<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Won Bites the Dust Yet Again&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rjkoehler.com/2008/05/09/the-won-bites-the-dust-yet-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2008/05/09/the-won-bites-the-dust-yet-again/</link>
	<description>Korea... in Blog Format</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 13:43:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: WangKon936</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2008/05/09/the-won-bites-the-dust-yet-again/#comment-153795</link>
		<dc:creator>WangKon936</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 21:36:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/?p=6575#comment-153795</guid>
		<description>Hey Linkd,

Sorry for not replying to you earlier.  Took me a while to come back to this posting as it's gotten a bit buried.  As I've told you before, if you have specific questions for me, get a hold of me through my xanga.

I don't think the BOK needs to manipulate the money supply too much because the won has already got downward pressure as it is.  In my opinion, central bank intervention into defense of the currency hinges on what commodity prices do.  If they go down like the BOK and even the U.S. Federal Reserve think they will, then the BOK will let the won fall against the dollar.

Food futures are overpriced and will fall.  Oil supply is increasing and oil futures should fall also (although long term oil prices will have upward pressure, but as it is $126 a barrel is too high right now).

So if commodity prices fall, then inflationary pressures will be eased, then deflating the won makes sense in 1) balancing out CAB by increasing trade and 2) increasing economic growth to relieve political pressure on LMB for his silly "747" plan of 7% economic growth.

Lastly, a cheaper won also solves another problem, which is the lack of liquidity in financing markets in Korea.  This is why the BOK has been so reluctant to cut interest rates.  The last thing Korea needs are people borrowing more, because the central bank doesn't have much more money to lend out.  If borrowing in Korea increases, the money has to come from somewhere and where ever it comes from, it's likely to affect Korea's CAB and foreign currency reserves negatively.  This is another reason why FDI is so important (insert Brendon Carr "I told you so" sarcastic comment here).  There are clearly risks to foreign firms to put money into Korea.  However, if the won deflates 20 or 30% and foreign investment firms see that as a temporary and opportunistic situation, they will take more of a "damn the torpedoes" attitude and take the plunge any ways.  Investment growth coupled with currency arbitrage equals fat IRRs and happy limited partners.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Linkd,</p>
<p>Sorry for not replying to you earlier.  Took me a while to come back to this posting as it&#8217;s gotten a bit buried.  As I&#8217;ve told you before, if you have specific questions for me, get a hold of me through my xanga.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think the BOK needs to manipulate the money supply too much because the won has already got downward pressure as it is.  In my opinion, central bank intervention into defense of the currency hinges on what commodity prices do.  If they go down like the BOK and even the U.S. Federal Reserve think they will, then the BOK will let the won fall against the dollar.</p>
<p>Food futures are overpriced and will fall.  Oil supply is increasing and oil futures should fall also (although long term oil prices will have upward pressure, but as it is $126 a barrel is too high right now).</p>
<p>So if commodity prices fall, then inflationary pressures will be eased, then deflating the won makes sense in 1) balancing out CAB by increasing trade and 2) increasing economic growth to relieve political pressure on LMB for his silly &#8220;747&#8243; plan of 7% economic growth.</p>
<p>Lastly, a cheaper won also solves another problem, which is the lack of liquidity in financing markets in Korea.  This is why the BOK has been so reluctant to cut interest rates.  The last thing Korea needs are people borrowing more, because the central bank doesn&#8217;t have much more money to lend out.  If borrowing in Korea increases, the money has to come from somewhere and where ever it comes from, it&#8217;s likely to affect Korea&#8217;s CAB and foreign currency reserves negatively.  This is another reason why FDI is so important (insert Brendon Carr &#8220;I told you so&#8221; sarcastic comment here).  There are clearly risks to foreign firms to put money into Korea.  However, if the won deflates 20 or 30% and foreign investment firms see that as a temporary and opportunistic situation, they will take more of a &#8220;damn the torpedoes&#8221; attitude and take the plunge any ways.  Investment growth coupled with currency arbitrage equals fat IRRs and happy limited partners.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linkd</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2008/05/09/the-won-bites-the-dust-yet-again/#comment-153709</link>
		<dc:creator>Linkd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 10:11:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/?p=6575#comment-153709</guid>
		<description>"Engineering won weakness", as Boston Rob calls it, is doable, and the reason would be export support, yes. &lt;i&gt;(The support for the US dollar now comes from the GCC (Persian Gulf Coast Countries) and China, though. Japan and Korea have been left behind by the scale of purchases by these other two major buyers of US bonds.)&lt;/i&gt;

So, Korea can expand its money supply enough to engineer won weakness. All this means is that the exporters get more won per export dollar, and so can keep Koreans working. That's a good thing. But those same workers are going to pay for it, because the price of won weakness is domestic inflation.

You don't get something for nothing. 

