Constitutional Court to Review Criminal Adultery

We can thank Ok So-ri for something other than providing tons of quality blog material — the naughty actress’s petition to the Constitutional Court challenging the constitutionality of Korea’s criminal adultery law will be heard Thursday.

Sphere: Related Content

7 Comments

  1. Gravatar Seth Gecko your flag
    Posted May 6, 2008 at 4:43 pm | Permalink

    Think about it… you catch your wife cheating on you. You slap her.

    Whose transgression was worse?!

    The law (back home) says that a slap would constitute assault, and thus be punishable by law.

    At sentencing, I’d say to the judge “Your honor, would you rather be cheated on by your spouse, or slapped by your spouse?”

    I used to think the Adultery Law was caveman b.s., but no. There should be legal punishment for adultery.

  2. Posted May 6, 2008 at 4:53 pm | Permalink

    Why not just divorce? Or forgive? Why bring the law into it. Is the need for revenge that strong?

    Anyways, I think the crux of this issue was that the adultery laws were horribly one sided - giving the men pretty much free reign to fuck anything they wanted while using it as a tool to punish or control the women.

    yeah…I am exaggerating but so be it.

  3. Posted May 6, 2008 at 5:41 pm | Permalink

    Anyways, I think the crux of this issue was that the adultery laws were horribly one sided - giving the men pretty much free reign to fuck anything they wanted while using it as a tool to punish or control the women.

    Actually, women’s groups have traditionally been the law’s biggest backers, although that’s now changing:

    http://www.hani.co.kr/arti/soc.....44040.html
    http://www.segye.com/Articles/.....1214000054

  4. Gravatar dda your flag
    Posted May 6, 2008 at 6:04 pm | Permalink

    Why bring the law into it. Is the need for revenge that strong?

    Ask the US divorce lawyers… :-)

  5. Gravatar dokdoforever your flag
    Posted May 6, 2008 at 6:14 pm | Permalink

    Kind of ironic that women would support the adultery law, since it likely originated from the perspective of women as property. Sleeping with someone’s wife was viewed as a type of theft, hence the application of criminal law. I’d imagine it was seldom brought against men in the past, but now that may be changing. With free marriage in Korea, the end of extended families, and an easing of patrinlineal descent, women are no longer viewed as property of the clan, leaving this law outdated and in need of change.

  6. Posted May 6, 2008 at 6:34 pm | Permalink

    I’d imagine it was seldom brought against men in the past, but now that may be changing.

    Actually, judging from one of the links, it was the opposite — it used to be brought against men primarily, but now more and more women are getting charged.

    I’d have to search around to see if the numbers back that up, of course.

  7. Posted May 6, 2008 at 8:55 pm | Permalink

    Well that is certainly an interesting turn of events…I stand corrected.

One Trackback

  1. [...] Constitutional Court to Review Criminal Adultery (Marmot) We can thank Ok So-ri for something other than providing tons of quality blog material — the naughty actress’s petition to the Constitutional Court challenging the constitutionality of Korea’s criminal adultery law will be heard Thursday. [...]

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*

Bad Behavior has blocked 17461 access attempts in the last 7 days.