From One Free Korea:
Being a glass-half-full sort of guy, I look at things like this and tell myself that a billion people can’t ALL be assholes.
Korea… in Blog Format
From One Free Korea:
Being a glass-half-full sort of guy, I look at things like this and tell myself that a billion people can’t ALL be assholes.
Previous post: Foreign Ministry Expresses ‘Strong Regret’ about Chinese Thugs
Next post: Olympic spirit lives in Pyongyang
Posted 40 minutes ago
Models promote St. Patrick's Day at a pub in Seoul on Tuesday, a day before the traditional Irish holiday. /Newsis [Link]
Posted 3 hours ago
A very refined royal dish plays smash mouth with a rainy day treat. Gujeolpan literally means “nine-sectioned dish.” Think of it like Korean fajitas. Very labor intensive, finely chopped vegetables and egg are placed in color coordination around a middle part stacked with little pancakes or pickled radishes for wrapping. Enjoyed by imbibing nobles. From Flickr SeolleongTang is representative of ... [Link]
Posted 3 hours ago
With hat tips and congratulations, the 10 Magazine poll asking readers' favorite Korean blogs is over. With that goes an odd sort of voting - only one blog could be chosen as 'the best', and three blogs taking a majority of the vote. Considering there's 'over 300 English blogs on Korea' according to 10 Magazine (I read almost 100 of ... [Link]
Posted 3 hours ago
Turkey is upset about the resolutions in the United States and Sweden regarding the alleged Armenian Genocide. Logical reaction from Turkey? Threaten to deport 100,000+ Armenians because it worked out so well the first time and all. “There are currently 170,000 Armenians living in our country. Only 70,000 of them are Turkish citizens, but we are tolerating the remaining 100,000. ... [Link]
Posted 4 hours ago
Here is a group assisting North Korean refugees in South Korea that needs some help in regards to English language tutor volunteers: Lee is a North Korean refugee who defected in 2005. Lee is also a student at People for Successful Corean Reunification, or Pscore. Established in 2006, Pscore is a non-governmental organization consisting entirely of volunteers, with bases in ... [Link]
Posted 4 hours ago
The Korea Times has the story:The Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism has filed a complaint against a group of netizens, who allegedly uploaded an edited video clip of skating queen Kim Yu-na and Minister Yu In-chon together.Jongno Police Station in Seoul said Wednesday that it was investigating the netizens for uploading the clip after receiving complaints from the ministry. ... [Link]
Posted 4 hours ago
A favorite of hardcore foodies goes against one of the most popular amongst the general public. Makchang/Gobchang Gui are dishes made from the business ends of cattle. Specifically, Makchang comes from the large intestine and Gobchang from the small intestine. They’re heavily cleaned and marinated and, when grilled properly, have a baconey meaty flavor that’s addictive. Samgyetang is a popular ... [Link]
Posted 4 hours ago
In the 20th century, Detroit, Mich., symbolized American industrial might. Today it symbolizes the offshored economy. Detroit’s population has declined by half. A quarter of the city—35 square miles—is desolate with only a few houses still standing on largely abandoned streets. If the local government can get the money from Washington, urban planners are going to shrink the city and ... [Link]
Posted 5 hours ago
How do you like your fish? Raw and so fresh that it’s a little crunchy? Or slowly braised until tender? Saengseon Hui is what we would call Korean sashimi. Hui restaurants usually have the little buggers swimming in tanks just moments before being served at the table with soy sauce, wasabi and vinegar-tinged gochujang. The remains of the fish dinner ... [Link]
Posted 6 hours ago
What does Super Mario Bros. have to do with Korean cuisine? We find out here. From Flickr GukBap is literally “soup and rice” and has many forms, each one of them hearty and satisfying to everyday folks. Back when creating Super Mario Bros., designer Shigeru Miyamoto wanted to name the big bad guy after a Korean dish. The Japanese word ... [Link]
Get smart with the Thesis WordPress Theme from DIYthemes.
Bad Behavior has blocked 8017 access attempts in the last 7 days.
{ 87 comments… read them below or add one }
Technically, no. But that’s because many of them are still infants and toddlers. True assholeness isn’t revealed until one is well into adolescence. /sarcasm
That link to the photo album is amazing. Great to see a ground-level perspective of what was going on at the torch run.
bum’s right – great photo set.
Now get back to your studies, dammit. You aren’t going to integrate schrodinger’s wave equation by browsing blogs.
I was intimidated. The propaganderthals did a pretty good job. I was there, too.
i cant believe they would actually go there and cause trouble to the extent they did
they should have been arrested and their visas revoked and sent back home in time to see the beloved olympics!
Actually, I didn’t find it so funny and let Joshua know that on his blog. I really it’s worded in a sort of facetious way, but it’s the attitude behind statements like that which are used by the CCP to whip up nationalist sentiment and defang any legitimate foreign criticism of Chinese policies and actions.
This is what happens when you get a generation of brainwashed dolts who have no experience in democratic rights or the Socratic method let loose on the streets. IMHO some values training for Chinese students might be a good thing before allowing them to participate in democratic societies with the human beings.
The overseas Chinese seems to be staunchly behind the CCP. They are even more hardcore than the Chinese in China. I thought there would be a few of them who would stand up to dictatorship. But natta, from talking to many of them.. they say the CNN, the West, white people are the ones creating problems for China. They are very proud of economically rising China and express their pride without hesitation.
Hopefully, the Chinese will host the Olympics successfully and life will go back to the way it was.
I’m wondering just where this generation of gullible and volatile only-children will find that “legitimate” criticism of which you speak. For that matter, I’m wondering about that great wave of introspection in the Muslim world that should have been trigged by the West’s collective decision to stop showing images of 9/11 on TV, or to refrain from criticizing the most repellent and misogynistic aspects of Islam. Can you cite any evidence that we’ve encouraged the more moderate elements of either society by abstaining from holding mirrors in front of their most thuggish members?
