<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Little Top-Heavy for Marilyn Monroe, No?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rjkoehler.com/2008/02/19/a-little-top-heavy-for-marilyn-monroe-no/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2008/02/19/a-little-top-heavy-for-marilyn-monroe-no/</link>
	<description>Korea... in Blog Format</description>
	<pubDate>Sun,  7 Sep 2008 04:32:21 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: william</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2008/02/19/a-little-top-heavy-for-marilyn-monroe-no/#comment-136232</link>
		<dc:creator>william</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 10:09:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/2008/02/19/a-little-top-heavy-for-marilyn-monroe-no/#comment-136232</guid>
		<description>She what?  22 yo?  and droopy boobs like dairy cow, disgusting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>She what?  22 yo?  and droopy boobs like dairy cow, disgusting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dda</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2008/02/19/a-little-top-heavy-for-marilyn-monroe-no/#comment-136227</link>
		<dc:creator>dda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 09:52:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/2008/02/19/a-little-top-heavy-for-marilyn-monroe-no/#comment-136227</guid>
		<description>I wonder what the Malaysian authorities will think of these pictures once they finally appear in my browser [how do you say sloooooow in Bahasa Melayu?]... Then again Malaysian efficiency being what it is... :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder what the Malaysian authorities will think of these pictures once they finally appear in my browser [how do you say sloooooow in Bahasa Melayu?]&#8230; Then again Malaysian efficiency being what it is&#8230; <img src='http://www.rjkoehler.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vicki</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2008/02/19/a-little-top-heavy-for-marilyn-monroe-no/#comment-136210</link>
		<dc:creator>vicki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 08:27:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/2008/02/19/a-little-top-heavy-for-marilyn-monroe-no/#comment-136210</guid>
		<description>She is a trainwreck.  Her life is a mess and it sells in the scandal sheets... Thats really pretty much it.  That goes for all the rest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>She is a trainwreck.  Her life is a mess and it sells in the scandal sheets&#8230; Thats really pretty much it.  That goes for all the rest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dissidentdave</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2008/02/19/a-little-top-heavy-for-marilyn-monroe-no/#comment-136198</link>
		<dc:creator>dissidentdave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 07:01:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/2008/02/19/a-little-top-heavy-for-marilyn-monroe-no/#comment-136198</guid>
		<description>i gotta say, you guys are being nice. that was perhaps one of the most horrible photo shoot i've ever seen. 

she's as attractive as a disemboweled chihuahua (wait, bad analogy), 

er, as attractive as yurt uzbek trash sucking on a panda's lollipop (wait, another bad one), 

er, okay, lohan's just fugly.

while freckles ARE nice (HT to foflappy at #4), they're nice on a chick who's hot, not on a worn-out piece of disney/rehab trash.

what is the US public's obsession with the likes of lohan, hilton, and spears? or is it more of a US media's obsession? i don't know which one it is, but it's revolting.

and check out what lohan's worn-out MIwouldn'tLF had to say:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23244296/

regarding the photo shoot's being artistic: "It was tastefully done"? luv, it's only tasteful if it's attractive.

referencing bert stein's taking the photos: "For him to call Lindsay 46 years later...is an honor." listen, dina, your first clue should have been 46 YEARS LATER--he's, like, 113 years old now; how good can his eyesight still be?

regarding aesthetics: "So I don't look at them like it's Playboy". dear shiva, let's hope to hell hefner feels the same way.

okay, sorry for the rant. time for my meds...

