<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What Would Marshall Have Said?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/08/11/what-would-marshall-have-said/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/08/11/what-would-marshall-have-said/</link>
	<description>Korea... in Blog Format</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 08:14:10 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Janus</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/08/11/what-would-marshall-have-said/#comment-101461</link>
		<dc:creator>Janus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 14:49:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/08/11/what-would-marshall-have-said/#comment-101461</guid>
		<description>To elaborate on what kyochan said, a crucial difference is that the marshall plan was given to struggling &lt;b&gt;democracies&lt;/B&gt; after the devastating confluence of unfortunate events in 1947 that seemed to put the tentative European postwar recovery in jeopardy.

Ultimately, the Marshall plan was economically immaterial to Europe's recovery--not to say it didn't matter. It made a huge difference by making the Europeans "believe in themselves again" (to quote somewhere in the first part of Tony Judt's borderline-spectacular work, &lt;i&gt;Postwar&lt;/I&gt;

This is doing the opposite--South Korea is not helping the citizens of a democracy believe in themselves, but helping a monstrous regime to maintain its fragile (while still staggeringly murderous) total grip on its victims.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To elaborate on what kyochan said, a crucial difference is that the marshall plan was given to struggling <b>democracies</b> after the devastating confluence of unfortunate events in 1947 that seemed to put the tentative European postwar recovery in jeopardy.</p>
<p>Ultimately, the Marshall plan was economically immaterial to Europe&#8217;s recovery&#8211;not to say it didn&#8217;t matter. It made a huge difference by making the Europeans &#8220;believe in themselves again&#8221; (to quote somewhere in the first part of Tony Judt&#8217;s borderline-spectacular work, <i>Postwar</i></p>
<p>This is doing the opposite&#8211;South Korea is not helping the citizens of a democracy believe in themselves, but helping a monstrous regime to maintain its fragile (while still staggeringly murderous) total grip on its victims.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kyochan</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/08/11/what-would-marshall-have-said/#comment-101161</link>
		<dc:creator>kyochan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2007 06:35:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/08/11/what-would-marshall-have-said/#comment-101161</guid>
		<description>The reason behind the Marshall Plan was to prevent countries from turning communist.  This plan keeps them communist.

Worse, Marshall was also Sec. Defense during the Korean War.  No doubt he is spinning in his grave.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The reason behind the Marshall Plan was to prevent countries from turning communist.  This plan keeps them communist.</p>
<p>Worse, Marshall was also Sec. Defense during the Korean War.  No doubt he is spinning in his grave.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
