against the Japanese viewpoint without any official retribution, unlike what happened to Gerry Bevers when the Koreans at his university freaked out.
Let me say personally that I was treated quite well by a few strangers I encountered in Japan, especially when I was lost. I will always be grateful to them. But yes, I did experience my frustrations, too, that still get me mad to think about (I mean REALLY mad). The necessity for this group think and all drove me nuts (like you wouldn’t believe), and it did get in the way of my travel plans where someone had promised to take me somewhere but at the last minute backed out of it because this other group of friends showed up and wanted to go elsewhere – so I went alone to where we had both originally planned to go. The Japanese person felt guilty for backing out of the promise with me….but that person still felt it more important to preserve the group dynamics despite the promise made to me several days before. And while Koreans can place importance on groups, too, many seem to have enough independence to do their own thing, too, in order to keep their commitments.
What, a tourists being subjected to “group think”? LOL. Sorry, but this sounds like bunk. I don’t know what happened to you but I doubt you being abandoned by the Japanese person had anything to do with “group dynamics”.
What happened to me in Japan is true. I met some very considerate Japanese….and some who were too weak-willed and indecisive. Take it or leave it. Unlike you, who lies about so-called “kyopo discrimination” and “racism” against you, I actually tell the truth. And at least I don’t go to a blog run by a Korean-American (me) under a silly alias like “kyopoboy.” Hence that’s why I booted your ass of it. *sniff sniff*
As for what happened to gbevers, if I had been the university president in the US and gbevers was a foreign (like, say Korean) teacher on contract there, I doubt I would have renewed his contract either if he had gone on and on about how Americans are liars or that America should quit lying about its history and that Americans are an immature people or that 9/11 was greatly exaggerated by Americans or wasn’t all that bad (the way bevers goes on and on about how the Japanese colonization wasn’t that bad for Koreans). He has the right to say what he wants, and I, if I were a university president, would have to right to renew his one-year contract or not. Now if gbevers, OVER THE YEARS, decided to tweak the nose of his host country one too many times foolishly, then he had what was coming to him.
And you actually helped him shoot himself, Matt, through your anti-Korea blog. You gave him a public forum where he got the attention he would not have normally gotten. And everyone reading this now knows that. How does that make you feel, Matt? You, living in the Land of the Convicts while cowardly writing your many biased lies about Korea, encouraged gbevers to write his many critiques of Korea on your blog. He had already put his foot in his mouth…but you helped shove it down his throat. You, Matt.
Blame Korea all you want for this one, but ultimately responsibility falls on gbevers…and yourself for encouraging his behavior. Now that IS a laugh.
Actually what happened to gbevers is not laughable and is sad. But what’s really sad is that gbevers still doesn’t realize that what he did was just plain stupid. I believe everyone, regardless of WHERE they stand on Korea-Japan relations, agrees with this. And yet, what happened to him would not have been possible without your help, Matty boy, while you were safely away from Korea.
And yet gbevers will never blame you for this. Instead he’ll blame Korea but not you and certainly not himself.
“JK, people in Japan people really don’t care about your personal activities. You can be a lecturer or professor in a university, and take positions on political subjects and conduct personal research without the fear of firing. This is not a generalization, it is a fact.”
Hm, let’s see if you’ll have a change of mind if gbevers goes to Japan for DECADES, writes repeatedly over the decades that Japan is a nation of liars, that Japan lies about its history…and that the Japanese are all terrorists (like gbevers said about Koreans in 2001 at the Korea Times)….and then doesn’t have his yearly contract at a Japanese university renewed. But we both know gbevers WON’T go to Japan. He’s home forever in Korea.
“Koreans in the meantime cannot handle it when foreigners refuse to validate their beliefs.”
What would happen to an American teacher on a yearly contract in Israel who goes on and on in public about how Jews are liars, that Israel lied or greatly exaggerated the extent of the Holocaust, that Nazi Germany was not as had as the Jews make it out to be, that Jews are blind and full of crap, etc.? Would this American lecturer truly be the victim of Jewish persecution? Answer that, Matty boy? And what would you say then, Matt? that “Jews in the meantime cannot handle it when foreigners refuse to validate their beliefs”?
Oh and be careful what you do because you’ve already helped cost Bevers one job. You don’t want to cost him another, do you?
Then again, maybe you do. After all, you’re safely far away from Korea so why should you care if gbevers loses his job, huh? Make Koreans the scapegoat for his stupidity.
Regarding #119: Yep, the writing style and phrases are most DEFINITELY familiar. I do remember the Bear God reference that he ridiculed back in the old days of the Korea Times as well as the reference to a supposed Korean claim to have created Chinese characters. And he had a distinct way of expressing himself, too.
See what I wrote in #109 and 112 to know what I am talking about.
What happened to me in Japan is true. I met some very considerate Japanese….and some who were too weak-willed and indecisive. Take it or leave it. Unlike you, who lies about so-called “kyopo discrimination” and “racism” against you, I actually tell the truth. And at least I don’t go to a blog run by a Korean-American (me) under a silly alias like “kyopoboy.” Hence that’s why I booted your ass of it. *sniff sniff*
JK, I am not saying that you were not abandoned by the Japanese person in Japan, what I am saying is that it probably has nothing to do with “group think” or “group dynamics”.
As for the kyopoboy moniker, it has nothing to do with making people think I am a kyopo. The username has a history from an old adversary on DavesESL. When I did post using ‘kyopoboy’ on xanga or whatever it was, I always made it clear that I was not a kyopo, that I am a white Australian. I never posted on your blog, btw. I think the reason you booted me is because I brought up racially charged comments found on your blog, comments that belie what you say here. I think dogbert and several others also saw the comments before you closed your blog to casual viewing.
As for what happened to gbevers, if I had been the university president in the US and gbevers was a foreign (like, say Korean) teacher on contract there, I doubt I would have renewed his contract either if he had gone on and on about how Americans are liars or that America should quit lying about its history and that Americans are an immature people or that 9/11 was greatly exaggerated by Americans or wasn’t all that bad (the way bevers goes on and on about how the Japanese colonization wasn’t that bad for Koreans). He has the right to say what he wants, and I, if I were a university president, would have to right to renew his one-year contract or not. Now if gbevers, OVER THE YEARS, decided to tweak the nose of his host country one too many times foolishly, then he had what was coming to him.
And you actually helped him shoot himself, Matt, through your anti-Korea blog. You gave him a public forum where he got the attention he would not have normally gotten. And everyone reading this now knows that. How does that make you feel, Matt? You, living in the Land of the Convicts while cowardly writing your many biased lies about Korea, encouraged gbevers to write his many critiques of Korea on your blog. He had already put his foot in his mouth…but you helped shove it down his throat. You, Matt.
Blame Korea all you want for this one, but ultimately responsibility falls on gbevers…and yourself for encouraging his behavior. Now that IS a laugh.
Actually what happened to gbevers is not laughable and is sad. But what’s really sad is that gbevers still doesn’t realize that what he did was just plain stupid. I believe everyone, regardless of WHERE they stand on Korea-Japan relations, agrees with this. And yet, what happened to him would not have been possible without your help, Matty boy, while you were safely away from Korea.
And yet gbevers will never blame you for this. Instead he’ll blame Korea but not you and certainly not himself
Sorry, but Koreans don’t pay enough to make it worthwhile to sell out. Gerry is 100% correct in what he has been saying about the Dokdo/Takeshima issue, and that Koreans cannot handle it is a reflection of them, not Gerry.
I really feel sorry for foreigners that worry that feel they need to agree with Koreans for the sake of employment in Korea. Nothing a Korean can give is worth tossing your values out the window. Foreigners with self respect know this, and respect Gerry’s stand, no matter what they think of the particulars of it.
You may be a Korean American, but you are just like Koreans in that no matter how much a foreigner respects Korean culture, learns the language, follows the manner and customs, if the foreigner disagrees with Koreans on a deal breaker (like Dokdo, the printing press, glorious Korean history, or whatever), then all that amounts to nothing. The fact is that Koreans are not like people in most other countries – they are hyper-sensitive to outside opinion, and constantly seeking validation.
Is anyone familiar with the psychological phenomenon called “Narcissistic Personality Disorder”?
Read the Wikipedia entry for this disorder and think about the Korean mindset. It’s so damn scary how the Korean mindset is pretty much the iconic example of this psychological disease. I seriously believe that the psychiatrist who founded this disorder must have been studying Korean subjects. Particularly standing out are the criteria:
A pervasive pattern of grandiosity (in fantasy or behavior), need for admiration, and lack of empathy, beginning by early adulthood and present in a variety of contexts, as indicated by five (or more) of the following[1]:
1. has a grandiose sense of self-importance
2. is preoccupied with fantasies of unlimited success, power, brilliance, beauty, or ideal love
3. believes that he or she is “special” and unique
4. requires excessive admiration
5. has a sense of entitlement
6. is interpersonally exploitative
7. lacks empathy
8. is often envious of others or believes others are envious of him or her
9. shows arrogant, haughty behaviors or attitudes
When I read JK’s comments accusing me about being a former nemesis from 10 years ago, I immediately thought of how number 8 in the list above applies so aptly.
“As for what happened to gbevers, if I had been the university president in the US and gbevers was a foreign (like, say Korean) teacher on contract there, I doubt I would have renewed his contract either if he had gone on and on about how Americans are liars or that America should quit lying about its history”
Obviously, you don’t know very much about America, do you? Ever hear of Noam Chomsky?
Actually, in the U.S., railing about oppressive dead white men will probably get you the academic job. Oh, and it doesn’t hurt to fictitiously belong to a victim group (Ward Churchill, anyone?).
HSPark did go over the edge there, but I hope him being banned won’t embolden folks here to continue expressing their ethno-hate. Especially when it comes to Japan, I do sense a feeling of shared entitlement to lash out whatever derogatory and unfounded comments as one sees fit. And they’re usually out of context with the thread.
“JK, I am not saying that you were not abandoned by the Japanese person in Japan, what I am saying is that it probably has nothing to do with ‘group think’ or ‘group dynamics’.
Actually it was. My Japanese (granted, amateur) guide who had made a commitment to me to show me a Japanese tourist attraction I really wanted to see was saying to me after we met up with some common friends (and after I had said after an hour of talking with them, “we should get going if we’re gonna see what I came to see”), “We should stick together as a group.” I was like, “Uh, no. I flew all the way to Japan to see this thing, and you DID promise to show it to me.” So I went and saw it alone. I am sure you would like to believe this is all made up, Matt, but it really did happen.
“As for the kyopoboy moniker, it has nothing to do with making people think I am a kyopo.”
So FINALLY you admit to having been “kyopoboy” when coming to my blog after repeatedly lying about it. Thank you.
“The username has a history from an old adversary on DavesESL. When I did post using ‘kyopoboy’ on xanga or whatever it was, I always made it clear that I was not a kyopo, that I am a white Australian. I never posted on your blog, btw. I think the reason you booted me is because I brought up racially charged comments found on your blog, comments that belie what you say here. I think dogbert and several others also saw the comments before you closed your blog to casual viewing.”
Actually you DID comment on it…with links to that anti-Korea hate site of yours. And rather than give you any more recognition of your site than I already had (because whether you believe the tripe you write or not, one thing I DO know is that what you want is attention for your blog), I deleted your comment rather than give you any more recognition. And besides, you KNOW my blog is not closed to casual viewing since you yourself have been on it recently. (Let’s see him try to lie his way out of this one.)
“I think the reason you booted me is because I brought up racially charged comments found on your blog, comments that belie what you say here.”
Just like gbevers, “I think…” Pray tell what racially charged comments I made? Now this I have to hear.
“I really feel sorry for foreigners that worry that feel they need to agree with Koreans for the sake of employment in Korea. Nothing a Korean can give is worth tossing your values out the window. Foreigners with self respect know this, and respect Gerry’s stand, no matter what they think of the particulars of it.”
Read what I wrote in #128. That’s my response.
And the thing is you STILL won’t take any responsibility for your part in the whole gbevers contract-not-being-renewed situation. I don’t care WHO you may be and whether you agree with him or not or if you think gbevers got screwed or not or if his right to free speech was violated or whatever…..there is not a soul on this blog (with the exception of maybe gbevers himself) who didn’t think he was being stupid for going on as he did over the years….while living in Korea and working for a university in Korea on a yearly contract basis! And you helped kill him (figuratively speaking) on this, Matt. And even NOW you are throwing the blame on Koreans instead of admitting that you could have foreseen this coming way back before it got out of hand yet you helped fuel it and gave gbevers exposure that he would not have normally gotten. You can’t even admit this even now.
How does that make you feel, Matt? I guess you won’t have to endure any harm while sitting safely behind your computer monitor far away from Korea….but with a couple hits of your keyboard, you encouraged a guy in Korea to destroy his own livelihood. With friends like you, who needs enemies?
If Gerry were concerned about his livelihood as an educator in Korea, he would never have gotten involved with the Takeshima issue in the first place. Gerry has lived in Korea a long time and he knows the score. Whatever motivated him, perhaps a burning desire to seek the truth, a knowledgeable amateur’s interest in history — I don’t know — Gerry knew how his views would be received by most Koreans, yet he did not hesitate to broadcast them.
So FINALLY you admit to having been “kyopoboy” when coming to my blog after repeatedly lying about it. Thank you.
Show a link, any link, with me lying about this. Put up or shut up. I am honest – do you really think that baseless accusations are going fly here?
Actually you DID comment on it…with links to that anti-Korea hate site of yours. And rather than give you any more recognition of your site than I already had (because whether you believe the tripe you write or not, one thing I DO know is that what you want is attention for your blog), I deleted your comment rather than give you any more recognition. And besides, you KNOW my blog is not closed to casual viewing since you yourself have been on it recently. (Let’s see him try to lie his way out of this one.)
What comment? Anyway, if you say I have been viewing your weblog, feel free to post the IP address here. Robert can confirm if it is mine. Again, put up or shut up.
Just like gbevers, “I think…” Pray tell what racially charged comments I made? Now this I have to hear.
How about the stuff about the how kyopo are always able to steal a white guys Korean GF, about how many times you have done it, and how the white guys deserved it every time? Lots of racial animus there.
And the thing is you STILL won’t take any responsibility for your part in the whole gbevers contract-not-being-renewed situation. I don’t care WHO you may be and whether you agree with him or not or if you think gbevers got screwed or not or if his right to free speech was violated or whatever…..there is not a soul on this blog (with the exception of maybe gbevers himself) who didn’t think he was being stupid for going on as he did over the years….while living in Korea and working for a university in Korea on a yearly contract basis! And you helped kill him (figuratively speaking) on this, Matt. And even NOW you are throwing the blame on Koreans instead of admitting that you could have foreseen this coming way back before it got out of hand yet you helped fuel it and gave gbevers exposure that he would not have normally gotten. You can’t even admit this even now.
And you still don’t understand. There is never, ever a reason to supplicate Koreans, and certainly not for employment. When people say Gerry is stupid, they are speaking out of fear for their jobs in Korea. A job in Korea is never that important, period. Fear of violence on your wife or children might be a good enough reason, however.
JK, I have no intention of stalking you around the net. I washed my hands of you long ago. Here on Robert’s site I am merely trying to be as on topic as possible, without getting personal or throwing around wild accusations.
Funny how you say you have “washed your hands of me a long tiem ago” but still try to get some catty digs at me. Well, anyways, on to your comments.
“How about the stuff about the how kyopo are always able to steal a white guys Korean GF, about how many times you have done it, and how the white guys deserved it every time? Lots of racial animus there.”
