The New York Times has released its “53 Places to Go in 2008.” Is it just me, or did Northeast Asia really get the shaft?
What? No Mungyeong?
This entry was written by Robert Koehler, posted on December 13, 2007 at 2:36 pm, filed under Asides, East and Central Asia. Bookmark the permalink. Follow any comments here with the RSS feed for this post.
Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.


13 Comments
What do you expect from an East Coast paper? The piece makes me wonder what is wrong with North Beach in Miami since South and Mid beaches both made the top ten.
Kuwait City as no. 32….now that’s a surprise
Detroit? [And I'm from there]
On the other hand, the absence of East Asian destinations is not terribly surprising, nor indicative of anything other than their relative lack of attractiveness given the obvious criteria of decision.
Seoul’s about to get a feature in there… so I hear…
Fuck me, Detroit is on there.
I’m not sure what the obvious criteria of decision was. Whatever it was, Mozambique has apparently got it while Kyoto and Beijing don’t.
Oh, they just listed what is “new and fresh” and possibly surprising as destinations for the globetrotting set, including some classic ones that have a refreshed attractiveness for some reason.
I, too, was disappointed to not find any Korean sites on the list.
> Detroit? [And I’m from there]
So am I, Sperwer! And it’s very rare that I feel like paying a visit to the old hometown… I have to think they just included it on this list for the shock-value of doing so — notice that the associated brief article doesn’t given any clear reason why one should risk their life by going there…
By the way, uber-expat Peter Bartholomew joins me in having grown up in Detroit’s northern suburb Birmingham; we went to the same elementary and high schools — now we’re on the RAS Council together — “small world” indeed.
> the absence of East Asian destinations is not terribly surprising
It is to me, particularly the Northeast Asian ones, considering how increasingly popular they are among actual tourists…
> nor indicative of anything other than their relative lack
> of attractiveness given the obvious criteria of decision.
I would disagree — I think it’s mainly indicative of the simple ignorance of whatever writers the editors assigned to do this list — and their laziness in not doing even basic homework while writing it, not even checking out the obvious stuff on the Internet.
Compare the similarity with the incredibly clueless list of the world’s top religious-pilgrimage sites that Newsweek magazine published this last April — see the letter to the editor I wrote to them protesting the blatant ignorance and laziness of their writers/editors:
http://san-shin.org/NewsweekLetter.html
Note that the links I included to the original Newsweek articles no longer work, as they apparently removed those articles from their website — in shame, I hope.
The Canadian Northwest Passage, 4600$ per person? My dad will drive you there in his Hyundai, half price. 2 person minimum.
Sanshinseon:
I’m an Eight Mile Roader myself - although it hadn’t gone so far down the tubes as in eminem’s day yet; but cousins lived in Birmingham - Beverley Hills, actually, near the cemetery off Peirce. It’s been a lot of years since I was back. I thought Bart was a Canadian. I was born in a car on the Peace Bridge, when my parents were coming back from a trip to Canada, and my Dad was Canadian at the time (he later wised up and got naturalized - just in time for the Korean War), so I had the option, but passed since that seemed to me to be a dishonorable thing to do after growing up in the States and just when they were about to pull my ticket out of the draft lotto.
Canada gets “Northwest Passage, Canada.”
Screw you guys.
#9,
The correct term is actually ‘Canadian Internal Waters’.
Ut Videam, who seems to have disappeared, was from Oakland, I think. I’m from a one-traffic-light podunk town near Lansing myself. Thanks to our moribund economy, it’s not unusual to meet other exiles from the once Great Lake State. I was shocked to read in a history article a few months ago that Detroit once had the highest per capita income of any city in the US.
If the purpose of lifting the curtain in #8 and baring your soul and heritage for us was to increase that Halo Of Honor that you imagine we see shimmering about your name, then I’m afraid you missed the mark. Such comments from an older man only detract from whatever nobility may have influenced his youthful decisions.
I’m a Fourteen-Mile Roader (at Southfield), Sperwer — in Birmingham but Beverley Hills was just one block away! I used to go swimming at the BHAC in BH, but otherwise my life was in B’ham…
> I thought Bart was a Canadian.
Naw, he just acts like one
Sonagi, correct, the “Once-Great Lake State” is a great place to be formerly from… Tho my bro & sis still live there — bro back in TigerTown with Chrysler, sis in the same house we grew up in… Time moves slower there, that’s for sure.
> I was shocked to read in a history article a few months ago
> that Detroit once had the highest per capita income of any
> city in the US.
Once it did, sure. My grandpa had one of those good unionized factory jobs (helped start the UAW, actually!), sent his daughter to college; they were so proud. Now, Detroit’s per-capita income only looks good if you factor in the crack dealers…