http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/04/20/good-news-for-park-lovers-maybe/ Korea... in Blog Format Fri, 5 Sep 2008 14:00:17 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1 http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/04/20/good-news-for-park-lovers-maybe/#comment-78917 Sperwer Fri, 20 Apr 2007 04:32:27 +0000 http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/04/20/good-news-for-park-lovers-maybe/#comment-78917 You are right to be skeptical. There is no guarantee the City itself won't decide to commercialize significant portions of South and or Main Post for $ of its own; the National govt apparently is doing that with the non-contiguous bits consisting of Camp Kim and the old UN compounf behind the Capitol Hotel. Moreover, if you read the news carefully, you'll see that the Ministry of Construction still hasn't given up its right to approve any land-use designation, which means - the least - that this isn't the last we'll hear of this; there's a lot more bureaucratic infighting yet to come. You are right to be skeptical. There is no guarantee the City itself won’t decide to commercialize significant portions of South and or Main Post for $ of its own; the National govt apparently is doing that with the non-contiguous bits consisting of Camp Kim and the old UN compounf behind the Capitol Hotel. Moreover, if you read the news carefully, you’ll see that the Ministry of Construction still hasn’t given up its right to approve any land-use designation, which means - the least - that this isn’t the last we’ll hear of this; there’s a lot more bureaucratic infighting yet to come.

]]> http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/04/20/good-news-for-park-lovers-maybe/#comment-78912 MrMao Fri, 20 Apr 2007 04:15:58 +0000 http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/04/20/good-news-for-park-lovers-maybe/#comment-78912 So why are they logging on Namsan? So why are they logging on Namsan?

]]>