Interesting. On my blog, I once recount an incident from my past when facing a moral dilemma regarding a Korean girl and her boyfriend in 2000….when a memory even FURTHER back that than this drifts into my head where I, as a very young and reckless youth (keep in mind this older incident was in 1997), DID make out with a Korean girl dating a white guy. Now how this is racial animus is beyond me. I was young, reckless, and very immature back then. But it happened. You, on the other hand, Matt, go into great detail on your blog about how you got wild with two prostitutes in Korea. Talk about sick.
“And you still don’t understand. There is never, ever a reason to supplicate Koreans, and certainly not for employment. When people say Gerry is stupid, they are speaking out of fear for their jobs in Korea. A job in Korea is never that important, period.”
So it seems you are saying you could have predicted this was gonna happen to Gerry? Yet you didn’t try to stop him or tell him to cool it?? because his job was not that important???
I hear what dogbert said about it being on gbevers alone….but if you could have predicted this, Matt, and you only encouraged him….well, I think your actions speak for themselves.
cmm:”Noam Chomsky was born an American citizen. There goes the logic behind that argument”
Not really, it partly addresses the argument that professors are not routinely fired for having unpopular or anti-American views.
There are also plenty of foreign-born political science professors who bring diverse viewpoints and have been critical of US policy. It just takes a little more research to find them. You can look into the Latino Caucus in Political Science, for instance.
cmm:”Noam Chomsky was born an American citizen. There goes the logic behind that argument.”
The Chomsky example addresses 1/2 of the argument. As for foreign born professors who are critical of US policy, but I had no examples to cite off the top.
JK: “Yo Mizar, ever heard of tenure? Gbevers didn’t have it. He was working on a yearly contract basis. Anything else?”
Have you ever heard of a foreign citizen getting tenure in Korea? If any, far and few between.
Mizar, I never heard of a lecturer in the US with just a Master’s degree (an MBA at that) being awarded tenured university professorship status at any university. Heck, it’s hard enough for a person with a Ph.D to get tenureship as a professor.
Due to the unequal relationship between East and West (sorry, but it’s true which is why English as a second language is more valued in Japan and Korea than Japanese or Korean as a second language would be in the US) an American or Canadian or any other Westerner can get a job as a lecturer at a university in Korea with just a Bachelor’s degree in practically ANYTHING as long as they speak fluent English (yep, it’s that easy). How many university lecturers (be they foreign or American) in the US can say that? And keep in mind, I said “lecturer” not “professor.”
The ones teaching English as a second language in universities in Korea and Japan are lecturers only and are NOT professors with Ph.Ds who write research papers (though there are many exceptions at places like Yonsei and Sogang University where there are Ph.D professors in English who are American of European descent). Academically some of these people are on par in terms of academic credentials with Ph.D-educated professors in the US. However, let’s just say that they are in the clear minority and that gbevers, and MOST English teachers in Korea, are not in this category. Gbevers and others are lecturers on a contract-to-contract basis, and I have never EVER heard of a lecturer being granted tenured professorship (because a lecturer and a professor are two different things) unless they received their Ph.Ds in the West (usually America), though I am sure exceptions exist.
Chomsky, say what you will about him and his crazy views, was a professor with some academic credentials from what I understand. He wasn’t some guy with just a four-year degree or a Master’s degree who got his job simply because he spoke a language. He may be looney, but he is a professor while gbevers was not.
BTW, nothing is STOPPING all these Western lecturers in Korea from getting their Ph.Ds in their pursuit of professorship. Just because the bar is lowered in Korea for a person to be a university lecturer does not mean the person would want to improve himself in his pursuit of tenureship. That teacher would certainly require, at a minimum, a Ph.D if he wished to be a tenured professor in the US. Why should Korea expect less?
You are so full of crap. Matt had nothing to do with my not being rehired. It was closed-minded, nationalistic Koreans who were responsible for that.
I had lived in Korean for many years, yet I was as surprised as hell when the president of my university called me into his office to talk to me not to post anymore about my Dokdo on the Internet. I had mistakeningly assumed that Korean academics would be more open-minded and more interested in truth. I was wrong. When it comes to Dokdo, even very friendly Korean professors will turn into angry, close-minded nationalists.
My school’s president tried to tell me that I was wrong about Dokdo, even though he knew almost nothing about its history. Most Koreans have been so brainwashed about Dokdo that they do not even bother to check the facts. And you cannot check the facts by reading a Korean historian’s book on Dokdo because Korean historians do not tell you all the facts. They only tell you half-truths, at best. If you want to know the facts, you have to go to the original documents, which is too difficult for most Koreans to read since they were written in Chinese characters. Therefore, Koreans are at the mercy of their nationalist historians.
Just a few days ago, I was talking about Dokdo with a Political Science professor at my university in the teacher cafeteria. The subject came up because when I asked why he had come to school that day, he said he had been in the library researching the political aspects of the Dokdo disppute. This was the same professor who told me in the hallway just a couple of months ago that a colleague of his at the Northeast Asia History Foundation had called him and asked if I worked at his school.
Anyway, this professor started telling me about how “Dokdo” has been mentioned over and over in Korean documents and on Korean maps since the Shilla dynasty. When I told him that the island Koreans claimed was Dokdo was actually called “Usando,” he was shocked. He had thought that the name “Dokdo” was the name used since “Shilla.” Did I mention that he is a Political Science professor at our university?
I think the reason that even Korean Political Science professors do not know that the name “Dokdo” is a 20th-century name is that Korean historians frequently substitute the name “Dokdo” for names given in on old documents and on old maps that they believed to have been Dokdo. For example, Korean historians often write articles with pictures of old maps that are too small to be read and say something like, “See! This map shows Dokdo was Korean territory,” when, in fact, it might show an island right next to Ulleungdo named “Usando.”
Even if a map shows Usando as a single island between Ulleungdo and the Korean mainland, Korean historians will still point to that island and say it is “Dokdo,” even though the real Dokdo is essentially two islands ninety-two kilometers southeast of Ulleungdo, not one island west of Ulleungdo.
Anyway, JK, you do not know me or what I think, so stop pretending you do. And why are you always talking about “Whites” instead of Westerners, Americans, or Europeans?
And so the cycle continues……and gbevers won’t stop……
Regarding Dokdo, as I have said repeatedly to you, I personally hope you DO prove that Dokdo belonged legitimately to Japan…and thus Korea can thus say it took Japanese land as a war reparation from Japan. As of yet, you have failed to prove that Dokdo WAS legitimately Japanese territory before 1905….thus Korea took back only Korean territory when it seized it after the defeat of Japan.
But I’m sure you’ll keep trying. I wish you well in this endeavor….and in your life in Korea.
Hey, when you discussed this issue with the Korean professor, you didn’t do your usual rants of “Koreans need to open their eyes” and “Koreans need to quit being blind to their history” and “the problem is Koreans are liars”, did you? DID YOU??
JK: “Due to the unequal relationship between East and West (sorry, but it’s true which is why English as a second language is more valued in Japan and Korea than Japanese or Korean as a second language would be in the US)…”
I suppose the fact that English is the international language of commerce and that the US has been Korea’s top export market has nothing to do with the desire of Koreans to learn English? I suppose the English language craze was imposed on Korea by the West too?
JK: “The ones teaching English as a second language in universities in Korea and Japan are lecturers only and are NOT professors with Ph.Ds who write research papers”
As is the precisely case with college ESL teachers in the US.
“an American or Canadian or any other Westerner can get a job as a lecturer at a university in Korea with just a Bachelor’s degree in practically ANYTHING as long as they speak fluent English (yep, it’s that easy). How many university lecturers (be they foreign or American) in the US can say that?”
Yes, US universities with ESL programs emply BAs and MAs, not PhDs. Have you ever heard of a TESOL degree?
Sorry, no double standard. But why reference hard facts when a fallacious conspiracy theory will serve the purpose of justifying your irrational prejudices, right?
I love JK’s accomodating way of discrediting his own arguments. Actually he is no more than an false ID I post under to bolster my own arguments. It’s a dirty trick, I confess, but it sure does the trick.
“I suppose the fact that English is the international language of commerce and that the US has been Korea’s top export market has nothing to do with the desire of Koreans to learn English? I suppose the English language craze was imposed on Korea by the West too?”
I never said nor implied nor thought this. And what do you mean by “too”? When have I said that ANYTHING was imposed on Korea? I merely described the world as not being fair…because the whole world needs English.
I am merely speaking from the experience of myself and those I knew in Korea. Despite my business background, when I first arrived in Korea in the late 90s, I needed a job…pronto…so per the suggestion of others, I got a job teaching English and economics in a university. With my academic background (an MBA but no Ph.D) I would never have had such an easy time getting a lecturer position at a four-year university in the US. What is wrong with me making my point? It’s not a criticism of the US OR Korea.
So do ESL teachers in the US have tenure? That must be a separate topic since YOU first referenced Chomsky, who, from what I understand, is NOT an ESL instructor. You were the one who tried to compare gbevers lack of tenure with Chomsky’s tenure in the US. If you want to discuss ESL teachers in the US with ESL teachers in Korea then why even mention looney ol’ Chomsky? Apples and oranges
“Actually he is no more than an false ID I post under to bolster my own arguments. It’s a dirty trick, I confess, but it sure does the trick.”
Don’t be bitter that HSPark got outed, Mizar. He was guilty and he got caught. Don’t let this upset you. I’m sure there are still others willing to make outlandish, generalizing, overboard criticisms of all Koreans and Korean-Americans. (Mind you, I don’t mind legitimate critique of Koreans and Korean-Americans but HSPark, who sounded WAY too familiar, was going on some serious ranting. And btw, he had an interesting ID, eh? No wonder I remembered Feng from the old days of the Korea Times.)
I was meaning to post earlier but it’s mid-year reviews here at the office…
# 135,
So HSPark was bbundaegi’s sockpuppet? Interesting, as HSPark was a lot more virluent than I remember bbundagi being. However, him thinking that I was a part of some Korean/Kyopo propaganda cabal was a little strange.
# 118,
Regarding Jingu Kogo. I believe that in Japanese schools she’s either taught as legendary, semi-legendary or as an actual historical figure. I believe the vast majority of times (90%-ish I believe) she’s considered legendary. However, it seems to me there is a trend to look at this time in history more in lines with how the Nihon Shoki shows it, which is to see it as Japanese dominance of southern Korea in the 3rd to 6th centuries A.D.
This worries me because precluding an aggressive stance by Japan towards the Korean peninsula is a dusting off, if you will, of the Jingu legend and the Nihon Shoki’s account of the Yamato government’s supposed control of southern Korea. It happened during Hideyoshi’s regency before the Imjin War and it happened just before and just after the Meiji Restoration. This simple fact isn’t conjecture because it’s just something that happens before Japan invades Korea, kind of like lambasting (another tale of mythic proportions) weapons of mass destruction before an invasion.
However, I’m not saying that Japan will invade or audibly threaten Korea anytime soon. I’m just saying it’s something that needs to be monitored for the future.
#118
I have to say your fear is unwarranted. Jingu-Kogo is not mentioned in Japanese textbooks and not taught in schools. Not even in the controversial “revisionist” history book issued by these guys (only if you could read Japanese to go to their website and confirm for yourself): http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese_Society_for_History_Textbook_Reform
You’d be surprised by the extensive coverage in Japanese textbooks about Chinese/Korean influences on Japanese culture. Did you know that classic Chinese literature is one of the three pillars of the university/college exam subject of “Japanese Language”, the other two being modern Japanese and classic Japanese?
The war resentment is still strong in Japan, and voices to rearm never get popular support. Nationalism is also scorned upon. Look what happened to Abe. Japan is the last place you should be monitoring.
Wangkon936, go to Japan and meet some actual Japanese people and you will see how unfounded your fears are. There is also a slight projection problem here as well, I think.
I’ve met quite a few actually as a lot come to my part of the country to study. I’ve had two Japanese (as in fresh off the boat) tenants plus one half Japanese American tenant. The Japanese individually are great people (and great tenants). I’d actually rather rent to them than to Koreans. But the Japanese, like most peoples and nations, have two sides- a collective and an individual side. The average individual Japanese do not worry me at all. It’s the collective I have concerns about.
Regarding the half Japanese American. His grandfather was a veteran of the Pacific War (on the American side). He spent 9 years in Japan as an English teacher. He loved it in Japan and had a great time there. But he also thought that Japan’s recollection of WWII was a bit worrisome. He said that a lot of Japanese just considered WWII as another war, just like the wars that the Europeans fought against each other for possession of more colonies, etc. Any ways, I’m still suspicious and so are a lot of other East Asians.
I share the same sentiments. The stereotype is that they make good tenants. I have heard that at some apartments in DC that someone who was Japanese didn’t have to put up a cleaning fee in order to rent while everyone else (American, Korean, Indian, whatever) did (it was apt. policy)…because of the reputation of Japanese for being so tidy.
And I agree with you, one-on-one Japanese are VERY friendly. By MY experience, it seemed to be a different story when there were a group of Japanese.
“And I agree with you, one-on-one Japanese are VERY friendly. By MY experience, it seemed to be a different story when there were a group of Japanese.”
Mizar, you sounded really mature in past comments you made (like early on in this thread), but after I corrected you on that whole Chomsky/gbevers tenure analogy and after I pointed out the possibility that HSPark was a non-Korean multi-id commenter from years back….you took on a pretty angry, haughty tone that sounds bitter. What’s your beef?
JK: “Indeed. Reminds me of certain areas of the South (as in the USA) were I grew up. Reflect.”
Really? Were they consistently involved in anti-foreign demonstations, too?
“Mizar, you sounded really mature in past comments you made (like early on in this thread), but after I corrected you on that whole Chomsky/gbevers tenure analogy…”
Oh, sorry, I must have missed that. Did you “correct” me, then? Did I say that Chomsky did not have tenure?
“…and after I pointed out the possibility that HSPark was a non-Korean multi-id commenter from years back….you took on a pretty angry, haughty tone that sounds bitter. What’s your beef?”
I’m sorry I really didn’t follow the HSPark thing either. I really don’t pay attention to off-topic or personal disputes. I only address the topic on hand, and if my ascerbit wit offends you, it is nothing personal. No need to take any of this seriously. It’s all pretty amusing.
JK: “Indeed. Reminds me of certain areas of the South (as in the USA) were I grew up. Reflect.”
Really? Were they consistently involved in anti-foreign demonstations, too?
“Mizar, you sounded really mature in past comments you made (like early on in this thread), but after I corrected you on that whole Chomsky/gbevers tenure analogy…”
Oh, sorry, I must have missed that. Did you “correct” me, then? Did I say that Chomsky did not have tenure?
“…and after I pointed out the possibility that HSPark was a non-Korean multi-id commenter from years back….you took on a pretty angry, haughty tone that sounds bitter. What’s your beef?”
I’m sorry I really didn’t follow the HSPark thing either. I really don’t pay attention to off-topic or personal disputes. I only address the topic on hand, and if my ascerbit wit offends you, it is nothing personal. No need to take any of this seriously. It’s all pretty amusing to me, and you amuse me.
Apologies for the double post. Just disregard one or the other. As for growing up in the South, where did you grow up – Atlanta?” Obviously I have no idea what that would be like. I resided in NYC and currently reside in the NE. I love it here.
“I’m sorry I really didn’t follow the HSPark thing either.”
Well everyone who has been following this thread knows that isn’t true based on your attempted cute remarks to me about online alter-egos. Obviously you were following the HSPark “thing.”
And man, after he got caught for being caught (and then banned) did you change your tone on this thread!
Fact No1:
According to this site,there are almost as much friendly notion of Koreans as in the state of war.
Fact No2:
The content of Nihon-Shoki is not being taught in Japanese educational system,only it’s existence and importance as the one of the oldest historical chlonology.
So I have to wonder where in the world have WangKong and otheres had obtained such detailed description about the state of Japanese school education that make them so suspicious about Japanese intention and make them believe that “Japanese are nice in individual,but not in groups” thing.