I think the answer can be found in the cartoon riots.
#8, As far as I know, post Tienanmen Square the CCP began to more rigidly vet those allowed to study abroad.
So far from the mark, its not even funny. What a load of racist bullcrap.
Oh no! Those dirty Chinese don’t agree with our world view! Let’s bash them good!
Oh no! They don’t accept out values! Let’s learn’em good and westernize ‘em. Then they’ll learn to appreciate us.
Meanwhile, let’s apply double standards and hide behind our broken morality and the shield of “human rights!”
Whatever, how typically naive of you all. Those protestors were friendly and polite. Naturally, you’ve let yourselves be brainwashed by the media and by your own misconceptions about Chinese society. I was there the entire time, following the protestors. This is absolute BS of the first degree. It was a peaceful demonstration, by all accounts, save a few incidents and a few people. Total BS. Shame on this site and all of you for spreading lies.
Remember when the whole world was ripping on those braindead Iraqi IED fodder who invaded and colonized Iraq? Most Americans didn’t appreciate that all that much, did they? Most Americans were downright indignant, where’nt they? They said “Mind your own business France, Russia and Germany. We don’t care about you or your opinions.” I guess now you know why the Chinese were so angry.
AaronM, what a load of bullshit. China is not a totaltarian state. They don’t “vet your background” anymore than the CIA or MI6 vetted your background before you came out here.
More lies and misconceptions.
I was at the relay. Both at the beginning in the Olympic Park and at the end by City Hall (I was at the Uri-LG game in between). From what I saw, and I’m only relating what I saw, the vast majority of Chinese flag wavers were peaceful, and I certainly saw a lot of Chinese flag wavers.
I’ve been to enough soccer games to know how these things go when you get large numbers of people banding together to support some cause with the “opposing” cause only metres away. You can speculate whether everyone from (name virtually any European or South American soccer playing nation) is an asshole because of trouble at soccer games if you like. Whether its rhetorical or hyperbolic or sarcastic, it’s not very helpful, and at the least rather simplistic.
Obviously there are some people who, by the looks of the photos and videos, were out of control and probably broke the law, but as I say, the experience I had was of many peaceful people who just wanted to take photos and wave their flags and were certainly not looking for trouble.
Now I doubt very much that you could get virtually every Canadian in Korea to turn out in Seoul to demonstrate the oneness of Canada, even if the embassy was giving away free Maple Leafs, but I think we should cut the Chinese some slack. Last I checked we haven’t exactly abolished idiocy in the West.
Even if they wanted to, do you think the CCP or the Chinese government has the manpower or the will to rigourously control and monitor 1.2 billion people? Even if they had the will, do you think they actually COULD do it? Crap. Crap. Crap. Crap. Crap,
Hands up anyone who thinks MoralMidgetElgin is getting Chinese pussy right now.
Or maybe MoralMidgetElgin actually lived in China for 15 years, speaks the language, does business with its people and actually knows what he’s talking about.
By the way, my wife is white.
Does anyone else see parallels between Germany coming out of their impotent Wiemar period with these schmucks? Olympics in 1936, war in 1939, anyone? We’ll teach the world to respect us?
Does anyone see that wedge is moron?
Comparing China to Nazi Germany? I guess someone here needs to retake 20th century history. Are you sure you’re not one of those teachers hear on a fake degree you bought on Khao San Road? That’s just ignorant and doesn’t make any sense. And all along I thought I was the troll! Sheesh!
There are no parralles whatsoever between China today and Nazi Germany. If any country resembles the offensive footing of Nazi Germany today, it’s the U.S. and it’s wars of aggression and resources in Iraq and Afghanistan. If any country is bound to upset the geopolitical order, it’s the U.S. China is a peaceful power. They follow Jefferson’s wonderful maxim: “make economic relations with everone and political relations with no one.”
Actually, they try to do just that regarding the dissemination of news. Their attempts to control the internet, the establishment of monitors in online bulletin boards, their dissemination of news — all speaks of the CCPs desire to filter and monitor anything that might cause political trouble. Here is just one current link regarding some of this. Though they try, there are plenty of Chinese with the skills to get around whatever blocks they put up too.
I believe you are the one peddling crap, crap, crap and more crap here.
#19,
That bit on the end is a lie. China does have pretty stong political relations with a few governments such as Sudan, Burma, North Korea and Zimbabwe.
BTW, it isn’t called the “Great Firewall of China” for nothing.
China is a one-party system, which is to say they wield complete control over the country and it is centralized to the extent that, yes, it is a totalitarian government, according to Websters. There are now elections of sorts but, as is common knowledge, Party candidates rule, thus it is a bit of stage puppetry.
Well “moral midget”, if you actually married a white woman, I guess you should brag about that because you have not much else that can be called a virtue.
I’m sorry, did I say having a “white” woman was a virtue? Only if she beats you with a stick, that is.
man i must be old because those demonstrators yesterday reminded me of the old red guard from the cultural revolution except they aint in china
somewhere mao is smiling
AaronM, what a load of bullshit. China is not a totaltarian state.
Why then do dissidents still receive jail terms for saying things the state does not like? If not totalitarian, what do you call single party rule then? Moral midget? How about moral equivalence at its abso-bloody-lute worst?
WRONG, Elgy, et al. I think you should chuck out that version of Webster’s your using and invest in a good dictionary. Or take Polisci 101.
China is authoritarian.
A totaltarian state is one in which the government tries to dominate all aspects of life, like Stalinist Russia or North Korea. CCP doesn’t dominate all aspects of life. Far from it. It might put some controls in place here and there, but it’s no 1984. It’s no USSR. It’s no Saudi Arabia. And, at least the people live free of fear, which is more than can be said for Iraq.
