MARMOT’S NOTE: Just in case I haven’t made this perfectly clear—and I believe I have down below, but just in case—the fact that the shooter is Korean is, ultimately, irrelevant. He was a sick kid. Period. You can talk try to read into this tragedy cultural factors all you like (and I’m afraid that’s going to happen both in the United States and here in Korea), but the fact remains that there are 100,000 Korean students in the United States, not to mention about 1 million Korean-Americans, many of whom share the same cultural background as the shooter, and NONE of them have shot up their schools. The overwhelming majority, in fact, are upstanding members of their academic and residential communities. Cho Seung-hui is about as representative of the Korean community as the Columbine shooters were of the white community, that is to say, he’s not. In fact, if there is any group that seems “predisposed” to this sort of violence in the United States, it’s not foreign Asian students, it’s white males.
ORIGINAL POST: I don’t want to spread unconfirmed rumors, but seeing how the government is doing the leaking now, you might as well read it here—NoCut News, citing a diplomatic source, is reporting that the Korean embassy in Washington has told the Foreign Ministry that the shooter at Virginia Tech was a Korean student [NoCut News, Korean], and that it has asked the ministry to provide more details about him.
I’d prefer to wait until an official announcement before deciding to believe it or not.
UPDATE: Now the WaPo is saying federal and local officials are saying the shooter was “of Korean descent.”
UPDATE 2: The NYT is now reporting a name—Cho Seung-hui.
UPDATE 3: Now this from ABC (BTW, thanks to the commenters):
Seung Hui Cho, a permanent resident of the United States, a Korean national and a Virginia Tech student has been identified as the gunman in the shootings that left 33 people dead on the Virginia Tech campus Monday, ABC News has learned.
The student left a “disturbing note” before killing two people in a dorm room, returning to his own room to re-arm and entering a classroom building on the other side of campus to continue his rampage, sources said.
And this just in—Yonhap (Korean) is reporting that the shooter was Cho Seung-hui, a 23-year-old student of Korean ethnicity in the English lit department.
UPDATE 4: NoCut News is reporting that Korean students in the United States—and there are a lot of them [NACAC]—are in shock [NoCut News, Korean] after learning that the perpetrator of the worst school shooting in U.S. history was a Korean. Naturally enough, they are also worried about the repercussions this might have on them. At Virginia Tech alone, there are 160 Korean grad students and some 300 undergrads.
Korean authorities, meanwhile, are worried that the incident might cause diplomatic problems with the United States, and are concerned for the security of Koreans in the United States. In particular, NoCut News reports, Korean diplomatic authorities are worried that the incident will not only throw cold water on recently improving relations with Washington since the signing of the KORUS FTA, but also damage the international image of Koreans.
UPDATE 5: This, from the Metropolitician:
I’d been waiting for it.
The shooter is South Korean.
I’d been suspecting it all day, for a lot of reasons, which is why I was sitting by the computer. Not the least of which was because a group of American university administrators whom Fulbright hosted nearly 10 years ago, when being a tour of Korean universities, asked the staff, “Why is it that out of all our international students, Korean males have so much trouble?”
To my surprise, all of the university officials cited incident after incident of Korean male graduate students who seemed to have trouble adjusting, often got into fights with other students in the living spaces, and were often the source of trouble in dealing with romantic relationships gone bad or women in general, especially when they involved Korean females dating non-Koreans.
Anyway, my little bit of uninformed analysis will be just the beginning. I’m sure we’ll see all sorts of explanations from the Korean media. And for what it’s worth, perhaps now the South Korean media and people will be faced with the question of stereotyping, media, and how treating individual incidents as evidence of various “national characters” leads down roads we don’t want to travel.
All in all, a tragic story. But the conversation will prove…interesting, I’m sure.
Let the shitstorm – and social experiment – begin.
UPDATE 6: Cho had been living in the United States since the age of 3 [IHT]. He was a permanent resident, but still a Korean citizen.
UPDATE 7: I should also point out that at least one of the injured was a Korean [Marmot's Hole], and Yonhap (Korean) is reporting that one of the dead might be a Korean (or at least ethnic Korean) as well.
I hate to go into motives, but since Michael alluded to the problem above, and other commenters [Foreign Dispatches] are already touching the theme, I should point out—before we go to far with the “Angry Korean Man pissed off that his Korean girlfriend was banging whity” meme—that the girl killed in the dorm (whom, I’ve been led to believe from reports, was the girlfriend he quarreled with) had a very non-Asian name. I’m going to wait before I start proposing any theories as to why what happened happened. Until I see proof otherwise, I’m going to avoid explaining this tragedy culturally. He could have very well simply been a fucked-up kid with a gun. Can’t get any more American than that.
UPDATE 8: Again, to demonstrate my point above [This is London]. Of course, the relationships have yet to be confirmed.
UPDATE 9: Cho is being described as a loner [Yonhap, Korean]—his seeming lack of friends is making it difficult for investigators to ascertain his motive. A Virginia Tech spokesman described him as “a loner,” and Korean students at the school say he hardly came to Korean student gatherings. In fact, they say they didn’t really know who he was.
UPDATE 10: The Chosun Ilbo (Korean) reports on the “netizen response,” or at least how it sees it. The general tone is disbelief. One netizen quoted by the paper said, “The name is similar to a Chinese one, so let’s wait until the final police announcement. Another said, “I’m so surprised that a Korean could do something so cruel I don’t believe it… I wonder if the investigation results are mistaken, so we have to keep watching.”
Korean netizens in the United States, meanwhile, are concerned that this may adversely affect Korean students in the country. One even said he was afraid to go to school tomorrow. Another said that just as all Middle Easterners were disadvantaged after Sept 11, the image of Koreans would take a massive hit as a result of the incident. One netizens said he feared for the safety of Koreans studying in the United States, and expressed concern about the possibility of a U.S. boycott of Korean goods.
Netizens preparing to study in the United States were also concerned. One wrote that visa requirements for students would grow even stricter, while another worried that the incident would affect Korea’s efforts to get into the U.S. visa waiver program.
UPDATE 11: NoCut News (Korean) is a bit, well, saddened by the headlines of much of the world press. Not that it’s complaining—it’s more ashamed if anything. The Korean press shouldn’t expect a ton of sympathy on this issue, however—we needn’t go back and look at the headlines Korean papers have run each and every time a foreigner f*cks up in this country.
UPDATE 12: Yonhap News (Korean) talks about the inability of many Koreans who immigrate abroad to study at a young age to adjust due to linguistic and cultural differences. According to one Korean who spent his middle and high school years abroad, they receive a lot of stress in overcoming the language barrier so they don’t fall behind in school, and some of them end up fighting a lot and doing drugs. Meanwhile, of those busted in Korea for smuggling and using drugs, Koreans who studied at U.S. universities and Korean-American university students are overrepresented vis-a-vis Korean university students. Others point out, however, that one shouldn’t generalize. Jo Yeong-dal, the dean of Seoul National University Law School, said shooter Cho had been in the United States since the second grade, i.e., he spent his developmental years and socialization years in the country, and that he might have had family problems. He added, however, that despite it being a multicultural society, the United States is still primarily a white society, and Cho might have had an inferiority complex that manifested itself in a hate for white people. Korea should learn a lesson from this, he said, and begin preparing for its transformation into a multicultural society.
Marmot’s Note: Like I said, until I see something different, I don’t want to make this a cultural/social issue. There are 100,000 Koreans studying in the United States, and except for Cho, none of them—as far as I know—have shot up their schools.
UPDATE 13: The Chicago Tribune talks a little bit about the note Cho left behind:
The suspected gunman in the Virginia Tech shooting rampage, Cho Seung-Hui, was a troubled 23-year-old senior from South Korea who investigators believe left an invective-filled note in his dorm room, sources say.
The note included a rambling list of grievances, according to sources. They said Cho also died with the words “Ismail Ax” in red ink on the inside of one of his arms.
Cho had shown recent signs of violent, aberrant behavior, according to an investigative source, including setting a fire in a dorm room and allegedly stalking some women.
A note believed to have been written by Cho was found in his dorm room that railed against “rich kids,” “debauchery” and “deceitful charlatans” on campus.
We’ll no doubt learn more in the coming days.
UPDATE 14: Over at Salon, Andrew Leonard posts some excellent advice:
Another fact provided by the Marmot’s Hole (Hey, that’s me!): According to one report, Korea has more students studying abroad in the U.S. than any other country: 100,000. Debbie Schlussel thinks that the foreign residency of Cho Seung-hui is “yet another reason to stop letting in so many foreign students.” But 99.999 percent of those 100,000 Koreans somehow managed not to engage in mass killing sprees. My advice to the Korean blogosphere — despite all the cultural hypothesizing that is about to swarm the mediasphere — is to strive to stay calm. Jealous rage knows no borders.
As I note in his comment section, however, the cultural hypothesizing won’t be limited to the United States, unfortunately—there will be plenty of that going on over here, too, both in the self-critical way (i.e., the stress on young children sent abroad to study at a young age) and in a not-so-self-critical way (i.e., See, another Korean corrupted by the evil ways of the West and/or White racism made him do it).
UPDATE 15: As you’d might expect, Michael has a monster post up at Metropolitician. Go read it.
UPDATE 16: Korean President Roh Moo-hyun and Foreign Minister Song Min-soon have offered their condolences to the American people.
UPDATE 17: YTN (Korean) reports that one of the dead, a female university student, was half-Korean and born in Korea. Condolences to her family and to all the families who lost loved ones in yesterday’s tragedy.
{ 11 trackbacks }
{ 468 comments… read them below or add one }
Oh man, if this is true, the Japanese netizen reaction is going to be wild.
korean embassy is seoul?
Cho Seung-hui, says the NYT.
Cho Seung-hui, says the NYT:
thelede.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/04/17/virginia-tech-shootings-the-day-after
New York Times has his name as Seung-Hui Cho, according to federal law enforcement authorities.
Sorry, bad link. here.
There is some irony in that, if true. I’m sure we’ll see some sites comparing the number of GIs who’ve killed Koreans, and now Koreans who’ve killed Americans.
[DELETED for one or more of the following reasons:
(1) off topic
(2) personal attack
(3) used inappropriate language or tone
(4) ongoing personal conflict
(5) took issue with commenter (qualifications, etc) instead of actual comment content
(6) was reaction to any of the above
NOTE:
(A) Repeatedly responding (6) to inappropriate comments is no less grounds for banning.
(b) We're sorry if a few comments are being deleted on accident as we attempt to weed out a recent series of inappropriate comments. Our intention is to err on the side of leniency, as comments that are borderline should not hurt the comment section atmosphere if they are responded to in a deliberately appropriate manner. However, one way to avoid having a well-intended comment be deleted in the course of a cleanup action is to consciously make sure it does not push the limits of what can be seen as appropriate.
(C) Take into account that some comments deemed appropriate may address comments deleted for inappropriate language.
(D) Responses to this moderation action are off topic if made in this comment section.]
MSNBC scroll says shooter was “23 year old Korean, permanent legal resident”. VA Tech University press conference starting now.