But then again,this is the reason why I’m cynical about Japan=Germany analogy.This sort of ignorance and paranoid won’t stand long in Europe,but not so in this part of the world.
If only Koreans could manage to save just a 1% of the incredulity upon Japanese psyche for selfcriticsm on their own collectivism,Korea wouldn’t have so many candle lights in the streets.
{ 173 comments… read them below or add one }
I hope that the ethnic/race bashing here stops. One should be able to discuss/debate things political, social, or cultural without resorting to that kind of crap.
I hope pawi’s recent silence represents a vacation or other activities and not any troubles with the Big Sur and other Bay Area wildfires I’ve been hearing about.
hello!
http://4ero.net/photos/y/yua-aida/zq88/4ero003.jpg
Nice, hardyandtiny. And to think I’m on some other thread talking about exchange rates. You win.
There’s been a bit of talk recently about Korea using the work ‘foreigner’ and how many foreign nationals and tourists find this word quaint and exclusive at best, rude and derogatory at worst.
How do you find the word 외국인 (foreigner)? Do you find it discriminatory? What word would you like to see it replaced with?
국제인 / 국제 사람 – International person
세계인 / 세계 사람 – Global person
양인 / 양 사람 – Foreign person
동양(인/사람) / 서양(인/사람) – Easterner / Westerner
인간 – Human
{insert country}게 한국인 – {Insert country}-Korean (for citizens/permanent residents of non-Korean ethnicity)
Or, would you prefer if they stop using labels completely?
And before anyone steps in, I doubt think:
양놈
똥개
외국 씨발놈
코쟁이
외국 새끼
개새끼
외구(外寇) – foreign enemy/invader
or any other like-minded colourful terms are suitable replacements.
Robert Downey Jr does a reverse Michael Jackson in “Tropic Thunder”.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-VmeO7Tu_y8&feature=related
Some Japanese edumacators want the local Koreans to know that Korea WASN’T a Japanese colony, after all. Glad we could clear *that* misunderstanding up.
“The head of the Shimonoseki city education board in Yamaguchi Prefecture has told officials of a Korean school that Japan’s 1910-1945 colonial rule of the Korean Peninsula ‘‘contradicts a historical fact,’’ the education board and the Korean school officials said Friday.”
http://www.japantoday.com/category/politics/view/japans-colonial-rule-of-korea-not-fact-says-city-education-board-head
#3, I vote for “foreigner” for 외국인 and “alien” for 외계인. I would rather be called a foreigner than an alien since “foreigner” sounds more exotic.
“Global person,” “International person”? Don’t people have more important things to worry about?
#5, I think “Freakin’ Non-*$&%^-Korean” would sum things up properly. I’m not sure how to spell all of that in Hangul, however
(^_^)
It’s a rainy day and I’ve got a lot of time on my hands. I’ve been thinking about the limitations of Hangeul when it comes to words and sounds not naturally occurring in Korean. I started thinking about Katakana, Japan’s alphabet used primarily for non-Japanese words. I then thought about all the Korean characters, which were once part of Hangeul but have since been eliminated. There’s scores of them in all kinds of shapes and combinations on the scrap heap.
Why doesn’t Korea reinstate some of these obsolete Hangeul characters and use them for foreign sounds and when transcribing foreign words? Believe or not, there exists now obsolete Hangeul characters for sounds such as ‘v’ and ‘w’. Why doesn’t Korea bring some of these obsolete Hangeul off the bench and use them for words and sounds of foreign origin? It would have the advantage of introducing Koreans to these sounds are an earlier date and help their pronunciation of non-Korean words, bringing a pronunciation close to the ‘true’ pronunciation of the non-Korean word.
Here are some examples:
The word city comes out as shitty in Korean as the rule with Korean is that a sh sound always proceeds a ‘i (ee)’ vowel. How about using the unused ᄼ (s) character for situations as above using non-Korean words such as city.
Here are a couple of characters which used to be used for sounds of non-Korean origin: ㅱ (w), ㅿ (z) and ㆅ (x) – but I personally prefer using ᄽ for (x).
Some other characters that could be used for foreign sounds: ᅅ (soft ‘th’ sound as in ‘thin’), ᅆ (hard ‘th’ sound as in ‘thick’), ᄙ (‘English-sounding’ r as in ‘rooster’), ㅬ (‘English-sounding’ l as in ‘love’), ㅸ (English-sounding’ b as in ‘boy’), ㅹ (v), ᄤ (f).
ㆍ – could be placed below words of foreign origin which end with consonant sounds, which are currently limited by Hangeul’s need for a vowel to follow the consonant as in ‘mart’ 마트 which comes out as ‘marteu’. Instead, have the dot below the final ㅌ so the word is pronounced ‘mart’, similar to in English.
El Canguro, as I heard the other day,
Question: What’s the politically correct term for anally retentive.
Answer: Political correctness.
#11
Keep up the good work. King Sejong will be very proud of you.
#12 – lol
I tried to link to Wikipedia’s page of Hangeul Jamo – both new and used – but I couldn’t get the link to work.
And, I should have used ‘this’ instead of ‘thick’ as an example of a ‘hard’ th sound.
ElCanguro @ #5,
외국인 is not offensive to me.
국제인 is an actual “internationalist”, not an international person, and 국제 사람 doesn’t really sound like a valid construction.
세계인 is one of those world citizen types, so it wouldn’t fit if you were not. Again, 세계 사람 doesn’t make sense to me.
Is 양인 even a valid word? Never heard it before, and it doesn’t really make sense in hanja.
서양인 I am fine with.
I want to be treated like an 인간 but am not fond of being refered to as the 인간 lol.
If there are people out there that think 외국인 is a racially prejudicial term, then there is no escaping it in Korea.
ElCanguro (#11),
Yes, I agree. I think Korea should add more sounds to their language by using some of the old symbols. It may pay off in the long run.
#15
양인in hanja 洋人 is how westerners are refered in old days at the turn of century..
외국인 is still better than 백인,흑인.
Siddhartha @ #15,
Ocean people? Interesting.
What’s wrong with 외국인(foreigner/外国人)?
This is 10000 times offensive!
http://youtube.com/watch?v=d_D_d3lKxE8
If someone ask me if I am a Korean, I would scream NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!.
#18:
Did you read #1?
#17:
It’s kind of the same with (Sino-)Japanese. Hence 洋食, 洋服, 洋館, 洋風, etc. I think the 西is abbreviated. But strangely, I’ve never heard of 洋人.
#18
LOL..I know why these Taiwanese fans reacted like that because of rumor last year that Yankee pitcher Wang has Korean ancestor. Totally fabricated story but Taiwaneses were pissed off anyway..
Why is KFC in Korea so bad?
“Bad” is a subjective term. KFC is a franchised restaurant (I think Doosan still owns the Korea franchise), but its menu is not 100% identical around the world. The local KFC menu is adapted to suit Korean palates, while I imagine the KFC Famous Bowls are unique to America.
El Canguro: re-adding the old hangul characters is an interesting notion, however they might have been dropped in the first place because of the linguitic principle of “economy of speech” by which speakers in a homogeneous society such as Korea can take for granted that everyone understands the same communication with the omissions.
I can’t imagine Koreans voluntarily adding “L” and “R” characters to the language….
Aieeesh….”linguistic” principle
The side of the comment window is cut off in my browser…that’s my excuse and I’m sticking with it.
Actually that’s {country}*계*.
#6 Just keep it as 외국인. Much simpler and easier for everyone. Let’s face it, if you’re not from around these parts originally, then the term 외국인 is perfect. Is Korea going the way of the US with its PCness??? I look at it this way, I’m a 외국인 to Koreans until I open my mouth and engage them in conversation. After that, I’m no longer considered 외국. Simple enough. As far as the old linguistic characters… It could happen and I see great benefits, but look at how Korean students pronounce the same letters in English. A “v” is a “bwee” et al.
I liked it best when I had to queue at the ‘Alien’ sign at Kimpo Airport. And I recall my first ID (a booklet) also had ‘Alien’ on it.
Nevertheless, it’s the sentiment rather than the words that matter.
KFC is bad as in almost every branch seems to be poorly managed. There seems to be little quality control with the preparation and standing time for the burgers in particular.
My problem is not with the taste of the items on the menu. My problem is with the staff who seem to turn over every few weeks and the mechanical way in which customers are served. KFC at 서울대입구역 is particularly terrible.
It seems there are good KFC’s and bad KFC’s depending on which store you visit. However, more often than not the fries are cold, the cola is flat and the burgers are cold have a green tomato, tiny bit of soggy lettuce and taste like shit.
On the other hand. I enjoy the fires and quality of Popeyes. It’s shame tho coz it sucks when I know not to go anywhere near that Zinger I crave.
I’d be happy to be called 외국인 in Korea, if only Koreans would stop referring to me a 외국인 in the U.S.
I’m not holding my breath.
At least you have a KFC, Ryan. In my town here in Korea, there are no KFCs, Burger Kings, or Popeyes, and there is only one small McDonalds.
Imagine a city without Buger King, KFC, or Starbucks, but “dirt duck” (황토오리) restaurants every fifty feet. It’s a madhouse here.
I miss Incheon, which was a relatively large city with good public transportation and most of the comforts of home. Also, Incheon buses went straight, instead of zigzaging down every other block like the buses do where I am now.
Damn Dokdo!!! Damn! Damn! Damn!
no wonder you want a hamster
Perceptions and Realities of Globalization
by Jacob Funk Kirkegaard, Peterson Institute
Berlin, April 28, 2008.
May 16, 2008
© Peterson Institute for International Economics
The reality of “globalization” is that it is a continuous economic process driven both by fundamental economic policy changes by individual governments and by technological innovation… The fact that in the global IT services industry, for instance, Indian multinational companies such as TCS or Infosys are now — less than ten years after they first ventured outside India on any scale — competing head-on globally against established US and European multinational companies like IBM or SAP for high value-added service contracts is testament to the novelty, speed, and broad scope of today’s globalization.
However, the perception of “globalization” among the European public and certainly as expressed by many voters in America’s current election cycle is very different. Among large groups of the traditional middle classes on both sides of the Atlantic, “globalization” is rather perceived as a transfer of existing jobs, know-how, and wealth from developed countries to the new and rapidly growing economies, especially China and India. In other words, not an integrative process, which new participants join, but rather a zero-sum type process of transferring “opportunities for an economically secure life” from one part of the world to another.
In recent years numerous public polls have documented how public support for free trade has plummeted, especially in the United States… increasingly elections are won on outright “antiglobalization” platforms. This is a big change from the 1990s.
…Exponents of free trade and globalization, therefore, face a perennial political challenge of having to “sell a case” for a process of economic change that unambiguously enhances wealth and welfare in the aggregate, but one in which individual voter gains are small and very widely distributed, while potential losses are large and heavily concentrated.
Nowhere is this more pertinent than when the pros and cons of globalization are evaluated exclusively through the lenses of “jobs”; globalization is great if it creates jobs, and utterly unacceptable if it destroys them.
While certainly recurrent in Europe, too, this view is expressed most strongly during elections in the United States. And that is no coincidence. The relatively less comprehensive and largely employment-based social safety net in America — where employees’ pensions and especially healthcare coverage are dependent on having a job—makes this inevitable. The loss of a job in the United States can often have both quick and catastrophic consequences for individuals. Americans out of a job might suddenly find themselves without access to required medical treatments. Given Europe’s universal and overwhelmingly government administered healthcare systems, this type of destructive individual outcome potentially directly linked to globalization simply does not occur. Europe’s universal healthcare systems thus provide a crucial protection for individuals against some of the worst fallouts from globalization — a very personal safety net that remains missing in the United States….
Dare I ask: “Where’s the beef?”
I’m curious… The shipment that’s been killing time in cold storage should be out of inspection and into stores soon. But does anyone have any idea where it will be sold? The last time the big department stores tried peddling it, they were covered in excrement. Will the beef only go to small butcher shops? Will Costco push aside aussie beef to clear space for a proper amuhracan product? And, will the excrement fly again to impede purchases?
It’s common nowdays to see a Korean girl walking arm in arm with her whitey boyfriend. Usually that Korean girl would be pretty, sophiscated, well dressed, and wearing a miniskirt. On the other hand the white guy would be well…fat, balding, dressed like a bum, and in some cases look like he hasn’t had a shower for a week.
Talking to some of my Korean friends, it seems that they are somewhat puzzled that the above mentioned Korean girl would reject bad looking unkempt Korean guys but look the other way when it came to white guys.
Which begs the question. Is the pretty Korean girl’s willingness to look the other way because hanging around with a white guy will;
a) enable her to learn English
b) endow her with some sort of a lofty status among the girl crowd
c) give her unimaginable excitement thanks to the big stick?
Either way it looks like that some of those guys are being used by their Korean girlfriends.
You and your friends should keep pondering that one for awhile, andy. It gives you something to do.
#33 – “Either way it looks like that some of those guys are being used by their Korean girlfriends.”
Wow, those poor guys. Used, treated like meat, even, by hot sexy women. The cruelty in this world never ends.
Andy (#33),
I noticed you left out “d” in your list:
d) get the great sex that only white guys know how to give
My favorite part of #33 was ‘Usually that Korean girl would be pretty, sophiscated, well dressed, and wearing a miniskirt’. Frankly, if you’re looking at other people walking by long enough to determine that they’re not merely well-dressed, but well-dressed and sophisticated, then you’re not really looking so much as staring.
“swlee” is back under a new moniker.
Funny thing, Robert, I missed the “kyopo bashing” that must’ve preceded it…
I don’t know what the heck a “gomigomi” is, and it blows my mind that there are six other gomigomis who ALSO have a youtube account, but Gomigomi7 has an amazing collection of old Korean TV commercials that he/she’s uploaded to youtube.
Worth a gander.
http://www.youtube.com/user/gomigomi7
enjoy!
Eh? Where?
@#39
Cool find!
This is an absolutely must see video:
KOREAN HISTORY CHANNEL
http://kr.youtube.com/watch?v=Ptyzc4BQliY
Who says kyopos don’t have a sense of humor?
The actors are pawi & swlee.
swlee is a troll, a third-rate one at that who can’t even provoke people’s thoughts. At least pawi has some intelligence. Who cares what name swlee uses. 똥 spelled as ddong still smells like poop.
41: Thanks roboseyo, you gave my gf some nostalgia… and I got to see some Korean icons before they were famous (esp. Lee Young Ae).
KFC in Australia is Delish! (better at stand alone stores rather than food courts).
Yeah, that one 서울대역 was bad..I once forgot how bad it was and went there again…no customers burger rack full…gee how long have they been sitting ther with lettuce and tomato making the chicken all soggy.
Lotteria takes the award for most amount of uneaten burgers piled up in the warmer for more thna an hour. I normally avoid it, but was anount to jump on a long bus ride and hadn’t eaten…oh it was shite.
gbevers…blessing in disguise there are no fast food traps in your town. You’ll appreciate good country korean food and enjoy your trips home all the more.
#43
LMAO watching all of them..you should read the comments made by Koreans.. These guys hang around in LA K-town way too much!!
#20
You won’t hear Korean say it..however it is still referenced in Chinese literatures. Many Chinese still say it.
Robert K., could you explain what the “Search_____” box on your site searches for? I’ve typed in everything, commentators names, sentences from comments I liked, post titles, …. freaking nothing comes up.
What I want to do is search by commentator and by keyword. Is it possible?
Andy and his puzzled friends reminded me of these classic clips: ‘Yellow Fever’ and the ‘Yellow Fever’ bloopers reel. Enjoy, and don’t think too much about other people.
A poster at Dave’s ESL scanned an old article from National Geographic about Korea from 1919. It’s a cool read.