You can say whatever you want in China. . You can critisize government policy till the cows come home. Secret police aren’t waiting around every corner to catch dissidents. Renmin Ribao even has a special editorial section where you write in complaints. Beijing has a petition office where those with grievences can come to complain. And, let’s not forget about the thousands upon thousands of protests that occur each year over issues like land rights and taxation. Those folks aren’t carted off to work camps. Concentration camps don’t exist in China. But I do know of one such einstitution on a certain leased section of Cuba.
The lies continue. Elgy, you have yet to say one truth regarding China. Everything you’ve said is filtered through your ideological filter and rationalized to support your untenable position. You want to see China go down in flames because its system and it’s people’s way of life don’t square with what you’ve been taught is correct. You’ve been led to believe that, as a Westerner, your values and morality are universalistic and welcomed by all mankind. Newsflash, Elg, their not. A government that gives people freedom to choose their life and be happy is a good government. A government that constantly strives to improve the lives of its people, despite lack of Western institutions like voting, is a good government. The CCP has its faults, but the crap that goes on here is beyond those faults. Lies and distortions are what you peddle in.
What you dont realize is that all this needless bias and anti-Chinese rhetoric does nothing but fan the flames of hatred and nationalism. A self-fullfiling prophecy? Absolutly. You want China to be the enemy, so you’ll make it the enemy. Just wait and see. Right now, the Chinese are not our enemy. The greatest danger to Western civilization is not China. It’s the lies and distortions that pass for truth and are accepted with out factchecking. China is not our enemy now, but believe you me, it will be if xenophobic, biases attitudes like this keep up.
I think we need to take a break from all this slagging one another off and name-calling. How about we take a rest for a few weeks and organise some friendly fun and games instead? We could have some track and field, swimming, rowing, perhaps a couple of team games thrown in too. We could even dish out medals to the people who do the best.
eujin: just make sure it’s mixed teams, and not expats vs. kyopos or something.
i’m in.
Andy Jackson,
China’s relations with those states are not political, they’re economic.
They’ve been politicized–in the sense that other countries make a big deal about them–sure– but their not ideologically based, like the U.S.’s foreign relations. China turns a blind eye to other governments. It doesn’t peddle its system or its ideologies. It doesn’t interfere in other states or tell them what to do. That’s why it didn’t interfer in Burma or North Korea.
It’s foreign policy is pragmatic and based on securing resources to continue to grow–the CCP’s top improve lives. It’s cheif goal is stability and a harmonious society.
There have been some hiccups along the way–I’m not disputing that. I’m not saying the CCP is perfect. Far from it. It has many problems. I’m disputing the tone taken on this site and in the Western media, which is making China out to be the bully to end all bullies, or recasting China as the next USSR/North Korea/etc. As well as the double standards that are so rampant by certain individuals.
Actually, I have though you shrug them off as if you are too biased to admit to them. Perhaps you have an agenda. You grossly misrepresent my wishes to see China “go down in flames” which I do not nor have ever hinted at. Basically you attempt to co-opt the concerns I express with “see, it’s not as bad as it looks” or “the media is all lies” or the old and tired “well, look what so-and-so has done elsewhere” as if that is any justification for the valid concerns expressed regarding China’s questionable ethics.
Rather than me attempting to “re-invent the wheel”, I can offer, in addition to the commentary I have made elsewhere, one site as an example of what is available regarding some of the problems of China: http://www.hrichina.org/public/ and, though, as you put it
I do not think for one moment that all non-Chinese media is biased against China and I know that Chinese media is one of elision and half-truths where it serves the interests of the Part — I’ve read samples.
To summarize before I turn in, it is absurd to think that only you know the truth and everyone else is so incredibly deluded!
#29, still waiting for your reply on the control of information. If everything in China is so free and hunky dory, why is access to certain internet sites so tightly controlled? Where is the accountability when one party only controls the apparatus of government? What rights to asylum do Koreans who defect from the DPRK have? Appologia at its absolute best from you, I dare say you’ll be up for some kind of star-shaped medal at the next plenum of the CCP.
P.S. Regarding you comment about “double standards”, do not even try to characterize my comments as being pro-America or pro-EU. I can make a list of complaints about both as can many others posting on this site.
My conspiracy theory of the day is that #19 must be a sock puppet for Richard Perle. I couldn’t imagine a less persuasive argument than an appeal to take the word of a self-evidently rabid shill over our own lying eyes.
Actually, Chinese nationals who study abroad with government financial assistance are given a propaganda course before leaving china and are required to check in twice a week. I know this because I studies with Chinese nationals during my masters.
In addition, like the muslims and their saudi funded students groups, the CCP is able to keep relative control over overseas students by funding and controlling overseas chinese students groups. Those who do not pull the CCP line are harassed as race-traitors and the like.
The race-centered nationalism of the han chinese is going to become a major global issue in the future.
Sorry, that is “check in twice a month.”. Every other Friday.
I am not going to defend the behavior of the Chinese “students” in Seoul. But as a first gen Chinese-American and NK Human Rights Activist, I want to show everyone that not every Chinese person are nationalistic and prone to violence.
I am from Hong Kong and the resident there have proven they are capable of holding peaceful demonstrations.
Think of these students like the rubes protesting the Berkeley recruiting center, except with a dash of nationalism and a lot more of them.
Now, for many of them this is probably the first time they even heard of North Korean Human Rights. Chances are they lumped them with the fire extinguisher wielding Free Tibet folks and acted accordingly.
My hope is that most of these protesters are reasonable people and would look into our cause. A good start is the DailyNK which is also published in Chinese.
