<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 5-18 Gwangju</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rjkoehler.com/2008/05/18/5-18-gwangju/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2008/05/18/5-18-gwangju/</link>
	<description>Korea... in Blog Format</description>
	<pubDate>Wed,  3 Dec 2008 05:27:38 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Roland Dodds</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2008/05/18/5-18-gwangju/#comment-154861</link>
		<dc:creator>Roland Dodds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 04:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/?p=6624#comment-154861</guid>
		<description>#33
Nope, it’s about the application of a set of principles. The Million Man March was not an armed insurrection, and the LA riots were. Many people said that the rioters had a legitimate beef, and reasoning for the things they were doing. The same has been said of those in Kwangju. Some of the LA rioters where just out looking for trouble, and some were arguably fighting for something more important. That’s why it is a better example.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#33<br />
Nope, it’s about the application of a set of principles. The Million Man March was not an armed insurrection, and the LA riots were. Many people said that the rioters had a legitimate beef, and reasoning for the things they were doing. The same has been said of those in Kwangju. Some of the LA rioters where just out looking for trouble, and some were arguably fighting for something more important. That’s why it is a better example.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aceface</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2008/05/18/5-18-gwangju/#comment-154859</link>
		<dc:creator>Aceface</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 04:10:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/?p=6624#comment-154859</guid>
		<description>"Unlike Japan, Korea can say it has a 2 major party system, where the governing body has a realistic chance of being replaced based on how liberal or conservative the people feel. Wow !"

Yeah,but the real difference between "liberal" and "conservative" aren't much in Korea compared to Japan.
Rho may be a liberal in the local standard,but he was pretty much a nationlist just like others in many ways.

Besides can you really expect the check-and-balance mechanism from "political parties" that come and go in every presidential elections?

Here in Japan,political parties are inpermanent stitutions belong to the groups,not the belonging of some political contenders establish in one day and tear it down the next.

Violent demonstrations and general strikes were norm in Japan from 1952 to 1970.Gwanju didn't happen in Japan simply because the riot police used tear gas instead of live bullets and LDP politicians choose to resign before the political turmoil gets out of control.

Not that I undermine the sacrifice of the people in Gwangju in any way,though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Unlike Japan, Korea can say it has a 2 major party system, where the governing body has a realistic chance of being replaced based on how liberal or conservative the people feel. Wow !&#8221;</p>
<p>Yeah,but the real difference between &#8220;liberal&#8221; and &#8220;conservative&#8221; aren&#8217;t much in Korea compared to Japan.<br />
Rho may be a liberal in the local standard,but he was pretty much a nationlist just like others in many ways.</p>
<p>Besides can you really expect the check-and-balance mechanism from &#8220;political parties&#8221; that come and go in every presidential elections?</p>
<p>Here in Japan,political parties are inpermanent stitutions belong to the groups,not the belonging of some political contenders establish in one day and tear it down the next.</p>
<p>Violent demonstrations and general strikes were norm in Japan from 1952 to 1970.Gwanju didn&#8217;t happen in Japan simply because the riot police used tear gas instead of live bullets and LDP politicians choose to resign before the political turmoil gets out of control.</p>
<p>Not that I undermine the sacrifice of the people in Gwangju in any way,though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: megook</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2008/05/18/5-18-gwangju/#comment-154852</link>
		<dc:creator>megook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 03:27:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/?p=6624#comment-154852</guid>
		<description>32. wait, wait, wait, hold the fuck up. are you seriously going to ignore the fact that it was the troops who were shooting at the unarmed (albeit, violent) protesters first? what would you have done if you were in that situation (not that you would be--i'm sure you'd have been content with lingering in your self-imposed fascism)? stand there stupidly singing songs, chanting slogans while they shot at you? the protesters did the right thing by fighting back and defending themselves and their comrades. you're disrespecting all the people who fought and lost their lives for democracy  in gwangju that day with your rightist bullshit. you're a fascist scum who swallow government without thinking. you fucking disgust me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>32. wait, wait, wait, hold the fuck up. are you seriously going to ignore the fact that it was the troops who were shooting at the unarmed (albeit, violent) protesters first? what would you have done if you were in that situation (not that you would be&#8211;i&#8217;m sure you&#8217;d have been content with lingering in your self-imposed fascism)? stand there stupidly singing songs, chanting slogans while they shot at you? the protesters did the right thing by fighting back and defending themselves and their comrades. you&#8217;re disrespecting all the people who fought and lost their lives for democracy  in gwangju that day with your rightist bullshit. you&#8217;re a fascist scum who swallow government without thinking. you fucking disgust me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wjk, 검은 머리 외국인</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2008/05/18/5-18-gwangju/#comment-154848</link>
		<dc:creator>wjk, 검은 머리 외국인</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 03:11:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/?p=6624#comment-154848</guid>
		<description>IF George W. Bush leveled Obama’s supporters with military, in any chosen state, and said it was for the good of the country,

What do you think would happen?