* When he talks about the subdirectory called /large/, it is from scans 24 through 48
The link is here.
http://forums.eslcafe.com/korea/viewtopic.php?t=127164
Johnson – sorry if this is obvious: go to Google’s homepage, click on ‘Advanced Search’. Put in the commenter’s name and keywords, and in the bottom box ‘Search within site or domain’, enter rjkoehler.com.
That’s how I got the info for this comment:
http://www.rjkoehler.com/2008/04/23/open-thread-48-talk-about-clinton-obama-here-if-you-must/#comment-149630
@44 pawi intelligent? 똥.
Fark discovers Korea’s Krazy Kow Karnival:
http://forums.fark.com/cgi/fark/comments.pl?IDLink=3702273
My friends had a good laugh at my `Alien Registration Card` last week.
Oh, and the correct term is `Foreign Resident`, dammit.
Japanese dinosaur eat Korean dinosaur!
But never say sorry!!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ptyzc4BQliY
Good Morning!
http://4ero.net/photos/y/yua-aida/zq88/4ero006.jpg
Holy crap! Spain won against Germany!
http://msn.foxsports.com/soccer/story/8293962?MSNHPHMA
Netherlands, Russia, Spain… Lol I won’t be bored in 2010.
I’ll feel a lot better about the world when the most popular sport is no longer a sport where the players can’t even use their hands.
@54 I heard those guys are Vietnamese.
“It happen 1,000,000 year ago. I still remember!!” LOL
robert, were you at school food on saturday? i saw a white guy in hanbok and immediately thought you.
I’m trying to decide between the following games for Wii:
Super Smash Bros.
Mario Galaxy
MarioKart
Anybody have any input?
My friend bought the Super Smash Bros for Wii a few weeks ago.
…
I still have not seen him. It is the devil’s video game. It will suck your soul out and insert it into the TV screen…
… Yeah, so I’d recommend Super Smash Bros.
The 1919 National Geographic article in #50 has been made into a pdf. It’s really, really funny.
http://www.koreanarchery.org/NatlGeo1919.pdf
@61 Thanks. That’s what I’m looking for.
Thanks for that link, Linked.
For many years wandering gangs of Chinese and Korean bandits have ranged along the forest borders, keeping the natives in terror and exacting tribute from every caravan which passed through the territory under their control. If the tribute was not paid destruction was certain. The Japanese have now pretty well cleared the country of these marauders; but though few remain the fear of them, inbred in the peace-loving Koreans, will live for years to come.
It appears there were also benefits to Japanese rule.
@58 but the one dude’s (Park, Kyu) Korean is pretty good for a viet… could be “but vietnam people so dirty asian!” “Korea gooood!”
…when are you leaving, Gerry?
Concerning #66: Do you mean my leaving on a crusade in support of pet hamsters?
A few months ago, someone from Korea’s Northeast Asia History Foundation called one of the professors at my university and asked if I was working here. The professor stopped me in hall and asked if it was true that I had written in support of Japan’s historical claim to Dokdo. I said that I had.
The professors at my current university are extremely nice, especially the guy who asked me about Dokdo, but the professors at my old university were nice, too, so I do not know what will happen at the end of my contract period.
Apparently, my current school had not heard of my Dokdo past, and since the question was not asked at my job interview, I did not mention it, either. If my school does not want to rehire me at the end of the year, I will probably leave Korea.
You never learn, huh gbevers?
Viva España!!!!
`It appears there were also benefits to Japanese rule.`
Not exactly benefits as the purpose was to falicitate things for the Japanese government, not improve the quality of life of the Korean public.
Awe-inspiring
Gerry, why don’t you consider visiting Japan and trying your hand at teaching there? It is a good chance to learn Japanese, and you will find many similarities to Korean.
Correlation does not equal causation.
That being said, does anyone else find it interesting that:
* the won dropped like crazy in the immediate aftermath of the PD Diary broadcast: 1USD = 1003.70 KRW on April 29, the day of the broadcast, dropping to a 2008 low of 1049.50 just over a week later on May 8)?
* the won recovered appreciably at the end of May and beginning of June (reaching a high of 1 USD = 1016.50 KRW on June 3), right around the time the agriculture minister announced that his ministry planned to publish the beef import regulations in the government register despite the protests?
* the won tanked again as it became clear that the government would not be able to carry out its plan and would have to renegotiate the beef deal (drop to 1043.70 on June 13)?
* after a brief respite (reaching a high of 1021.50 on June 17), the won has continued its dive as it has become clear that not even a renegotiated beef deal giving Korea everything it asked for would satisfy the protesters?
All data from Google Finance; I highly suggest that everyone check out the graph and nota bene the strength of the won since Cows Gone Wild! got started.
Ut videam, that’s an excellent point. And then there was this headline today: Foreigners Flee Seoul Bourse as Clouds Gather.
Stupidity in L.A.
And Hancock Park is one of the nicer neighborhoods in Los Angeles…
@74:
Matt, one thing that is true of MANY (definitely not all) American English teachers in Korea is that they live there, enjoy some aspects of it, complain about it to EXCESS where they bitch up and down about everything Korean (including its history), go back to the US or to another country (where they can teach ESL), rave about the new country where they are teaching, and then ALWAYS coming back to Korea because they miss it so much. It’s a pattern I have seen often among many English teachers. Obviously there is something about Korea that draws them back.
I think everyone on this blog pretty much knows gbevers is passed the point of no return and cannot leave Korea….and if he does, he will have to be back to it within a few months. Yep, the very place (and people) he complains and negatively generalizes the most about…is the only place he can now live. That’s why over the years I have advised him to take it easy and not get so worked up about this and that in Korea’s history (and it wouldn’t be so bad if what he believed was even true) and just be more laidback and chill and enjoy Korea. Instead, like many ESL teachers (again, not all), he has to go on and on with generalizing words about the whole people like, “The problem with Koreans is that they are liars” or “Koreans need to know the truth of their history that they were allies of Japan” or “Koreans fought against the US in WWII.” It’s so obvious he is lashing out at Koreans and their history because of some perceived snub he got over the years in Korea and that this is the only way he can get back at them (which actually only backfires on him). I mean, if the stuff he said about Korea was even TRUE…..WHY SAY IT REPEATEDLY IN KOREA???? You’re not gonna win friends that way and are SURE to make enemies….no matter WHAT country you do this in. If I were to go to a country like Denmark and talk about how the Danes fought against the US on the side of Germany in WWII or that the Danes were liars or that Danes need to open their eyes and know the truth about how screwed up Danes are…..#1 would this help the Danes? and #2 would this help me as I live in Denmark?? The answer to both is no. So why would I do it? Gbevers, at least be like Matt or Ponta who do their anti-Korea blogging in another country.
But make no mistake about it….gbevers CANNOT leave Korea. I’ve met a few ESL teachers like him who complained up and down about everything in Korea….and they went on to Japan or to Europe, where they said life was better. But without exception, they DID return to Korea to live….permanently. Korea was too much a part of them. Seems nothing would satisfy them. Very sad. They couldn’t live with Korea but couldn’t live without it. For gbevers it’s that much worse since he’s spent DECADES in the Land of the Morning Calm.
PS I see through my tracer that someone from Australia looked at my blog today at an entry where I first linked to a certain anti-Korea site. Interesting.
Video of a man in downtown Seoul carrying a very big knife and threatening to kill President Lee.
http://www.tagstory.com/video/video_post.aspx?media_id=V000211204
JK, I see you are still full of crap.
Gbevers, say what you will. I only wish you the best in Korea, your home now and forever. Enjoy it. I am sure there are tons of people who would want to be in your shoes now. It’s a good place.
JK, I don’t know about any of that.
I just think Japan would be a good change of scene, and people there don’t care about your private activities.
#80
Danes don’t post derogatory comments about Germany all over the net & out of context.
“…and people there don’t care about your private activities…”
Or so you think, Matt.
*Warning: Generalization impending*
Koreans (relative to Japanese) are noted for wearing their emotions on their sleeve and telling you what they think of you or your country. Many Japanese (sorry, but I am generalizing again), on the other hand, won’t tell you what they are thinking of you and your country and will smile to your face (especially if you’re a Westerner). And I don’t blame them. After all, they lost to the US (and the rest of the West even if those other countries played a negligent role in the fight against Japanese expansionism in WWII), so I understand why they kiss up to Westerners they way they do.
But gbevers would have to leave his home of several decades and adapt to another country, culture and language….only to find that he likes Korea more. That’s the pattern I have seen among Western people who complained about Korea, left it, then returned.
Since the following aside was brought up (#78 JK)…
“If I were to go to a country like Denmark and talk about how the Danes fought against the US on the side of Germany in WWII or that the Danes were liars or that Danes need to open their eyes and know the truth about how screwed up Danes are…..#1 would this help the Danes? and #2 would this help me as I live in Denmark?? The answer to both is no.”
The Danes (Danes) fought against the USSR in Frikorps Danmark and SS Nordland. The ones who did, around 10,000, were volunteers. The Danish Government did sign the Anti-Comitern Pact but there were no Danish army units involved fighting the USSR and Denmark did not declare war on the USSR (or the US). I don’t know of any Danish volunteers to fight the US. I’m sure there were some individuals, especially from Schleswig-Holstein. If you have information I’d be interested to hear.
Many Danes lie, although I’m struggling to think of an example that would particularly upset expats. I do think the Danes could do with a bit of eye-opening. With respect to the war people have been trying for years but most people aren’t interested (you could start, for example, with Sandi Toksvig’s rather rose-tinted version in Hitler’s Canary.) As for pointing out how screwed up the Danes are I’m all in favour. The Danes have become particularly adept recently at pointing out how screwed up others are, it would be good to see it going both ways.
So I think #1, it would help the Danes, especially if they listened, and #2, you’d probably find a number of people who were sympathetic if you tried, but many would just dismiss you as an apologist for extremism.
BTW, the above is in no way intended to reflect any opinion about gbevers and Korea.
“Many Japanese (sorry, but I am generalizing again), on the other hand, won’t tell you what they are thinking of you and your country and will smile to your face (especially if you’re a Westerner).”
It’s interesting…the only people from whom I have heard this stereotyping have been largely for the most part Korean. No Japanese person with whom I have spoken said that their culture values chicanery and deception. Whenever I mention this fact to Koreans, they always say, “No, don’t listen to Japanese. We know better about Japan than the Japanese themselves.”
How interesting (or arrogant) that Koreans claim to be more of an expert on another country’s culture than that country’s people themselves. I guess the next thing you know, Koreans will be saying they know more about America than Americans themselves…especially US Beef and how Americans always eat hamburgers or bread with every meal. Oops..what am I talking about? They already are claiming to be experts of our culture! Well, I guess if a Korean says it, it must be 100% accurate.
In any case, I think that Koreans may be confusing the entire “not wearing your emotions on your sleeve” with the western and first world concept of acting “mature” or having “tact”. I guess in Korea, crying and screaming whenever one doesn’t get one’s way…or shouting angrily and screaming in public when one is angered is considered normal and admirable. Unfortunately, in western and I guess in Japanese society too, displaying emotion without consideration of others is behavior reserved for children under the age of 5 years. We learn that a big part of acting as a mature adult is having tact and learning to control one’s emotional outbursts.
I guess Korean culture finds the act of middle age men screaming and shouting like lunatics whenever someone walks in front of them without bowing to be noble.
I wouldn’t pick on the Danes. The French, now, they actually fought U.S. and British forces in North Africa, thus giving them the singular distinction of having surrendered to both sides in WWII.
To HSPark in #85:
“It’s interesting…the only people from whom I have heard this stereotyping have been largely for the most part Korean.”
Really? I have heard this from many an American (and that means white and black and not just Americans of Korean descent like myself) who have had interaction with the Japanese.
“No Japanese person with whom I have spoken said that their culture values chicanery and deception.”
I never used the words chicanery or deception. Hm. Talk about spin on your part.
“Whenever I mention this fact to Koreans, they always say, ‘No, don’t listen to Japanese. We know better about Japan than the Japanese themselves.’
But as I have pointed out, I am an American, and I know many other Americans (both white and black) who at one point lived in Japan who have said the same thing. Okay, you may want to call me “Korean” because ethnically I am….but surely you won’t count my white and black American friends as Korean!
“How interesting (or arrogant) that Koreans claim to be more of an expert on another country’s culture than that country’s people themselves.”
Is this any more arrogant than a white expat or a Japanese claiming to be more an expert of Korea and Korea’s history than the country’s people themselves? I don’t think so.
“I guess the next thing you know, Koreans will be saying they know more about America than Americans themselves…especially US Beef and how Americans always eat hamburgers or bread with every meal. Oops..what am I talking about? They already are claiming to be experts of our culture! Well, I guess if a Korean says it, it must be 100% accurate.”
Not sure what Koreans in Korea has to do with what I just wrote. After all, I am an American, born and raised. So do I have the right to make my own assessment of Korean and Japanese culture based on my own interactions with Korean and Japanese people? Can I express my opinions? Matt (a guy of European descent) did about Korean culture. Can I not about the Japanese (even if I am of Korean descent)? PRETTY PLEASE????
“In any case, I think that Koreans may be confusing the entire ‘not wearing your emotions on your sleeve’ with the western and first world concept of acting ‘mature’ or having ‘tact’. I guess in Korea, crying and screaming whenever one doesn’t get one’s way…or shouting angrily and screaming in public when one is angered is considered normal and admirable. Unfortunately, in western and I guess in Japanese society too, displaying emotion without consideration of others is behavior reserved for children under the age of 5 years. We learn that a big part of acting as a mature adult is having tact and learning to control one’s emotional outbursts.”
Hm, so I suppose you count the Scotts and Irish as “crying and screaming whenever one doesn’t get one’s way or shouting angrily and screaming” while the poker-faced English are “mature” or having “tact”, eh? Actually by English standards, many Americans are viewed and categorized in the same way you just did the Koreans, namely “crying and screaming whenever one doesn’t get one’s way.” I simply call it cultural relativism. I personally would rather deal with a person who will tell me how it is to my face (so I can give him back just as good) rather than have experiences like I did in Japan when a Japanese was too scared to say “no” to my polite request to show me something on a tour….only to found out that person was not able to do so. I said as politely as I could, “You could have just said no PRIOR to us coming all this way. We wouldn’t have come here if you had said we couldn’t see that particular site because that was the reason we agreed to come to this particular city.” You may call his weak behavior “mature” or “having tact”, but by American standards, that kind of behavior was just plain wrong. But…OH MY! Am I, an American (of Korean descent at that) allowed to say that???? The horror or me making an assessment of Japanese culture!
Wow…talk about getting het up.
Say, Gerry, did that Japanese artist ever do any more comics about your situation? Are the originals still available online?
JK: “Is this any more arrogant than a white expat or a Japanese claiming to be more an expert of Korea and Korea’s history than the country’s people themselves? I don’t think so.”
First, I would advise you to drop the word “white” from your arguments. Gratuitous discrimination along racial lines only serves to weaken your objectivity and therefore your argument.
Second, with regard to the above-stated claim, I fail to see the line of reasoning. Are you asserting that nationality determines expertise? Are you equating expertise with arrogance in the event that a non-national commands greater expertise than the average national?
The self-sabatage apparent in these arguments is that they attempt to argue from exclusivity, which effectively invalidates the argument you are putting forth.
Why is it that people like #87 who make rather harsh assessments of Japan and the Japanese here seem to be Americans, Australians, or Canadians of Korean descent? Correct me if I’m wrong.
# 90,
Go to a China centric site (I was moderator to one) and you’ll see the exact same thing from Chinese Americans, Canadians, Australians and Singaporeans.
@89:
“First, I would advise you to drop the word ‘white’ from your arguments. Gratuitous discrimination along racial lines only serves to weaken your objectivity and therefore your argument.