“Or maybe MoralMidgetElgin actually lived in China for 15 years, speaks the language, does business with its people and actually knows what he’s talking about.”
Not based on the evidence offered so far.
Joshua: I’m guessing the “Master Race” act will not be popular in South Korea.
I’m afraid it ain’t an act.
Being a glass-half-full sort of guy, I look at things like this and tell myself that a billion people can’t ALL be assholes.
#7: IMHO some values training for Chinese students might be a good thing before allowing them to participate in democratic societies with the human beings.
I agree with Sonagi that this isn’t so funny and it only feeds nationalist anger among Chinese. The first statement means that most Chinese are probably assholes because they are Chinese. The second one says that Chinese students aren’t human beings. Intentional or not, this is race-based demonizing.
Many young, college-educated Chinese are informed about bloody suppressions of demonstrations and other stories censored in the Chinese media. But when they see dehumanizing attacks instead of rational arguments, it is very difficult to win hearts and minds.
Well said, svend.
38. Leaving aside the issue of whether you’re missing your sarcasm gene, your literacy is questionable. My words were “can’t all be assholes,” which is in fact a denial of a generalization. It says nothing about “most Chinese.” You’re hallucinating that part.
Race-based demonizing? What an insipid and stupid thing to say. It’s an old saw of thugs who use it as a shield against being called what they are. And it misses the broader point, which is that the ChiCom regime carefully manages and regulates exactly what opinions are being expressed and seen, and where, and how.
Would you be willing to acknowledge that the subjects of this story certainly seem to be assholes? Someone needs to tell these people how they’ve been behaving by trying to censor free speech and assembly on the streets of an independent democratic nation’s capital.
You know, I’m beginning to suspect that these people think that Seoul is also a part of China.
@#10:
Do not lump the Chinese and Muslims together. This thread and yours are about the Chinese. Muslims are completely irrelevant to this discussion.
Despite vigilant net nannyism, Chinese university students have access to “subversive” content, some of it produced domestically. One thing that strikes me while browsing Chinese forums is that the Chinese know that the little fat man is to blame for North Korea’s ills in spite of the kid glove treatment the country and its leader receive in the press. Chinese visitors to North Korea bring back photos and stories, which get posted on the internet.
Calling one billion people assholes because of the behavior of a few punks isn’t classy. Period.
Not to condone the bad behavior of some of the Chinese demonstrators, excuse the possible role of Chinese authorities in the demonstration, or condone the authoritarian nature of the Chinese government, but I think these protests are perhaps playing a counterproductive role. At one point I thought that protesting the torch relay might be a good way of putting the spotlight on a few China-related issues, but I’m not so sure about it now.
I get the impression that Chinese in general, even those who may be critical of their government/system, feel as if they are the target of these protests. Of course this is how it is being spun by authorities in the state media/propaganda machine, but there is a real danger that these protests – as well-intentioned as they may be – are doing little good to win over the people who will be responsible for future reforms in China – the Chinese people.
“Being a glass-half-full sort of guy, I look at things like this and tell myself that a billion people can’t ALL be assholes.”
It is indeed funny, but I don’t think the reaction of Chinese netizens – assuming your comments are translated and reprinted by some of them – will see the humor. Admittedly, the hardcore elements are not exactly open to changing their minds, but are those kinds of comments – like the protests – going to convince more moderate Chinese that your cause is just or encourage them to reflect on their country’s shortcomings?
The reason a regular Chinese dude will think that HE is the object of the protest is because the CCP has changed the ideology of the party from communist to Defenders of Han-Chinese Glory From Outside Barbarians. This change has been very effective, and as I said before, is going to be a major problem in the future. The greatest weakness of the HCGFOB paradigm is that the Muslims, Tibetans, Koreans and Mongolians who reside in China (among others) will likely have a few points of objection with the new cultural focus of “their” government.
Shall we ask the relevant questions about how this might alter assumptions about Chinese immigration to the West and the myth of the “model minority”? Nah.
@41 Sonagi
Muslims may be irrelevant to this discussion, but the perceived ineffectiveness of a “speak no evil” response to an aggression carried out in the name of Islam is probably relevant to the hypothetical effectiveness of a “speak no evil” response to aggression carried out in the name of Chinese nationalism.
I think (if I may presume to interpret the thought of so articulate a commenter as Joshua) his premise was that tribal militancy takes its adversaries’ forbearance as a sign of weakness. This is a statement about human nature.
You can reasonably disagree with him, but I think you are mistaken when you reject his point as irrelevant.
I too have been struck by the similarities between the anti-CNN movement by Chinese nationalists and the various reactions in the Muslim world to, say, Salman Rushdie’s book and, recently, the Danish cartoons. Mindless unreason and a herd mentality are the common denominators.
The Rushdie book burnings involved people who not only hadn’t read Satanic Verses, but couldn’t because they were illiterate. (Presumably, they were selectively told about the contents). A PRChinese journalist in Washington told me last week that what she found baffling about the anti-CNN uproar is that CNN is not available to ordinary Chinese, who are getting a very selective version of that network’s alleged distortions.
#26,
Strives to improve the lives of its people? Then, why do they jail people who point out what needs to be done to do so?
“It is ironic that one of the people in charge of organizing the Olympic Games is the head of the Bureau of Public Security, which is responsible for so many human rights violations. It is very serious that the official promises are not being kept before the games.”
Hu Jia
@#44:
Perhaps you and others are misreading my point. I objected to Joshua’s statement not because it would offend the Chinese per se but because it appeared to slur most Chinese because of the actions of a few. I have no problem offending the Chinese (see some of my recent posts) with just and fair criticism. I do have a problem with gratuitous insults.
CCTV is stiflingly censored and laughingly propagandist, but at least its anchors do not regularly refer to the US government by belittling diminutives the way Lou Dobbs and others spew out Chicom whenever they talk about China.
