<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Split Loyalties?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/11/13/split-loyalties/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/11/13/split-loyalties/</link>
	<description>Korea... in Blog Format</description>
	<pubDate>Fri,  9 Jan 2009 05:46:32 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Korean Americans Filling up Fullerton, Calfornia &#124; The Marmot's Hole</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/11/13/split-loyalties/comment-page-2/#comment-206819</link>
		<dc:creator>Korean Americans Filling up Fullerton, Calfornia &#124; The Marmot's Hole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 01:46:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/11/13/split-loyalties/#comment-206819</guid>
		<description>[...] Koreans from Fullerton? Eric Mun of Shinhwa, singer and draft dodger Steve Yoo, and the &#8220;Stanford Imposter&#8221; Azia [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Koreans from Fullerton? Eric Mun of Shinhwa, singer and draft dodger Steve Yoo, and the &#8220;Stanford Imposter&#8221; Azia [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dogbertt</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/11/13/split-loyalties/comment-page-2/#comment-118483</link>
		<dc:creator>dogbertt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 02:46:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/11/13/split-loyalties/#comment-118483</guid>
		<description>I can only hope that jk, wjk, and baduk make up a small sampling that is absolutely not representative of Korean-Americans as a whole.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can only hope that jk, wjk, and baduk make up a small sampling that is absolutely not representative of Korean-Americans as a whole.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul H.</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/11/13/split-loyalties/comment-page-2/#comment-118466</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul H.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 02:17:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/11/13/split-loyalties/#comment-118466</guid>
		<description>1) #88 -- "...I’m positively gobsmacked you could identify ethnicity from rantings on the Internet."

Nothing to be astonished about.  "Silly Sally" would make various "handle" changes over at GI Korea but "she" had an incorrigible need to lecture the plebians (just like cinema); "her" style was unmistakable so the attempt at disguise became readily apparent after a paragraph or so.

Under one of her "alternates" I think I recall "she" had a post with a moment of candor about being a UK resident of ethnic Indian origin.  That ties in with some other indicators such as "her" choice of adjectives ("daft", "bloody-minded"...)

2) #91 --  "Honestly speaking...I wouldn’t post a guy’s address nor would I call attention to it if I found it.
But I would pull off his mask."

Amen to that.  I'm not interested in violating anyone's personal privacy but I'm not inclined to passively endure anonymous lectures from "citizens of the world".  The Delphic oracle went out of business quite a while back and there's no valid successor out there, esp not at that collection of thugocracies known as the UN General Assembly.  

Anyone is entitled to state their views here as determined by our host(s) --if they mind their manners, maybe even throw a few sharp elbows, but the readers are damn sure entitled to know what nationalistic gas the poster has been inhaling.  