Fine. Let’s say “Westerners of European descent” as opposed to “white.” Happy?
“Second, with regard to the above-stated claim, I fail to see the line of reasoning.”
Well let me explain it slowly and methodically to you now.
Matt made his implied assertion about Koreans and Japanese in #81. I made a replyin #83 as to why I thought his assertions were incorrect. Then someone under the id KSPark commented in #85 that “Koreans” do this, and “Koreans” do that based on what I, an American, wrote. I then gave my reply that whereas blogs like this are populated with commenters who make generalizing remarks about Koreans (which aren’t necessarily wrong nor are they always right) that a person being KOREAN or of Korean descent should not be held against him when making a comment about Japanese, or any other, culture ESPECIALLY in light of the fact that people who make generalizing comments about Korean culture often are “Westerners of European descent” or are Japanese. How are the comments about Koreans, be they positive or negative, from a Japanese or a “Westerner of European descent” any better or worse than comments about the Japanese from an American (me) who happens to be of Korean descent? THAT was my point. I saw a hypocrisy in the comment by the person going under the id “HSPark.”
“Are you asserting that nationality determines expertise?”
Not at all. Once again, read HSPark’s remark and my rebuttal….and do so objectively please.
“Are you equating expertise with arrogance in the event that a non-national commands greater expertise than the average national?”
Not at all, once again. In fact I am saying that I have as much right as anyone else to make a comment on another culture that is not my own EVEN IF I HAPPEN TO BE OF KOREAN DESCENT. Why is my right to make a comment about another culture suspect because I happen to be of Korean descent? Since you seem to be sensitive to racial references, I would think you would support me on this. Read over HSPark’s remark that made a remark about “Koreans” in reply to my remark, which in turn was merely a reply to Matt’s remark which DID make a comparison of Koreans and Japanese. (BTW, I don’t believe Matt is of Korean descent yet no one questioned his right to make a comment about Koreans, even though he is usually wrong).
“The self-sabatage apparent in these arguments is that they attempt to argue from exclusivity, which effectively invalidates the argument you are putting forth.”
The word is “sabotage” I believe. If you would actually READ over all the comments and not do so selectively, you would see that I am NOT arguing from exclusivity at all. Hence my argument is not at all invalidated.
Anything else?
#91
Then there must be some sort of racial/ethnic prejudice that’s behind them. Except for Singapore, where it’s basically a Chinese state and was occupied by Japan during WWII.
“Why is it that people like #87 who make rather harsh assessments of Japan and the Japanese here seem to be Americans, Australians, or Canadians of Korean descent? Correct me if I’m wrong.”
Okay, you’re wrong. I’ve heard this from plenty of Americans of European and African descent as well.
Skookum,
You’d be suprised how western in mind-set a lot of Singaporeans are. It was just a lump of rock before it was a British colony after all.
The first fault in your quick analysis is that while is it true that Singapore was occupied by Imperial Japan, so was Manchuria and large parts of coastal China, all parts of today’s PRC. Japanese occupation of coastal, central and southern China was pretty brutal by most western and Chinese accounts. That’s one of the reasons why the Americans stopped selling oil and scap metal to Imperial Japan. Japanese soliders bayoneting unarmed civilians didn’t play well in movie news reels in the U.S.
My friend, who is of Manchurian heritage, is not enamored with the Japan of that era either as they evicted his grandfather from his land. I’m not too happy with the Japanese of that time period as well since my grandmother had scars from her encounter with Japanese police who were breaking up some type of patriotic protest.
Your belief that it may be some sort of racial/ethnic prejudice is oversimplistic. Nothing comes about from a vacuum.
#95
What do WWII conducts have to do with cultural/ethnic assessments of modern Japanese like the one JK is engaging now, or the claims of cultural suzerainty by the Koreans (and the Chinese) over the Japanese that I often see here? I think they’re misplacing their grief.
JK,
Hmm..you have your experiences, I have mine.
You say you have met plenty of black and western friends/associates who have repeated the same mantra that Koreans and Chinese have about Japanese people. I am willing to bet almost all of your “friends” are probably biased to Korea.
On the other hand, none of the black, white and western people I have met said anything remotely close to what you have repeated. Furthermore, I know tons of non-Asian people who have no previous bias to any country in Asia, and they have all said that they would much rather lose a wallet full of money on a train in Japan than lose a pack of cigarettes in Korea since in Korea, the chances of it coming back to you are zero. So what does that prove?
Thus, you know 50 white/black/hispanic people who agree with you. I know 50 white/black/hispanic people…who is right? This argument means nothing and your attempt to use your own personal experiences to somehow prove that the Korean-American view of Japan is more valid than an actual Japanese person’s view holds as much water as a sand sifter.
Sorry..but my experiences have shown that on internet sites or in general, the only people who bring up WWII era regarding their assessment of modern Japan are Korean or Chinese-Americans. I have yet to find a single white European-American or black person under the age of 70 to bring up WWII regarding their assessment of Japan. It really is sort of embarrassing though when we are out on business lunches with the engineers and managers visiting from our offices in Japan, and the only person out of our group of 20 who always brings up WWII in a pleasant discussion about the current sales of Sony Playstation or how the cherry blossoms are doing this year in Japan is that Korean-American dufus with a chip on his shoulder. To this day, I have never seen a single white, black, hispanic, or Arabic-descent person ever initiate such a tactless maneuver in front of others…only Korean-Americans.
On the other hand, I will agree with you somewhat regarding the testiness of Scotch-Irish people compared to their blander English counterparts. However, that is a weak example compared to Koreans because I found that the stereotype of Scots/Irish being more fiery than their English counterparts is more or less just that…a stereotype. Most Scotts and Irishmen with whom I have had the pleasure to converse have been quite on the mellow side. On the other hand, the temper-tantrum prone, yelling and screaming at the drop of hat behavior by Koreans seems almost impossible to notice even for a tourist within just one week stay of Korea.
The story you have about the tour guide in Japan is quite interesting, because I have a very similar experience in both Korea and Japan during my stay in those two countries.
I found out that in Japan, whenever I asked a taxi driver if he know how to get to a place with which he was not faimliar, he would basically flat out apologize and say “No, I am sorry, I cannot. It would be better if you ask at the station, etc.” I appreciated his honesty.
On the other hand, in Korea, regardless of whether or not they would actually know how to get to a certain place, Korean taxi drivers would always tell me, “No problem! Get in! I take you!”. Then, being the gullible foreign tourist that I am, I would spend the next hour in this taxi while the driver is driving around in circles calling his friend at the sauna or his brother in law at the room salon asking for directions meanwhile racking up a huge fare for me. This happened to me so many times, and on the last time, it pissed me off so much I flat out demanded why the driver told me he could take me somewhere of which he clearly did not know the whereabouts? His answer was not surprising…”I cannot afford to turn away a potential customer.”
Even at the expense of inconveniencing a customer? Please.
No… not WWII. Remember, Japanese imperial ambitions in China and Korean started way before 1939 or 1941. It’s really events that happened during the Showa and Taishō Emperors’ reign.
Any ways, assertions of cultural/ethnic suzerainty by Chinese and Korean netziens are often clumsy and poorly executed. However, using events from the misty past to make a present day point isn’t an exclusive Chinese or Korean thing. Japan justified their invasions and colonizations of Korea on the Nihon Shoki’s legendary account of Jingu’s invasions into southern Korea. Many Japanese nationalists still accept Jingu’s accounts as historical, despite the fact that most modern historians (both Japanese and non-Japanese) do not today.
Wangkon,
I agree with you. I am pretty sure that Hideki Tojo is not responsible for designing Pokemon or the latest hip clothing lines coming from Japan (A Bathing Ape, Youji Yamamoto, etc.). Nor do I think that any of the designers at Samsung are worshippers of Cho Seung Hui, whose influence would be more expected given how recent his claim to “fame” is.
Thus, there is no need to mention any of those bad seeds when talking about either country.
So far, however, I am really impressed and totally surprised that the Korean public has managed to keep the US Beef import fiasco separate from Nogunri, the Korean War, or Ohno (I guess that has finally been laid to rest? If so..congratulations Korean)
“Thus, there is no need to mention any of those bad seeds when talking about either country.”
Unless you are speaking from ignorance, there is no logical way you can compare Hideki Tojo to Cho Seung Hui. Tojo was in a position to dictate policy and government direction, Cho was most certainly not. Cho, since he was not in any position of power (thank goodness) was only responsible for his own actions whereas Tojo was responsible for the actions of his government, which is why he was hanged as a war criminal. I have no idea why he has been deified at Yasukuni…
HSPark, why do you post using a Korean name?
Anyhoo, JK probably has a point (although he stated it in reverse) about the different perceptions of Japanese by Americans on the one hand and Chinese and Koreans on the other: America beat Japan soundly, so can Americans can afford to have a gracious attitude toward Japanese (note how this changed a bit in the ’80s when many Americans felt threatened by Japan economically). In contrast, Chinese and Koreans have not experienced a decisive victory over Japan in centuries, although both are convinced they deserve one. This fuels their need to bad-mouth Japan and Japanese while glorifying themselves.
My point was not trying to ascertain whether or not a given icon of either country was in a position of power. My point was that it would be wrong to just pick either of those icons and ascribe either to be a representative icon of each’s nationality. In that respect, Cho Seung Hui is fair game. If that example does not fit well, Kim Jong Il could easily fill in for Cho.
HSPark (what an interesting ID),
With comments like your last paragraph in #99, I cannot help but feel that you come across as this smug, condescending, sniffing person with your nose in the air. The same with your comments to me, which I shall now address.
“Hmm..you have your experiences, I have mine.”
Indeed. And I’ll never forget mine, that’s for sure.
“You say you have met plenty of black and western friends/associates who have repeated the same mantra that Koreans and Chinese have about Japanese people. I am willing to bet almost all of your ‘friends’ are probably biased to Korea.”
First of all, no need to put quotes around the word “friend.” They were and are my friends. You are already questioning me that they were friends and that lives up to the image I have of you as this very smug, arrogant person. Why continue to foster that image? And btw, by “Western” I guess you mean white?
As for being “biased to Korea”, what exactly does that mean? There were a LOT of things these friends of mine of European and African descent did not like about Korea…a LOT. I never heard so much complaining (and maybe a lot of it was justified) from them about the way they got elbowed in a crowd or how people didn’t say excuse me or how there wasn’t a snow plow going regularly through the roads when it snowed, etc. My African-American friends talked about all the gaping they got in Korea on the subways. Then many of them got the chance to go to Japan to live for a while. While they said they didn’t get gaped at hardly as much (actually no one would even look at them on a subway, which they liked) they still experienced racism in Japan. And the one common observation many of them said about the Japanese was that they didn’t really know what the person really thought about them….because they always had that smile on their faces. Some of them found out that while many Japanese would smile to their faces that they weren’t exactly their biggest fans and would even talk smack about them behind their backs to other Japanese. They said that at least with Koreans they encountered, they knew where they stood…and they liked this better.
Let me say personally that I was treated quite well by a few strangers I encountered in Japan, especially when I was lost. I will always be grateful to them. But yes, I did experience my frustrations, too, that still get me mad to think about (I mean REALLY mad). The necessity for this group think and all drove me nuts (like you wouldn’t believe), and it did get in the way of my travel plans where someone had promised to take me somewhere but at the last minute backed out of it because this other group of friends showed up and wanted to go elsewhere – so I went alone to where we had both originally planned to go. The Japanese person felt guilty for backing out of the promise with me….but that person still felt it more important to preserve the group dynamics despite the promise made to me several days before. And while Koreans can place importance on groups, too, many seem to have enough independence to do their own thing, too, in order to keep their commitments.
“On the other hand, I will agree with you somewhat regarding the testiness of Scotch-Irish people compared to their blander English counterparts. However, that is a weak example compared to Koreans because I found that the stereotype of Scots/Irish being more fiery than their English counterparts is more or less just that…a stereotype.”
First of all, you imply I presented this description as a negative…but I LIKE dealing with Scotts and Irish. You often get more straight dealing and no BS. Anyway, I stand by what I said.
“Most Scotts and Irishmen with whom I have had the pleasure to converse have been quite on the mellow side. On the other hand, the temper-tantrum prone, yelling and screaming at the drop of hat behavior by Koreans seems almost impossible to notice even for a tourist within just one week stay of Korea.”
Actually, I find Koreans to be a pretty patient people but who express their anger in a way that may not be to your liking but is what it is the way the Scotts and Irish and Italians are what they are. But the way you label it as “temper-tantrum prone, yelling and screaming at the drop of a hat behavior” is in itself also a stereotype that I do not support. Personally, I seem to get along fine with people in Korea the way you may get along fine with people in Europe. The difference is I don’t bitch up and down about the culture and people of certain countries in Europe using the most negative terms possible. Your choice to use such words and to attempt to condescendingly dismiss my observations and slam an entire race of people reflects badly on you and makes you look less than objective. I mean look at your own words to me in #85.
Regarding your taxi experience, what can I say? I am sure it happened to you and that was unfortunate. The same thing happened to me here in Washington, DC late at night. What, should I make an assessment of the American character based on it?
“It really is sort of embarrassing though when we are out on business lunches with the engineers and managers visiting from our offices in Japan, and the only person out of our group of 20 who always brings up WWII in a pleasant discussion about the current sales of Sony Playstation or how the cherry blossoms are doing this year in Japan is that Korean-American dufus with a chip on his shoulder.”
I know of no Korean-American that would bring up WWII with Japanese guests. As for the cherry blossoms reference, where is the offense? Here in DC that is a natural topic to come up in April….even if there are no Japanese around.
“To this day, I have never seen a single white, black, hispanic, or Arabic-descent person ever initiate such a tactless maneuver in front of others…only Korean-Americans.”
Well, that has not been my experience, and I interact with Asian-American, as well as FOB, groups all the time in DC (those of Chinese, Japanese, Philipino, Vietnamese descent). Everyone seemed to get along fine and no mention was ever made to any Japanese by any Korean-American about WWII.
BTW, do you want me to list all the offenses I’ve witnessed committed by white folks here in the greater DC area against ethnic minorities? I could give you a LONG list. But you won’t hear my slamming all white people either. Maybe you can learn from this, HSPark.
“Fine. Let’s say “Westerners of European descent” as opposed to “white.” Happy?”
No. The validity of a person’s statement should be evaluated on content rather than in terms of his racial heritage, just as I support your statement that “my right to make a comment about another culture (should not be) suspect because I happen to be of Korean descent.”
European descent is just another code word for “white” really. Do I really need to remind people that this is the 21st century, and the general social consensus is that we need to be post-racial?
Yes, people often generalize about “Koreans”, “Americans,” etc., and yes, it is often done in a hurtful, goading manner. Although we may be post-racial, we are not yet post-national or post-cultural.
One of the other posters here, who is also Korean American, made the suggestion that the commonality in American culture might be summarized as “arrogant,” “bad food”, etc. This is an example of hasty generalizations based entirely on sterotyping and/or personal prejudice. Similarly I have heard some Americans (regardless of race) stereotype Europeans as arrogant, and the English as having bad food, etc. The stereotypes are false and can be experienced as false as one gets acquainted with French people.
OK, so sterotyping on all sides is deplorable. That said, let me state what I see as the crux of the issue.
A common experience among foreign residents in Korea is frustration, anger and caustic criticism. Some indeed acquire antipathy. Where does this come from? In affirming your perception that this anti-Korean sentiment is quite pervasive among foreign residents, wouldn’t the next logical step be to analyze how it is that is that it becomes so pervasive?
Surely, the vast majority of foreign residents know precious little about the country before arriving, and it follows that they wouldn’t live here if they harbored prejudices from the start. It therefore follows that this antipathy is not innate, but acquired in the course of the expatriates’ experiences in Korea.