The anti-CNN movement and the Muslim demonstrations are both orchestrated by the government. However, the Chinese anti-CNN movement is non-violent. I haven’t heard of any Chinese leaders issuing fatwas against Jack Cafferty. Sure, there are similarities, but there are differences, too.
#29,
China’s relations with Japan, South Korea and the USA are economic. China’s relations with Burma, Sudan and Zimbabwe are political. China is proping up those regimes because they are China’s allies. Chinese arms and soldiers keep the later two in business for economic resources and support for the later in order to gain military access to the Indian Ocean and perhaps an oil pipeline.
Those are not cases of China refusing to interfer with other nations. Those are cases of China interfering on the wrong side.
North Korea is a special case and has evolved into China’s tar baby.
Former CNN Beijing Bureau chief Yang Hengjun made the same observation in a recent blog post, “Why Is CNN Patriotic?” translated at EastSouthWestNorth:
http://www.zonaeuropa.com/20080425_1.htm
Oh? And I suppose this is the sort of august discourse that will appeal to a nation’s tender conscience, then.
Actually, Andy, China’s relations with Burma are about natural gas, and its relations with Sudan are about oil. Western companies are kept out of these nations by the conscience of their home populations, which is no impediment for China’s state-owned energy companies and sovereign wealth funds. Dunno about Zimbabwe.
I don’t see what the problem is with China’s relationship to Sudan or Zimbabwe or Burma. All are sovereign states who are conducting legitimate business with China. None of them are being propped up with soldiers or weapons.
Unlike Uncle Sam, China is not in the business of giving away weapons for free. They pay cash, they get weapons. It’s a fairly simple business transaction. No money, no guns. Quite unlike the 600 million the US gave for free to armed Sudanese rebel groups in 2007. It’s funny that mutually beneficial business transactions are seen as propping up a government while sending money and weapons to murderous thugs is somehow stabilizing.
Governments only become unsavory regimes to be overthrown when they stop being useful to America, quite convenient might I add.
Jing, you’re high.
1. Chinese arms company NORINCO (owned by the Chinese military) was recently revealed to have been trying to sell half a million AK47s and 10 million rounds of ammo to Libya, via middlemen in the Italian mafia. The AK47 is an elderly weapon (60+ years old), and even the Libyans wouldn’t use it to equip their armed forces nowadays. And 500,000 guns would way oversupply the Libyan military, which is only 100,000. The likely end customers? Various revolutionary groups (i.e. terrorists) in Africa and around the world. In other words, Gaddafi is up to his usual mischief and China is all too willing to oblige him, for the right price of course.
2. New Chinese bomber aircraft are showing up in Sudan, no doubt violating one toothless UN resolution or another. Improved bombers will allow the Khartoum regime to better kill their own people in Darfur and elsewhere in the country. China doesn’t care, as long as they are paid and the oil keeps flowing.
3. Last week a Chinese merchant vessel full of weapons for the detestable regime of Robert Mugabe in (landlocked) Zimbabwe showed up in Durban, South Africa for unloading. The contents of the Chinese shipment include, according to the Guardian (UK):
… 3.5m rounds of ammunition for AK47 assault rifles and for small arms, 1,500 40mm rockets, 2,500 mortar shells of 60mm and 81mm calibre, as well as 93 cases of mortar tubes
These supplies will naturally allow Mugabe’s thugs to better brutalize and terrorize his own people, who are languishing under nearly 30 years of Mugabe’s tyranny. Mugabe’s continued rule is at least in part underwritten by his backers in Beijing. The dockworkers in Durban, to their credit, refused to handle or offload the cargo.
http://www.strategypage.com/dl.....722369.asp
http://www.guardian.co.uk/worl......armstrade
http://www.strategypage.com/ht.....80415.aspx
Get you head out of the sand. Chinese soldiers are deep in the Sudan.
MoralMidgetElgin must be talking about another country called China. His China is replete with cigarette trees and whiskey streams. His China does not have persecution of Falung Gong or tanks in the streets. His China does not have the Government taking funds from bank accounts to fund their state owned industries. MoralMidgetElgin is right, we are all drinking the wrong Kool-aid.
Not to defend the Chinese on human rights or their choice of friends, but I wouldn’t support a boycot or round of protests related to a future Olympic Games in the United States based on American support for Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Pakistan, and other authoritarian regimes.
Or for invading Iraq for the reason(s) they did.
Jing, don’t bother arguing with these folk. They’re set in their ways and blinded by their ancient cold war ideologies. “CCP is bad because the USSR was communist and the communists were our ‘enemies.’” That how folks around here think.
Of course, they offer no proof of these supposed human rights violations, other than hearsay and isolated incidents. They want to bash China because they want to see China fail because that’s what the media and politicians tell them to think. They think their making “free choices” but they’re not. They’re just rationalizing away the truth to support their ideology. I doubt one person on this site has done indiependent reading on China, visited the country with an open mind, or questioned their own assumptions regarding these issues. They don’t. They just accept what they hear as fact. It’s obviouse they do this because their view doesn’t square with reality on the ground in China.
China’s foreign policy is refreshingly pragmatic. China gets flack from morally-bankrupt American hippocrits for persuing economic development. Yet, these same hippocrits turn a blind eye to U.S. atrocities in Guantanamo Bay, Iraq, Afghanistan, Saudi Arabia, and other U.S. puppet regimes. China gets flack because it doesn’t ask “how high?” when America says “jump.” Plain and simple. U.S. have supported more than its fair share of currupt tin-pot dictatorships and American hippocrits apply their double standards and rationalize it away as “necessary for democracy” or some other B.S.
