Comments on: Continuing Controversy http://www.rjkoehler.com/2008/02/02/continuing-controversy/ Korea... in Blog Format Sun, 12 Oct 2008 06:07:06 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2 By: the_dog_catcha http://www.rjkoehler.com/2008/02/02/continuing-controversy/#comment-132870 the_dog_catcha Sun, 03 Feb 2008 16:45:26 +0000 http://www.rjkoehler.com/2008/02/02/continuing-controversy/#comment-132870 GB Curly. Sorry your article was a debacle, but usually there aren't too many expletives blogged here-all things considered. GB Curly. Sorry your article was a debacle, but usually there aren’t too many expletives blogged here-all things considered.

]]> By: leefr http://www.rjkoehler.com/2008/02/02/continuing-controversy/#comment-132868 leefr Sun, 03 Feb 2008 15:45:12 +0000 http://www.rjkoehler.com/2008/02/02/continuing-controversy/#comment-132868 I don't understand why the previous thread was deleted - as far as Marmot threads go, it was fairly civil overall, at least until I posted a comment. One request to Curley - I don't really care what you choose to post about, but keep the f*** word off the screen. I've read a lot of crap here on the Marmot's Hole but that kind of language just really turns me off. I don’t understand why the previous thread was deleted - as far as Marmot threads go, it was fairly civil overall, at least until I posted a comment.

One request to Curley - I don’t really care what you choose to post about, but keep the f*** word off the screen. I’ve read a lot of crap here on the Marmot’s Hole but that kind of language just really turns me off.

]]> By: G.B. Curley http://www.rjkoehler.com/2008/02/02/continuing-controversy/#comment-132863 G.B. Curley Sun, 03 Feb 2008 14:12:31 +0000 http://www.rjkoehler.com/2008/02/02/continuing-controversy/#comment-132863 Ain't nothing like a healthy bout of dueling to cap off the weekend. I am so glad as I skim through this scroll of redundancies that a select few have got a grapple on what the heck I was on about in the first place. And to think this personal jab at ONE particular "celebrity" in question (smokin' I might add) was pulled in to a tidal wave of ego jabbing! 1) Who has an affair with who is their own business. End of story. Consequences become burdensome when you don't cover your tracks too well. 2) How many times the lady in question was granted orgasmic delights is slightly irrelevant. The fact is, she wasn't exaclty a sleuth in keeping the whole matter quiet. 3) The adultery law stinks. I NEVER delved in to that cauldron of cardinal fucking ruin from the get go. Yes, I cynically said the country "abides" by the code, but Christ - it was tongue in cheek! 4) Bottom line, the damn article read like the Enquirer and I found it laughable that SHE and apparently the damn string of those defending her in this here comment thread see it as anything more than that. She strayed from the nest on thin ice by shagging her husband's best friend and a bloody foreign chef! My angle there was that it drew a shit load of press because he wasn't of Korean origin. Not a smart move. Ain’t nothing like a healthy bout of dueling to cap off the weekend. I am so glad as I skim through this scroll of redundancies that a select few have got a grapple on what the heck I was on about in the first place. And to think this personal jab at ONE particular “celebrity” in question (smokin’ I might add) was pulled in to a tidal wave of ego jabbing!

1) Who has an affair with who is their own business. End of story. Consequences become burdensome when you don’t cover your tracks too well.

2) How many times the lady in question was granted orgasmic delights is slightly irrelevant. The fact is, she wasn’t exaclty a sleuth in keeping the whole matter quiet.

3) The adultery law stinks. I NEVER delved in to that cauldron of cardinal fucking ruin from the get go. Yes, I cynically said the country “abides” by the code, but Christ - it was tongue in cheek!

4) Bottom line, the damn article read like the Enquirer and I found it laughable that SHE and apparently the damn string of those defending her in this here comment thread see it as anything more than that. She strayed from the nest on thin ice by shagging her husband’s best friend and a bloody foreign chef! My angle there was that it drew a shit load of press because he wasn’t of Korean origin. Not a smart move.

