<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Safari for Korean Windows</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/07/05/safari-for-korean-windows/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/07/05/safari-for-korean-windows/</link>
	<description>Korea... in Blog Format</description>
	<pubDate>Tue,  2 Dec 2008 13:04:51 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: French Quarter</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/07/05/safari-for-korean-windows/#comment-95422</link>
		<dc:creator>French Quarter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2007 09:24:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/07/05/safari-for-korean-windows/#comment-95422</guid>
		<description>I agree that the reporters should have said Safari 3 for Windows is a beta version.  However, Safari 3.0 and 3.01 for Windows were UNUSABLE.  I regularly download beta versions of the software that I'm interested in.  Safari 3.0 was, as some people on the IT blogs called, like a "pre-alpha" version.  Security experts found security holes within 2 hours after the release and found 18 holes within 24 hours.  Safari 3.0 and 3.01 did not run or did not show its menu on some computers (of course, with the English version Windows XP and Vista) for unknown reasons.  When I reinstalled 3.0 version for a problem on Windows XP, its menu disappeared, and I had to delete "invisible" Safari-related folders and reinstalle Safari 3.0 to get it to show the menu.  Anyone could download 3.0 and 3.01, but not all of them could deal with those problems.  The public who downloaded 3.0 had been exposed to security risk until 3.02 was released.  Not all of the known security holes have been plugged yet.

Safari 3.0 for Mac was much more stable than the Windows version.  Current Safari 3.02 for Windows usable as a beta.   On my Mac, I use Safari 3.02 for Mac and Camino, which is another web  browser.

The below is a part of the PC World review on the Safari 3.0 for Windows:
"Although Safari 3.0 is beta code, and expected to include bugs, Ferris said that Apple's team should have tested it more carefully before making it available to such a large group of testers. "In order to have a useful beta test of a Web browser people need to use it in the real world, which is ultimately exposing them to malware," he said."
http://www.pcworld.com/article/id,132845-c,browserbugs/article.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that the reporters should have said Safari 3 for Windows is a beta version.  However, Safari 3.0 and 3.01 for Windows were UNUSABLE.  I regularly download beta versions of the software that I&#8217;m interested in.  Safari 3.0 was, as some people on the IT blogs called, like a &#8220;pre-alpha&#8221; version.  Security experts found security holes within 2 hours after the release and found 18 holes within 24 hours.  Safari 3.0 and 3.01 did not run or did not show its menu on some computers (of course, with the English version Windows XP and Vista) for unknown reasons.  When I reinstalled 3.0 version for a problem on Windows XP, its menu disappeared, and I had to delete &#8220;invisible&#8221; Safari-related folders and reinstalle Safari 3.0 to get it to show the menu.  Anyone could download 3.0 and 3.01, but not all of them could deal with those problems.  The public who downloaded 3.0 had been exposed to security risk until 3.02 was released.  Not all of the known security holes have been plugged yet.</p>
<p>Safari 3.0 for Mac was much more stable than the Windows version.  Current Safari 3.02 for Windows usable as a beta.   On my Mac, I use Safari 3.02 for Mac and Camino, which is another web  browser.</p>
<p>The below is a part of the PC World review on the Safari 3.0 for Windows:<br />
&#8220;Although Safari 3.0 is beta code, and expected to include bugs, Ferris said that Apple&#8217;s team should have tested it more carefully before making it available to such a large group of testers. &#8220;In order to have a useful beta test of a Web browser people need to use it in the real world, which is ultimately exposing them to malware,&#8221; he said.&#8221;<br />
<a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/id,132845-c,browserbugs/article.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.pcworld.com/article.....ticle.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brendon Carr</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/07/05/safari-for-korean-windows/#comment-95416</link>
		<dc:creator>Brendon Carr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2007 08:24:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/07/05/safari-for-korean-windows/#comment-95416</guid>
		<description>No way baby! It's imperative that Koreans be led to understand that Apple products are complete shit! Especially -- especially -- since they're not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No way baby! It&#8217;s imperative that Koreans be led to understand that Apple products are complete shit! Especially &#8212; especially &#8212; since they&#8217;re not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SomeguyinKorea</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/07/05/safari-for-korean-windows/#comment-95100</link>
		<dc:creator>SomeguyinKorea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2007 23:14:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/07/05/safari-for-korean-windows/#comment-95100</guid>
		<description>So, will the reporters who were quick to criticize the previous version's inability to encode Korean text, not understanding that it was just a beta version, print some sort of correction?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, will the reporters who were quick to criticize the previous version&#8217;s inability to encode Korean text, not understanding that it was just a beta version, print some sort of correction?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R. Elgin</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/07/05/safari-for-korean-windows/#comment-95068</link>
		<dc:creator>R. Elgin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2007 12:38:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/07/05/safari-for-korean-windows/#comment-95068</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I use performancing as well and it is great.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I use performancing as well and it is great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Koehler</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/07/05/safari-for-korean-windows/#comment-95066</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Koehler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2007 12:06:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/07/05/safari-for-korean-windows/#comment-95066</guid>
		<description>Sorry, didn't see you're comment back there.

Now, if only I could find a Safari blogging tool like Performancing for Firefox...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, didn&#8217;t see you&#8217;re comment back there.</p>
<p>Now, if only I could find a Safari blogging tool like Performancing for Firefox&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ut videam</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/07/05/safari-for-korean-windows/#comment-95063</link>
		<dc:creator>Ut videam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2007 11:58:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/07/05/safari-for-korean-windows/#comment-95063</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Is there an &lt;a href="http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/06/15/thats-my-beta/#comment-91983" rel="nofollow"&gt;in here?&lt;/a&gt; ;)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there an <a href="http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/06/15/thats-my-beta/#comment-91983" rel="nofollow">in here?</a> <img src='http://www.rjkoehler.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: French Quarter</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/07/05/safari-for-korean-windows/#comment-95049</link>
		<dc:creator>French Quarter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2007 08:25:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/07/05/safari-for-korean-windows/#comment-95049</guid>
		<description>http://www.apple.com/safari/download/

The above link says a bunch of features including international text input are coming.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.apple.com/safari/download/" rel="nofollow">http://www.apple.com/safari/download/</a></p>
<p>The above link says a bunch of features including international text input are coming.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: French Quarter</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/07/05/safari-for-korean-windows/#comment-95048</link>
		<dc:creator>French Quarter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2007 08:23:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/07/05/safari-for-korean-windows/#comment-95048</guid>
		<description>We can read Korean on Safari for Windows 3.02, but it doesn't support text input of some languages including Chinese and Korean.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We can read Korean on Safari for Windows 3.02, but it doesn&#8217;t support text input of some languages including Chinese and Korean.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