A "subcontinent" ethnicity poster obsessed with 9/11 conspiracy makes a lot more "sense" once one recalls the importance of conspiracy as affecting the terms of office of the governments down there, since 1947.  Where you sit (or sat) has a lot to do with where you stand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1) #88 &#8212; &#8220;&#8230;I’m positively gobsmacked you could identify ethnicity from rantings on the Internet.&#8221;</p>
<p>Nothing to be astonished about.  &#8220;Silly Sally&#8221; would make various &#8220;handle&#8221; changes over at GI Korea but &#8220;she&#8221; had an incorrigible need to lecture the plebians (just like cinema); &#8220;her&#8221; style was unmistakable so the attempt at disguise became readily apparent after a paragraph or so.</p>
<p>Under one of her &#8220;alternates&#8221; I think I recall &#8220;she&#8221; had a post with a moment of candor about being a UK resident of ethnic Indian origin.  That ties in with some other indicators such as &#8220;her&#8221; choice of adjectives (&#8221;daft&#8221;, &#8220;bloody-minded&#8221;&#8230;)</p>
<p>2) #91 &#8212;  &#8220;Honestly speaking&#8230;I wouldn’t post a guy’s address nor would I call attention to it if I found it.<br />
But I would pull off his mask.&#8221;</p>
<p>Amen to that.  I&#8217;m not interested in violating anyone&#8217;s personal privacy but I&#8217;m not inclined to passively endure anonymous lectures from &#8220;citizens of the world&#8221;.  The Delphic oracle went out of business quite a while back and there&#8217;s no valid successor out there, esp not at that collection of thugocracies known as the UN General Assembly.  </p>
<p>Anyone is entitled to state their views here as determined by our host(s) &#8211;if they mind their manners, maybe even throw a few sharp elbows, but the readers are damn sure entitled to know what nationalistic gas the poster has been inhaling.  </p>
<p>A &#8220;subcontinent&#8221; ethnicity poster obsessed with 9/11 conspiracy makes a lot more &#8220;sense&#8221; once one recalls the importance of conspiracy as affecting the terms of office of the governments down there, since 1947.  Where you sit (or sat) has a lot to do with where you stand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JK</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/11/13/split-loyalties/comment-page-2/#comment-118380</link>
		<dc:creator>JK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 15:27:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/11/13/split-loyalties/#comment-118380</guid>
		<description>dogbert wrote:
"My view of jk’s narcissism, self-importance, and contempt for others, primarily non-Korean-Americans, is based on his blog writings, which others may have not read."

Hah!  And what do you write in YOUR blog?  Heck your own comments on THIS blog alone reveal enough about you.

What's even funnier....you will CONTINUE to read my blog.  I didn't know I had such an audience!  (Actually I did know with my tracer.)

And FYI: I showed contempt for non-Korean-Americans???  This coming from you with all your comments about how we Korean-Americans are all suspect in our loyalty to America?  Puh-lease!  Who do you think I critique the most on my blog (and a critique is not the same as contempt)?  No, it ain't white Anglos or Japanese or native Koreans (though there is much to write about each group, and not always in a positive way either); more often than not, it's Korean-Americans...but I dish it out all around to everybody because every ethnic, national, and religious group in the world has its problems (you yourself are hopefully just an extreme example of YOUR ethnic group).  So next time you make a claim about me or anyone else, be ACCURATE and not say lies.

Funny, Wangkon corrects you in #81....and after sheepishly admitting you were in the wrong, you stubbornly go on a tangent to talk about my blog.  Well, guess what?  It's my blog!  And I draw such pleasure knowing it irks you to read it but that you will continue to do so. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dogbert wrote:<br />
&#8220;My view of jk’s narcissism, self-importance, and contempt for others, primarily non-Korean-Americans, is based on his blog writings, which others may have not read.&#8221;</p>
<p>Hah!  And what do you write in YOUR blog?  Heck your own comments on THIS blog alone reveal enough about you.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s even funnier&#8230;.you will CONTINUE to read my blog.  I didn&#8217;t know I had such an audience!  (Actually I did know with my tracer.)</p>
<p>And FYI: I showed contempt for non-Korean-Americans???  This coming from you with all your comments about how we Korean-Americans are all suspect in our loyalty to America?  Puh-lease!  Who do you think I critique the most on my blog (and a critique is not the same as contempt)?  No, it ain&#8217;t white Anglos or Japanese or native Koreans (though there is much to write about each group, and not always in a positive way either); more often than not, it&#8217;s Korean-Americans&#8230;but I dish it out all around to everybody because every ethnic, national, and religious group in the world has its problems (you yourself are hopefully just an extreme example of YOUR ethnic group).  So next time you make a claim about me or anyone else, be ACCURATE and not say lies.</p>
<p>Funny, Wangkon corrects you in #81&#8230;.and after sheepishly admitting you were in the wrong, you stubbornly go on a tangent to talk about my blog.  Well, guess what?  It&#8217;s my blog!  And I draw such pleasure knowing it irks you to read it but that you will continue to do so. <img src='http://www.rjkoehler.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dda</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/11/13/split-loyalties/comment-page-2/#comment-118371</link>
		<dc:creator>dda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 14:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/11/13/split-loyalties/#comment-118371</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;is only drawing sympathy for cg&lt;/blockquote&gt;That'd be a hard sell -- one would have to be already way across the fence with the other lulus to feel any sympathy for the... er... fellow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>is only drawing sympathy for cg</p></blockquote>
<p>That&#8217;d be a hard sell &#8212; one would have to be already way across the fence with the other lulus to feel any sympathy for the&#8230; er&#8230; fellow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MigukNamja</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/11/13/split-loyalties/comment-page-2/#comment-118366</link>
		<dc:creator>MigukNamja</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 13:58:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/11/13/split-loyalties/#comment-118366</guid>
		<description>Brendon,

You're taking someone else's blog post way too personally and way too far. Your compulsive-obsessive attack is making you look bad and is only drawing sympathy for cg in the victim role, thus supporting his/her position.

Chill.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brendon,</p>
<p>You&#8217;re taking someone else&#8217;s blog post way too personally and way too far. Your compulsive-obsessive attack is making you look bad and is only drawing sympathy for cg in the victim role, thus supporting his/her position.</p>
<p>Chill.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dokdoforever</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/11/13/split-loyalties/comment-page-2/#comment-118357</link>
		<dc:creator>dokdoforever</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 12:53:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/11/13/split-loyalties/#comment-118357</guid>
		<description>You guys.. taking this far too seriously.  What fun would this be if everyone agreed with you all the time?  It's good to have some people with different views, makes it interesting.  No reason to get all personal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You guys.. taking this far too seriously.  What fun would this be if everyone agreed with you all the time?  It&#8217;s good to have some people with different views, makes it interesting.  No reason to get all personal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brendon Carr (Korea Law Blog)</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/11/13/split-loyalties/comment-page-2/#comment-118353</link>
		<dc:creator>Brendon Carr (Korea Law Blog)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 10:52:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/11/13/split-loyalties/#comment-118353</guid>
		<description>Don't have his address -- but anything that's discoverable by typing the compound &lt;a href="http://www.google.com/search?rls=en&#038;q=cinemagauche&#038;ie=UTF-8&#038;oe=UTF-8" rel="nofollow"&gt;"cinemagauche"&lt;/a&gt; into Google and clicking around on the &lt;i&gt;first page&lt;/i&gt; of search results seems fair game to me. He's not keeping his name a secret if he's using that handle publicly.

I didn't have to use any of my magic powers from the National Security Agency to find it. Honestly speaking, though, I wouldn't post a guy's address nor would I call attention to it if I found it.

But I would pull off his mask.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t have his address &#8212; but anything that&#8217;s discoverable by typing the compound <a href="http://www.google.com/search?rls=en&#038;q=cinemagauche&#038;ie=UTF-8&#038;oe=UTF-8" rel="nofollow">&#8220;cinemagauche&#8221;</a> into Google and clicking around on the <i>first page</i> of search results seems fair game to me. He&#8217;s not keeping his name a secret if he&#8217;s using that handle publicly.</p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t have to use any of my magic powers from the National Security Agency to find it. Honestly speaking, though, I wouldn&#8217;t post a guy&#8217;s address nor would I call attention to it if I found it.</p>
<p>But I would pull off his mask.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Koehler</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/11/13/split-loyalties/comment-page-2/#comment-118352</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Koehler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 10:42:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/11/13/split-loyalties/#comment-118352</guid>
		<description>Yes, that was quite uncalled for, Truther or not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, that was quite uncalled for, Truther or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nerdieboy</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/11/13/split-loyalties/comment-page-2/#comment-118348</link>
		<dc:creator>nerdieboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 10:07:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/11/13/split-loyalties/#comment-118348</guid>
		<description>I think that's creepy. 

Why don't you post his address while you're at it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that&#8217;s creepy. </p>
<p>Why don&#8217;t you post his address while you&#8217;re at it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
