<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pan-Korea Grand Waterway?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/05/18/pan-korea-grand-waterway/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/05/18/pan-korea-grand-waterway/</link>
	<description>Korea... in Blog Format</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 02:58:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: sewing</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/05/18/pan-korea-grand-waterway/#comment-83857</link>
		<dc:creator>sewing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 00:23:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/05/18/pan-korea-grand-waterway/#comment-83857</guid>
		<description>That's what they did in Panama....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s what they did in Panama&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wjk</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/05/18/pan-korea-grand-waterway/#comment-83856</link>
		<dc:creator>wjk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 23:42:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/05/18/pan-korea-grand-waterway/#comment-83856</guid>
		<description>i think Lee Myung Bak knows what he's talking about and I support him with the woon-ha.

There is no way that he'll be pushing this, this being his biggest weakness in the whole campaign, if he didn't absolutely have good reason for it, given that he's leading in all the polls and is pretty much a lock-in to win the Presidency.

Maybe he has the engineers in Hyundai.  Maybe there is no plan to raze mountains.  

I thought the plan involved submerging the mountains by building dams.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think Lee Myung Bak knows what he&#8217;s talking about and I support him with the woon-ha.</p>
<p>There is no way that he&#8217;ll be pushing this, this being his biggest weakness in the whole campaign, if he didn&#8217;t absolutely have good reason for it, given that he&#8217;s leading in all the polls and is pretty much a lock-in to win the Presidency.</p>
<p>Maybe he has the engineers in Hyundai.  Maybe there is no plan to raze mountains.  </p>
<p>I thought the plan involved submerging the mountains by building dams.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sewing</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/05/18/pan-korea-grand-waterway/#comment-83854</link>
		<dc:creator>sewing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 22:10:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/05/18/pan-korea-grand-waterway/#comment-83854</guid>
		<description>Sorry...dike...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry&#8230;dike&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sewing</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/05/18/pan-korea-grand-waterway/#comment-83853</link>
		<dc:creator>sewing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 22:10:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/05/18/pan-korea-grand-waterway/#comment-83853</guid>
		<description>I'm not trying to be smug, though...the Fraser River is possibly about to hit its 2nd-highest water level in the last 100 years, and I work behind a dyke at sea level.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not trying to be smug, though&#8230;the Fraser River is possibly about to hit its 2nd-highest water level in the last 100 years, and I work behind a dyke at sea level.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sewing</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/05/18/pan-korea-grand-waterway/#comment-83852</link>
		<dc:creator>sewing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 22:05:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/05/18/pan-korea-grand-waterway/#comment-83852</guid>
		<description>Aren't half of your polders flooding from the table water underneath, though?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aren&#8217;t half of your polders flooding from the table water underneath, though?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sewing</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/05/18/pan-korea-grand-waterway/#comment-83851</link>
		<dc:creator>sewing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 22:04:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/05/18/pan-korea-grand-waterway/#comment-83851</guid>
		<description>Havik: a man with a vision! :lol:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Havik: a man with a vision! <img src='http://www.rjkoehler.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_lol.gif' alt=':lol:' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Havik</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/05/18/pan-korea-grand-waterway/#comment-83849</link>
		<dc:creator>Havik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 21:02:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/05/18/pan-korea-grand-waterway/#comment-83849</guid>
		<description>Living in a land full of canals and having studied civil engineering, I must say that canals have definitely proven their effectivity. The tonnage transported via waterways is still growing in the Netherlands and studies point out that transportation over water is less damaging for the environment, quite efficient and economically viable.

There are some prerequisites though:
1. there must be no mountains
2. there must be an existing myriad of natural waterways
3. there must be a pool of experienced engineers 
4. there must be some neighbouring countries to transport the goods to

So it is absolutely possible provided that Korea:
1. razes all mountains to the ground
2. is overflooded by massive monsoons
3. hire me and other Dutch bloakes from the TU Delft
4. builds polders between Korea and Japan (we Dutch can support that too)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Living in a land full of canals and having studied civil engineering, I must say that canals have definitely proven their effectivity. The tonnage transported via waterways is still growing in the Netherlands and studies point out that transportation over water is less damaging for the environment, quite efficient and economically viable.</p>
<p>There are some prerequisites though:<br />
1. there must be no mountains<br />
2. there must be an existing myriad of natural waterways<br />
3. there must be a pool of experienced engineers<br />
4. there must be some neighbouring countries to transport the goods to</p>
<p>So it is absolutely possible provided that Korea:<br />
1. razes all mountains to the ground<br />
2. is overflooded by massive monsoons<br />
3. hire me and other Dutch bloakes from the TU Delft<br />
4. builds polders between Korea and Japan (we Dutch can support that too)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wedge</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/05/18/pan-korea-grand-waterway/#comment-82578</link>
		<dc:creator>Wedge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 08:37:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/05/18/pan-korea-grand-waterway/#comment-82578</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Chief. This is classic:

"It's hardly an exaggeration to say that every administration since has had to deal with the chaotic legacy of Carter's mind-boggling cowardice and incompetence."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Chief. This is classic:</p>
<p>&#8220;It&#8217;s hardly an exaggeration to say that every administration since has had to deal with the chaotic legacy of Carter&#8217;s mind-boggling cowardice and incompetence.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/05/18/pan-korea-grand-waterway/#comment-82574</link>
		<dc:creator>michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 08:06:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/05/18/pan-korea-grand-waterway/#comment-82574</guid>
		<description>Snow, Wedge, Peninsular, this one's for you:
http://www.slate.com/id/2166661/nav/tap2/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Snow, Wedge, Peninsular, this one&#8217;s for you:<br />
<a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2166661/nav/tap2/" rel="nofollow">http://www.slate.com/id/2166661/nav/tap2/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/05/18/pan-korea-grand-waterway/#comment-82572</link>
		<dc:creator>michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 07:56:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/05/18/pan-korea-grand-waterway/#comment-82572</guid>
		<description>That canal would be hell of stanky in no time at all, with dead bodies and an armada of plastic trash bags floating down it. They could call it Lee's Folly, or Dong Pari Ditch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That canal would be hell of stanky in no time at all, with dead bodies and an armada of plastic trash bags floating down it. They could call it Lee&#8217;s Folly, or Dong Pari Ditch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