“Seung Hui Cho, a permanent resident of the United States, a Korean national and a Virginia Tech student has been identified as the gunman in the shootings that left 33 people dead…”
http://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=3048108
I can see the Korean and Japanese blogsphere lighting up.
confirmed.
Yes, I’m afraid this could get ugly. It must be like an early Christmas at 2ch.
Thankfully, no commenter at the NYT has made reference to the killer’s nationality, but if the Yahoo boards were still up, there’d be a slurfest.
I think my last post got eaten…
I am a little happy at how at least the patches of the expat K-blogsphere I woddle into haven’t gone the way mud-slinging fighting fire-with-fire by taking the opportunity of this tragedy to strike back after so many barrages of GI taxi cab stories year-to-year.
[DELETED for one or more of the following reasons:
(1) off topic
(2) personal attack
(3) used inappropriate language or tone
(4) ongoing personal conflict
(5) took issue with commenter (qualifications, etc) instead of actual comment content
(6) was reaction to any of the above
NOTE:
(A) Repeatedly responding (6) to inappropriate comments is no less grounds for banning.
(b) We're sorry if a few comments are being deleted on accident as we attempt to weed out a recent series of inappropriate comments. Our intention is to err on the side of leniency, as comments that are borderline should not hurt the comment section atmosphere if they are responded to in a deliberately appropriate manner. However, one way to avoid having a well-intended comment be deleted in the course of a cleanup action is to consciously make sure it does not push the limits of what can be seen as appropriate.
(C) Take into account that some comments deemed appropriate may address comments deleted for inappropriate language.
(D) Responses to this moderation action are off topic if made in this comment section.]
I wish to point out that the killer’s background, nationality and area of study break every stereotype and expectation in the book for this kind of crime.
The “script” of a disgruntled and anti-social American engineering student raised and twisted in a US culture of guns and violence was, I’m sure, in the minds of many, with policy recommendations to follow.
I can only hope that the actual facts don’t cause an anti-immigration “script” — or worse –to be substituted.
It’s another mass killing in the U.S., another tragedy, no matter who the gunman was.
It breaks no stereotype at all.
Please have the decency not to make excuses at this time.
[DELETED for one or more of the following reasons:
(1) off topic
(2) personal attack
(3) used inappropriate language or tone
(4) ongoing personal conflict
(5) took issue with commenter (qualifications, etc) instead of actual comment content
(6) quotes rumor in a manner that is inflammatory (regarding race, etc)
(7) was reaction to any of the above
NOTE:
(A) Repeatedly responding (6) to inappropriate comments is no less grounds for banning.
(b) We're sorry if a few comments are being deleted on accident as we attempt to weed out a recent series of inappropriate comments. Our intention is to err on the side of leniency, as comments that are borderline should not hurt the comment section atmosphere if they are responded to in a deliberately appropriate manner. However, one way to avoid having a well-intended comment be deleted in the course of a cleanup action is to consciously make sure it does not push the limits of what can be seen as appropriate.
(C) Take into account that some comments deemed appropriate may address comments deleted for inappropriate language.
(D) Responses to this moderation action are off topic if made in this comment section.]
This is what happens when you send decent Koreans to America and have them infected by American society and culture. Maybe the practice of sending students by the planeload to America to study needs to be rethought.
I’m sure the above (the first sentence, at least) will soon appear in the Korean media.
[DELETED for one or more of the following reasons:
(1) off topic
(2) personal attack
(3) used inappropriate language or tone
(4) ongoing personal conflict
(5) took issue with commenter (qualifications, etc) instead of actual comment content
(6) quotes rumor in a manner that is inflammatory (regarding race, etc)
(7) was reaction to any of the above
NOTE:
(A) Repeatedly responding (6) to inappropriate comments is no less grounds for banning.
(b) We're sorry if a few comments are being deleted on accident as we attempt to weed out a recent series of inappropriate comments. Our intention is to err on the side of leniency, as comments that are borderline should not hurt the comment section atmosphere if they are responded to in a deliberately appropriate manner. However, one way to avoid having a well-intended comment be deleted in the course of a cleanup action is to consciously make sure it does not push the limits of what can be seen as appropriate.
(C) Take into account that some comments deemed appropriate may address comments deleted for inappropriate language.
(D) Responses to this moderation action are off topic if made in this comment section.]
[DELETED for one or more of the following reasons:
(1) off topic
(2) personal attack
(3) used inappropriate language or tone
(4) ongoing personal conflict
(5) took issue with commenter (qualifications, etc) instead of actual comment content
(6) quotes rumor in a manner that is inflammatory (regarding race, etc)
(7) was reaction to any of the above
NOTE:
(A) Repeatedly responding (6) to inappropriate comments is no less grounds for banning.
(b) We're sorry if a few comments are being deleted on accident as we attempt to weed out a recent series of inappropriate comments. Our intention is to err on the side of leniency, as comments that are borderline should not hurt the comment section atmosphere if they are responded to in a deliberately appropriate manner. However, one way to avoid having a well-intended comment be deleted in the course of a cleanup action is to consciously make sure it does not push the limits of what can be seen as appropriate.
(C) Take into account that some comments deemed appropriate may address comments deleted for inappropriate language.
(D) Responses to this moderation action are off topic if made in this comment section.]
Having been in the military, I probably like shooting rifles more than the average person, but I can say that I’m incredibly happy after hearing the identity of the gunman that South Korea has strict gun control laws. Thanks to them, nothing like this has happened here since that cop went on a rampage in the early 80’s (was it 99 victims?)…and I hope it stays that way. There are far too many suicidal people here to allow any of them to have guns in their hands. It’s dangerous enough as it is that many of them jump off rooftops.
#21: You beat me to it. What’s the over-under on when the local press starts blaming this on America? Tomorrow’s edition?
bulgasari – you have got to be kidding me, right?!
I am surprised the fight-or-flight instinct didn’t kick in and someone rush the shooter and instantly trigger a few more to rush him too.
I am surprised he wasn’t stopped fairly early on since he was a lone gunman with 2 handguns.
It isn’t easy to hit moving targets or targets of any real distance with a handgun unless you are practiced at it, but even then, being rushed by 2 or more people probably would have ended this shooting much earlier. I can understand how individuals were frozen in place or obeyed his commands or whatnot. That is human instinct too, but I would have expected some of the males to have said, “Screw it” and gone for him instinctively when he started shooting people execution style and kept on firing….
Whoever did this – and let’s leave out his nationality and race – must have been a very depressed and crazy man…
[DELETED for one or more of the following reasons:
(1) off topic
(2) personal attack
(3) used inappropriate language or tone
(4) ongoing personal conflict
(5) took issue with commenter (qualifications, etc) instead of actual comment content
(6) quotes rumor in a manner that is inflammatory (regarding race, etc)
(7) was reaction to any of the above
NOTE:
(A) Repeatedly responding (6) to inappropriate comments is no less grounds for banning.
(b) We're sorry if a few comments are being deleted on accident as we attempt to weed out a recent series of inappropriate comments. Our intention is to err on the side of leniency, as comments that are borderline should not hurt the comment section atmosphere if they are responded to in a deliberately appropriate manner. However, one way to avoid having a well-intended comment be deleted in the course of a cleanup action is to consciously make sure it does not push the limits of what can be seen as appropriate.
(C) Take into account that some comments deemed appropriate may address comments deleted for inappropriate language.
(D) Responses to this moderation action are off topic if made in this comment section.]
Well, I certainly doubt we will see in America the kind of angry mania and mass demonstrations that South Korea after American soldiers *accidentally* ran over Korean schoolgirls. And I also guess Xinhua is going to move the story off of the bottom of its page (“no Chinese killed”) to the top.
Out of a sense of decency to those who have suffered from this tragedy as well as those who have to live with it, I would request that the posters on this board keep their schadenfreude and the speculation to a minimum if at all possible.
And while Metropolitician has already gone a limb to attribute motives, specifically “Korean females dating non-Koreans”, I would prefer to be more circumspect and let cooler heads prevail.
This is a flat out tragedy regardless of what your race or nationality is.
Any bets on how KCNA will bend this? I’ll bet they run it… somehow.
A beautiful young woman of South Asian descent and a black 4.0 student and marching band member with charisma that made him famous campus-wide were among the earliest victims identified. Some 20% of VT students are of Asian decsent or nationality, according to one tally I saw.
Author Fox Butterfield (exNYT) is on NPR now saying his recent work on profiles of mass killers debunked the notion of any one profile. He said the stereotype is of a middle-aged white loner, but that past killers have also been young, black, female and Asian-American.
This story requires a calm focus on just the facts and the utmost of media professionalism, which, to me, unfortunately means it may be too sensitive for most ROK outlets to handle.
I also worry about the usual suspects here, whose names or initials almost always mark the place where rational debates go to die.
[DELETED for one or more of the following reasons:
(1) off topic
(2) personal attack
(3) used inappropriate language or tone
(4) ongoing personal conflict
(5) took issue with commenter (qualifications, etc) instead of actual comment content
(6) quotes rumor in a manner that is inflammatory (regarding race, etc)
(7) was reaction to any of the above
NOTE:
(A) Repeatedly responding (6) to inappropriate comments is no less grounds for banning.
(b) We're sorry if a few comments are being deleted on accident as we attempt to weed out a recent series of inappropriate comments. Our intention is to err on the side of leniency, as comments that are borderline should not hurt the comment section atmosphere if they are responded to in a deliberately appropriate manner. However, one way to avoid having a well-intended comment be deleted in the course of a cleanup action is to consciously make sure it does not push the limits of what can be seen as appropriate.
(C) Take into account that some comments deemed appropriate may address comments deleted for inappropriate language.
(D) Responses to this moderation action are off topic if made in this comment section.]
Anybody remember the string of copycat slaughters in fast food restaurants in the 1980s?
Anybody remember where the phrase “going postal” came from?
Saddly, these kinds of things happen enough in American society that the person’s nationality won’t come into play much.
And from a different angle, looking back at how the bloodbath on Arab-looking individuals didn’t happen after 9/11 like I fully expected, i don’t think Koreans have to worry much in the US.
#31: Typo
my mistake (lazy fingers):
…gone out on a limb…
In response to #27, if he was the typical loner Korean, he would have played enough videogames to know to keep his distance, keep his targets within his field of vision, and maintain situational awareness to prevent the blindside attack. Any tactial shooter (CS, GRAW, RB6, AA) teaches you to instinctively do these things. The only thing for the students to do was barricade or run.
#34: Typo
athical: ethical
(lazy fingers and Baron du Val wine)
There is a profile, Slim: mass killers are all whacked in the head.
USinKorea wrote:
“I am surprised the fight-or-flight instinct didn’t kick in and someone rush the shooter and instantly trigger a few more to rush him too.”
Honestly, I don’t think I would have had the courage to rush the shooter. Nearly every victim had multiple bullet wounds. If four people had charged him, the first three would have fallen. 30 people were shot in that lecture hall anyway, but I can understand why everyone cowered behind desks as the gunman was shooting. At least they had the sense and courage to hold the door shut when the killer returned.