China is not the enemy of the U.S. Chinese people have good feelings towards Americans and Westerners. For now. But incessent anti-Chinese rants, distoritions and lies will no doubt have an effect.
I’m going to repeat this paragraph becuase its worth repeating. Re-read. Re-read and re4-read again. Then do:
They think their making “free choices” but they’re not. They’re just rationalizing away the truth to support their ideology. I doubt one person on this site has done indiependent reading on China, visited the country with an open mind, or questioned their own assumptions regarding these issues. They don’t. They just accept what they hear as fact. It’s obviouse they do this because their view doesn’t square with reality on the ground in China.
#53: “Unlike Uncle Sam, …”
#56: “China gets flack from morally-bankrupt American hippocrits for persuing economic development.”
But it’s not just Americans who are critical of China’s human rights abuses, its occupation of Tibet, its repatriation of North Korean refugees, etc.
There are plenty of protests in the US concerning said issues — quite odd for a country where the citizenry just does what the media and politicians tell them. Let me ask, in the Land of the Free that apparently is the People’s Republic of China, how many Chinese are protesting China’s bankrolling of North Korea, Burma and Zimbabwe?
“Of course, they offer no proof of these supposed human rights violations, other than hearsay and isolated incidents. They want to bash China because they want to see China fail because that’s what the media and politicians tell them to think.”
Don’t try telling us that Chinese human rights abuses can be dismissed as “hearsay and isolated incidents.” I’m impressed with China’s progress, not convinced they are the enemy, not in favor of some of the torch relay protests that have occurred, and also unhappy with what I see as some examples of American hypocrisy in foreign policy, but that doesn’t mean I should therefore ignore the authoritarian nature and actions of the Chinese government.
“Let me ask, in the Land of the Free that apparently is the People’s Republic of China, how many Chinese are protesting China’s bankrolling of North Korea, Burma and Zimbabwe?”
Marmot, few or none. Even if they were free to do so – which, in all probability, they are not – they probably wouldn’t care enough about it to get out and protest. As you pointed out, in the United States there are thousands, even millions, of people who are interested enough in issues – domestic or foreign – to make heir voices heard. And, best of all, they are free to exercise that right.
Robert,
They don’t protest, because they don’t care. They understand that in order for China to survive economically, China needs resources. They haven’t been whippead up into an ideological fervor like some Americans (excuse me– some Westerners). They don’t view those actions as “bankrolling depspotic regimes.” They see it as the cost of doing busines. Chinese sense of values and ethics are far different from Westerners. Some things that seem anethma to you, are ok to them.
Contrary to what’s been said here, the Chinese do have many ways of expressing their opinions publically. Petition offices, local elections, editorial pages and so on provide an outlet for the people. The only thing that’s not up for public discussion is the CCP’s monopoly on power. Everything else is fair game. If every dissident in China were arrested and monitored, you’d have 1 billion people living in jail. People accept this because A) they’ve seen what happened in the former USSR when the communists collapsed and the chaos that resulted and B) they value peace and harmony over dissent. As long as their allowed to go on making money and choosing their futures, they’re happy and willing to put political reform on the back burner. What get’s me about some of the comments on here and in the media in general is the “we know what’s best for the Chinese” attitude that so pervasive and condescending. Believe it or not, the CCP is very receptive to public oppinion. And, while there are still many restrictions, it does strive to give the people what they desire. They have to, or else they’ll be booted out like dynasties past.
By the way–all trolling aside– I really like your photographs. You have a good eye for catching intersting and though-provoking scenes. You’ve especially gotten me interested in colonial Japanese archetecture.
Internal Chinese politics is one thing. Shipping refugees back to North Korea when there’s other countries willing to take them is just plain evil. No way around that.
“China is not the enemy of the U.S. Chinese people have good feelings towards Americans and Westerners.”
Sorry, but I find that hard to believe.
Maybe I’ve been to too many Chinese sites for overseas Chinese, but most of the feeling seems to be of the ‘evil white man’ versus the good Chinese. That’s a constant theme reinforced over and over
Wow. I wish I could channel the collective anima of over a billion people, like you can. That must be truly magical.
That’s an amazing multiplicity of opinion in a group you feel so comfortable painting as a monolithic opinion block in your previous comments. I suppose that, with so many dissidents, it’s not surprising that the CCP takes a targeted approach… like they have with Falun Gong, the Panchen Lama, and Hu Jia.
Do you live in China? Have you tried to leave recently? I would like to put forward the position that China IS 1 billion people living in jail. A closely-monitored jail with very vicious and cruel guards, the CCP. They do not tolerate dissent, but they do tolerate a brisk trade in cigarettes and turn a blind eye to violent attacks in the back room.
I have to agree with MoralMidgetElgin. This site is pretty discusting in the way people constantly attack China. I live in China and I can say this all lies. You people are sick and disturbed, How can you attack my country so viciously? You have no right. Communist Party of China is good and wise. They take care of its people. They make China strong. China is not a jail. I can leave whenever I want. I can do whatever I want.
I agree you all talk out your asses. Falun Gong and Tibetan splitists are criminals, like the mafia and terrorists. That damange society and make life difficult. Religion must be banned. It is bad for the people. Free speech must be limited, or else we’ll get out of control. China is a good and harmounious society. You are all fools.
Westerners imprison and beat muslims and lynch the blacks, don’t forget. Tibetans get special treatment like affirmative action. Minorities in the west are treated so poorly. They are so far behind. Chinese minorities are equal to Han Chinese in everyway. They get good treatement. Han Chinese make life good for our minorities. We are one big family, and the west wants to split us for geopolitical reasons. They fear the strong China. This is not about olympics. This is about politics.
It’s funny… When the Tibetans go on the rampaging race riot and beat up innocent civilians, they get the world’s sympathy and bleeding-heart activists from all over the world step up to protest for them.
