<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: In Good (Non-Metric) Company</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/07/02/in-good-non-metric-company/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/07/02/in-good-non-metric-company/</link>
	<description>Korea... in Blog Format</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 23:29:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sonagi</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/07/02/in-good-non-metric-company/#comment-94697</link>
		<dc:creator>Sonagi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 03:40:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/07/02/in-good-non-metric-company/#comment-94697</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;"I would find it totally annoying at school to use the English Imperial system in Maths then switch to the Metric system during Science… "&lt;/i&gt;

It's worse than that.  Both systems are used in math AND science until 7th or 8th grade, when the need for easy convertibility pushes aside customary in favor of metric in the science lab.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>&#8220;I would find it totally annoying at school to use the English Imperial system in Maths then switch to the Metric system during Science… &#8220;</i></p>
<p>It&#8217;s worse than that.  Both systems are used in math AND science until 7th or 8th grade, when the need for easy convertibility pushes aside customary in favor of metric in the science lab.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richardson</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/07/02/in-good-non-metric-company/#comment-94686</link>
		<dc:creator>Richardson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 01:52:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/07/02/in-good-non-metric-company/#comment-94686</guid>
		<description>Try this;
http://www.weirdconverter.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Try this;<br />
<a href="http://www.weirdconverter.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.weirdconverter.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peninsular aborigine</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/07/02/in-good-non-metric-company/#comment-94665</link>
		<dc:creator>peninsular aborigine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2007 23:58:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/07/02/in-good-non-metric-company/#comment-94665</guid>
		<description>I remember being taught in school that America would be metric by 1976!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remember being taught in school that America would be metric by 1976!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SomeguyinKorea</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/07/02/in-good-non-metric-company/#comment-94664</link>
		<dc:creator>SomeguyinKorea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2007 23:58:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/07/02/in-good-non-metric-company/#comment-94664</guid>
		<description>"Pounds, shillings and pence would be better."

Only if you're a 50 year-old Brit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Pounds, shillings and pence would be better.&#8221;</p>
<p>Only if you&#8217;re a 50 year-old Brit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: otoritakeo</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/07/02/in-good-non-metric-company/#comment-94661</link>
		<dc:creator>otoritakeo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2007 23:46:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/07/02/in-good-non-metric-company/#comment-94661</guid>
		<description>Wouldn't it be easier for children to learn just the metric system in school? Then the next-generation Americans would find it easier to make the change to the metric system.... and I would find it totally annoying at school to use the English Imperial system in Maths then switch to the Metric system during Science... 

Plus degrees celcius is easier- 0 being the freezing point and 100 being the boiling point.. rather than 32 degrees F being the freezing point and godknowswhat being the boiling point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wouldn&#8217;t it be easier for children to learn just the metric system in school? Then the next-generation Americans would find it easier to make the change to the metric system&#8230;. and I would find it totally annoying at school to use the English Imperial system in Maths then switch to the Metric system during Science&#8230; </p>
<p>Plus degrees celcius is easier- 0 being the freezing point and 100 being the boiling point.. rather than 32 degrees F being the freezing point and godknowswhat being the boiling point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sonagi</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/07/02/in-good-non-metric-company/#comment-94658</link>
		<dc:creator>Sonagi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2007 23:02:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/07/02/in-good-non-metric-company/#comment-94658</guid>
		<description>Oops, you're right.  I must have been been groggy after my nap.  Nutritional information is in grams, not ounces.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops, you&#8217;re right.  I must have been been groggy after my nap.  Nutritional information is in grams, not ounces.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: globalvillageidiot</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/07/02/in-good-non-metric-company/#comment-94655</link>
		<dc:creator>globalvillageidiot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2007 22:21:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/07/02/in-good-non-metric-company/#comment-94655</guid>
		<description>"3 ounces is equal to 85 grams, not 20."

Drawing on certain recreational activities growing up in Canada many moons ago, that sounds about right!

I think we switched in the mid-1970s, so a lot of us growing up in the transition period (ie. speed limit signs indicating both miles and km/h for a while) have the good fortune of being able to think/function comfortably in both.  (Not to say that one had to grow up in Canada in the 70s to do that, but it didn't hurt.)  

Metric makes a hell of a lot more sense - someguy's money analogy is a prime example - but I can understand why some people might want to stick with something familiar, especially when it comes to such basic day-to-day things as temperature, distance, weight, etc.

As for Myanmar, I guess that the checkpoints along the highways (or the sometimes-paved arteries that pass for highways there) must have been situated every few miles, but it could just as easily have been every km from what I can remember.  Metric or not, there's a police state for you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;3 ounces is equal to 85 grams, not 20.&#8221;</p>
<p>Drawing on certain recreational activities growing up in Canada many moons ago, that sounds about right!</p>
<p>I think we switched in the mid-1970s, so a lot of us growing up in the transition period (ie. speed limit signs indicating both miles and km/h for a while) have the good fortune of being able to think/function comfortably in both.  (Not to say that one had to grow up in Canada in the 70s to do that, but it didn&#8217;t hurt.)  </p>
<p>Metric makes a hell of a lot more sense - someguy&#8217;s money analogy is a prime example - but I can understand why some people might want to stick with something familiar, especially when it comes to such basic day-to-day things as temperature, distance, weight, etc.</p>
<p>As for Myanmar, I guess that the checkpoints along the highways (or the sometimes-paved arteries that pass for highways there) must have been situated every few miles, but it could just as easily have been every km from what I can remember.  Metric or not, there&#8217;s a police state for you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ut videam</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/07/02/in-good-non-metric-company/#comment-94650</link>
		<dc:creator>Ut videam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2007 21:15:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/07/02/in-good-non-metric-company/#comment-94650</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;one serving of meat = 3 oz. or 20 grams or about the size of a deck of cards&lt;/blockquote&gt;Sonagi, you're unintentionally proving Josue's point here.

3 ounces is equal to 85 grams, not 20.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>one serving of meat = 3 oz. or 20 grams or about the size of a deck of cards</p></blockquote>
<p>Sonagi, you&#8217;re unintentionally proving Josue&#8217;s point here.</p>
<p>3 ounces is equal to 85 grams, not 20.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sonagi</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/07/02/in-good-non-metric-company/#comment-94641</link>
		<dc:creator>Sonagi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2007 18:01:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/07/02/in-good-non-metric-company/#comment-94641</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;"Grams are much too small to be a reasonable unit of measurement, and kilograms too high."&lt;/i&gt;

I'm guessing you don't cook much or read labels.

one serving of meat = 3 oz. or 20 grams or about the size of a deck of cards

Nutrition information on US packaging is almost exclusively in metric.  Folks minding their fats, protein, and carbs think in grams, not ounces.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>&#8220;Grams are much too small to be a reasonable unit of measurement, and kilograms too high.&#8221;</i></p>
<p>I&#8217;m guessing you don&#8217;t cook much or read labels.</p>
<p>one serving of meat = 3 oz. or 20 grams or about the size of a deck of cards</p>
<p>Nutrition information on US packaging is almost exclusively in metric.  Folks minding their fats, protein, and carbs think in grams, not ounces.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Western Confucian</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/07/02/in-good-non-metric-company/#comment-94633</link>
		<dc:creator>The Western Confucian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2007 14:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/07/02/in-good-non-metric-company/#comment-94633</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Tell me, how is it different from counting your money in cents and dollars?&lt;/em&gt;

Pounds, shillings and pence would be better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Tell me, how is it different from counting your money in cents and dollars?</em></p>
<p>Pounds, shillings and pence would be better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