At my school, there are codes and procedures in place for different types of emergencies, including communication methods and duties for staff. I wonder if clear emergency procedures were in place at Virginia Tech, if the staff and students are aware of procedures, and if there are regular drills.
If you are not a practiced shot with a real handgun, you aren’t going to take out 3 or 4 people rushing at you. Hitting targets with a pistol is not as easy as it looks. Once you go a few yards away from the target, unless you have had training and practice, you’ll miss even a stationary target.
Moving targets coming at him with all the adrenline pumping through his body, he wouldn’t have stood a chance of hitting 1 perhaps 2 people before the others got to him.
[DELETED for one or more of the following reasons:
(1) off topic
(2) personal attack
(3) used inappropriate language or tone
(4) ongoing personal conflict
(5) took issue with commenter (qualifications, etc) instead of actual comment content
(6) quotes rumor in a manner that is inflammatory (regarding race, etc)
(7) was reaction to any of the above
NOTE:
(A) Repeatedly responding (6) to inappropriate comments is no less grounds for banning.
(b) We're sorry if a few comments are being deleted on accident as we attempt to weed out a recent series of inappropriate comments. Our intention is to err on the side of leniency, as comments that are borderline should not hurt the comment section atmosphere if they are responded to in a deliberately appropriate manner. However, one way to avoid having a well-intended comment be deleted in the course of a cleanup action is to consciously make sure it does not push the limits of what can be seen as appropriate.
(C) Take into account that some comments deemed appropriate may address comments deleted for inappropriate language.
(D) Responses to this moderation action are off topic if made in this comment section.]
[DELETED for one or more of the following reasons:
(1) off topic
(2) personal attack
(3) used inappropriate language or tone
(4) ongoing personal conflict
(5) took issue with commenter (qualifications, etc) instead of actual comment content
(6) quotes rumor in a manner that is inflammatory (regarding race, etc)
(7) was reaction to any of the above
NOTE:
(A) Repeatedly responding (6) to inappropriate comments is no less grounds for banning.
(b) We're sorry if a few comments are being deleted on accident as we attempt to weed out a recent series of inappropriate comments. Our intention is to err on the side of leniency, as comments that are borderline should not hurt the comment section atmosphere if they are responded to in a deliberately appropriate manner. However, one way to avoid having a well-intended comment be deleted in the course of a cleanup action is to consciously make sure it does not push the limits of what can be seen as appropriate.
(C) Take into account that some comments deemed appropriate may address comments deleted for inappropriate language.
(D) Responses to this moderation action are off topic if made in this comment section.]
“I don’t think I would have had the courage to rush the shooter.”
I’m talking about the fight-or-flight instinct. It is an animal instinct and not really about courage or cowardice.
I would think with that many people around, and the guy firing and firing, and especially if he did order some people to stand against the wall and then shot them — there would have been a high enough percentage of “fighters” among the “flighters” to stop the guy…
Cho’s photo released;
http://www.dprkstudies.org/
The girlfriend was white.
#35 — I can’t forget though that one or two Sikhs were gunned down in the wake of 9/11.
The only thing I want to add is let’s not turn this tragedy into a session of finger pointing, stereotyping, racial remarks, and we are not to blame crap.
This applies to both Koreans and non-Koreans.
It is a sad time for America and Korea. How many kyopo students were shot?
#47 — I was so worried about how many revenge killings and attacks were going to take place, I emailed 3 or 4 Muslim organizations immediately after the 9/11 attacks expressing my hopes things would settle down.
How come when everyone thought that the perp was Chinese from Shanghai that no one was calling for no finger pointing, but now it is revealed that it was a South Korean that did it we have two people from the same country as the perp warning us not to point fingers? There has not even been any finger pointing on this thread. I think these folk are a little trigger happy with their warnings!
[DELETED for one or more of the following reasons:
(1) off topic
(2) personal attack
(3) used inappropriate language or tone
(4) ongoing personal conflict
(5) took issue with commenter (qualifications, etc) instead of actual comment content
(6) quotes rumor in a manner that is inflammatory (regarding race, etc)
(7) was reaction to any of the above
NOTE:
(A) Repeatedly responding (6) to inappropriate comments is no less grounds for banning.
(b) We're sorry if a few comments are being deleted on accident as we attempt to weed out a recent series of inappropriate comments. Our intention is to err on the side of leniency, as comments that are borderline should not hurt the comment section atmosphere if they are responded to in a deliberately appropriate manner. However, one way to avoid having a well-intended comment be deleted in the course of a cleanup action is to consciously make sure it does not push the limits of what can be seen as appropriate.
(C) Take into account that some comments deemed appropriate may address comments deleted for inappropriate language.
(D) Responses to this moderation action are off topic if made in this comment section.]
[DELETED for one or more of the following reasons:
(1) off topic
(2) personal attack
(3) used inappropriate language or tone
(4) ongoing personal conflict
(5) took issue with commenter (qualifications, etc) instead of actual comment content
(6) quotes rumor in a manner that is inflammatory (regarding race, etc)
(7) was reaction to any of the above
NOTE:
(A) Repeatedly responding (6) to inappropriate comments is no less grounds for banning.
(b) We're sorry if a few comments are being deleted on accident as we attempt to weed out a recent series of inappropriate comments. Our intention is to err on the side of leniency, as comments that are borderline should not hurt the comment section atmosphere if they are responded to in a deliberately appropriate manner. However, one way to avoid having a well-intended comment be deleted in the course of a cleanup action is to consciously make sure it does not push the limits of what can be seen as appropriate.
(C) Take into account that some comments deemed appropriate may address comments deleted for inappropriate language.
(D) Responses to this moderation action are off topic if made in this comment section.]
News accounts say that survivors never heard him say a single word.
Two pistols, one a Glock 9mm, one a Walther 22 caliber. Not sure of the magazine capacity of either but I suspect double digits for each (for reference, standard US 45 is/was a 7 round magazine).
Some accounts say that at least one point he was firing both weapons, one from either hand. If he kept one with some rounds still loaded while he loaded the other, it would have been very tough to rush him with an instant “pick-up” team of guys who don’t normally work together.
Evidently he was carrying plenty of additional ammo, sounds like it was pre-loaded in magazines. You can slam in a fresh pre-loaded magazine in an instant, just like in the movies; I think successful “rushes” of previous shooters in similar incidents usually occurred during a “stoppage” (jam), or the weapon had to be reloaded one round at a time; more likely to have the shooter start fumbling when this happens and watching potential victims will immediately be able to “nerve” themselves to try a rush.
CNN is interviewing one young guy who went out into the hallway, saw the shooter emerging from a classroom down the hallway and headed his way. He ducked back into the classroom and started to hide but realized that wouldn’t do any good, so he and a couple of other guys grabbed a heavy table or desk near the door and used it to block the door.
Held the door handle to keep him from opening it, but stayed off to the side so when the shooter fired through the door to stop them from blocking it, they weren’t hit. From the other side of the door, they heard him drop a magazine out of a weapon and then slap in another one.
Shooter gave up and went on to his next target. I’d say the actions of these young guys were probably the best that could be done under the circumstances.
As far as unprepared civilians being able to suddenly coordinate a “rush” against a fast-moving opponent who suddenly appears, I think you’re underestimating the shock factor of the totally unexpected.
If the US is a mature society, the fact that this dude was Korean shouldn’t really matter.
So, it turned out he’s Korean.
One of those Koreans, dogbertt hates.
What and why was this dude a Green card holder still with ROK citizenship when he’s been in the states since a elementary school kid?
Just using the US for personal benefits, is what I say. Either that, or he had personal real estate in ROK or something.
Dude deserves all the worst possible that comes at him, post mortum.
Congradulations, shaku, party and rock on. This is your day. Your glorious day. He’s a kyopo, he’s hated, why he’s your favorite. Burn him in effigay. Go vandalize your favorite Korean restaurant.
Something like this should never, ever happen again, anywhere.
Fox reports one of the victims killed was a “Henry Lee.”
[DELETED for one or more of the following reasons:
(1) off topic
(2) personal attack
(3) used inappropriate language or tone
(4) ongoing personal conflict
(5) took issue with commenter (qualifications, etc) instead of actual comment content
(6) quotes rumor in a manner that is inflammatory (regarding race, etc)
(7) was reaction to any of the above
NOTE:
(A) Repeatedly responding (6) to inappropriate comments is no less grounds for banning.
(b) We're sorry if a few comments are being deleted on accident as we attempt to weed out a recent series of inappropriate comments. Our intention is to err on the side of leniency, as comments that are borderline should not hurt the comment section atmosphere if they are responded to in a deliberately appropriate manner. However, one way to avoid having a well-intended comment be deleted in the course of a cleanup action is to consciously make sure it does not push the limits of what can be seen as appropriate.
(C) Take into account that some comments deemed appropriate may address comments deleted for inappropriate language.
(D) Responses to this moderation action are off topic if made in this comment section.]
It’s terrible time to be Korean abroad right now.
I had co-workers marching into my office and letting me graciously know the maniac was a Korean and probably asking for a some kind of explanation. To that I said, “Really? That was a terrible incident, at least one good thing he blew his brains out”. In the corners of the offices, I hear whispers of “immigrants that come here and don’t integrate, ruining everything”.
cm—I’m sorry to hear that. You shouldn’t have to put up with that shit.
The whole thing sickens me. I am only left wondering how the Korean press will report it. As I was sitting here in the PC room I was showing one of the young employees here how much stuff that tends to portray Korea in a negative light never makes it to the Korean press, and, if it does, it is relegated to a fourth or fivth page and heavily glossed over.
I don’t think this incident is a reflection on Korea itself – the actions of one tormented psycho – but I think the Korean press and government’s actions and how they handle this horrible incident will and should be a reflection.
for what its worth (not much) but we know that there will be no anti Korean reaction in the US.
Contrast that with the depraved hate orgy that followed the accidental killings of Mee-su and Hyo-Sun.
I know Koreans will be rather concerned about this guy because of the possible reaciton in the US they perceive. They are projecting their reaction were the same to happen here (say, if a deranged English teacher were to drop a gasoline bomb on a crowded Daegu subway killing 144 people etc…)
[DELETED for one or more of the following reasons:
(1) off topic
(2) personal attack
(3) used inappropriate language or tone
(4) ongoing personal conflict
(5) took issue with commenter (qualifications, etc) instead of actual comment content
(6) quotes rumor in a manner that is inflammatory (regarding race, etc)
(7) was reaction to any of the above
NOTE:
(A) Repeatedly responding (6) to inappropriate comments is no less grounds for banning.
(b) We're sorry if a few comments are being deleted on accident as we attempt to weed out a recent series of inappropriate comments. Our intention is to err on the side of leniency, as comments that are borderline should not hurt the comment section atmosphere if they are responded to in a deliberately appropriate manner. However, one way to avoid having a well-intended comment be deleted in the course of a cleanup action is to consciously make sure it does not push the limits of what can be seen as appropriate.
(C) Take into account that some comments deemed appropriate may address comments deleted for inappropriate language.
(D) Responses to this moderation action are off topic if made in this comment section.]