So rather than simply accepting a facile explanation and writing it off as racial or cultural prejudice, when surely any observer of American culture would know better, wouldn’t it be logical to engage in a bit of introspection and discovery to understand exactly what it is in the experience of the expat that so often causes antipathy?
I leave the question to you. Perhaps a constructive dialogue can yet develop but I’m afraid that for this to happen, everyone needs to get past racial and cultural stereotypes and discuss the question in a mutually respectful way. Or we can continue to attribute this unfortunate situation to peoples’ race, gender or culture and therefore perpetuate and compound the problem.
In other words, if we care how we are perceived and want to know why we are so perceived, wouldn’t it be more constructive to inquire, rather than deny?
Even if Japanese nationalists back in the colonial period did use Jingu’s campaign story or any other obscure myth to claim suzerainty over Korea, that’s not happening now, so you bringing up that story now seems irrelevant. What is the present-day point you can achieve from that story?
“So far, however, I am really impressed and totally surprised that the Korean public has managed to keep the US Beef import fiasco separate from Nogunri, the Korean War, or Ohno”
Is that your perception of the situation? Do you honestly fail to see the linkage?
JK,
Listen, why are you trying to make this a white against minorities thing? You seem very adamant in trying to make a statement about European racism compared with Korean or Japanese racism.
OK fine..you had white or African friends who said that they encountered some Japanese who had a smile on their face but did not say anything to them. From my perspective, I know way many more Koreans who have done that….will act cordial and everything in front of foreigners. However, as soon as the door shuts, then the “true face” of the Korean character comes out along with the racial epithets of “kamdoongi”, “yangnom seki”, “jjanke”, etc. And mind you, this in normal everyday conversation among people who were supposedly “mature” and “educated”. Needless to say, when I and my other non-Korean associates found out about this appalling behavior, we were shocked. In Taiwan, Japan, Hong Kong, or any country in Europe, N. America, etc..if a person did this, they would be looked upon as having absolutely no sense of tact and manners, let alone being too much of a coward to say it their faces. In any of the other countries, calling someone a racial epithets is not looked upon as being a “good thing” because someone is being honest. Its actually looked upon as “barbaric” and indicative of low education, low class, and stupidity. I guess Koreans think of this “honesty” and insulting people whenever they feel slighted as being a good thing. Thank God, the rest of the world does not subscribe to this same standard. Also, another thing that my non-Korean colleagues also remarked was that of all the countries in Asia to which they have travelled, none has ever had a language filled with so many bigoted terms and insults for other nationalities as Korean. This speaks volumes about the Korean national mindset.
Also, you seem to think that Europeans are tempter-tantrum prone and willing to issue death threats at any Olympic athlete that beats one of their own countrymen for a continuous 3 years after the event occurred. Well, I guess you can believe what you want to, but for some reason, I feel that there are more people here who are willing to bet that Koreans are more prone to that behavior…perhaps because it really did happen in Korea with a certain short track skater from the US. Have yet to see an actual real example of white people in N. America or Europe doing the same. Oh, but I have heard countless accounts about how Europeans and N. Americans in DC are “likely” to react in the same way from the mouths of K-Americans…but not a single actual recorded incident. Funny how that works.
Anyways, this debate is getting pointless because for each example of how people in Japan, Europe, or whites in DC are offensive, I can come up with an equal or higher number of counter examples for Koreans committing offensive acts. What’s your end purpose?
I am glad that you interact well with Asian-American, as well as FOB, groups all the time in DC (those of Chinese, Japanese, Korean, Philipino, Vietnamese descent). All the more power to you.
“Anyways, this debate is getting pointless because for each example of how people in Japan, Europe, or whites in DC are offensive, I can come up with an equal or higher number of counter examples for Koreans committing offensive acts. What’s your end purpose?”
I have often pondered about why people sometimes accuse one another of harboring certain feelings and motives when the logical thing to do would be to simply ask them what they are really thinking?
Why don’t we just clear up all the misunderstandings and ask everyone what their end purpose is in the dialogue?
Wow, this tirade sounds familiar. HSPark reminds me a lot of a guy who went on these anti-Korea tirades back in the old days of the Korea Times and Korea Herald discussion boards like back in 1999 and 2000….who made up several ids, some white American, some black American, one was an Englishman, one was a Japanese-American engineer who cried out for calm and racial tolerance….even to his other online IDs, some even Korean, each posting a different story about how cowardly and evil and racist Koreans were. One id was a Korean woman suffering from an abusive relationship with her Korean husband. It was only after we did an IP comparison that we realized it was all the same person. And the language….pretty distinct and distinguishable. I remmeber one of the aliases did complain about Korean arrogance and racism saying he had heard Koreans using the terms ‘kamdoongi’, ‘yangnom seki’, ‘jjanke’, etc. And this latest prolific tirade by HSPark does sound eerily familiar…. He went by several ids. We simply referred to him as “Feng.”
Anyway, on to your comment to me.
“Listen, why are you trying to make this a white against minorities thing?”
I am not. What I am pointing out is that while a person could make a generalizing (and irresponsible) comment about white people and their racism based on several incidences that took place here in the greater Washington DC area, I won’t do that….and maybe you could learn a lesson from it and quit making these generalized statements when you say, “Koreans do this” or “Koreans do that” or “Koreans are racist”, etc.
I don’t approve of racial epithets by ANYONE. I don’t approve of white people in northern VA going “Oh-sohhh!” when passing by an Asian person minding his own business. (BTW, ever notice that when you talk smack back to these people and insult them and say things about their mother that they don’t want to get into a physical fight??)
“I am glad that you interact well with Asian-American, as well as FOB, groups all the time in DC (those of Chinese, Japanese, Korean, Philipino, Vietnamese descent). All the more power to you.”
Well I am glad, too. But the POINT of why I brought it up was that some Korean-American is, for sure, going to say something tactless in front of a Japanese guest about WWII, which I assured you didn’t happen around any of my Korean-American and Japanese-American friends.
104 (Mizar5), you bring up a very interesting point.
What’s interesting is that Korea seems to be a nation to which foreigners will go and live a couple of years, and end up leaving hating the country and its people even more than prior to arriving for the first time.
Usually, with other countries, it’s the opposite. Westerners might have negative feelings about China, Philippines, Japan, or Vietnam but after living in those countries for a while and experiencing real people instead of myths propagated by anti-Chinese/Japanese/Vietnamese propagandists (such as some of the kyopo posters in here) they develop a liking to their host countries which they carry over even upon returning to their home countries.
On the other hand, foreigners go to Korea with positive anticipation and high expectations because prior to going, all they hear from Koreans is that “Korea is the best country in the world” or “Koreans are the most physically attractive people in Asia”, or “Koreans are inherently good, peaceful, and never will cheat. Only Chinese and Japanese are cruel and dishonest.” Thus, many of them go to Korea expecting a real heavenly treat with lots of positive feelings about Korea.
Unfortunately, after arriving in Korea and spending enough time there to discover the truth of Korea’s real face, these foreigner undergo a drastic change. They witness first hand the bigotry, selfishness of the “me first”-ism ruling the country, childish arrogance, disregard for consideration of the non-Korean point of view. As a result, foreigners feel cheated and betrayed and end up with feelings of contempt and disdain for Korea even though they came without any. It’s the opposite of what happens to foreigners when they travel to other Asian countries.
Thus, when foreigners bring up this very interesting and valid point on internet discussion boards like this, the first reaction by Korean-Americans and Koreans always seems to be that of defensiveness consisting of “I have experienced the same bad things in your country so don’t say anything bad about Korea” or “You have some nerve trying to hold Korea to the same standard of western countries when we have our own special standard.” The point is that the Koreans and kyopos always an excuse. On the other hand, one response you will never hear from is the expected mature reply of “Hmm…it’s obvious that many foreigners seem to have difficulties and express frustration at alot of aspects of Korean culture and society. I wonder why that is? Maybe we should take a deeper self-retrospective analysis of ourselves to find out what we can do to improve this situation.”
JK,
Rest assured, I am not this “ghost poster” of which you seem to have recurring nightmares. He does seem interesting though that he could pose as a Korean woman in an abusive relationship. That’s creativity there. LOL. BTW, why do you call this nemesis of yours “Feng”? Isn’t that a Chinese name?
Also, if you think that Koreans do not use the words “kamdoongi” or “jjanke” or “kojengi” regularly..you seriously are out of touch.
(Continuing from 109)
Oh yeah, and Feng, back in the old days of 1999 and 2000 used to talk about how Koreans proclaimed themselves to be superior to the Japanese and Chinese (and he seemed fluent in both the Japanese and Chinese languages). Another common reference he would use sarcastically was “5000 year history…”
I guess if someone like me is still hitting Korea blogs after almost ten years, it should be no surprise that Feng would as well.
For the people who don’t want to read through the long posts above, here’s the summary:
Anything you can generalize, I can generalize better. I can generalize anything better than you.
No you can’t!
Yes I can!
No you can’t!
Yes I can!
It’s just back and forth of ‘Koreans are [insert characteristics]‘ vs. ‘Whites are [insert characteristics]‘. Nothing too much significant going on here, folks.
I saw a Korean international student shoving a black guy for looking at his girlfriend (turned out she wasn’t) funny. On the same day, a K-i student friend of mine had a good time hanging out with a Mexican dude with a Korean girlfriend (who we knew).
What does this anecdote tell you? That Koreans hate black people but likes Mexicans? That Korean guys are chauvinistically protective of ‘their’ women when it comes to blacks but not Mexicans?
Actually, it can tell you jack shit about Koreans, KAms, or [insert color] Americans because it’s a bloody anecdote. Personal observations, no matter how long and extensive, cannot be used to conclude anything about an entire society. If I did that, America would be a racist, equal-opportunity-driven country full of incredibly compassionate, sympathetic assholes who desire diversity and understanding while hating non-white people.
# 110,
Well, quite a laundry list you got there. I think you generalize expats too much. From my experience, I wouldn’t say every last one of them go back to their home countries hating Korea more. That just runs the risk of painting with a brush too broad, doesn’t it?
I would say that people who have spent some time in Korea come back with a stronger opinion on the country. A stronger love or a stronger hate for it. I’d also say, even if they come back with their neutrality intact, they still have a stronger opinion on their home countries. This one young lady’s opinion an example.
Using netizen’s comments as an informal poll somehow reflecting reality is flawed. Just ask Ron Paul.
Actually, Casey Lartigue is a he.
What ever happened to him, anyway?
“Anything you can generalize, I can generalize better. I can generalize anything better than you…Personal observations, no matter how long and extensive, cannot be used to conclude anything about an entire society.”
That’s a pretty broad generalization. The above fallacy is called petitio principii or begging the question, in which the proposition to be proved is assumed implicitly or explicitly in one of the premises.
In fact, if reasonable inferences could not be drawn from observations, there would be no scientific method. Inductive inference is the very method of science. A theory is proposed based on multiple observations, usually observations carried out with great care, using measurement. The theory is then tested many times, by independent investigators, using their own multiple observations. If the theory proves correct to within the accuracy of those observations, then it is provisionally accepted. Any scientific theory is subject to additional testing, and may be modified or overthrown based on additional evidence.
With regard to logic, the process by which a conclusion is inferred from multiple observations is inductive reasoning. The conclusion may be correct or incorrect, or partially correct, or correct to within a certain degree of accuracy, or correct in certain situations.
“If that example does not fit well, Kim Jong Il could easily fill in for Cho.”
KJI’s butchery did not extend beyond the 38th parallel or the Tumen and Yalu rivers. Tojo’s butchery… well… covered a greater geographic area and was againt people who were never under (or cared to be under) Imperial Japanese jurisdiction.
“Even if Japanese nationalists back in the colonial period did use Jingu’s campaign… to claim suzerainty over Korea, that’s not happening now.”
Japanese nationalists are keeping that one in the vault just in case they need it. They don’t need it now, so they are not using it. Most Japanese still see her as a historical figure. Japanese schools certainly teach that. It isn’t too much of a jump to say that she conquered southern Korea if and when Japan desires to think about inter island expansion.
“Japanese nationalists are keeping that one in the vault just in case they need it. They don’t need it now, so they are not using it.”
Now this sounds paranoid.
“Japanese schools certainly teach that.”
No they don’t. Talk about disinformation! I’m surprised that you engage in this kind of game.
“It isn’t too much of a jump to say that she conquered southern Korea if and when Japan desires to think about inter island expansion.”
Yes, it is too much of a jump. You’re spreading fear based on false assumptions.
“Japanese nationalists are keeping that one in the vault just in case they need it. They don’t need it now, so they are not using it”
I see. So again, does your Korean-American background somehow give you the innate ability to read the minds of these people? Or I don’t know..maybe you are like Hunter S. Thompson and practiced gonzo journalism. I guess you are trying to make us believe that you and these nationalists probably hung out with each other everyday for the past couple of years and your theory is a result of collected conversations?
Methinks that most likely you are pulling this thought from that golden bible of Korean Kyopos “Stuff that Korean-Americans Know About Japanese Without Having to Provie Proof That Even Japanese Don’t Know Themselves”?
“Most Japanese still see her as a historical figure. Japanese schools certainly teach that.”
Hmm…so can you please provide a link or any statement that proves that Japanese schools teach this as part of a curriculum? Otherwise, I am afraid that your claim will have to be classified as one of the millions of other that come from that kyopo bible “Stuff that Korean-Americans Know About Japanese Without Having to Provie Proof That Even Japanese Don’t Know Themselves”.
I am thinking of perhaps creating a Korean version called “Stuff that Waegookins Know About Korea Better Than Koreans and Korean-Americans Even Without Having to Provide Proof.” In it, will be mention about how Korean schools teach their students how Koreans are descended from a Bear God, how Koreans teach their children in schools that they invented the wheel, gunpowder, air, water, Chinese characters, about how Koreans all believe that Confucius was Korean, about how Koreans believe that Michael Jordan and Albert Einstein are actually Korean.
Yep…just because I heard this from my Chinese and ESL-Teacher friends, it makes it absolutely 100% true. No need to provide evidence or fact when it comes to generalizations about Korea…we are above having to provide evidence. Providing evidence is so…oh, what’s the word..”western.” Why do we have to bother to provide evidence or facts? Just yell loud enough and enough times, and eventually it becomes the truth. At least in Korea, that’s how it’s done.
@#116
Except that the observations themselves are inadequate in the situation. Ever been irritated in your life? How true or scientific would it be if I happened to see you when you were irritated and I decided ‘Man, that dude got some issues.’?
I’m sure (or hoping, for their sake) that neither of the two have been observing the same people or observing the same group of people no smaller than defined by race or nationality (which would be ridiculously broad as you suggested above). Even then, the assertions that states ‘Koreans are [blank]‘ or ‘Whites are [blank]‘ are at fault because it fails to consider other possibilities of causality.
In short, unless JK or HSPark has consistently observed a population of whites/Koreans with control (variables that need to be controlled, btw, would be impossibly numerous), both are pulling things out of their asses.
A kid that went to the same high school with me called all Asian kids at school ‘Ching-Chongs’(guys) and ‘Ching-Changs’(girls). But my observation of his behavior cannot possibly represent American or even Arizonan society.
While volunteering, I’ve seen quite a number of amazingly heartwarming incidences of charity, compassion, etc. But it would be foolish of me to use that as the characteristics of Americans or Arizonans.
Hence, personal observations pertaining to people (perhaps I should’ve included this) means jack shit if you’re trying to draw a conclusion to the entire society. People are way more complex than just a couple of throw-away sentences.
