<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How Many Theme Parks? . . .</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rjkoehler.com/2008/02/16/theme-parks-and-canals/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2008/02/16/theme-parks-and-canals/</link>
	<description>Korea... in Blog Format</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 12:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: vicki</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2008/02/16/theme-parks-and-canals/#comment-136143</link>
		<dc:creator>vicki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 03:15:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/2008/02/16/theme-parks-and-canals/#comment-136143</guid>
		<description>#10  "There is nothing that would make Korean people want to live anywhere other than Seoul."    

I love the little shop down the street from my house.  A really nice Korean family owns it. I asked the father if he missed living in Korea, and he did.  I asked him why he left and he told me that Seoul was too crowded and he couldn't find work there.  He loves his country but left because Seoul was too crowded and there was no work for him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#10  &#8220;There is nothing that would make Korean people want to live anywhere other than Seoul.&#8221;    </p>
<p>I love the little shop down the street from my house.  A really nice Korean family owns it. I asked the father if he missed living in Korea, and he did.  I asked him why he left and he told me that Seoul was too crowded and he couldn&#8217;t find work there.  He loves his country but left because Seoul was too crowded and there was no work for him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R. Elgin</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2008/02/16/theme-parks-and-canals/#comment-135744</link>
		<dc:creator>R. Elgin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 01:25:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/2008/02/16/theme-parks-and-canals/#comment-135744</guid>
		<description>"Cydevil", I am referring to the psychological affect of what happens if one tears down a multiple-scale neighborhood and replaces this with monolithic concrete structures.  It is very cold and sterile and nullifies what makes one place unique as compared to another.  Take a walk through Pundang and compare this to a real neighborhood in Seoul that does not have large areas of "tombstones".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Cydevil&#8221;, I am referring to the psychological affect of what happens if one tears down a multiple-scale neighborhood and replaces this with monolithic concrete structures.  It is very cold and sterile and nullifies what makes one place unique as compared to another.  Take a walk through Pundang and compare this to a real neighborhood in Seoul that does not have large areas of &#8220;tombstones&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cydevil</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2008/02/16/theme-parks-and-canals/#comment-135728</link>
		<dc:creator>cydevil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 23:05:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/2008/02/16/theme-parks-and-canals/#comment-135728</guid>
		<description>#4, never underestimate the power of Ajummas. I doubt higher density will ever stop them from forming tight-knit communities sharing information on their family's welfare and collectively addressing issues related to their family's welfare.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#4, never underestimate the power of Ajummas. I doubt higher density will ever stop them from forming tight-knit communities sharing information on their family&#8217;s welfare and collectively addressing issues related to their family&#8217;s welfare.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: babarian.</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2008/02/16/theme-parks-and-canals/#comment-135601</link>
		<dc:creator>babarian.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 05:29:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/2008/02/16/theme-parks-and-canals/#comment-135601</guid>
		<description>That's why the government should make a continuous effort to make regional cities more attractive places to live in, instead of artificially forcing them to do so.  I think one relatively easy way might be to make international airlines to use Busan, Daegu or Gwanju more, rather than most of them using Inchon as they do now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s why the government should make a continuous effort to make regional cities more attractive places to live in, instead of artificially forcing them to do so.  I think one relatively easy way might be to make international airlines to use Busan, Daegu or Gwanju more, rather than most of them using Inchon as they do now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brendon Carr (Korea Law Blog)</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2008/02/16/theme-parks-and-canals/#comment-135593</link>
		<dc:creator>Brendon Carr (Korea Law Blog)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 05:03:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/2008/02/16/theme-parks-and-canals/#comment-135593</guid>
		<description>There is &lt;b&gt;nothing&lt;/b&gt; that would make Korean people want to live anywhere other than Seoul.

I am not in favor of government regulation &lt;b&gt;compelling&lt;/b&gt; people to live in Seoul, nor am I all that pleased with efforts to force them out of Seoul. They'll live where they want to live.