It is a tragedy. If Cho stayed in Korea, he would have well-adjusted into Korean society.
His parents decide to go to America. If they have gone to a big city like NY or LA, he would have been OK.
However, he had grown up in a small town in virginia. He suffered much racism. He was judged to be less than his peers.
He became very anti-social. He hated everyone. He got to know a white girl. This was, he thought, a chance to become a full American.
When she dumped him, he became so angry. He hated her, the university and USA.
He shot everyone.
P.S. American gun law and society need changing. As usinkorea pointed out, Cho must have had lots of practice in shooting people. Where did he get such practice? Video games? Maybe not. In small town USA, young people play with guns. It is so easy to get guns. Actually, it is encouraged to have gun and learn to shoot.
Why is a hand gun sold to young people? I can think of no reason why people under 30 be allowed to own a hand gun?
America has a problem with guns.
Again, I’m talking about the fight-or-flight instinct, not some coordination or something that is even conscious thought. Yes, I can picture the shock freezing people. I can picture it getting people to do what the guy said if he told them to stand against the wall. But, human instinct when cornered is also to fight, and I’m suprised given the number of people around, and how long the shootings went on, the “fight” instinct didn’t kick in way in which he was rushed by a few people at some point.
As for the stuff about the guns, that is part of my thinking too.
Unless he was trained and practiced, hitting targets with a pistol isn’t as easy as people think.
And they specifically train you not to use one hand when shooting at targets because it makes you even more inaccurate – even at close distances.
Reloading magazines is also going to be an issue if you are acting Joe Hollywood blazing with a gun in each hand.
[DELETED for one or more of the following reasons:
(1) off topic
(2) personal attack
(3) used inappropriate language or tone
(4) ongoing personal conflict
(5) took issue with commenter (qualifications, etc) instead of actual comment content
(6) quotes rumor in a manner that is inflammatory (regarding race, etc)
(7) was reaction to any of the above
NOTE:
(A) Repeatedly responding (6) to inappropriate comments is no less grounds for banning.
(b) We're sorry if a few comments are being deleted on accident as we attempt to weed out a recent series of inappropriate comments. Our intention is to err on the side of leniency, as comments that are borderline should not hurt the comment section atmosphere if they are responded to in a deliberately appropriate manner. However, one way to avoid having a well-intended comment be deleted in the course of a cleanup action is to consciously make sure it does not push the limits of what can be seen as appropriate.
(C) Take into account that some comments deemed appropriate may address comments deleted for inappropriate language.
(D) Responses to this moderation action are off topic if made in this comment section.]
Captbbq & JK, refer to my first post (#30).
cm – and this is happening to you in Canada?
[DELETED for one or more of the following reasons:
(1) off topic
(2) personal attack
(3) used inappropriate language or tone
(4) ongoing personal conflict
(5) took issue with commenter (qualifications, etc) instead of actual comment content
(6) quotes rumor in a manner that is inflammatory (regarding race, etc)
(7) was reaction to any of the above
NOTE:
(A) Repeatedly responding (6) to inappropriate comments is no less grounds for banning.
(b) We're sorry if a few comments are being deleted on accident as we attempt to weed out a recent series of inappropriate comments. Our intention is to err on the side of leniency, as comments that are borderline should not hurt the comment section atmosphere if they are responded to in a deliberately appropriate manner. However, one way to avoid having a well-intended comment be deleted in the course of a cleanup action is to consciously make sure it does not push the limits of what can be seen as appropriate.
(C) Take into account that some comments deemed appropriate may address comments deleted for inappropriate language.
(D) Responses to this moderation action are off topic if made in this comment section.]
They have already reacted.
Part of their response is to hint that he is more American than Korean by pointing out that he has been in the US since 1992.
[DELETED for one or more of the following reasons:
(1) off topic
(2) personal attack
(3) used inappropriate language or tone
(4) ongoing personal conflict
(5) took issue with commenter (qualifications, etc) instead of actual comment content
(6) quotes rumor in a manner that is inflammatory (regarding race, etc)
(7) was reaction to any of the above
NOTE:
(A) Repeatedly responding (6) to inappropriate comments is no less grounds for banning.
(b) We're sorry if a few comments are being deleted on accident as we attempt to weed out a recent series of inappropriate comments. Our intention is to err on the side of leniency, as comments that are borderline should not hurt the comment section atmosphere if they are responded to in a deliberately appropriate manner. However, one way to avoid having a well-intended comment be deleted in the course of a cleanup action is to consciously make sure it does not push the limits of what can be seen as appropriate.
(C) Take into account that some comments deemed appropriate may address comments deleted for inappropriate language.
(D) Responses to this moderation action are off topic if made in this comment section.]
Good point Shakuhachi….you are indeed correct that they are trying to quickly point out that he is more American than Korean…..unlike Hines….who, after doing something that Korea could capitalize upon, quickly was lauded for being Korean
I am not of partial Japanese descent, not a single drop. Please do not spread any more lies with that forked tongue of yours.
[DELETED for one or more of the following reasons:
(1) off topic
(2) personal attack
(3) used inappropriate language or tone
(4) ongoing personal conflict
(5) took issue with commenter (qualifications, etc) instead of actual comment content
(6) quotes rumor in a manner that is inflammatory (regarding race, etc)
(7) was reaction to any of the above
NOTE:
(A) Repeatedly responding (6) to inappropriate comments is no less grounds for banning.
(b) We're sorry if a few comments are being deleted on accident as we attempt to weed out a recent series of inappropriate comments. Our intention is to err on the side of leniency, as comments that are borderline should not hurt the comment section atmosphere if they are responded to in a deliberately appropriate manner. However, one way to avoid having a well-intended comment be deleted in the course of a cleanup action is to consciously make sure it does not push the limits of what can be seen as appropriate.
(C) Take into account that some comments deemed appropriate may address comments deleted for inappropriate language.
(D) Responses to this moderation action are off topic if made in this comment section.]
Shakuhachi has a point. I had to wonder why the first Korean headline I saw called him a kyopo. But those are apparently the facts.
[DELETED for one or more of the following reasons:
(1) off topic
(2) personal attack
(3) used inappropriate language or tone
(4) ongoing personal conflict
(5) took issue with commenter (qualifications, etc) instead of actual comment content
(6) quotes rumor in a manner that is inflammatory (regarding race, etc)
(7) was reaction to any of the above
NOTE:
(A) Repeatedly responding (6) to inappropriate comments is no less grounds for banning.
(b) We're sorry if a few comments are being deleted on accident as we attempt to weed out a recent series of inappropriate comments. Our intention is to err on the side of leniency, as comments that are borderline should not hurt the comment section atmosphere if they are responded to in a deliberately appropriate manner. However, one way to avoid having a well-intended comment be deleted in the course of a cleanup action is to consciously make sure it does not push the limits of what can be seen as appropriate.
(C) Take into account that some comments deemed appropriate may address comments deleted for inappropriate language.
(D) Responses to this moderation action are off topic if made in this comment section.]
“cm – and this is happening to you in Canada?”
It’s a big news here with this story splashed all over the papers. Is that a surprise? I don’t think the backlash will be against Koreans (minus some minor aggrevations), it will be more towards immigration issues.
Xinhua just sent this story from very bottom to the top of their page.
#61:
At least not collectively or en masse — that’s not the American way. But I guarantee you, there will be a backlash and a concomitant increase in the following:
Increased anti-immigrant sentiment;
1) Increased anti-Asian sentiment;
2) Increased discrimination against Asians;
3) Increased hate crimes against Asians;
4) Increased denial of service against Asians;
5) Increased civil rights violations against Asians;
6) Increased racial tension between Asians and other races;
7) Increased crime against Asians;
9) Increased white ethnocenticism;
10) Increased racial polarization in American society.
There will be repercussions, not just toward Koreans, KAs, but any Asian or Asian American wishing to make a go of it in the U.S.
robert neff,
I am just describing difficulties faced by Asians in smalltown, USA because they look different. It is more severe for Orientals. Much more so than Hispanics and Blacks. Being a super-small minority has its sting as many of you ex-pats in Korea will attest to.
Sonagi,
I am glad that you are doing something about it. If Cho had met many good and kind Americans who had taken time to talk to him and prop up his self-esteem, this would not have happened.
#63 –
Hold your horses there. Fairfax County, where Mr. Cho grew up, is emphatically not a small town. Rather, it is an extremely affluent, extremely diverse suburb of Washington, DC. In fact, it has a significant Korean community, as evidenced by the presence of an ethnic Korean Catholic parish there.
Also, as a wealthy suburban area—hence fairly densely populated—with a generally liberal political bent, Fairfax County is not the kind of place where young people play with guns.
Such baseless assumptions and generalizations are entirely unhelpful, baduk. In this case, they couldn’t be much further off the mark.
ban ki moon referred to it as a “tragic accident.”
Ut videam,
OK, maybe I am wrong. Maybe Cho had some family history of madness.
However, I do think he had a very low self-esteem. Shooting at everyone? He must hated everyone in USA. Why he got to be that way?
It must something to do with his environment and his upbringing.
[DELETED for one or more of the following reasons:
(1) off topic
(2) personal attack
(3) used inappropriate language or tone
(4) ongoing personal conflict
(5) took issue with commenter (qualifications, etc) instead of actual comment content
(6) quotes rumor in a manner that is inflammatory (regarding race, etc)
(7) was reaction to any of the above
NOTE:
(A) Repeatedly responding (6) to inappropriate comments is no less grounds for banning.
(b) We're sorry if a few comments are being deleted on accident as we attempt to weed out a recent series of inappropriate comments. Our intention is to err on the side of leniency, as comments that are borderline should not hurt the comment section atmosphere if they are responded to in a deliberately appropriate manner. However, one way to avoid having a well-intended comment be deleted in the course of a cleanup action is to consciously make sure it does not push the limits of what can be seen as appropriate.
(C) Take into account that some comments deemed appropriate may address comments deleted for inappropriate language.
(D) Responses to this moderation action are off topic if made in this comment section.]
@H.Kim #78,
You implore fellow commenters not to indulge in schadenfreude, and then spew a long list of presumptions about how Americans will react. I look forward to seeing you prove your predictions right with objective data, like news reports of revenge attacks and such.
@Baduk #79,
It isn’t me. It’s the community. The people of my community are very tolerant and welcoming to newcomers no matter where they’re from.
@Ut videam #80,
Glad you caught that error. The Fairfax County town of Centreville, where Cho grew up, is diverse with a large and growing Asian population. In fact, I do my shopping at Korean-owned Grand Mart supermarket right smack in the middle of Centreville. In the Fairfax County school system, Koreans comprise the second largest ESL population after Salvadorans. Baduk is wrong. Cho did not grow up as an isolated minority.
Thanks Ut Videam for your insight… I have nothing against you Baduk but I found your comments extremely offensive. Perhaps you should have taken the cue of the Marmot and refrained from spewing unsubstantuated rumors or personal beliefs.
I don’t condone racism or other …isms of the same ilk, but it is true in all countries and all cities…that there is some racism and prejudism…no different in Korea. In the past there was a strong regionalism that was prevalent in the society – thankfully this has eased.