WangKon,
Not that you meant to imply a 50/50 split in that love and hate, but it kinda sounds that way. Mizar5 was just building on his previous observation:
…and it looks like HSPark had a whole laundry list of agreement. I’ll also echo the assumption that prior to arriving in Korea, we western whities know NOTHING about the place, and have little or no bias toward Korea, either positive or negative.
bumfrom Korea: “Except that the observations themselves are inadequate in the situation. Ever been irritated in your life? How true or scientific would it be if I happened to see you when you were irritated and I decided ‘Man, that dude got some issues.’?”
Fallacious comparison. You would be observing just a single aspect of my personality. As opposed to living in the midst of a culture, experiencing it intimately for a number of years.
“In short, unless JK or HSPark has consistently observed a population of whites/Koreans with control (variables that need to be controlled, btw, would be impossibly numerous), both are pulling things out of their asses.”
Agreed. The controls you speak of in the realm of social interaction are such things as openmindednes, empathy. objectivivity, observation, fact checking, interaction, discussion, inductive reasoning and critical analysis.
What is problematic is the “ugly” tourists or visitors who assiduosly quarantine themselves from the culture at lodge, view things from a narrow, solipsistic perspective, and interpret their observations in a manner aimed at justifying beliefs. These people cannot be reasoned with because they are stuck in a belief system that walls them off from reality.
No, you are.
JK, people in Japan people really don’t care about your personal activities. You can be a lecturer or professor in a university, and take positions on political subjects and conduct personal research without the fear of firing. This is not a generalization, it is a fact.
Koreans in the meantime cannot handle it when foreigners refuse to validate their beliefs.
To give an example of tolerant Japan, there is the case of Pak Il. He is a zainichi Korean (a Korean citizen) and frequently appears on Japanese TV and forcefully presents the Korean point of view. He is a professor at a Japanese university, and is able to make statements against the Japanese viewpoint without any official retribution, unlike what happened to Gerry Bevers when the Koreans at his university freaked out.
What, a tourists being subjected to “group think”? LOL. Sorry, but this sounds like bunk. I don’t know what happened to you but I doubt you being abandoned by the Japanese person had anything to do with “group dynamics”.
gbevers back?
They let him out early?
Matt @126:
What happened to me in Japan is true. I met some very considerate Japanese….and some who were too weak-willed and indecisive. Take it or leave it. Unlike you, who lies about so-called “kyopo discrimination” and “racism” against you, I actually tell the truth. And at least I don’t go to a blog run by a Korean-American (me) under a silly alias like “kyopoboy.” Hence that’s why I booted your ass of it. *sniff sniff*
As for what happened to gbevers, if I had been the university president in the US and gbevers was a foreign (like, say Korean) teacher on contract there, I doubt I would have renewed his contract either if he had gone on and on about how Americans are liars or that America should quit lying about its history and that Americans are an immature people or that 9/11 was greatly exaggerated by Americans or wasn’t all that bad (the way bevers goes on and on about how the Japanese colonization wasn’t that bad for Koreans). He has the right to say what he wants, and I, if I were a university president, would have to right to renew his one-year contract or not. Now if gbevers, OVER THE YEARS, decided to tweak the nose of his host country one too many times foolishly, then he had what was coming to him.
And you actually helped him shoot himself, Matt, through your anti-Korea blog. You gave him a public forum where he got the attention he would not have normally gotten. And everyone reading this now knows that. How does that make you feel, Matt? You, living in the Land of the Convicts while cowardly writing your many biased lies about Korea, encouraged gbevers to write his many critiques of Korea on your blog. He had already put his foot in his mouth…but you helped shove it down his throat. You, Matt.
Blame Korea all you want for this one, but ultimately responsibility falls on gbevers…and yourself for encouraging his behavior. Now that IS a laugh.
Actually what happened to gbevers is not laughable and is sad. But what’s really sad is that gbevers still doesn’t realize that what he did was just plain stupid. I believe everyone, regardless of WHERE they stand on Korea-Japan relations, agrees with this. And yet, what happened to him would not have been possible without your help, Matty boy, while you were safely away from Korea.
And yet gbevers will never blame you for this. Instead he’ll blame Korea but not you and certainly not himself.
The Torture Memos and Academic Freedom:
http://www.law.berkeley.edu/news/2008/edley041008.html
“JK, people in Japan people really don’t care about your personal activities. You can be a lecturer or professor in a university, and take positions on political subjects and conduct personal research without the fear of firing. This is not a generalization, it is a fact.”
Hm, let’s see if you’ll have a change of mind if gbevers goes to Japan for DECADES, writes repeatedly over the decades that Japan is a nation of liars, that Japan lies about its history…and that the Japanese are all terrorists (like gbevers said about Koreans in 2001 at the Korea Times)….and then doesn’t have his yearly contract at a Japanese university renewed. But we both know gbevers WON’T go to Japan. He’s home forever in Korea.
“Koreans in the meantime cannot handle it when foreigners refuse to validate their beliefs.”
What would happen to an American teacher on a yearly contract in Israel who goes on and on in public about how Jews are liars, that Israel lied or greatly exaggerated the extent of the Holocaust, that Nazi Germany was not as had as the Jews make it out to be, that Jews are blind and full of crap, etc.? Would this American lecturer truly be the victim of Jewish persecution? Answer that, Matty boy? And what would you say then, Matt? that “Jews in the meantime cannot handle it when foreigners refuse to validate their beliefs”?
Oh and be careful what you do because you’ve already helped cost Bevers one job. You don’t want to cost him another, do you?
Then again, maybe you do. After all, you’re safely far away from Korea so why should you care if gbevers loses his job, huh? Make Koreans the scapegoat for his stupidity.
Regarding #119: Yep, the writing style and phrases are most DEFINITELY familiar. I do remember the Bear God reference that he ridiculed back in the old days of the Korea Times as well as the reference to a supposed Korean claim to have created Chinese characters. And he had a distinct way of expressing himself, too.
See what I wrote in #109 and 112 to know what I am talking about.
JK, I am not saying that you were not abandoned by the Japanese person in Japan, what I am saying is that it probably has nothing to do with “group think” or “group dynamics”.
As for the kyopoboy moniker, it has nothing to do with making people think I am a kyopo. The username has a history from an old adversary on DavesESL. When I did post using ‘kyopoboy’ on xanga or whatever it was, I always made it clear that I was not a kyopo, that I am a white Australian. I never posted on your blog, btw. I think the reason you booted me is because I brought up racially charged comments found on your blog, comments that belie what you say here. I think dogbert and several others also saw the comments before you closed your blog to casual viewing.
Sorry, but Koreans don’t pay enough to make it worthwhile to sell out. Gerry is 100% correct in what he has been saying about the Dokdo/Takeshima issue, and that Koreans cannot handle it is a reflection of them, not Gerry.
I really feel sorry for foreigners that worry that feel they need to agree with Koreans for the sake of employment in Korea. Nothing a Korean can give is worth tossing your values out the window. Foreigners with self respect know this, and respect Gerry’s stand, no matter what they think of the particulars of it.
You may be a Korean American, but you are just like Koreans in that no matter how much a foreigner respects Korean culture, learns the language, follows the manner and customs, if the foreigner disagrees with Koreans on a deal breaker (like Dokdo, the printing press, glorious Korean history, or whatever), then all that amounts to nothing. The fact is that Koreans are not like people in most other countries – they are hyper-sensitive to outside opinion, and constantly seeking validation.
This is a must.
Is anyone familiar with the psychological phenomenon called “Narcissistic Personality Disorder”?
Read the Wikipedia entry for this disorder and think about the Korean mindset. It’s so damn scary how the Korean mindset is pretty much the iconic example of this psychological disease. I seriously believe that the psychiatrist who founded this disorder must have been studying Korean subjects. Particularly standing out are the criteria:
From Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Narcissistic_personality_disorder):
A pervasive pattern of grandiosity (in fantasy or behavior), need for admiration, and lack of empathy, beginning by early adulthood and present in a variety of contexts, as indicated by five (or more) of the following[1]:
1. has a grandiose sense of self-importance
2. is preoccupied with fantasies of unlimited success, power, brilliance, beauty, or ideal love
3. believes that he or she is “special” and unique
4. requires excessive admiration
5. has a sense of entitlement
6. is interpersonally exploitative
7. lacks empathy
8. is often envious of others or believes others are envious of him or her
9. shows arrogant, haughty behaviors or attitudes
When I read JK’s comments accusing me about being a former nemesis from 10 years ago, I immediately thought of how number 8 in the list above applies so aptly.
“As for what happened to gbevers, if I had been the university president in the US and gbevers was a foreign (like, say Korean) teacher on contract there, I doubt I would have renewed his contract either if he had gone on and on about how Americans are liars or that America should quit lying about its history”
Obviously, you don’t know very much about America, do you? Ever hear of Noam Chomsky?
Actually, in the U.S., railing about oppressive dead white men will probably get you the academic job. Oh, and it doesn’t hurt to fictitiously belong to a victim group (Ward Churchill, anyone?).
Noam Chomsky was born an American citizen. There goes the logic behind that argument.
HSPark — all very interesting. But sounded better when you were bbundaegi.
Commenter banned.
Excellent. I went out to eat dinner with a friend, and when I came back, Koreans are now mental patients. It only takes an evening…
It goes on and on and on and on…
Hope your dinner went well, anyway.
HSPark did go over the edge there, but I hope him being banned won’t embolden folks here to continue expressing their ethno-hate. Especially when it comes to Japan, I do sense a feeling of shared entitlement to lash out whatever derogatory and unfounded comments as one sees fit. And they’re usually out of context with the thread.
@132:
Yo Mizar, ever heard of tenure? Gbevers didn’t have it. He was working on a yearly contract basis. Anything else?
@ Matt:
“JK, I am not saying that you were not abandoned by the Japanese person in Japan, what I am saying is that it probably has nothing to do with ‘group think’ or ‘group dynamics’.
Actually it was. My Japanese (granted, amateur) guide who had made a commitment to me to show me a Japanese tourist attraction I really wanted to see was saying to me after we met up with some common friends (and after I had said after an hour of talking with them, “we should get going if we’re gonna see what I came to see”), “We should stick together as a group.” I was like, “Uh, no. I flew all the way to Japan to see this thing, and you DID promise to show it to me.” So I went and saw it alone. I am sure you would like to believe this is all made up, Matt, but it really did happen.
“As for the kyopoboy moniker, it has nothing to do with making people think I am a kyopo.”
So FINALLY you admit to having been “kyopoboy” when coming to my blog after repeatedly lying about it. Thank you.
“The username has a history from an old adversary on DavesESL. When I did post using ‘kyopoboy’ on xanga or whatever it was, I always made it clear that I was not a kyopo, that I am a white Australian. I never posted on your blog, btw. I think the reason you booted me is because I brought up racially charged comments found on your blog, comments that belie what you say here. I think dogbert and several others also saw the comments before you closed your blog to casual viewing.”
Actually you DID comment on it…with links to that anti-Korea hate site of yours. And rather than give you any more recognition of your site than I already had (because whether you believe the tripe you write or not, one thing I DO know is that what you want is attention for your blog), I deleted your comment rather than give you any more recognition. And besides, you KNOW my blog is not closed to casual viewing since you yourself have been on it recently. (Let’s see him try to lie his way out of this one.)
“I think the reason you booted me is because I brought up racially charged comments found on your blog, comments that belie what you say here.”
Just like gbevers, “I think…” Pray tell what racially charged comments I made? Now this I have to hear.
“I really feel sorry for foreigners that worry that feel they need to agree with Koreans for the sake of employment in Korea. Nothing a Korean can give is worth tossing your values out the window. Foreigners with self respect know this, and respect Gerry’s stand, no matter what they think of the particulars of it.”
Read what I wrote in #128. That’s my response.
And the thing is you STILL won’t take any responsibility for your part in the whole gbevers contract-not-being-renewed situation. I don’t care WHO you may be and whether you agree with him or not or if you think gbevers got screwed or not or if his right to free speech was violated or whatever…..there is not a soul on this blog (with the exception of maybe gbevers himself) who didn’t think he was being stupid for going on as he did over the years….while living in Korea and working for a university in Korea on a yearly contract basis! And you helped kill him (figuratively speaking) on this, Matt. And even NOW you are throwing the blame on Koreans instead of admitting that you could have foreseen this coming way back before it got out of hand yet you helped fuel it and gave gbevers exposure that he would not have normally gotten. You can’t even admit this even now.
How does that make you feel, Matt? I guess you won’t have to endure any harm while sitting safely behind your computer monitor far away from Korea….but with a couple hits of your keyboard, you encouraged a guy in Korea to destroy his own livelihood. With friends like you, who needs enemies?
If Gerry were concerned about his livelihood as an educator in Korea, he would never have gotten involved with the Takeshima issue in the first place. Gerry has lived in Korea a long time and he knows the score. Whatever motivated him, perhaps a burning desire to seek the truth, a knowledgeable amateur’s interest in history — I don’t know — Gerry knew how his views would be received by most Koreans, yet he did not hesitate to broadcast them.
You can’t blame Matt for that.
Show a link, any link, with me lying about this. Put up or shut up. I am honest – do you really think that baseless accusations are going fly here?
What comment? Anyway, if you say I have been viewing your weblog, feel free to post the IP address here. Robert can confirm if it is mine. Again, put up or shut up.
How about the stuff about the how kyopo are always able to steal a white guys Korean GF, about how many times you have done it, and how the white guys deserved it every time? Lots of racial animus there.
And you still don’t understand. There is never, ever a reason to supplicate Koreans, and certainly not for employment. When people say Gerry is stupid, they are speaking out of fear for their jobs in Korea. A job in Korea is never that important, period. Fear of violence on your wife or children might be a good enough reason, however.
JK, I have no intention of stalking you around the net. I washed my hands of you long ago. Here on Robert’s site I am merely trying to be as on topic as possible, without getting personal or throwing around wild accusations.
Matt @ 142:
Funny how you say you have “washed your hands of me a long tiem ago” but still try to get some catty digs at me. Well, anyways, on to your comments.
“How about the stuff about the how kyopo are always able to steal a white guys Korean GF, about how many times you have done it, and how the white guys deserved it every time? Lots of racial animus there.”
Interesting. On my blog, I once recount an incident from my past when facing a moral dilemma regarding a Korean girl and her boyfriend in 2000….when a memory even FURTHER back that than this drifts into my head where I, as a very young and reckless youth (keep in mind this older incident was in 1997), DID make out with a Korean girl dating a white guy. Now how this is racial animus is beyond me. I was young, reckless, and very immature back then. But it happened. You, on the other hand, Matt, go into great detail on your blog about how you got wild with two prostitutes in Korea. Talk about sick.
“And you still don’t understand. There is never, ever a reason to supplicate Koreans, and certainly not for employment. When people say Gerry is stupid, they are speaking out of fear for their jobs in Korea. A job in Korea is never that important, period.”
So it seems you are saying you could have predicted this was gonna happen to Gerry? Yet you didn’t try to stop him or tell him to cool it?? because his job was not that important???
I hear what dogbert said about it being on gbevers alone….but if you could have predicted this, Matt, and you only encouraged him….well, I think your actions speak for themselves.
cmm:”Noam Chomsky was born an American citizen. There goes the logic behind that argument”
Not really, it partly addresses the argument that professors are not routinely fired for having unpopular or anti-American views.
There are also plenty of foreign-born political science professors who bring diverse viewpoints and have been critical of US policy. It just takes a little more research to find them. You can look into the Latino Caucus in Political Science, for instance.
cmm:”Noam Chomsky was born an American citizen. There goes the logic behind that argument.”
The Chomsky example addresses 1/2 of the argument. As for foreign born professors who are critical of US policy, but I had no examples to cite off the top.
JK: “Yo Mizar, ever heard of tenure? Gbevers didn’t have it. He was working on a yearly contract basis. Anything else?”
