<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ROKN Reveals Revised ROKS Dokdo Logo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/11/26/rokn-reveals-revised-roks-dokdo-logo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/11/26/rokn-reveals-revised-roks-dokdo-logo/</link>
	<description>Korea... in Blog Format</description>
	<pubDate>Sat,  6 Sep 2008 18:06:17 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Breaktrack</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/11/26/rokn-reveals-revised-roks-dokdo-logo/#comment-120183</link>
		<dc:creator>Breaktrack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 22:27:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/11/26/rokn-reveals-revised-roks-dokdo-logo/#comment-120183</guid>
		<description>I like both of them. The second does look better though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like both of them. The second does look better though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richardson</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/11/26/rokn-reveals-revised-roks-dokdo-logo/#comment-120181</link>
		<dc:creator>Richardson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 21:32:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/11/26/rokn-reveals-revised-roks-dokdo-logo/#comment-120181</guid>
		<description>Lead - Command - Project</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lead - Command - Project</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: arthjourneyman</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/11/26/rokn-reveals-revised-roks-dokdo-logo/#comment-120178</link>
		<dc:creator>arthjourneyman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 18:00:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/11/26/rokn-reveals-revised-roks-dokdo-logo/#comment-120178</guid>
		<description>The source at Occi doesn't work Peter, is there any other places with the pic?  Just asking 'cause that site has used doctored photos before.

Anyway, glad they changed the pic, though I think the flag and ship are ok, the chopper is awkward though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The source at Occi doesn&#8217;t work Peter, is there any other places with the pic?  Just asking &#8217;cause that site has used doctored photos before.</p>
<p>Anyway, glad they changed the pic, though I think the flag and ship are ok, the chopper is awkward though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: empraptor</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/11/26/rokn-reveals-revised-roks-dokdo-logo/#comment-120177</link>
		<dc:creator>empraptor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 17:17:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/11/26/rokn-reveals-revised-roks-dokdo-logo/#comment-120177</guid>
		<description>Better.  But they really should make it more abstract.  Cut out the helicopter.  Make the ship simpler and not be a long stick that goes outside the circle.  Maybe even take out the ship - replace it with some symbol or other.  The flag doesn't need to be photorealistic.  Take out those wrinkles.  If English need be there, get someone who can make it sound less dumb.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Better.  But they really should make it more abstract.  Cut out the helicopter.  Make the ship simpler and not be a long stick that goes outside the circle.  Maybe even take out the ship - replace it with some symbol or other.  The flag doesn&#8217;t need to be photorealistic.  Take out those wrinkles.  If English need be there, get someone who can make it sound less dumb.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richardson</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/11/26/rokn-reveals-revised-roks-dokdo-logo/#comment-120175</link>
		<dc:creator>Richardson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 17:04:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/11/26/rokn-reveals-revised-roks-dokdo-logo/#comment-120175</guid>
		<description>Depending on the role of the Dokdo, they could also have said, "Sea Command."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Depending on the role of the Dokdo, they could also have said, &#8220;Sea Command.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stafford</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/11/26/rokn-reveals-revised-roks-dokdo-logo/#comment-120162</link>
		<dc:creator>stafford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 13:24:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/11/26/rokn-reveals-revised-roks-dokdo-logo/#comment-120162</guid>
		<description>Typical! Incorrect use of the determiner. (Or lack thereof.) Lead THE Fleet, Command THE Sea. Project Power is good though. (As long as the stress is correct.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Typical! Incorrect use of the determiner. (Or lack thereof.) Lead THE Fleet, Command THE Sea. Project Power is good though. (As long as the stress is correct.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: globalvillageidiot</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/11/26/rokn-reveals-revised-roks-dokdo-logo/#comment-120155</link>
		<dc:creator>globalvillageidiot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 12:27:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/11/26/rokn-reveals-revised-roks-dokdo-logo/#comment-120155</guid>
		<description>Maybe "ROKS Dokdo" would look/read better than "Republic of Korea Ship Dokdo", but nothing too strange about the English.  Anyway, I think the new logo looks pretty sharp.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe &#8220;ROKS Dokdo&#8221; would look/read better than &#8220;Republic of Korea Ship Dokdo&#8221;, but nothing too strange about the English.  Anyway, I think the new logo looks pretty sharp.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richardson</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/11/26/rokn-reveals-revised-roks-dokdo-logo/#comment-120153</link>
		<dc:creator>Richardson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 12:20:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/11/26/rokn-reveals-revised-roks-dokdo-logo/#comment-120153</guid>
		<description>Nevermind, now see the small print...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nevermind, now see the small print&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richardson</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/11/26/rokn-reveals-revised-roks-dokdo-logo/#comment-120150</link>
		<dc:creator>Richardson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 12:09:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/11/26/rokn-reveals-revised-roks-dokdo-logo/#comment-120150</guid>
		<description>I don’t think "ROK Ship Dokdo" should be considered Konglish.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don’t think &#8220;ROK Ship Dokdo&#8221; should be considered Konglish.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: otoritakeo</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/11/26/rokn-reveals-revised-roks-dokdo-logo/#comment-120149</link>
		<dc:creator>otoritakeo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 12:09:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/11/26/rokn-reveals-revised-roks-dokdo-logo/#comment-120149</guid>
		<description>"I like that new one, I actually do."

Good for you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I like that new one, I actually do.&#8221;</p>
<p>Good for you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