Schools are notorious for their “in groups” and the ostracizing of those who do not fit into the “in group.” While it is wrong to mistreat people in this manner it does not justify taking a gun and shooting innocent people. Why are you trying to justify this?
[DELETED for one or more of the following reasons:
(1) off topic
(2) personal attack
(3) used inappropriate language or tone
(4) ongoing personal conflict
(5) took issue with commenter (qualifications, etc) instead of actual comment content
(6) quotes rumor in a manner that is inflammatory (regarding race, etc)
(7) was reaction to any of the above
NOTE:
(A) Repeatedly responding (6) to inappropriate comments is no less grounds for banning.
(b) We're sorry if a few comments are being deleted on accident as we attempt to weed out a recent series of inappropriate comments. Our intention is to err on the side of leniency, as comments that are borderline should not hurt the comment section atmosphere if they are responded to in a deliberately appropriate manner. However, one way to avoid having a well-intended comment be deleted in the course of a cleanup action is to consciously make sure it does not push the limits of what can be seen as appropriate.
(C) Take into account that some comments deemed appropriate may address comments deleted for inappropriate language.
(D) Responses to this moderation action are off topic if made in this comment section.]
The shooter is indeed a US kyopo.
But yesterday he was Chinese.
Probably deduced from the earliest eyewitness accounts that described the killer as Chinese, since that is what all Asians are, for the most part, in America.
Today, they are making him to sound like an Korean international student, which he is not.
If the killer has been living in the US since the age of 3, then he is Korean-American, a kyopo.
robert neff,
I am not justifying the horrendous killing.
I just like to get into Cho’s head and understand why. Since I have similar background as his, I ventured my explaination.
Understanding this incident correctly will help us to prevent similar acts of violence. I am concentrating on
1) Why did he hate everyone?
2) What drove him to such madness?
3) What is his upbringing, environment, family, school life, religion?
4) How can we prevent this type acts?
5) Is it videogames or Korean family life or gun law that caused this tragedy?
The ROK Foreign Ministry statement on the Brisbane Times is AP coverage of the statement, not the statement itself. I don’t think one can fairly accuse the ministry of spinning it that way based on the juxtaposition chosen by the reporter. It looks like they wisely stuck to the known facts and offered sincere condolences.
I worry that Roh Moo-hyun or someone from the Uri Party might say something dumb or crass and possibly unintentionally revealing — but until that moment, we have baduk.
[DELETED for one or more of the following reasons:
(1) off topic
(2) personal attack
(3) used inappropriate language or tone
(4) ongoing personal conflict
(5) took issue with commenter (qualifications, etc) instead of actual comment content
(6) quotes rumor in a manner that is inflammatory (regarding race, etc)
(7) was reaction to any of the above
NOTE:
(A) Repeatedly responding (6) to inappropriate comments is no less grounds for banning.
(b) We're sorry if a few comments are being deleted on accident as we attempt to weed out a recent series of inappropriate comments. Our intention is to err on the side of leniency, as comments that are borderline should not hurt the comment section atmosphere if they are responded to in a deliberately appropriate manner. However, one way to avoid having a well-intended comment be deleted in the course of a cleanup action is to consciously make sure it does not push the limits of what can be seen as appropriate.
(C) Take into account that some comments deemed appropriate may address comments deleted for inappropriate language.
(D) Responses to this moderation action are off topic if made in this comment section.]
As for gun laws – did anyone notice that the mayor of Nagasaki was shot a couple of hours ago? I think Japan has some pretty severe gun laws – as does Korea (thank God). This guy that killed his fellow student in Virginia evidently bought his guns in March….seems he has been stewing and planning this for quite some time….prepared to the end. Chains for the doors? A boyscout-like uniform and lots of ammo. sick
“It’s terrible time to be Korean abroad right now.
I had co-workers marching into my office and letting me graciously know the maniac was a Korean and probably asking for a some kind of explanation. To that I said, “Really? That was a terrible incident, at least one good thing he blew his brains out”. In the corners of the offices, I hear whispers of “immigrants that come here and don’t integrate, ruining everything”.”
Man, that sucks. Look on the bright side. Didn’t you say you’re the office manager? You now know who to pick if the company asks you to lay off a few workers.
“10) Increased racial polarization in American society.”
H. Kim, # 78:
You have been contributing to this racial polarisation (as I would spell it in British English) all the time by your racially-motivated insults. So do not shed any false tears…
The killer, however, was just a killer – there is no proof that he was a racist. Nor do I believe that any White, Black or Hispanic American who have their wits together will ascribe the killer’s crime to his race. But then, of course, in your view “Race Matters”…
#87 Netizen Kim wrote:
“Probably deduced from the earliest eyewitness accounts that described the killer as Chinese, since that is what all Asians are, for the most part, in America.”
The eyewitness accounts I read described the killer as “Asian,” not “Chinese.” It was preliminary news reports that erroneously identified the man as a Chinese national on a student visa. These news reports were probably based on leaks from law enforcement, who were trying to identify a man with no ID and no face.
Excuse me, but have I shown any enjoyment over this? I reiterate again — this whole thing is a tragedy for all those involved, as well as a national disgrace for this country and the U.S. And I hope you prove me wrong about a backlash — that would be only redeeming thing to come out of this if it happened.
I fully agree with Fantasy:
“The killer, however, was just a killer – there is no proof that he was a racist. Nor do I believe that any White, Black or Hispanic American who have their wits together will ascribe the killer’s crime to his race.”
#87-
Maybe to a small extent. But it was primarily due, I think, to early reports that the investigation was focusing on a 24 year old from Shanghai who was in the US on a student visa.
According to the ROK Foreign Ministry, he had been in the US since 1992, which would have made him 8 when he immigrated. His immigration status was Resident Alien, which means he held ROK citizenship.
Not that it really matters. He was a profoundly disturbed human person who committed a senseless act. Whether he was Korean or Korean-American is trivial. The leitmotif here is man’s inhumanity to man.
Cho moved to the US when he was three.
He grew up as a KoreanAmerican. He grew up in America! He watched American TV, attended American schools and lived in American surrounding.
And, he killed over 30 people in one day.
Why?
The reason is totally American. His “Americanness” drove him to do this violent act.
Obviously, his family life had severe problem. His parents must be pretty bad people to raise a son like him. I think his parents should be jailed for bringing this problem to the society.
I hold them responsible. Then, I hold American gun merchants responsible.
i mentioned it won’t be problem whether he was Korean or not, if America was a mature country.
Linking back to my white flight talk, which makes most of you uncomfortable, evidently, America is not that mature.
Cm’s North American colleagues talking about immigrants and integration, when cm’s the boss.
Asking for an explanation? What does cm have to do with it?
Remember when that dude in Japan grabbed a sword and slashed away at toddlers at a school? I heard this white lady, who was a PhD in the medical sciences ask another Japanese PhD in the medical sciences, what was going “with your country”.
That was like year 2000 or so. We East Asians don’t go around asking white people what’s going on with America when loner gunmen of Columbine shoot up people or ask black people what’s going on with America when Malvo snipes people in DC.
Double, double.
Standard.
Besides, what does my explanation or cm’s explanation accomplish anything?
Do they have the same balls to ask an Arab American what’s going on with Muslims when a US citizen terrorist is captured in the US by the FBI?
Or ask a Chinese US Citizen what’s going on with China when some Chinese scientist get caught red handed stealing military secrets?
Not as mature as you would like to believe.
[DELETED for one or more of the following reasons:
(1) off topic
(2) personal attack
(3) used inappropriate language or tone
(4) ongoing personal conflict
(5) took issue with commenter (qualifications, etc) instead of actual comment content
(6) quotes rumor in a manner that is inflammatory (regarding race, etc)
(7) was reaction to any of the above
NOTE:
(A) Repeatedly responding (6) to inappropriate comments is no less grounds for banning.
(b) We're sorry if a few comments are being deleted on accident as we attempt to weed out a recent series of inappropriate comments. Our intention is to err on the side of leniency, as comments that are borderline should not hurt the comment section atmosphere if they are responded to in a deliberately appropriate manner. However, one way to avoid having a well-intended comment be deleted in the course of a cleanup action is to consciously make sure it does not push the limits of what can be seen as appropriate.
(C) Take into account that some comments deemed appropriate may address comments deleted for inappropriate language.
(D) Responses to this moderation action are off topic if made in this comment section.]
[DELETED for one or more of the following reasons:
(1) off topic
(2) personal attack
(3) used inappropriate language or tone
(4) ongoing personal conflict
(5) took issue with commenter (qualifications, etc) instead of actual comment content
(6) quotes rumor in a manner that is inflammatory (regarding race, etc)
(7) was reaction to any of the above
NOTE:
(A) Repeatedly responding (6) to inappropriate comments is no less grounds for banning.
(b) We're sorry if a few comments are being deleted on accident as we attempt to weed out a recent series of inappropriate comments. Our intention is to err on the side of leniency, as comments that are borderline should not hurt the comment section atmosphere if they are responded to in a deliberately appropriate manner. However, one way to avoid having a well-intended comment be deleted in the course of a cleanup action is to consciously make sure it does not push the limits of what can be seen as appropriate.
(C) Take into account that some comments deemed appropriate may address comments deleted for inappropriate language.
(D) Responses to this moderation action are off topic if made in this comment section.]
[DELETED for one or more of the following reasons:
(1) off topic
(2) personal attack
(3) used inappropriate language or tone
(4) ongoing personal conflict
(5) took issue with commenter (qualifications, etc) instead of actual comment content
(6) quotes rumor in a manner that is inflammatory (regarding race, etc)
(7) was reaction to any of the above
NOTE:
(A) Repeatedly responding (6) to inappropriate comments is no less grounds for banning.
(b) We're sorry if a few comments are being deleted on accident as we attempt to weed out a recent series of inappropriate comments. Our intention is to err on the side of leniency, as comments that are borderline should not hurt the comment section atmosphere if they are responded to in a deliberately appropriate manner. However, one way to avoid having a well-intended comment be deleted in the course of a cleanup action is to consciously make sure it does not push the limits of what can be seen as appropriate.
(C) Take into account that some comments deemed appropriate may address comments deleted for inappropriate language.
(D) Responses to this moderation action are off topic if made in this comment section.]
so far a lot of these mass killers were loners with guns.
You ought to be able to reference 5 people at least when you buy a gun. Not that I know anything about buying guns. You know, similar to a job screen.
In defense of the NRA, if there was a security guard on hand with a good shot, this guy didn’t get to kill 32, that’s for sure.
Actually, if Cho had made frequent trips to Korea, he would not have had such a low self-esteem.
Growing up in America, an Oriental can get “brainwashed” into believing Asians are inferior race. This happens to all minorities in America.
Things are getting better, though. Much better.
Finger prints were misidentified and that created confusion. It had nothing to do with witnesses not being able to tell Asians apart.
He is a South Korean national, not a Korean American. However, Kyopo also covers permanent resident Korean nationals. So he is a Kyopo but not a Korean American.