When Chinese students peacefully protests, it’s called a riot and it’s blown out of proportion. Participants are called deranged robots, fascists, brownshirts, and red guards. The world dumps their scorn on the evil han Chinese.
Talk about double standards!
@#51:
I’ve said on this blog that I don’t wear a halo.
When I hear of Tibetans rapaging in a race riot in Shanghai, you can bet that I will be against it.
BTW, “Han Chinese” is a bit reduntant. It basically means “Chinese Chinese.” You have the Chinese and then you have folks who are not Chinese but are governed by Beijing, such as the Tibetans.
Actually, we do. I know freedom of speech is probably an alien and distasteful concept for you, but it’s generally held to include the right to criticize the governments of other countries.
Of course! So it must be okay to oppress your minorities.
Yeah yeah, I know… don’t feed the trolls.
Regarding Jing’s comment:
Well, take a look at the press on Zimbabwe and the Chinese ship full of arms that was recently turned away from South Africa. There is every indication that that old, wicked Mugabe would turn these weapons on the very people that have voted against him in the recent elections. Zimbabwe is now a repressive regime with what any reasonable person would call a very poor human rights record and, yes, China does help support it by doing business with Mugabe because of the uranium there. I am sure that “midget” boy will claim that so-and-so has done the same thing or worse but the point is supporting such a regime speaks of the real nature of those that support it.
This site was just one of many that point out some interesting connections regarding Zimbabwe: http://www.nkeconwatch.com/cat...../zimbabwe/
I find it interesting that “moral-midget” has moved from outright off-topic trolling, personal attacks and provocative race-baiting to attempting to post arguments, especially since it became apparent that such cheap tactics would gain him nothing and give people that the supporters of the CCP are trolls.
I find it interesting that he always attempts to shift the thread away from most valid questions and points made by commentators herein, dismissing all as if there is no one capable of understanding the good and the bad tendencies of Chinese Government and their actions — regardless of experience.
“moral-midget”, how about explaining such sites as: http://www.hrichina.org/public/index
These guys have been to China I would say since they are Chinese. Are they merely “race traitors” as some claim or are they part of the vast “western media” plot against the homeland?
While you may argue that the CCP has done many useful things for China — and they have — they are far from being the “benevolent organization” you claim they are. Regardless of your rationalization of their motives, based upon what can be found in books and online, there are tendencies in their leadership that worry many non-Chinese because they demonstrate some of the worst traits of humanity and their (and your) attempt to justify the indefensible simply is not good enough. If you were originally to argue that such behavior is a weakness of human-kind — to do what the CCP has done — that could be a valid point but, rather, you claim their actions as being more a virtue! That is like going out to rob others because my children were hungry and needed to eat, claiming my actions to be taken in good faith and were a virtue!
There is a good reason why their are laws against people torturing animals in the U.S. because psychologists realize that though an animal is considered to be less than human, it is sign of what may come when the animal torturer finds such to be not satisfying and finds it much easier to justify doing the unspeakable upon his fellow human beings. Likewise, for a government to do what the CCP has done to its own citizens should cause non-Chinese to consider well just what could happen to them later if the CCP should suddenly decided that it has justification for using its rapidly expanding arsenal and the purloined military technology it has so avidly sought after.
Considering the flexibility of “history” in China and its uses in the service of the Party, it would be quite easy to find some rationale that could be made palatable to Chinese sensibilities since they seem to have a taste for revisionism and oft-repeated slogans, but then, this dangerous vice is shared with so many humans throughout the world and not just Chinese.
Uh, yeah, everyone I know talks about how nice China would look if it were cut up into little pieces and painted purple . . . you are such an incredibly naive and simplistic dupe to spout such nonsense.
Bad people do bad things such as lynching blacks years ago but you will find such is illegal, immoral and not state-supported policy in America, unlike what appears to be happening in Tibet, which whether good or bad, is claimed to be state-supported policy. Likewise, Muslims are not imprisoned in the U.S. as an effort to enforce some state-sanctioned policy regarding the security or integrity of America. Perhaps you will now claim that if so-and-so commits a crime, you should be free to go shoot your neighbor and steal his car?
Additionally, have you ever read up on the current state of constitutional rights in America and how there is a constant struggle to defend and further define just what these rights are for the individual and the state?
Please get off the internet and learn how to be a decent human being to as many people as you can. It could only help.
Why is anyone “debating” a person who went to a violent rally, widely documented with photographs and now being prosecuted by South Korean authorities who are normally loathe to upset China, and saw only a peaceful demonstration?
MME seems delusional and a troll to many here, but those points all represent rote Party-line stuff, which, like all propaganda that succeeds in sustaining false consciousness, contains kernels of fact and truth. It doesn’t work well on those with wider bases of comparison, the skepticism that comes with citizenship in free societies, and access to the whole picture.
Claims that China is still one big prison are as preposterous as asserting that China has one billion dissidents and these will be spun into new propaganda. However much world opinion may be souring on China (and I’m not sure that is happening), clearly at home the regime is successfully turning all these lemons into lemon Kool Aid and folks are lapping it up.
If I were R.Elgin, I would at a minimum insist on the removal of my moniker from MME’s handle for the win-win effect of stopping an offensive slur to R.Elgin and perhaps leaving his new Chinese guest with a more accurate handle.
Humm, that’s an idea Slim but leaving it serves to show how he stoops to personal attacks when his arguments are lacking.
Besides, I have to live with the shame of having a certain imperialistic-style relative steal the cultural heritage from a foreign land (naturally he is only misunderstood), thus it gives me some insight into certain matters . . .