Would you cheapen it and discount it totally, because the response was with armed weapons?

I think a lot of you would write down Bush as Most Evil President Ever, and celebrate the resistance for eternity.

But, of course, that is day-dreaming.

George W. Bush would never do such a thing.  And you know it, too.

He really does belong in Mount Rushmore.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IF George W. Bush leveled Obama’s supporters with military, in any chosen state, and said it was for the good of the country,</p>
<p>What do you think would happen?</p>
<p>Would you cheapen it and discount it totally, because the response was with armed weapons?</p>
<p>I think a lot of you would write down Bush as Most Evil President Ever, and celebrate the resistance for eternity.</p>
<p>But, of course, that is day-dreaming.</p>
<p>George W. Bush would never do such a thing.  And you know it, too.</p>
<p>He really does belong in Mount Rushmore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wjk, 검은 머리 외국인</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2008/05/18/5-18-gwangju/#comment-154843</link>
		<dc:creator>wjk, 검은 머리 외국인</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 02:53:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/?p=6624#comment-154843</guid>
		<description>Gwangju was more than a protest.  It became an armed rebellion.

The govt they were rebeling against, was it legitimate?

Was it?

Kyong Sang's Son, the first, Park Gyn Hye's father, he rolled in with tanks.  He was couping against the govt.  He should have been shot, right?  He was shot after more than 2 decades.

Kyong Sang's Son, the 2nd, General Jun Doo Hwan.  Who gave him the country?  The people?  He took it.  It's coup.  He should have been shot, right?  He was rebelling against the people for personal and regional gain.

The people of Kwangju.  They were in armed rebellion after trying daemo.  They were rebelling against the new South Korean military govt.  With guns.  They should have been shot, right?  You make the call.

The way Park and Chun took over is no different than the recent Thailand military coup.

they do that in 3rd world countries, too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gwangju was more than a protest.  It became an armed rebellion.</p>
<p>The govt they were rebeling against, was it legitimate?</p>
<p>Was it?</p>
<p>Kyong Sang&#8217;s Son, the first, Park Gyn Hye&#8217;s father, he rolled in with tanks.  He was couping against the govt.  He should have been shot, right?  He was shot after more than 2 decades.</p>
<p>Kyong Sang&#8217;s Son, the 2nd, General Jun Doo Hwan.  Who gave him the country?  The people?  He took it.  It&#8217;s coup.  He should have been shot, right?  He was rebelling against the people for personal and regional gain.</p>
<p>The people of Kwangju.  They were in armed rebellion after trying daemo.  They were rebelling against the new South Korean military govt.  With guns.  They should have been shot, right?  You make the call.</p>
<p>The way Park and Chun took over is no different than the recent Thailand military coup.</p>
<p>they do that in 3rd world countries, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bumfromkorea</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2008/05/18/5-18-gwangju/#comment-154841</link>
		<dc:creator>bumfromkorea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 02:42:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/?p=6624#comment-154841</guid>
		<description>Baduk, your argument would work if time had compressed into a single point and everything happened simultaneously.  Fortunately, that is not the case at this particular dimension.  Guess who shot first.  And second.  And third.  And fourth.

It took quite a while before the protesters armed themselves. 

I actually didn't believe my parents when they told me some people still believe that bullshit spewed by Chun regime.  Well, you live and learn I guess...

"That’s a terrible analogy. A much better one would be the LA riots in the 90s."

No, THAT would be a terrible analogy.  Gwangju was a protest about democracy.  LA riot was a riot stemming from racial tension.  Besides, the analogy is to point out that faultiness of a minor sector of a particular event(communist/ultraliberal extremist) does not define the entire event (Gwangju/Million Man) at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Baduk, your argument would work if time had compressed into a single point and everything happened simultaneously.  Fortunately, that is not the case at this particular dimension.  Guess who shot first.  And second.  And third.  And fourth.</p>
<p>It took quite a while before the protesters armed themselves. </p>
<p>I actually didn&#8217;t believe my parents when they told me some people still believe that bullshit spewed by Chun regime.  Well, you live and learn I guess&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8220;That’s a terrible analogy. A much better one would be the LA riots in the 90s.&#8221;</p>
<p>No, THAT would be a terrible analogy.  Gwangju was a protest about democracy.  LA riot was a riot stemming from racial tension.  Besides, the analogy is to point out that faultiness of a minor sector of a particular event(communist/ultraliberal extremist) does not define the entire event (Gwangju/Million Man) at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: baduk</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2008/05/18/5-18-gwangju/#comment-154832</link>
		<dc:creator>baduk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 01:53:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/?p=6624#comment-154832</guid>
		<description>If the Million man marchers were armed and shooting at the policemen, then they would have to have been killed.