[DELETED for one or more of the following reasons:
(1) off topic
(2) personal attack
(3) used inappropriate language or tone
(4) ongoing personal conflict
(5) took issue with commenter (qualifications, etc) instead of actual comment content
(6) quotes rumor in a manner that is inflammatory (regarding race, etc)
(7) was reaction to any of the above
NOTE:
(A) Repeatedly responding (6) to inappropriate comments is no less grounds for banning.
(b) We're sorry if a few comments are being deleted on accident as we attempt to weed out a recent series of inappropriate comments. Our intention is to err on the side of leniency, as comments that are borderline should not hurt the comment section atmosphere if they are responded to in a deliberately appropriate manner. However, one way to avoid having a well-intended comment be deleted in the course of a cleanup action is to consciously make sure it does not push the limits of what can be seen as appropriate.
(C) Take into account that some comments deemed appropriate may address comments deleted for inappropriate language.
(D) Responses to this moderation action are off topic if made in this comment section.]
As Baduk and WJK condemn American society for its inherent racism they turn to ridiculous armchair psychology and racial stereotyping. How appropriate.
[Comment deleted: obscenity and personal attacks]
wjk wrote:
“We East Asians don’t go around asking white people what’s going on with America when loner gunmen of Columbine shoot up people or ask black people what’s going on with America when Malvo snipes people in DC.”
I thought you were Korean-American. I can assure you that East Asians, specifically Koreans and Chinese, do ask us Americans “What’s up with your country?” when violent crimes in the US get coverage in the local press. The young Korean student shot by the gunman who killed 11? people in Illinois and Indiana a few years ago got days of press in South Korea, including photos of a weeping father.
Ut videam,
I was talking about Violence in America. Especially about Gun Worship.
Yes, hand guns are sold in “Gun Shows”. After Columbine, anti-gun laws are passed but I have heard in news shows that one can still just walk in and buy pistols in one of those gun shows.
Cho bought pistols.
This is a big problem in America. Am I suddenly become anti-American just because I point out this love of guns are just as American as apple pies?
Don’t shoot the messenger. American attitude toward guns have to change. There is something wrong with a society where one guy can walk into a public place shoot up thirty people.
And, nobody is doing anything about the real cause! Tighten the requirement for getting guns. Put inhibition mechanism for guns and ammo.
#99-
Actually… several of my students asked me exactly that sort of question on Tuesday. These aren’t kids, mind you, but engineers and managers at one of the country’s largest chaebol firms.
Wednesday’s classes ought to be interesting.
[DELETED for one or more of the following reasons:
(1) off topic
(2) personal attack
(3) used inappropriate language or tone
(4) ongoing personal conflict
(5) took issue with commenter (qualifications, etc) instead of actual comment content
(6) quotes rumor in a manner that is inflammatory (regarding race, etc)
(7) was reaction to any of the above
NOTE:
(A) Repeatedly responding (6) to inappropriate comments is no less grounds for banning.
(b) We're sorry if a few comments are being deleted on accident as we attempt to weed out a recent series of inappropriate comments. Our intention is to err on the side of leniency, as comments that are borderline should not hurt the comment section atmosphere if they are responded to in a deliberately appropriate manner. However, one way to avoid having a well-intended comment be deleted in the course of a cleanup action is to consciously make sure it does not push the limits of what can be seen as appropriate.
(C) Take into account that some comments deemed appropriate may address comments deleted for inappropriate language.
(D) Responses to this moderation action are off topic if made in this comment section.]
Hey Baduk, how can you blame American society for this one, http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wor.....107754.stm
American imperialism creating a sense of shame among Korean officers who then beat their subordinates who then kill their superiors in revenge? Sounds about as logical as your earlier bleating.
Lord knows these kind of things could never happen in a pure, uncorrupted Korean society. Gotta be those damn racist caucasoids in America.
#109:
That was Won-joon Yoon who was murdered by white supremacist Benjamin Nathaniel Smith back in 1999 on July 4th weekend. Smith also killed Northwestern University basketball coach Ricky Byrdsong during his spree. I was living in Chicago at the time and everyone was freaked out by his rampage through Rogers Park where he wounded several orthodox Jews and Skokie, where he killed Byrdsong.
Another pic;
http://www.680news.com/news/in.....t=w041745A
It sucks to hear about the shooting, it must be devastating for the families. It also sucks that the media is going to brand this guy as South Korean to the Nth degree. I can see it now…if he was an exchange student, they would probably blame it on extensive Sudden Attack game play…
There are psychos from every country. This one just so happened to be Korean.
I fully expect the Korean media to go into defense mode and after a week the media will twist this terrible event so that Korea and Koreans are not to blame. Not that they are to blame. Again there are psychos in every country. This was an act of one lone psycho and his nationality has little if anything to do with it. But they will put the blame on something else all the same.
During the 2002 schoolgirl accident, a half dozen U.S government officials apologized and Bush apologized twice and it still wasn’t “sincere” or good enough. What would be Korea’s standard in this case? How many times would Roh have to apologize? Luckily I think Americans are not as petty.
[DELETED for one or more of the following reasons:
(1) off topic
(2) personal attack
(3) used inappropriate language or tone
(4) ongoing personal conflict
(5) took issue with commenter (qualifications, etc) instead of actual comment content
(6) quotes rumor in a manner that is inflammatory (regarding race, etc)
(7) was reaction to any of the above
NOTE:
(A) Repeatedly responding (6) to inappropriate comments is no less grounds for banning.
(b) We're sorry if a few comments are being deleted on accident as we attempt to weed out a recent series of inappropriate comments. Our intention is to err on the side of leniency, as comments that are borderline should not hurt the comment section atmosphere if they are responded to in a deliberately appropriate manner. However, one way to avoid having a well-intended comment be deleted in the course of a cleanup action is to consciously make sure it does not push the limits of what can be seen as appropriate.
(C) Take into account that some comments deemed appropriate may address comments deleted for inappropriate language.
(D) Responses to this moderation action are off topic if made in this comment section.]
#110-
Ah, you mean like Germany? France? Switzerland? Japan? Brazil? Australia? The United Kingdom? South Korea?
It can happen anywhere, baduk. Madness is endemic to the human condition.
What gets me is how the labeling of the killer is the most prevalent in all the stories. He was “South Korean”…the same as how some terrorists are all labeled “Islamic”…
Corpy Carly, Ut videam, and others,
OK. I admit Koreans do go berserk in military and society.
But, you must admit that American society’s lax attitude and over promotion of gun possession need correction. No other civilized society in Europe and Asia has this love of rugged individualism protected by self-arming.
Many Korean parents observe their children educated in America has more “affinity” toward guns and violence. American media is filled with violent images and killings. Monkey see, monkey do.
And, guns are so easy to get in America. $50 will buy you a nice pistol.
If you are mad, get even. Shoot those you hate. Cho did that.
#121 $50?!? Where? I need to get my ass down there before they sell out
What gets me is how the labeling of the killer is the most prevalent in all the stories. He was “South Korean”…
I have been watching FOX NEWS for nearly and hour. And I have heard the words “South Korea” only once, as they showed pics of his house and discussed his parents. Just ONCE!
I had a friend in college who went crazy. Very weird thing, to see someone you know slipping into schizophrenia. He even stabbed his shrink.
Point being, mental illness happens everywhere, and happens for a wide variety of reasons. Senseless to speculate the causes and details in this guy’s case, especially when so little is known about him.
I just heard from News that Cho wrote in his last note that ” he hates rich kids and debauchery”.
This brings in new dimension. Class Warfare.
I guess Cho was not one of those “rich kids”. He is lying to himself that he lost his girl because he was not rich enough.
This story has everything; love, jealousy, gun, killing, racism, low self-esteem, the rich and the poor, Korean experience in America, college, professors, heroism, etc..
#121-
More “affinity” than, say, the kids who spend their weekend in the PC rooms blasting away at Sudden Attack, Special Force, etc.? Please.
How about this? I’ll refrain from posting a laundry list of the faults I perceive in Korean culture, and you respect the memory of the fallen by refraining from using this tragedy to tell Americans what you think is wrong with ours.
Not to put too fine a point on it, shut the hell up already.
From the AP:
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/s.....TE=DEFAULT
I just love the way the Metropolitician managed to use this tragic incident to work in some of the most irrelevant stuff imaginable, using the example of Korean international students, even the killer was NOT an Korean international student.
Metropolitican wrote:
I’d been waiting for it.
The shooter is South Korean.
I’d been suspecting it all day, for a lot of reasons, which is why I was sitting by the computer. Not the least of which was because a group of American university administrators whom Fulbright hosted nearly 10 years ago, when being a tour of Korean universities, asked the staff, “Why is it that out of all our international students, Korean males have so much trouble?”
To my surprise, all of the university officials cited incident after incident of Korean male graduate students who seemed to have trouble adjusting, often got into fights with other students in the living spaces, and were often the source of trouble in dealing with romantic relationships gone bad or women in general, especially when they involved Korean females dating non-Koreans.
Ut videam,
You seemed to be a nice man and suddenly you lose it when I point out this “gun problem” in America.
I guess you love your gun too.
Things don’t change until America first recognize it has a problem.
I repeat “in no other countries, a man can walk into a public place and gun down thirty people one at a time”.
No other.
If the murderer didn’t live in America but in Korea, he would have done the same thing in Korea, either shot up a military barrack or pour gasoline in a subway train. This kind of thing always happens in Korea. The only differences are that usually it’s not gun related in Korea. This terrible incident has nothing to do with American culture nor Korean culture (both sides of the fence who are saying one or the other are BS’ing). Reading the AP news, it sounds like he was a mentally disturbed individual but we don’t know for that sure. He may well been an angry person who wanted to get back at the world for his life that sucked.
Cho wore a vest filled with ammo. Even to shoot and kill thirty people. He must have had over 100 bullets.
For a country that requires doctor’s note to buy medicine, it does not take any permission for a civilian to buy as many bullets as he wants.
Cho could have bought over 1000 bullets to kill 1000 people.
Something got to be done about guns and ammo but America will not do anything. I can sense that from the responses I get from here.
[DELETED for one or more of the following reasons:
(1) off topic
(2) personal attack
(3) used inappropriate language or tone
(4) ongoing personal conflict
(5) took issue with commenter (qualifications, etc) instead of actual comment content
(6) quotes rumor in a manner that is inflammatory (regarding race, etc)
(7) was reaction to any of the above
NOTE:
(A) Repeatedly responding (6) to inappropriate comments is no less grounds for banning.
(b) We're sorry if a few comments are being deleted on accident as we attempt to weed out a recent series of inappropriate comments. Our intention is to err on the side of leniency, as comments that are borderline should not hurt the comment section atmosphere if they are responded to in a deliberately appropriate manner. However, one way to avoid having a well-intended comment be deleted in the course of a cleanup action is to consciously make sure it does not push the limits of what can be seen as appropriate.
(C) Take into account that some comments deemed appropriate may address comments deleted for inappropriate language.
(D) Responses to this moderation action are off topic if made in this comment section.]
