A Little Top-Heavy for Marilyn Monroe, No?

by Robert Koehler on February 19, 2008

In case you haven’t seen Lindsay Lohan’s nude photo spread in New York Magazine, here you go.

Why does she have to be from Long Island?

UPDATE: Entire photo spread here.

{ 28 comments… read them below or add one }

1 Woland February 19, 2008 at 9:09 pm

Well, it’s not as if we haven’t seen them before.

And besides, she’s no Djamilya.

2 Brian February 19, 2008 at 9:18 pm

Too freckly.

3 Mr Kim February 19, 2008 at 10:01 pm
4 foflappy February 19, 2008 at 11:47 pm

Me likes freckly. Freckles all over..hmmm.

5 Maekchu February 20, 2008 at 12:40 am

How do you say “skanky” in Hangul-mal?

6 The Luke February 20, 2008 at 2:48 am

I ain’t complainin’.

7 WangKon936 February 20, 2008 at 3:27 am

# 3,

Yeah, those Edison Chen pics are pretty wild. Why in the freak’in world would highly paid, highly visible celebrities pose for shit like that even if it’s supposedly for “private” use?

I can tell you for sure that I won’t be looking at Failan the same way anymore…!

8 wjk February 20, 2008 at 6:26 am

the Chinese gong-an didn’t execute him for that, or the girls?

How weird. I guess there IS autonomy in Hong Kong.

Seems like that dude messed up big time.

I know of a friend who does that too.

Makes his own porn or what not, while sleeping around with girls.

in the age of digi cams, things like this were going to happen, since film is not an issue of cost, and well, people are idiots here and there to be found.

what will happen if you make that stuff with your wife, and your kids find it?

“Mommy ?!”

I haven’t seen the pics. I just read the wiki entry.

Let the land be ruled with morals.

9 WangKon936 February 20, 2008 at 6:45 am

From what I heard, those ladies were into Edison not for his prowess in bed but for his ready supply of dope.

Those girls making those poses had that glassy look from a coke high… which makes clothes come off easier and an awareness that someone is clicking away with a digi that much more fuzzier…

10 Sonagi February 20, 2008 at 6:50 am

I’m twice as old as she is, and my tits don’t hang as low. I feel better now. Thanks, Robert.

11 Lana February 20, 2008 at 7:01 am

I thought Marilyn’s boobs were bigger.

12 WangKon936 February 20, 2008 at 7:05 am

The disadvantage of size is greater exposure to gravity…

Someone should develop an equation based on some sort of theorem. Something like mass times coefficient of gravity equals X number of centimeter sag over a set period of time.

Unfortunately, the mathematicians who have the most ability to do so probably don’t get enough ”hands on experience” with the subject matter to apply the numbers to the concept… ;)

13 cmm February 20, 2008 at 8:28 am

Sonagi, please send us some pictures of a woman/some women whom you find sexy. You seem to take a shot at any T&A pics here, but surely you can appreciate the visual beauty of some woman/women.

14 Sonagi February 20, 2008 at 9:09 am

@#11:

It’s not just about size but shape: melons versus ski slopes. Ski slopes on young women are perky; why, they just protrude right out like missiles in a military parade and say “hello.” They resist sagging better, too, IMO.

@#12:

Send you linked pics? You want me, a woman, to supply you with porn? Are you outta your fukn mind? I will give you some names of women whose bodies I’d love to inhabit:

Jessica Biel: Beautiful face, perfect body, amazing butt. Bitch!!!

Scarlett Johanssen that big rack might be fake, but damn, it hangs well, and doesn’t look out of place on her curvy body

Hallie Berry also probable minor nose shaving (before and after pics are convincing) and rumored boob job; her waist-to-hip form is perfect

That perfect bitch Jessica Biel

Jessica Alba: three words: Beautiful. Skinny. Bitch.

Beyonce Knowles: Rumored minor nose job but the body is natural. A little hippy but she wears them well.