That said, I just checked the BOK's site, and the growth in money supply is indeed accelerating. But my amateur assumption is that the sudden switch to a negative trade balance in 2008 had more to do with the won's sudden slide.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Engineering won weakness&#8221;, as Boston Rob calls it, is doable, and the reason would be export support, yes. <i>(The support for the US dollar now comes from the GCC (Persian Gulf Coast Countries) and China, though. Japan and Korea have been left behind by the scale of purchases by these other two major buyers of US bonds.)</i></p>
<p>So, Korea can expand its money supply enough to engineer won weakness. All this means is that the exporters get more won per export dollar, and so can keep Koreans working. That&#8217;s a good thing. But those same workers are going to pay for it, because the price of won weakness is domestic inflation.</p>
<p>You don&#8217;t get something for nothing. </p>
<p>That said, I just checked the BOK&#8217;s site, and the growth in money supply is indeed accelerating. But my amateur assumption is that the sudden switch to a negative trade balance in 2008 had more to do with the won&#8217;s sudden slide.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WangKon936</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2008/05/09/the-won-bites-the-dust-yet-again/#comment-153193</link>
		<dc:creator>WangKon936</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 20:59:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/?p=6575#comment-153193</guid>
		<description># 25,

Bingo Boston_Rob.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p># 25,</p>
<p>Bingo Boston_Rob.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rowan</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2008/05/09/the-won-bites-the-dust-yet-again/#comment-153131</link>
		<dc:creator>rowan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 11:25:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/?p=6575#comment-153131</guid>
		<description>if it takes a graduate level student rather than just an undergrad student to tell that exchange rates and the current account are linked then Koreans aren't getting much for all these education dollars.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if it takes a graduate level student rather than just an undergrad student to tell that exchange rates and the current account are linked then Koreans aren&#8217;t getting much for all these education dollars.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stacked</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2008/05/09/the-won-bites-the-dust-yet-again/#comment-153112</link>
		<dc:creator>stacked</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 05:48:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/?p=6575#comment-153112</guid>
		<description>@25, I wouldn't call it engineering. What they are banking on is that in the very near future the price of oil and some commodities will drop. Oil especially is expected to drop and the dollar is expected to recover slightly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@25, I wouldn&#8217;t call it engineering. What they are banking on is that in the very near future the price of oil and some commodities will drop. Oil especially is expected to drop and the dollar is expected to recover slightly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tbonetylr</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2008/05/09/the-won-bites-the-dust-yet-again/#comment-153109</link>
		<dc:creator>tbonetylr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 05:30:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/?p=6575#comment-153109</guid>
		<description># 20 WangKon936

If you were to ask Lee, Seong-tae a question or two what would you ask?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p># 20 WangKon936</p>
<p>If you were to ask Lee, Seong-tae a question or two what would you ask?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boston_Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2008/05/09/the-won-bites-the-dust-yet-again/#comment-153108</link>
		<dc:creator>Boston_Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 05:22:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/?p=6575#comment-153108</guid>
		<description>I have a feeling that the ROK govt is engineering won weakness to 1) boost the country's exports and 2) along w/ japan help support an ailing US dollar

w/ LMB as president, is this really that farfetched?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a feeling that the ROK govt is engineering won weakness to 1) boost the country&#8217;s exports and 2) along w/ japan help support an ailing US dollar</p>
<p>w/ LMB as president, is this really that farfetched?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MigukNamja</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2008/05/09/the-won-bites-the-dust-yet-again/#comment-153082</link>
		<dc:creator>MigukNamja</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 01:39:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/?p=6575#comment-153082</guid>
		<description>The formula to success is not:

FDI     : LoneStar-style persecution
Tourism : More golf courses

it's rather:

chaebol protection : LoneStar-style persecution
chaebol executives : More golf courses
 
Korea has the best politicians money can buy (and Korea is not unique by a long shot).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The formula to success is not:</p>
<p>FDI     : LoneStar-style persecution<br />
Tourism : More golf courses</p>
<p>it&#8217;s rather:</p>
<p>chaebol protection : LoneStar-style persecution<br />
chaebol executives : More golf courses</p>
<p>Korea has the best politicians money can buy (and Korea is not unique by a long shot).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linkd</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2008/05/09/the-won-bites-the-dust-yet-again/#comment-152973</link>
		<dc:creator>Linkd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 02:18:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/?p=6575#comment-152973</guid>
		<description>I don't underestimate the American consumer's &lt;i&gt;desire or willingness&lt;/i&gt; to consume, WangKon. I do wonder at this point, though, how it is that further consumption will be paid for. Aren't the West's consumers about tapped out? Aren't we at a point where spending has to come from either governments or Asian consumers?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t underestimate the American consumer&#8217;s <i>desire or willingness</i> to consume, WangKon. I do wonder at this point, though, how it is that further consumption will be paid for. Aren&#8217;t the West&#8217;s consumers about tapped out? Aren&#8217;t we at a point where spending has to come from either governments or Asian consumers?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Austin</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2008/05/09/the-won-bites-the-dust-yet-again/#comment-152971</link>
		<dc:creator>Austin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 01:59:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/?p=6575#comment-152971</guid>
		<description>Economists are notoriously wrong when it comes to predictions. How many economists are hot shot commodity traders or fund managers? Definition of an economist...., someone who tells you tommorow, why what they said yesterday, DID'NT happen today!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Economists are notoriously wrong when it comes to predictions. How many economists are hot shot commodity traders or fund managers? Definition of an economist&#8230;., someone who tells you tommorow, why what they said yesterday, DID&#8217;NT happen today!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