I too thought the Metropolitician was over the top and too quick on the draw with that kind of speculation. Some Korean ingredients of that portrait might be contained in the details that are emerging (of course not Cho’s educational timeline), but I look forward to an elaboration or a climbdown from the metro-man.
Ut videam,
I guess you are new and do not know that I am as American as you. So, don’t say “Korea has its other problems as bad as this”.
I am trying to prevent this type of tragedy.
News media is putting heavy blame on VT’s decision not to suspend the classes after the initial killing that occurred in the dorm.
Media is spinning it. The real cause is “guns and ammos”.
People get mad. They get mad at their girl friend. They get mad about their situation. Money, job, neighbors, etc. And, they want to vent their frustration.
They could just kick their dogs. Or, drive wild. Or, spit on the sidewalk.
But, in America, they go out shooting.
America must control its guns and bullets. How about national database of guns and bullets? How about tracking every bullet? It is possible. Why are pistols sold? Only gaming rifles should be sold.
The truth is Gun manufacturing is a big business. Just like Tobacco. And, organization like NRA is spreading lies.
How many more lives should be given to this “gun obssession” before things change?
“No other.”
That’s the smartest thing you’ve said since you nailed Hwang.
I hope some head starts to roll in the security dept. @7:00 AM two shot dead. Over two hours later, this mofo is still at large. He should have been mowed down way before. How could they be so complacent. Friggin mind boggling
And no, guns are fine. He could have gone to Home Depot and pulled Timothy McVeigh.
baduk,
What part of IT HAPPENS EVERYWHERE are you unable or unwilling to understand?
It’s utterly disgraceful, if unsurprising, that anyone would be so opportunistic as to employ a tragedy to advance a political agenda.
The fact that implementing such an agenda would not prevent such tragedies (witness the spree killings in other countries twice hitherto referenced) only adds an additional pathetic element to the cravenness.
Guns don’t kill people… but I might, if I had to listen to this drivel in person.
[DELETED for one or more of the following reasons:
(1) off topic
(2) personal attack
(3) used inappropriate language or tone
(4) ongoing personal conflict
(5) took issue with commenter (qualifications, etc) instead of actual comment content
(6) quotes rumor in a manner that is inflammatory (regarding race, etc)
(7) was reaction to any of the above
NOTE:
(A) Repeatedly responding (6) to inappropriate comments is no less grounds for banning.
(b) We're sorry if a few comments are being deleted on accident as we attempt to weed out a recent series of inappropriate comments. Our intention is to err on the side of leniency, as comments that are borderline should not hurt the comment section atmosphere if they are responded to in a deliberately appropriate manner. However, one way to avoid having a well-intended comment be deleted in the course of a cleanup action is to consciously make sure it does not push the limits of what can be seen as appropriate.
(C) Take into account that some comments deemed appropriate may address comments deleted for inappropriate language.
(D) Responses to this moderation action are off topic if made in this comment section.]
Good points CM.
What a sad, awful tragedy! My heart goes out to the families and friends of those victims. Too bad Cho didn’t shoot himself first. May there be NO Mercy on his deranged soul.
[DELETED for one or more of the following reasons:
(1) off topic
(2) personal attack
(3) used inappropriate language or tone
(4) ongoing personal conflict
(5) took issue with commenter (qualifications, etc) instead of actual comment content
(6) quotes rumor in a manner that is inflammatory (regarding race, etc)
(7) was reaction to any of the above
NOTE:
(A) Repeatedly responding (6) to inappropriate comments is no less grounds for banning.
(b) We're sorry if a few comments are being deleted on accident as we attempt to weed out a recent series of inappropriate comments. Our intention is to err on the side of leniency, as comments that are borderline should not hurt the comment section atmosphere if they are responded to in a deliberately appropriate manner. However, one way to avoid having a well-intended comment be deleted in the course of a cleanup action is to consciously make sure it does not push the limits of what can be seen as appropriate.
(C) Take into account that some comments deemed appropriate may address comments deleted for inappropriate language.
(D) Responses to this moderation action are off topic if made in this comment section.]
As bad as this tragedy is, perhaps something good will come of it in the sense that Koreans can no longer turn a blind eye to their own faults and misdeeds.
Every time a foreigner does something in this country its plastered all over the news but if a Korean does something its rarely, if ever reported.
Case in point the US Army doctor that was murdered in front of Yongsan by a Korean a few years ago and the female US Army soldier that was raped in Taegu last year in her apartment by a Korean. Neither story was covered in the Korean media. To say the stories were buried would not be an exaggeration.
I can’t see them burying this story although I can see them blaming US society for driving the poor misunderstood Korean lad to kill. Somehow they’ll find a way to blame it on the US Army or Japanese but at least they can’t ignore this one.
I’m looking forward to the candlelight vigils in Seoul and throughout Korea to mourn for the 33 victims.
netizen: “I’m so surprised that a Korean could do something so cruel I don’t believe it…”
Besides the obvious examples (Kim Il Sung and dear sonny boy):
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Woo_Bum-Kon
Record holder for the most deadly spree killing of all time.
News services report that Cho was taking anti-depressant medication and showed signed of mental illness.
He wrote in his suicide notes, “Ishmael acts”, which no one can understand.
Could this be like the Son of Sam? Satanic possession?
He locked the door behind him when he walked into the engineering building. He repeated reloaded his pistol, smiling. Totally mad, yet methodical.
Satanic possession.
1) Baduk #98:
“…The reason is totally American. His “Americanness” drove him to do this violent act.
Obviously, his family life had severe problem. His parents must be pretty bad people to raise a son like him. I think his parents should be jailed for bringing this problem to the society.
I hold them responsible…..”
2) CNN just interviewed the Caucasian-looking US mailman for Cho family. He said he had been mailman for Cho family since they moved into their current home in Centreville.
He said he didn’t see the parents much as they were gone all the time, evidently they both worked (another report (FOX news?) says they own a dry cleaning business in Centreville).
When he did see them, his impression was favorable, as they were always smiling and polite. The mailman then had to pause for a moment, as he got choked up; then he said “No parent should have to go through this”.
Should we take this mailman’s reaction as typical of white Americans, while we take yours as typical of Koreans and Korean-Americans, Baduk?
Baduk, I recommend you just cease-fire for a while. Let your comment gun barrel cool down; your mouth is overloading your ass.
Yes, the shooter was just a nut who happened to be Korean, but that does not change the fact that Koreans tend to be hypocrites in regard to tragedies like this.
Did anyone see the cartoon in Seoul Shinmun?
http://www.occidentalism.org/?p=594
Paul H.,
I value your opinion and stop writing for a while.
1) Unless Cho had mental illness, I still hold his parents responsible. Maybe they were too busy to love their son.
2) American society must control its “guns and ammos”. Columbine was bad. And, now this..How do you stop it? Nothing can stop it? I believe a government must act when it sees problems. Actually, it should be pro-active. However, if a government does nothing even in the face of Columbine and this, then it is still not recognizing it has a problem.
3) I will vote for those politicians who speak for gun control. This is bigger than Iraq. This hits where I live. My children can be killed by another mad man with 100 bullets on the campus. Am I pushing for a political agenda? Yes, I am.
‘I think Japan has some pretty severe gun laws – as does Korea (thank God).’ neff
koreans been coming here in large numbers since the 70s. took almost 40 years for some american guy of korean ancestry to do what he did. i know you don’t like innuendo but see if you can understand my implication as i understood yours.
‘I fully expect the Korean media to go into defense mode and after a week the media will twist this terrible event so that Korea and Koreans are not to blame. Not that they are to blame….’
then, why would they have to twist anything? man, think before you write!
lastly, how many white folk breathed a sigh of relief that the killer wasn’t yet again one of them? how many on this board are gleeful the perp is an american of korean ancestry? sad…..
slim, how about not reading my comments?
I think you’re my biggest fan.
You read everything I write.
Really? I’m talking nonsense?
Did people storm the Idaho Neo Nazi compounds and harass them when Timothy Buford got caught after shooting automatic rifles at Jewish children in southern California?
No.
Did a white guy in Arizona drive up to a Shikh, and gun him down with a rifle, right after 911?
Yes. The dumbass couldn’t even tell the difference between a Shikh and Muslim’s headdress. All that mattered to him was darker complexion and a turban. Typical for the white American.
Why were Korean mom and pop shops in New York and Los Angeles suddenly having a display of American flags at the registered post 911? As dumb as it sounds, it lowers the hostility down from white Americans.
It’s so elementary, childish, obvious, and ridiculous.
Shaku, take that photo down. Mr. Chiang has nothing to do with it. Why should people even know who he is?
Mr. Chiang got death threats.
Did you see a fat white guy from Idaho, who owned guns get similar threats in Idaho?
Did the KKK leader of the US get any death threats for that matter after Buford’s rampage against Jewish children?
Not that I know of.
I guaranttee you that Mr. Chiang was targeted because he’s not white.
I’m not talking nonsense. Suburbia vs Inner Cities. True in all 50 states. Can’t hide it. America’s Shame.
[DELETED for one or more of the following reasons:
(1) off topic
(2) personal attack
(3) used inappropriate language or tone
(4) ongoing personal conflict
(5) took issue with commenter (qualifications, etc) instead of actual comment content
(6) quotes rumor in a manner that is inflammatory (regarding race, etc)
(7) was reaction to any of the above
NOTE:
(A) Repeatedly responding (6) to inappropriate comments is no less grounds for banning.
(b) We're sorry if a few comments are being deleted on accident as we attempt to weed out a recent series of inappropriate comments. Our intention is to err on the side of leniency, as comments that are borderline should not hurt the comment section atmosphere if they are responded to in a deliberately appropriate manner. However, one way to avoid having a well-intended comment be deleted in the course of a cleanup action is to consciously make sure it does not push the limits of what can be seen as appropriate.
(C) Take into account that some comments deemed appropriate may address comments deleted for inappropriate language.
(D) Responses to this moderation action are off topic if made in this comment section.]
Baduk,
Criminals will always have firearms. If one makes it where regular citizens can’t have them, only criminals – and police; who can’t be everywhere – will have them.
If VA had not passed on a bill to allow concealed weapons (via permit) on campus, this might not have happened. A society w/o the right of self-defense is not the way to go, and is why우범근 wasn’t stopped until he stopped himself.
If you don’t want guns around, I suggest you move to a country that doesn’t allow them. I’ll even suggest the UK. But there you’ll have a far greater chance of someone breaking into your home while you’re there and beating the crap out of you while robbing you. That started happening after their gun ban.
But in the U.S. we have the constitution, and it’ll be a cold day in hell before the rights of normal citizens are truncated due to the fears of those running on pure emotion rather than logic. If you think it’s corporations, think again, it’s grassroots.
Read here for my comment: http://livejournal.com/users/tharp42
Hey man. You should link me. I have a Busan blog that a lot of people read. Give the expat south a voice… I am the first of the Busan 9, as well, though it looks pretty silly in light of recent events.
Here’s my two cents: htpp://livejournal/users/tharp42
Hey man,
You should give me a link. I have a Busan blog that a lot of people read, though anything I have to say is silly, given recent events.
Even so, give us southern expats a voice. And dare say I’m the one.
