<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Typography Change</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/08/22/typography-change/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/08/22/typography-change/</link>
	<description>Korea... in Blog Format</description>
	<pubDate>Tue,  2 Dec 2008 22:04:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: foobat</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/08/22/typography-change/#comment-102597</link>
		<dc:creator>foobat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 05:51:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/08/22/typography-change/#comment-102597</guid>
		<description>try Verdana instead of Helvetica, you could also ajust using something like:
&lt;code&gt;letter-spacing: 0.15em;&lt;/code&gt; 
to spread the characters out a tad.

personally, i like my heading and titles to be a nice big serif (Georgia at 16px or 18px) and Verdana for the body copy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>try Verdana instead of Helvetica, you could also ajust using something like:<br />
<code>letter-spacing: 0.15em;</code><br />
to spread the characters out a tad.</p>
<p>personally, i like my heading and titles to be a nice big serif (Georgia at 16px or 18px) and Verdana for the body copy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ut videam</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/08/22/typography-change/#comment-102594</link>
		<dc:creator>Ut videam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 05:37:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/08/22/typography-change/#comment-102594</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;"I usually prefer sans-serif fonts on the Internet."&lt;/em&gt;

I tend to agree---if I'm stuck with Windows' crappy on-screen text rendering. On the Mac though (or Safari for Windows, which I guess does text rendering through Quartz libraries?) serif fonts are much easier on the eyes at smaller point sizes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>&#8220;I usually prefer sans-serif fonts on the Internet.&#8221;</em></p>
<p>I tend to agree&#8212;if I&#8217;m stuck with Windows&#8217; crappy on-screen text rendering. On the Mac though (or Safari for Windows, which I guess does text rendering through Quartz libraries?) serif fonts are much easier on the eyes at smaller point sizes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Koehler</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/08/22/typography-change/#comment-102571</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Koehler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 03:24:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/08/22/typography-change/#comment-102571</guid>
		<description>A couple of other folk said the same thing, and they appear to be right. Switched back.

That being said, I usually prefer sans-serif fonts on the Internet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A couple of other folk said the same thing, and they appear to be right. Switched back.</p>
<p>That being said, I usually prefer sans-serif fonts on the Internet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tz247</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/08/22/typography-change/#comment-102569</link>
		<dc:creator>tz247</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 03:05:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/08/22/typography-change/#comment-102569</guid>
		<description>Traditionally, typography is the opposite. Sans-serif for headlines (makes an impact) and serif for copy (makes it easier to read small words close together. So you've actually made it harder on the eyes...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Traditionally, typography is the opposite. Sans-serif for headlines (makes an impact) and serif for copy (makes it easier to read small words close together. So you&#8217;ve actually made it harder on the eyes&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