]]> By: a-letheia http://www.rjkoehler.com/2008/02/02/continuing-controversy/#comment-132861 a-letheia Sun, 03 Feb 2008 13:57:12 +0000 http://www.rjkoehler.com/2008/02/02/continuing-controversy/#comment-132861 Funny, when your taste gets offended you get self-righteous, when others are...well, to each his own... Funny, when your taste gets offended you get self-righteous, when others are…well, to each his own…

]]> By: R. Elgin http://www.rjkoehler.com/2008/02/02/continuing-controversy/#comment-132856 R. Elgin Sun, 03 Feb 2008 12:46:56 +0000 http://www.rjkoehler.com/2008/02/02/continuing-controversy/#comment-132856 Off-topic: "a-letheia", the blog entry you linked to is an "aside" which is supposed to be a short call-out for a news point of interest, used as a starting point for comment from other blog readers. An "aside" is not supposed to be an full-blown editorial thread. Review the previous blog entries labeled "asides" to get an idea of just how the aside blurb works, as per Robert's site. Other than that, to each his own taste, however suspect. Off-topic: “a-letheia”, the blog entry you linked to is an “aside” which is supposed to be a short call-out for a news point of interest, used as a starting point for comment from other blog readers. An “aside” is not supposed to be an full-blown editorial thread. Review the previous blog entries labeled “asides” to get an idea of just how the aside blurb works, as per Robert’s site.

Other than that, to each his own taste, however suspect.

]]> By: a-letheia http://www.rjkoehler.com/2008/02/02/continuing-controversy/#comment-132853 a-letheia Sun, 03 Feb 2008 12:29:03 +0000 http://www.rjkoehler.com/2008/02/02/continuing-controversy/#comment-132853 See now, Mr. Elgin, you sat there and bitched about G.B.'s lack of links, and that is ALL you provide: http://www.rjkoehler.com/2008/02/03/pride-goes-before-a-fall/#comments Your own blogging is insufficient in my opinion and generally veers beyond the limits of "interesting". So there. See now, Mr. Elgin, you sat there and bitched about G.B.’s lack of links, and that is ALL you provide:

http://www.rjkoehler.com/2008/...../#comments

Your own blogging is insufficient in my opinion and generally veers beyond the limits of “interesting”. So there.

]]> By: G.B. Curley http://www.rjkoehler.com/2008/02/02/continuing-controversy/#comment-132850 G.B. Curley Sun, 03 Feb 2008 11:58:36 +0000 http://www.rjkoehler.com/2008/02/02/continuing-controversy/#comment-132850 Richardson, I'll give it to you - that is classic. When the shit settles I'll try my hand at another post. Richardson, I’ll give it to you - that is classic. When the shit settles I’ll try my hand at another post.

]]> By: The Goat http://www.rjkoehler.com/2008/02/02/continuing-controversy/#comment-132844 The Goat Sun, 03 Feb 2008 10:46:21 +0000 http://www.rjkoehler.com/2008/02/02/continuing-controversy/#comment-132844 Lol Richardson...that's awesome. Lol Richardson…that’s awesome.

]]> By: Richardson http://www.rjkoehler.com/2008/02/02/continuing-controversy/#comment-132840 Richardson Sun, 03 Feb 2008 10:24:52 +0000 http://www.rjkoehler.com/2008/02/02/continuing-controversy/#comment-132840 As requested; http://www.dprkstudies.org/documents/HurtFeelingsReport.pdf As requested;

http://www.dprkstudies.org/doc.....Report.pdf

]]> By: jag http://www.rjkoehler.com/2008/02/02/continuing-controversy/#comment-132839 jag Sun, 03 Feb 2008 10:07:55 +0000 http://www.rjkoehler.com/2008/02/02/continuing-controversy/#comment-132839 Lovely.A moral issue wrapped in legal jargon.There's,what...6 billion or so people on this planet?Who the hell is ANYONE to tell me I got it right the first time out? Marriage should be hard, divorce should be easy.Marriage should not be entered into lightly.Adultery can be a reason to ask for divorce, but not a reason to be punished criminally.If you spiritually inclined morals lead you to be more choosy about a marriage partner, bully for you, but you can jam it up your ass if YOUR religious feelings urge you to get in my face about how I handle MY marital affairs. Lovely.A moral issue wrapped in legal jargon.There’s,what…6 billion or so people on this planet?Who the hell is ANYONE to tell me I got it right the first time out? Marriage should be hard, divorce should be easy.Marriage should not be entered into lightly.Adultery can be a reason to ask for divorce, but not a reason to be punished criminally.If you spiritually inclined morals lead you to be more choosy about a marriage partner, bully for you, but you can jam it up your ass if YOUR religious feelings urge you to get in my face about how I handle MY marital affairs.

]]>