Given that everyone seems to want to live in Kangnam, I say let 'em. Let 'em live on the 90th floor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is <b>nothing</b> that would make Korean people want to live anywhere other than Seoul.</p>
<p>I am not in favor of government regulation <b>compelling</b> people to live in Seoul, nor am I all that pleased with efforts to force them out of Seoul. They&#8217;ll live where they want to live.</p>
<p>Given that everyone seems to want to live in Kangnam, I say let &#8216;em. Let &#8216;em live on the 90th floor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Railwaycharm</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2008/02/16/theme-parks-and-canals/#comment-135582</link>
		<dc:creator>Railwaycharm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 04:28:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/2008/02/16/theme-parks-and-canals/#comment-135582</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;"Having more large-scale, corporate theme parks than most any other place in the world will not encourage tourism either. Would I trust a Korean third-party to evaluate the impact and benefits of these ventures upon the locale?"&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Wholesale change has to occur before you can attract people to come to Korea. As long as the Koreans have the “Kill my neighbor’s pig” attitude, people will not come.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>&#8220;Having more large-scale, corporate theme parks than most any other place in the world will not encourage tourism either. Would I trust a Korean third-party to evaluate the impact and benefits of these ventures upon the locale?&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Wholesale change has to occur before you can attract people to come to Korea. As long as the Koreans have the “Kill my neighbor’s pig” attitude, people will not come.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: babarian.</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2008/02/16/theme-parks-and-canals/#comment-135581</link>
		<dc:creator>babarian.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 04:27:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/2008/02/16/theme-parks-and-canals/#comment-135581</guid>
		<description>30-50-story apartment buildings in Seoul?  Not a good idea.  It will attract even more people into Seoul and even worse traffic congestion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>30-50-story apartment buildings in Seoul?  Not a good idea.  It will attract even more people into Seoul and even worse traffic congestion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R. Elgin</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2008/02/16/theme-parks-and-canals/#comment-135578</link>
		<dc:creator>R. Elgin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 04:15:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/2008/02/16/theme-parks-and-canals/#comment-135578</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the additional thoughts Brendon -- it helps me at least.

I wonder just how large these parks would be and what their impact would be upon the surrounding areas.  I wonder if this is really the best way to bring in economic benefits to these areas.

Having more large-scale, corporate theme parks than most any other place in the world will not encourage tourism either.  Would I trust a Korean third-party to evaluate the impact and benefits of these ventures upon the locale?  

No, not really.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the additional thoughts Brendon &#8212; it helps me at least.</p>
<p>I wonder just how large these parks would be and what their impact would be upon the surrounding areas.  I wonder if this is really the best way to bring in economic benefits to these areas.</p>
<p>Having more large-scale, corporate theme parks than most any other place in the world will not encourage tourism either.  Would I trust a Korean third-party to evaluate the impact and benefits of these ventures upon the locale?  </p>
<p>No, not really.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2008/02/16/theme-parks-and-canals/#comment-135574</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 04:04:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/2008/02/16/theme-parks-and-canals/#comment-135574</guid>
		<description>They need an Andre Kim theme park</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They need an Andre Kim theme park</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brendon Carr (Korea Law Blog)</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2008/02/16/theme-parks-and-canals/#comment-135555</link>
		<dc:creator>Brendon Carr (Korea Law Blog)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 02:00:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/2008/02/16/theme-parks-and-canals/#comment-135555</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Do you really want to see 30-50-story tombstone apartment buildings in Seoul?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Not tombstones, but yes -- we need to build &lt;b&gt;a lot&lt;/b&gt; taller in Seoul. The tombstone apartments are a direct response to edicts the government made from the 1970s to very recently about how to build a "good" apartment. And those edicts were wrong, and still are wrong in many ways.

&lt;blockquote&gt;As it is, when large areas are rebuilt with “tombstones”, the neighborhood is effectively dead since there is little or no sense of humanity therein, little multipurpose building of different scale unless one walks *out* of the tombstone-designated area.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Sure, but that's a failure of regulation. The answer is not more regulation. Hong Kong's humanity comes from the fact that the first two-to-four levels of any residential property near a thoroughfare tends to be occupied by commercial uses. I also think Korea could learn a lot from Singapore in this regard -- hell, even Jakarta! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Do you really want to see 30-50-story tombstone apartment buildings in Seoul?</p></blockquote>
<p>Not tombstones, but yes &#8212; we need to build <b>a lot</b> taller in Seoul. The tombstone apartments are a direct response to edicts the government made from the 1970s to very recently about how to build a &#8220;good&#8221; apartment. And those edicts were wrong, and still are wrong in many ways.</p>
<blockquote><p>As it is, when large areas are rebuilt with “tombstones”, the neighborhood is effectively dead since there is little or no sense of humanity therein, little multipurpose building of different scale unless one walks *out* of the tombstone-designated area.</p></blockquote>
<p>Sure, but that&#8217;s a failure of regulation. The answer is not more regulation. Hong Kong&#8217;s humanity comes from the fact that the first two-to-four levels of any residential property near a thoroughfare tends to be occupied by commercial uses. I also think Korea could learn a lot from Singapore in this regard &#8212; hell, even Jakarta!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