What a load of crap Elg-o. Talk about switching the topic! From your own anti-Chinese biases to my character! Hmm…I see you’ve cooled down your anti-CCP rhetoric coz you knew you were in an indefensible position. The government that’s presided over the greatest and fastest improvement in human living standards in history can’t be all that bad, now can it? Good on you. I give you an electronic pat on the back.
As for my handle, well, I just tell like it is, right, Elgy? Hipocracy and double standards. I know for a hardcore Righty (or lefty? I guess the political spectrum meets up at the extreme anyways) as yourself that morality is a virtue. You attack the Chinese and toss around weblinks, but I still contend you don’t know squat about China. The CCP does its best to improve people’s lives. They’re not crooks or thugs or mafioso. Their polticians who politick and horse-trade. They look out for their citizens welfares because they know they’ll be in deep shit if they don’t. They don’t need ballots boxes to say so. At the very least their on par with Washington’s “freely elected” Republicrats. But hey, what do you know about anything? You just contribute to a blog and teach English grammar to six-year olds. I guess that makes you a China expert, right?
Your attitude has been akin to the imperialists of old, telling people from other cultures how they should run their countries and turning up your rightous nose at anything that fails to square with your worldview. You jumped to the rescue of crooks and thugs in Lhasa a few weeks ago, and now you belittle a few rambunctious students. Way to go. What’s the difference between a Tibetan Chinese and a Han Chinese? One is supported by Hollywood and the Western Establishment coz an old fart of a monk claims he’s the reincarnated version of some god, the other are dirty Chinese here to steal our jobs and poison us with low quality wares.
I’ll keep my moniker as it is. To remind you, Elgy, of your true nature: a morally bankrupt hippocrit who supports thugs and criminals and brings down peaceful students, who condones the beating death of innocent civilians in Lhasa, and the imprisonment of Muslism in American while attacking the CCP on purely ideological grounds.
Your hatred and venom towards China and the great Chinese people is apparant, despite your attempts to cloak your racism under the banner of morality and human rights. Next time, get a thicker cloack.
Slim: the regime is successfully turning all these lemons into lemon Kool Aid and folks are lapping it up
Nice turn of phrase.
Elgin: Humm, that’s an idea Slim but leaving it serves to show how he stoops to personal attacks when his arguments are lacking.
You should leave his old comments up, but force him to choose a new userid NOW (and make sure everyone knows who it is). I’d hate to see “loser-81″ every time I wrote a post, even seeing “mental midget Elgin” is annoying.
We can read the People’s Daily or Xinhua on line and get the same shit he’s spewing, without most (but not all) of the insults.
So you would agree then that the Japanese occupation of China was a positive action by a benevolent government? After all, living standards did improve…
If you’re really going to harp on the hypocrisy angle, at least learn to spell it. It’s a lazy, ad hominem attack that makes you look like you can’t debate an issue, but at least try not to look too stupid when using it.
“So you would agree then that the Japanese occupation of China was a positive action by a benevolent government? After all, living standards did improve…”
No, they didn’t. Maybe in Korea and Taiwan, but not Mainland China.
Are you sure MME is Chinese? MME seems to be focusing attacks on Elgin and leaving others alone. The most effective response to a chain-yanking troll is silence. Nothing frustrates a troll more than when a target won’t bite. The moment a commenter starts sounding creepily personal, I quit responding. It’s hilarious when a frustrated troll ratchets up the personal insults and still no response.
MME makes some fair points when he takes his medication.
It’s even possible to answer them if you have the time:
http://www.rjkoehler.com/2008/.....ent-150739
Please forget the unnecessary “medication” jibe.
Notice how “moral-midget” condescendingly attempts to re-explain my explicit words and dismiss them, claiming that I am just a China-hater — all without once offering and explanation of any of the links or talking points I have outlined before now.
As I have mentioned before in passing, some positive accomplishments have been made by the CCP, which I will not pedantically sit and list herein, however, despite these accomplishments, there remain issues that are more than a little worrisome. As per yet another example: http://www.guardian.co.uk/spor.....le/7490967 , which basically is about how lawyers in China face Party interference, jail in some instances and harassment. If one reads the article:
So how is it that China can build trust with any other civilized nation when such a government so blatantly interferes in any sort of due process — oh wait, the idea of legal fairness through judicial due process is a non-Chinese concept, just like others basic human rights. Therein lies another problem: how does the CCP their version of reality when many other nations do not share their casual attitudes towards human rights and other important issues?
Mind you, the CCP spokesman dismisses the report as being “biased”. The report link is http://www.hrw.org/english/doc.....a18656.htm thus the Party spokesperson is also adapt at misdirection and at least uses a greater array of adjectives than you do “midget”.
Combined with the flexible sense of history (as observed in China) that is more in service to the Party than any real standards of academic excellence (got you there) and the obvious fomenting of nationalism, there are more than a few legitimate concerns regarding the actions of China, after all, if any nation holds such economic and military power that China is accumulating, combined with blind, rampant nationalism . . . we have seen recipes like this before and they result in some of the worst bouts of atrocities and war that mankind has ever known. Is it then racist or hating China to have doubts and worries about these things and is it normal to have so many younger Chinese show no worry and little insight over such issues?
I do not expect any real discussion of my questions or observations because your behavior has been dishonest and embodies the kind of intelligence that marks the difference between people of good faith and those who are essentially evil. That you so avidly defend the policies of the CCP without acknowledging or demonstrating any insight to any of their faults or serious problems in ethics, governance, financial transparency, etc. demonstrates you are more used to deceit in its many and subtle forms.
Change your name to “slander-master” and there would be more truth in that than any of your dodging *all* the valid observations and issues that I have mentioned, heretofore in any other thread.
edit, 4th para: . . . how does the CCP maintaintheir version of reality when many other nations do not share their casual attitudes towards human rights and other important issues?
You must log in to post a comment.