Information and its dissemination is a very important thing since it shapes pubic opinion; opinion from which a democratic leader must take their cues from. As can be demonstrated in China, the control of information is synonymous to the control of a nation’s people and helps maintain their legitimacy (having an army with guns certainly helps in China’s case). Korea is now experiencing a new chapter in a continuing political struggle over who has control over the media and what bias it may have.
Originally, I made mention of this in “The Revolution Will Be Televised on Your Handphone” since there seemed to be a interesting relation between the attempt of the Roh administration’s attempt to control, if not influence the press, the public disclosure of the “Il-shim-huway” spy-ring that was run by a prominent media and IT executive here in South Korea, and the creation of a new “broadcasting super-committee”.
This super-committee was supposed to “deal with “media convergence”, i.e., internet-based DMB video broadcasting and games that can be viewed or played on one’s handphone (gameboy/camera/PIM)” as well as “handle all the functions of the Korean Broadcasting Commission, including the appointments to boards of public broadcasters such the Korean Broadcasting System”.
Now, certain civic groups, unions and rival politicians have decided to oppose President Lee’s selection of a “close confidante” of his (Choi See-joong) to lead this new “super-committee”, having fears that the very tool they wished to create may now be turned against them and their interests.
I love the quote from the United Democratic Party Uridang mash-up, who are quick to worry about this development:
We seriously doubt whether a person like this can maintain the neutrality of the broadcasting industry . . . the designation of Choi has been unilaterally pushed by President Lee, so we will do everything we can to block the decision.
. . . thus the game continues.
One must wonder if the Roh Administration, like Nolbu, has unwittingly cut open the wrong gourd and just who might be worthy to handle this newly hatched position of influence since the mis-use of this position could result in the same sort of media control that Roh’s Administration sought, only at a more sophisticated level of influence that might be more difficult to monitor.
Sphere: Related Content









8 Comments
What? No mention of North Korea? One would think that they’d be the poster children for state control of all information. Compared to them, China is positively libertarian.
deleted (off-topic)
deleted (off-topic)
deleted (off-topic)
“Barney” try something on-topic or post in the open thread below this. Otherwise, it gets deleted.
Talk about control of the media…
China and North Korea are the same. One just has better economic policies.
China at least has an Internet presence (which is reaffirmed every day when I open my email to find upwards of ten bits of spam offering to make my penis and breasts bigger), as well as a populace that is aware that in some parts of the world, oxen are not the primary means of transportation for farm products. Sure, lots of things are censored and controlled in China, but I don’t think the two countries are really that comparable.