Have you ever heard of a foreign citizen getting tenure in Korea? If any, far and few between.
Mizar, I never heard of a lecturer in the US with just a Master’s degree (an MBA at that) being awarded tenured university professorship status at any university. Heck, it’s hard enough for a person with a Ph.D to get tenureship as a professor.
Due to the unequal relationship between East and West (sorry, but it’s true which is why English as a second language is more valued in Japan and Korea than Japanese or Korean as a second language would be in the US) an American or Canadian or any other Westerner can get a job as a lecturer at a university in Korea with just a Bachelor’s degree in practically ANYTHING as long as they speak fluent English (yep, it’s that easy). How many university lecturers (be they foreign or American) in the US can say that? And keep in mind, I said “lecturer” not “professor.”
The ones teaching English as a second language in universities in Korea and Japan are lecturers only and are NOT professors with Ph.Ds who write research papers (though there are many exceptions at places like Yonsei and Sogang University where there are Ph.D professors in English who are American of European descent). Academically some of these people are on par in terms of academic credentials with Ph.D-educated professors in the US. However, let’s just say that they are in the clear minority and that gbevers, and MOST English teachers in Korea, are not in this category. Gbevers and others are lecturers on a contract-to-contract basis, and I have never EVER heard of a lecturer being granted tenured professorship (because a lecturer and a professor are two different things) unless they received their Ph.Ds in the West (usually America), though I am sure exceptions exist.
Chomsky, say what you will about him and his crazy views, was a professor with some academic credentials from what I understand. He wasn’t some guy with just a four-year degree or a Master’s degree who got his job simply because he spoke a language. He may be looney, but he is a professor while gbevers was not.
BTW, nothing is STOPPING all these Western lecturers in Korea from getting their Ph.Ds in their pursuit of professorship. Just because the bar is lowered in Korea for a person to be a university lecturer does not mean the person would want to improve himself in his pursuit of tenureship. That teacher would certainly require, at a minimum, a Ph.D if he wished to be a tenured professor in the US. Why should Korea expect less?
JK,
You are so full of crap. Matt had nothing to do with my not being rehired. It was closed-minded, nationalistic Koreans who were responsible for that.
I had lived in Korean for many years, yet I was as surprised as hell when the president of my university called me into his office to talk to me not to post anymore about my Dokdo on the Internet. I had mistakeningly assumed that Korean academics would be more open-minded and more interested in truth. I was wrong. When it comes to Dokdo, even very friendly Korean professors will turn into angry, close-minded nationalists.
My school’s president tried to tell me that I was wrong about Dokdo, even though he knew almost nothing about its history. Most Koreans have been so brainwashed about Dokdo that they do not even bother to check the facts. And you cannot check the facts by reading a Korean historian’s book on Dokdo because Korean historians do not tell you all the facts. They only tell you half-truths, at best. If you want to know the facts, you have to go to the original documents, which is too difficult for most Koreans to read since they were written in Chinese characters. Therefore, Koreans are at the mercy of their nationalist historians.
Just a few days ago, I was talking about Dokdo with a Political Science professor at my university in the teacher cafeteria. The subject came up because when I asked why he had come to school that day, he said he had been in the library researching the political aspects of the Dokdo disppute. This was the same professor who told me in the hallway just a couple of months ago that a colleague of his at the Northeast Asia History Foundation had called him and asked if I worked at his school.
Anyway, this professor started telling me about how “Dokdo” has been mentioned over and over in Korean documents and on Korean maps since the Shilla dynasty. When I told him that the island Koreans claimed was Dokdo was actually called “Usando,” he was shocked. He had thought that the name “Dokdo” was the name used since “Shilla.” Did I mention that he is a Political Science professor at our university?
I think the reason that even Korean Political Science professors do not know that the name “Dokdo” is a 20th-century name is that Korean historians frequently substitute the name “Dokdo” for names given in on old documents and on old maps that they believed to have been Dokdo. For example, Korean historians often write articles with pictures of old maps that are too small to be read and say something like, “See! This map shows Dokdo was Korean territory,” when, in fact, it might show an island right next to Ulleungdo named “Usando.”
Even if a map shows Usando as a single island between Ulleungdo and the Korean mainland, Korean historians will still point to that island and say it is “Dokdo,” even though the real Dokdo is essentially two islands ninety-two kilometers southeast of Ulleungdo, not one island west of Ulleungdo.
Anyway, JK, you do not know me or what I think, so stop pretending you do. And why are you always talking about “Whites” instead of Westerners, Americans, or Europeans?
And so the cycle continues……and gbevers won’t stop……
Regarding Dokdo, as I have said repeatedly to you, I personally hope you DO prove that Dokdo belonged legitimately to Japan…and thus Korea can thus say it took Japanese land as a war reparation from Japan. As of yet, you have failed to prove that Dokdo WAS legitimately Japanese territory before 1905….thus Korea took back only Korean territory when it seized it after the defeat of Japan.
But I’m sure you’ll keep trying. I wish you well in this endeavor….and in your life in Korea.
Hey, when you discussed this issue with the Korean professor, you didn’t do your usual rants of “Koreans need to open their eyes” and “Koreans need to quit being blind to their history” and “the problem is Koreans are liars”, did you? DID YOU??
Sigh.
gbevers, read my #128 comment.
JK: “Due to the unequal relationship between East and West (sorry, but it’s true which is why English as a second language is more valued in Japan and Korea than Japanese or Korean as a second language would be in the US)…”
I suppose the fact that English is the international language of commerce and that the US has been Korea’s top export market has nothing to do with the desire of Koreans to learn English? I suppose the English language craze was imposed on Korea by the West too?
JK: “The ones teaching English as a second language in universities in Korea and Japan are lecturers only and are NOT professors with Ph.Ds who write research papers”
As is the precisely case with college ESL teachers in the US.
“an American or Canadian or any other Westerner can get a job as a lecturer at a university in Korea with just a Bachelor’s degree in practically ANYTHING as long as they speak fluent English (yep, it’s that easy). How many university lecturers (be they foreign or American) in the US can say that?”
Yes, US universities with ESL programs emply BAs and MAs, not PhDs. Have you ever heard of a TESOL degree?
Sorry, no double standard. But why reference hard facts when a fallacious conspiracy theory will serve the purpose of justifying your irrational prejudices, right?
I love JK’s accomodating way of discrediting his own arguments. Actually he is no more than an false ID I post under to bolster my own arguments. It’s a dirty trick, I confess, but it sure does the trick.
“I suppose the fact that English is the international language of commerce and that the US has been Korea’s top export market has nothing to do with the desire of Koreans to learn English? I suppose the English language craze was imposed on Korea by the West too?”
I never said nor implied nor thought this. And what do you mean by “too”? When have I said that ANYTHING was imposed on Korea? I merely described the world as not being fair…because the whole world needs English.
I am merely speaking from the experience of myself and those I knew in Korea. Despite my business background, when I first arrived in Korea in the late 90s, I needed a job…pronto…so per the suggestion of others, I got a job teaching English and economics in a university. With my academic background (an MBA but no Ph.D) I would never have had such an easy time getting a lecturer position at a four-year university in the US. What is wrong with me making my point? It’s not a criticism of the US OR Korea.
So do ESL teachers in the US have tenure? That must be a separate topic since YOU first referenced Chomsky, who, from what I understand, is NOT an ESL instructor. You were the one who tried to compare gbevers lack of tenure with Chomsky’s tenure in the US. If you want to discuss ESL teachers in the US with ESL teachers in Korea then why even mention looney ol’ Chomsky? Apples and oranges
Anything else, mizar?
“Actually he is no more than an false ID I post under to bolster my own arguments. It’s a dirty trick, I confess, but it sure does the trick.”
Don’t be bitter that HSPark got outed, Mizar. He was guilty and he got caught. Don’t let this upset you. I’m sure there are still others willing to make outlandish, generalizing, overboard criticisms of all Koreans and Korean-Americans. (Mind you, I don’t mind legitimate critique of Koreans and Korean-Americans but HSPark, who sounded WAY too familiar, was going on some serious ranting. And btw, he had an interesting ID, eh? No wonder I remembered Feng from the old days of the Korea Times.)
“Anything else, mizar?”
Yeah, keep up the good work of making me look good, alterego.
I was meaning to post earlier but it’s mid-year reviews here at the office…
# 135,
So HSPark was bbundaegi’s sockpuppet? Interesting, as HSPark was a lot more virluent than I remember bbundagi being. However, him thinking that I was a part of some Korean/Kyopo propaganda cabal was a little strange.
# 118,
Regarding Jingu Kogo. I believe that in Japanese schools she’s either taught as legendary, semi-legendary or as an actual historical figure. I believe the vast majority of times (90%-ish I believe) she’s considered legendary. However, it seems to me there is a trend to look at this time in history more in lines with how the Nihon Shoki shows it, which is to see it as Japanese dominance of southern Korea in the 3rd to 6th centuries A.D.
This worries me because precluding an aggressive stance by Japan towards the Korean peninsula is a dusting off, if you will, of the Jingu legend and the Nihon Shoki’s account of the Yamato government’s supposed control of southern Korea. It happened during Hideyoshi’s regency before the Imjin War and it happened just before and just after the Meiji Restoration. This simple fact isn’t conjecture because it’s just something that happens before Japan invades Korea, kind of like lambasting (another tale of mythic proportions) weapons of mass destruction before an invasion.
However, I’m not saying that Japan will invade or audibly threaten Korea anytime soon. I’m just saying it’s something that needs to be monitored for the future.
#118
I have to say your fear is unwarranted. Jingu-Kogo is not mentioned in Japanese textbooks and not taught in schools. Not even in the controversial “revisionist” history book issued by these guys (only if you could read Japanese to go to their website and confirm for yourself):
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese_Society_for_History_Textbook_Reform
You’d be surprised by the extensive coverage in Japanese textbooks about Chinese/Korean influences on Japanese culture. Did you know that classic Chinese literature is one of the three pillars of the university/college exam subject of “Japanese Language”, the other two being modern Japanese and classic Japanese?
The war resentment is still strong in Japan, and voices to rearm never get popular support. Nationalism is also scorned upon. Look what happened to Abe. Japan is the last place you should be monitoring.
I meant #154, that is.
Well I hope so! Time will tell.
Wangkon936, go to Japan and meet some actual Japanese people and you will see how unfounded your fears are. There is also a slight projection problem here as well, I think.
shaku,
I’ve met quite a few actually as a lot come to my part of the country to study. I’ve had two Japanese (as in fresh off the boat) tenants plus one half Japanese American tenant. The Japanese individually are great people (and great tenants). I’d actually rather rent to them than to Koreans. But the Japanese, like most peoples and nations, have two sides- a collective and an individual side. The average individual Japanese do not worry me at all. It’s the collective I have concerns about.
Regarding the half Japanese American. His grandfather was a veteran of the Pacific War (on the American side). He spent 9 years in Japan as an English teacher. He loved it in Japan and had a great time there. But he also thought that Japan’s recollection of WWII was a bit worrisome. He said that a lot of Japanese just considered WWII as another war, just like the wars that the Europeans fought against each other for possession of more colonies, etc. Any ways, I’m still suspicious and so are a lot of other East Asians.
@160:
I share the same sentiments. The stereotype is that they make good tenants. I have heard that at some apartments in DC that someone who was Japanese didn’t have to put up a cleaning fee in order to rent while everyone else (American, Korean, Indian, whatever) did (it was apt. policy)…because of the reputation of Japanese for being so tidy.
And I agree with you, one-on-one Japanese are VERY friendly. By MY experience, it seemed to be a different story when there were a group of Japanese.
But yes, I am still suspicious, too.
“And I agree with you, one-on-one Japanese are VERY friendly. By MY experience, it seemed to be a different story when there were a group of Japanese.”
Sounds familiar, doesn’t it? Reflect.
Indeed. Reminds me of certain areas of the South (as in the USA) were I grew up. Reflect.
Mizar, you sounded really mature in past comments you made (like early on in this thread), but after I corrected you on that whole Chomsky/gbevers tenure analogy and after I pointed out the possibility that HSPark was a non-Korean multi-id commenter from years back….you took on a pretty angry, haughty tone that sounds bitter. What’s your beef?
JK: “Indeed. Reminds me of certain areas of the South (as in the USA) were I grew up. Reflect.”
Really? Were they consistently involved in anti-foreign demonstations, too?
“Mizar, you sounded really mature in past comments you made (like early on in this thread), but after I corrected you on that whole Chomsky/gbevers tenure analogy…”
Oh, sorry, I must have missed that. Did you “correct” me, then? Did I say that Chomsky did not have tenure?
“…and after I pointed out the possibility that HSPark was a non-Korean multi-id commenter from years back….you took on a pretty angry, haughty tone that sounds bitter. What’s your beef?”
I’m sorry I really didn’t follow the HSPark thing either. I really don’t pay attention to off-topic or personal disputes. I only address the topic on hand, and if my ascerbit wit offends you, it is nothing personal. No need to take any of this seriously. It’s all pretty amusing.
JK: “Indeed. Reminds me of certain areas of the South (as in the USA) were I grew up. Reflect.”
Really? Were they consistently involved in anti-foreign demonstations, too?
“Mizar, you sounded really mature in past comments you made (like early on in this thread), but after I corrected you on that whole Chomsky/gbevers tenure analogy…”
Oh, sorry, I must have missed that. Did you “correct” me, then? Did I say that Chomsky did not have tenure?
“…and after I pointed out the possibility that HSPark was a non-Korean multi-id commenter from years back….you took on a pretty angry, haughty tone that sounds bitter. What’s your beef?”
I’m sorry I really didn’t follow the HSPark thing either. I really don’t pay attention to off-topic or personal disputes. I only address the topic on hand, and if my ascerbit wit offends you, it is nothing personal. No need to take any of this seriously. It’s all pretty amusing to me, and you amuse me.
Apologies for the double post. Just disregard one or the other. As for growing up in the South, where did you grow up – Atlanta?” Obviously I have no idea what that would be like. I resided in NYC and currently reside in the NE. I love it here.
“I’m sorry I really didn’t follow the HSPark thing either.”
Well everyone who has been following this thread knows that isn’t true based on your attempted cute remarks to me about online alter-egos. Obviously you were following the HSPark “thing.”
And man, after he got caught for being caught (and then banned) did you change your tone on this thread!
Edit: “After he got caught for multi-iding (the previous id of “bbunddaegi” having already been banned) did you change your tone!”
Sorry, I really don’t care to follow this kind of personal stuff.
LMAO Mizar5.
Types well, but has the balls and maturity of an eight year old.
Those who actually want to know something about Nihon-Shoki and Korean peninsula.this web pages may be interested.
http://www.k3.dion.ne.jp/~kodaira/xyz1004.htm
Fact No1:
According to this site,there are almost as much friendly notion of Koreans as in the state of war.
Fact No2:
The content of Nihon-Shoki is not being taught in Japanese educational system,only it’s existence and importance as the one of the oldest historical chlonology.
So I have to wonder where in the world have WangKong and otheres had obtained such detailed description about the state of Japanese school education that make them so suspicious about Japanese intention and make them believe that “Japanese are nice in individual,but not in groups” thing.
But then again,this is the reason why I’m cynical about Japan=Germany analogy.This sort of ignorance and paranoid won’t stand long in Europe,but not so in this part of the world.
If only Koreans could manage to save just a 1% of the incredulity upon Japanese psyche for selfcriticsm on their own collectivism,Korea wouldn’t have so many candle lights in the streets.
LMAO your post screams “JAP”. Try to make your posts make sense.
I am a “Jap”.and it seems you got the point of what I wanted to say,Stacked.
Yeah,Robert is right.This place DOES look like 2Chnannel,only it has more cosmopolitan aspect plus a moderator….
You must log in to post a comment.