On the spot.

That is what happened in Kwangju.

Analogy to the Independence War does not fly.  Even today, a group of people arm themselves and shoot at the military, then there is no choice.

No choice at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the Million man marchers were armed and shooting at the policemen, then they would have to have been killed.</p>
<p>On the spot.</p>
<p>That is what happened in Kwangju.</p>
<p>Analogy to the Independence War does not fly.  Even today, a group of people arm themselves and shoot at the military, then there is no choice.</p>
<p>No choice at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wjk, 검은 머리 외국인</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2008/05/18/5-18-gwangju/#comment-154829</link>
		<dc:creator>wjk, 검은 머리 외국인</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 01:37:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/?p=6624#comment-154829</guid>
		<description>Unlike Japan, Korea can say it has a 2 major party system, where the governing body has a realistic chance of being replaced based on how liberal or conservative the people 
[of sudo-gwon and choong chun do]
feel. Wow !

[the rest of south korea still votes by region]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unlike Japan, Korea can say it has a 2 major party system, where the governing body has a realistic chance of being replaced based on how liberal or conservative the people<br />
[of sudo-gwon and choong chun do]<br />
feel. Wow !</p>
<p>[the rest of south korea still votes by region]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wjk, 검은 머리 외국인</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2008/05/18/5-18-gwangju/#comment-154827</link>
		<dc:creator>wjk, 검은 머리 외국인</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 01:24:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/?p=6624#comment-154827</guid>
		<description>nacho sees it the right way.

South Korea was capitalist, but was never much democratic.

It's even more convincing to say it was a capitalist, fascist state, whose government, economy, and social system was modeled after
...

Japan.  

with some of the US stuff mixed in.

Gradually, more of the US stuff made up the core of it.

Unlike Japan, Korea can say it has a 2 major party system, where the governing body has a realistic chance of being replaced based on how liberal or conservative the people feel.  Wow !

Democracy as it is practiced in the US, is a rare thing to be found in the rest of the world.

South Korea took it the way Japan took it.
And now, it took a step beyond Japan.

In a way, People's Republic of China is also a capitalist, fascist state, but there you have no way to replace the governing body.

To say it another way, the people of Kyong Sang Do used every trick in the book, to make South Korea a capitalist, fascist state. 

At the expense of other -do's.
Label someone a communist, develop their region only.

This is also classically seen in 3rd world countries.  Phillipines, that I know for sure.


Those people are still worshipping Park Gyn Hye.

Also, in 3rd world countries, they worship and elect the daughters of dead dictators of the past.

Isn't South Korea too good to be like that?

I think it is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nacho sees it the right way.</p>
<p>South Korea was capitalist, but was never much democratic.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s even more convincing to say it was a capitalist, fascist state, whose government, economy, and social system was modeled after<br />
&#8230;</p>
<p>Japan.  </p>
<p>with some of the US stuff mixed in.</p>
<p>Gradually, more of the US stuff made up the core of it.</p>
<p>Unlike Japan, Korea can say it has a 2 major party system, where the governing body has a realistic chance of being replaced based on how liberal or conservative the people feel.  Wow !</p>
<p>Democracy as it is practiced in the US, is a rare thing to be found in the rest of the world.</p>
<p>South Korea took it the way Japan took it.<br />
And now, it took a step beyond Japan.</p>
<p>In a way, People&#8217;s Republic of China is also a capitalist, fascist state, but there you have no way to replace the governing body.</p>
<p>To say it another way, the people of Kyong Sang Do used every trick in the book, to make South Korea a capitalist, fascist state. </p>
<p>At the expense of other -do&#8217;s.<br />
Label someone a communist, develop their region only.</p>
<p>This is also classically seen in 3rd world countries.  Phillipines, that I know for sure.</p>
<p>Those people are still worshipping Park Gyn Hye.</p>
<p>Also, in 3rd world countries, they worship and elect the daughters of dead dictators of the past.</p>
<p>Isn&#8217;t South Korea too good to be like that?</p>
<p>I think it is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rich1million</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2008/05/18/5-18-gwangju/#comment-154823</link>
		<dc:creator>rich1million</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 00:59:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/?p=6624#comment-154823</guid>
		<description>Baduk: "All those anecdotes are all bullshit."

Great arguement. Got me convinced...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Baduk: &#8220;All those anecdotes are all bullshit.&#8221;</p>
<p>Great arguement. Got me convinced&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