Jennifer Garner: All natural beauty

Vanessa Minnillo: way sexier than a certain stumpy legged bimbo who overfilled those Daisy Dukes. Long live Catherine Bach!

Jessica Biel, who obviously made a pact with the devil to look that good.

Kelly Ripa: petite but very toned

Hayden Panettiere: and her mom’s hot, too.

Rihanna: great gams

Justin Timberlake’s girlfriend, whose name we won’t mention.

15 Brendon Carr (Korea Law Blog) February 20, 2008 at 9:47 am

Sonagi, we seem to have identical taste in women.

16 stef February 20, 2008 at 10:53 am

She is chook-chook without the bang-bang.

17 SomeguyinKorea February 20, 2008 at 11:07 am

“Justin Timberlake’s girlfriend, whose name we won’t mention.”

You want to ‘be is girlfriend’ because you like her looks or because you want to do him? ;)

18 Railwaycharm February 20, 2008 at 11:24 am

Affected!

19 vicki February 20, 2008 at 11:33 am

yuk!

20 timmy February 20, 2008 at 12:05 pm

These are actually the classiest photos of Lohan I’ve seen in a long while. Kinda sad if you think about it.

21 hardyandtiny February 20, 2008 at 12:17 pm

“Why does she have to be from Long Island?”

Yeah, I’d rather see a nude spread of Julius “Dr J” Erving.

22 Sonagi February 20, 2008 at 12:24 pm

You want to ‘be is girlfriend’ because you like her looks or because you want to do him?

DEFINITELY the former. Justin is not at all my type. It’s Reese Witherspoon I envy.

23 Konglick February 20, 2008 at 1:38 pm

“These are actually the classiest photos of Lohan I’ve seen in a long while.”

Yeah, it sure beats the pictures of her getting out of a limo.

24 pixel February 20, 2008 at 2:28 pm

I’m with vicki on this one. Yes, she’s topless, which I’m sure turns some cranks, but this offering is sadly lacking. No oomph. She doesn’t seem to have any relationship with the camera. Did they choose her for this part just because she’d take her clothes off?

25 dissidentdave February 20, 2008 at 4:01 pm

i gotta say, you guys are being nice. that was perhaps one of the most horrible photo shoot i’ve ever seen.

she’s as attractive as a disemboweled chihuahua (wait, bad analogy),

er, as attractive as yurt uzbek trash sucking on a panda’s lollipop (wait, another bad one),

er, okay, lohan’s just fugly.

while freckles ARE nice (HT to foflappy at #4), they’re nice on a chick who’s hot, not on a worn-out piece of disney/rehab trash.

what is the US public’s obsession with the likes of lohan, hilton, and spears? or is it more of a US media’s obsession? i don’t know which one it is, but it’s revolting.

and check out what lohan’s worn-out MIwouldn’tLF had to say:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23244296/

regarding the photo shoot’s being artistic: “It was tastefully done”? luv, it’s only tasteful if it’s attractive.

referencing bert stein’s taking the photos: “For him to call Lindsay 46 years later…is an honor.” listen, dina, your first clue should have been 46 YEARS LATER–he’s, like, 113 years old now; how good can his eyesight still be?

regarding aesthetics: “So I don’t look at them like it’s Playboy”. dear shiva, let’s hope to hell hefner feels the same way.

okay, sorry for the rant. time for my meds…

thanks for the pics, though. got some angst off my chest. better than a burning down a national monument or shooting up a school campus.

26 vicki February 20, 2008 at 5:27 pm

She is a trainwreck. Her life is a mess and it sells in the scandal sheets… Thats really pretty much it. That goes for all the rest.

27 dda February 20, 2008 at 6:52 pm

I wonder what the Malaysian authorities will think of these pictures once they finally appear in my browser [how do you say sloooooow in Bahasa Melayu?]… Then again Malaysian efficiency being what it is… :-)

28 william February 20, 2008 at 7:09 pm

She what? 22 yo? and droopy boobs like dairy cow, disgusting.

Previous post:

Next post: