<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Political Volatility</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/10/31/political-volatility/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/10/31/political-volatility/</link>
	<description>Korea... in Blog Format</description>
	<pubDate>Sat,  5 Jul 2008 11:38:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Some Reviews of Books on Korea, Part 3: The Labor Movement &#171; The Grand Narrative</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/10/31/political-volatility/#comment-122478</link>
		<dc:creator>Some Reviews of Books on Korea, Part 3: The Labor Movement &#171; The Grand Narrative</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2007 15:34:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/10/31/political-volatility/#comment-122478</guid>
		<description>[...] of mere elections and votes, and it is only on this procedural level that Korean politics appears like the mundane multiparty systems in readers&#8217; home countries. This was starkly shown to me [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of mere elections and votes, and it is only on this procedural level that Korean politics appears like the mundane multiparty systems in readers&#8217; home countries. This was starkly shown to me [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: boshintang</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/10/31/political-volatility/#comment-116340</link>
		<dc:creator>boshintang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 23:59:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/10/31/political-volatility/#comment-116340</guid>
		<description>I agree, Koreans are way too liberal on their use of "progressive."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, Koreans are way too liberal on their use of &#8220;progressive.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jefferyhodges</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/10/31/political-volatility/#comment-115942</link>
		<dc:creator>jefferyhodges</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 21:47:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/10/31/political-volatility/#comment-115942</guid>
		<description>Finally, Koreans are making &lt;i&gt;progress&lt;/i&gt; on the use of "liberal."

Jeffery Hodges

* * *</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Finally, Koreans are making <i>progress</i> on the use of &#8220;liberal.&#8221;</p>
<p>Jeffery Hodges</p>
<p>* * *</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Goat</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/10/31/political-volatility/#comment-115924</link>
		<dc:creator>The Goat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 12:09:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/10/31/political-volatility/#comment-115924</guid>
		<description>@#2

Thank you.  I thought I was the only one that despised the 'p word'.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@#2</p>
<p>Thank you.  I thought I was the only one that despised the &#8216;p word&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: red sparrow</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/10/31/political-volatility/#comment-115904</link>
		<dc:creator>red sparrow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 07:54:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/10/31/political-volatility/#comment-115904</guid>
		<description>I think this is the first time in the Korean news media that I have seen the word 'liberal' used instead of that god-awful, pinko commie-soaked term 'progressive'.

Finally.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this is the first time in the Korean news media that I have seen the word &#8216;liberal&#8217; used instead of that god-awful, pinko commie-soaked term &#8216;progressive&#8217;.</p>
<p>Finally.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sperwer</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/10/31/political-volatility/#comment-115895</link>
		<dc:creator>Sperwer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 06:26:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/10/31/political-volatility/#comment-115895</guid>
		<description>The most significant statement in the article:

&lt;blockquote&gt;According to Lee, people's stance on North Korea and human rights are the two major criteria that can distinguish the conservatives from the liberals.

``There are no other policy areas that could discern conservative from liberals in the country,'' Lee stressed.&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The most significant statement in the article:</p>
<blockquote><p>According to Lee, people&#8217;s stance on North Korea and human rights are the two major criteria that can distinguish the conservatives from the liberals.</p>
<p>&#8220;There are no other policy areas that could discern conservative from liberals in the country,&#8221; Lee stressed.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