thanks for the pics, though. got some angst off my chest. better than a burning down a national monument or shooting up a school campus.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i gotta say, you guys are being nice. that was perhaps one of the most horrible photo shoot i&#8217;ve ever seen. </p>
<p>she&#8217;s as attractive as a disemboweled chihuahua (wait, bad analogy), </p>
<p>er, as attractive as yurt uzbek trash sucking on a panda&#8217;s lollipop (wait, another bad one), </p>
<p>er, okay, lohan&#8217;s just fugly.</p>
<p>while freckles ARE nice (HT to foflappy at #4), they&#8217;re nice on a chick who&#8217;s hot, not on a worn-out piece of disney/rehab trash.</p>
<p>what is the US public&#8217;s obsession with the likes of lohan, hilton, and spears? or is it more of a US media&#8217;s obsession? i don&#8217;t know which one it is, but it&#8217;s revolting.</p>
<p>and check out what lohan&#8217;s worn-out MIwouldn&#8217;tLF had to say:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23244296/" rel="nofollow">http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23244296/</a></p>
<p>regarding the photo shoot&#8217;s being artistic: &#8220;It was tastefully done&#8221;? luv, it&#8217;s only tasteful if it&#8217;s attractive.</p>
<p>referencing bert stein&#8217;s taking the photos: &#8220;For him to call Lindsay 46 years later&#8230;is an honor.&#8221; listen, dina, your first clue should have been 46 YEARS LATER&#8211;he&#8217;s, like, 113 years old now; how good can his eyesight still be?</p>
<p>regarding aesthetics: &#8220;So I don&#8217;t look at them like it&#8217;s Playboy&#8221;. dear shiva, let&#8217;s hope to hell hefner feels the same way.</p>
<p>okay, sorry for the rant. time for my meds&#8230;</p>
<p>thanks for the pics, though. got some angst off my chest. better than a burning down a national monument or shooting up a school campus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pixel</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2008/02/19/a-little-top-heavy-for-marilyn-monroe-no/#comment-136182</link>
		<dc:creator>pixel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 05:28:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/2008/02/19/a-little-top-heavy-for-marilyn-monroe-no/#comment-136182</guid>
		<description>I'm with vicki on this one. Yes, she's topless, which I'm sure turns some cranks, but this offering is sadly lacking. No oomph. She doesn't seem to have any relationship with the camera. Did they choose her for this part just because she'd take her clothes off?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m with vicki on this one. Yes, she&#8217;s topless, which I&#8217;m sure turns some cranks, but this offering is sadly lacking. No oomph. She doesn&#8217;t seem to have any relationship with the camera. Did they choose her for this part just because she&#8217;d take her clothes off?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Konglick</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2008/02/19/a-little-top-heavy-for-marilyn-monroe-no/#comment-136160</link>
		<dc:creator>Konglick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 04:38:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/2008/02/19/a-little-top-heavy-for-marilyn-monroe-no/#comment-136160</guid>
		<description>"These are actually the classiest photos of Lohan I’ve seen in a long while."

Yeah, it sure beats the pictures of her getting out of a limo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;These are actually the classiest photos of Lohan I’ve seen in a long while.&#8221;</p>
<p>Yeah, it sure beats the pictures of her getting out of a limo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sonagi</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2008/02/19/a-little-top-heavy-for-marilyn-monroe-no/#comment-136146</link>
		<dc:creator>Sonagi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 03:24:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/2008/02/19/a-little-top-heavy-for-marilyn-monroe-no/#comment-136146</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;You want to ‘be is girlfriend’ because you like her looks or because you want to do him?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

DEFINITELY the former.  Justin is not at all my type.  It's Reese Witherspoon I envy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>You want to ‘be is girlfriend’ because you like her looks or because you want to do him?</p></blockquote>
<p>DEFINITELY the former.  Justin is not at all my type.  It&#8217;s Reese Witherspoon I envy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hardyandtiny</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2008/02/19/a-little-top-heavy-for-marilyn-monroe-no/#comment-136144</link>
		<dc:creator>hardyandtiny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 03:17:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/2008/02/19/a-little-top-heavy-for-marilyn-monroe-no/#comment-136144</guid>
		<description>"Why does she have to be from Long Island?"

Yeah, I'd rather see a nude spread of Julius "Dr J" Erving.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Why does she have to be from Long Island?&#8221;</p>
<p>Yeah, I&#8217;d rather see a nude spread of Julius &#8220;Dr J&#8221; Erving.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: timmy</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2008/02/19/a-little-top-heavy-for-marilyn-monroe-no/#comment-136140</link>
		<dc:creator>timmy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 03:05:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/2008/02/19/a-little-top-heavy-for-marilyn-monroe-no/#comment-136140</guid>
		<description>These are actually the classiest photos of Lohan I've seen in a long while.  Kinda sad if you think about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These are actually the classiest photos of Lohan I&#8217;ve seen in a long while.  Kinda sad if you think about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vicki</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2008/02/19/a-little-top-heavy-for-marilyn-monroe-no/#comment-136132</link>
		<dc:creator>vicki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 02:33:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/2008/02/19/a-little-top-heavy-for-marilyn-monroe-no/#comment-136132</guid>
		<description>yuk!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yuk!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