@gbeverss:
that cartoon, just….wow!
talk about a backfired attempt at yet another jab at the US by the Shinmun.
truly disgusting.
CM: I’m sorry to hear about your experience. That’s just wrong.
USinKorea: In a couple of comments further up, you wondered why someone didn’t rush the assailant. Others have already replied, but this wasn’t a Hollywood movie, and by the sounds of it, it would have taken not just one but maybe a couple of people with the superhuman presence of mind (in the heat of the moment), cojones, and complete lack of selflessness to disregard risking their life on the spur of the monent, to attempt such a move. In traumas like this, those who live are often plagued with “survivors’ guilt,” hating themselves for living when those close to them died. Let’s not compound that guilt by saying they could have done something more. There is nothing more any of the students or teachers caught in that situation could have been expected to do. Kudos, though, to those two guys who barricaded the door to their classroom.
We should wonder why this guy wasn’t successfully detained after the first spree—that would have been the best way to spare some lives.
I pray that the souls of those whose lives were cut short are enjoying eternal rest in God’s loving presence, and that he is comforting and guiding their families and loved ones.
@stupid cartoon
At least almost all the comments at the original Korean news site said the cartoon was bad taste, even before the shooter was outed as Korean. I guess even netizens have their limits.
Ledtim,
Yes, Koreans are criticizing the cartoon on the Seoul Shinmun Web site, but those comments did not start until 23:16, which was after Koreans found out that a Korean was the shooter. Why weren’t there any comments before then?
now is the time to examine why america is such a violent society. yeah, it happens everywhere and i am sure you can give examples but what we’re talking about here is frequency. this kind of thing happens here a hell of a lot more than any other country i know of. why? in my opinion, we have a culture of violence and a belief that said violence can solve anything. just look at iraq for a good example of our violent tendencies.
@156
I don’t know the exact timeline when the shooter’s Koreanness was confirmed, but there seems to be a couple of post before 23:16 http://tinyurl.com/2e8far
At least no one praised the cartoonist from what I’ve skimmed through.
On a somewhat tasteless note, at least the shooter had the courtesy to start the shooting during the beginning of final exam crunch time, not after all the finals are over and the summer vacation begins.
[DELETED for one or more of the following reasons:
(1) off topic
(2) personal attack
(3) used inappropriate language or tone
(4) ongoing personal conflict
(5) took issue with commenter (qualifications, etc) instead of actual comment content
(6) quotes rumor in a manner that is inflammatory (regarding race, etc)
(7) was reaction to any of the above
NOTE:
(A) Repeatedly responding (6) to inappropriate comments is no less grounds for banning.
(b) We're sorry if a few comments are being deleted on accident as we attempt to weed out a recent series of inappropriate comments. Our intention is to err on the side of leniency, as comments that are borderline should not hurt the comment section atmosphere if they are responded to in a deliberately appropriate manner. However, one way to avoid having a well-intended comment be deleted in the course of a cleanup action is to consciously make sure it does not push the limits of what can be seen as appropriate.
(C) Take into account that some comments deemed appropriate may address comments deleted for inappropriate language.
(D) Responses to this moderation action are off topic if made in this comment section.]
America has always been a violent society. We were founded on violence. It is our history. We have a history of blood – from our civil war to the Indian “wars.” Violence has always been our MO. We try to flee from it in our suburbs and “gated communities,” but the fact remains that America was founded on blood, and was consolidated by the same currency.
I’m American, BTW. But we are a society based on conquest and killing. I don’t deny that. That doesn’t make us admirable, but our history is hardcore. It is a blood history. But it is ours, nonetheless.
I love my land and I hate what it’s become. But it’s who I am. I’m not a fighter or a hard man, but a good american cat will always have my heart, even if he wants to kick my ass… at least he’s interesting.
Judging from reactions by colleagues and hearsay from the baristas in the local coffee shop here in Northern Virginia, Koreans can rest easy. The shooter’s ethnicity is not an issue. Folks around here are just shook up and feeling tremendous sympathy for the deceased and their families. Nobody in our community is making any cultural connections between the killer’s nationality and his actions.
Thanks for the link, Ledtim.
I glanced over the boards and noted that a few commenters were concerned about a translated version of the cartoon appearing on US websites and have come down hard on the cartoonist. I thought this comment was well worth translating:
만평가는 범인이 한국인이라고 밝혀진다면.. 조회 90추천 02007/04/17 23:25
If the cartoonist had known the criminal was Korean…
titan94 IP 211.47.xxx.195
이렇게 미국을 비아냥거리면서 남의일처럼 느껴지는 만화질은 더이상 못하겠죠? 내일 만평이 참으로 궁금하네요..백무현씨가 어떤 만화를 그릴까? 오늘처럼 미국에서 사람죽은일을 비아냥거리는 만평으로 일관할까? 궁금하네요..
would he be so sarcastic towards the US? I wonder what sort of cartoon Baek Mu-hyeon will draw tomorrow. Will it be the same sarcasm as today towards America’s dead? I wonder.
I wish we waegooks had access to Naver. I’d love to rec that comment.
And this was the very first post to the cartoon:
한국계가 사실이라면 조회 138추천 02007/04/17 22:21
If it’s true that it was an ethnic Korean
jslfree IP 59.13.xxx.172
이 만화빨리 내려야 할 듯 하네요….
미국 네티즌 켑쳐하기 전에…
better hurry and take down the cartoon before American netizens copy it.
[DELETED for one or more of the following reasons:
(1) off topic
(2) personal attack
(3) used inappropriate language or tone
(4) ongoing personal conflict
(5) took issue with commenter (qualifications, etc) instead of actual comment content
(6) quotes rumor in a manner that is inflammatory (regarding race, etc)
(7) was reaction to any of the above
NOTE:
(A) Repeatedly responding (6) to inappropriate comments is no less grounds for banning.
(b) We're sorry if a few comments are being deleted on accident as we attempt to weed out a recent series of inappropriate comments. Our intention is to err on the side of leniency, as comments that are borderline should not hurt the comment section atmosphere if they are responded to in a deliberately appropriate manner. However, one way to avoid having a well-intended comment be deleted in the course of a cleanup action is to consciously make sure it does not push the limits of what can be seen as appropriate.
(C) Take into account that some comments deemed appropriate may address comments deleted for inappropriate language.
(D) Responses to this moderation action are off topic if made in this comment section.]
“The Korean guy couldn’t say anything, couldn’t even stammer out a coherent reply.”
He should have said, “fuck off, you retard.”
I don’t think that kind of behavior deserves an eloquent reply.
I think
만평가는 범인이 한국인이라고 밝혀진다면.. 조회 90추천 02007/04/17 23:25
translates better as:
If it turns out that the criminal was a Korean, what would the cartoonist…
instead of
If the cartoonist had known the criminal was Korean…
Because I think the poster didn’t know for sure the criminal was Korean when he posted it, from his phrasing and the joking replies asking if he has the power of prophecy. Not that it matters too much.
[DELETED for one or more of the following reasons:
(1) off topic
(2) personal attack
(3) used inappropriate language or tone
(4) ongoing personal conflict
(5) took issue with commenter (qualifications, etc) instead of actual comment content
(6) quotes rumor in a manner that is inflammatory (regarding race, etc)
(7) was reaction to any of the above
NOTE:
(A) Repeatedly responding (6) to inappropriate comments is no less grounds for banning.
(b) We're sorry if a few comments are being deleted on accident as we attempt to weed out a recent series of inappropriate comments. Our intention is to err on the side of leniency, as comments that are borderline should not hurt the comment section atmosphere if they are responded to in a deliberately appropriate manner. However, one way to avoid having a well-intended comment be deleted in the course of a cleanup action is to consciously make sure it does not push the limits of what can be seen as appropriate.
(C) Take into account that some comments deemed appropriate may address comments deleted for inappropriate language.
(D) Responses to this moderation action are off topic if made in this comment section.]
anyone have stories to share about black Americans getting harassed on right after they got Malvo and his junior sniper helper?
What? None?
How do you explain the lash against Koreans?
And how do you explain the above commenter’s comment that it was long overdue, deserved, and coming?
Double, double.
[DELETED for one or more of the following reasons:
(1) off topic
(2) personal attack
(3) used inappropriate language or tone
(4) ongoing personal conflict
(5) took issue with commenter (qualifications, etc) instead of actual comment content
(6) quotes rumor in a manner that is inflammatory (regarding race, etc)
(7) was reaction to any of the above
NOTE:
(A) Repeatedly responding (6) to inappropriate comments is no less grounds for banning.
(b) We're sorry if a few comments are being deleted on accident as we attempt to weed out a recent series of inappropriate comments. Our intention is to err on the side of leniency, as comments that are borderline should not hurt the comment section atmosphere if they are responded to in a deliberately appropriate manner. However, one way to avoid having a well-intended comment be deleted in the course of a cleanup action is to consciously make sure it does not push the limits of what can be seen as appropriate.
(C) Take into account that some comments deemed appropriate may address comments deleted for inappropriate language.
(D) Responses to this moderation action are off topic if made in this comment section.]
wjk wrote:
“How do you explain the lash (sic) against Koreans?”
What backlash? One unfamiliar anonymous poster, firebrand, relates an anecdote about a Korean who apparently isn’t well-liked, imbedded in a comment spouting negative generalizations about Korean attitudes towards Americans.
One swallow does not a summer make.
#161 Sonagi: “Judging from reactions by colleagues and hearsay from the baristas in the local coffee shop here in Northern Virginia….Nobody in our community is making any cultural connections between the killer’s nationality and his actions.”
Sonagi! Better refer your colleagues & coffee shop “baristas” (?) to posts:
a) #157 (pawi: “…this kind of thing happens here a hell of a lot more than any other country i know of. why? in my opinion, we [Americans] have a culture of violence and a belief that said violence can solve anything…”)
b) #160 (tharp42: “….America has always been a violent society. We were founded on violence. It is our history. We have a history of blood – from our civil war to the Indian “wars.” Violence has always been our MO…”)
Based on these two posts, your colleagues’ responses are all wrong! They should be loading & cocking their own guns, measuring out lengths of rope, & casting dark & menacing glances at any Korean-Americans within eyeshot.
It’s simply impossible that pawi & tharp could be so wrong about their compelling insights into our fundamental American character. Better call for your fellow Virginians to come into compliance.
(A side note, from dictionary.com:
Main Entry: barista
Part of Speech: n
Definition: a person who works at the counter of a coffee shop; a coffee bar server
Example: He plans to become a barista at Starbucks.
Etymology: 1982; Ital
Usage: pl. baristi)
(Paul H: “A new word to me — had to look it up….I suppose smiling Virginia Starbucks baristas would be horrified, if I suggested they should keep a sawed-off behind the counter, like the barkeeps in the old-timey saloons?”)
(Sonagi: “*!%$@*!!!!”)
(Paul H: (Sigh)”Yes, I thought they would be…forget it, it was just a passing fancy on my part.”
(Paul H.: “May the Lord protect and keep safe all Starbucks customers, though Paul H wouldn’t take it amiss if Messrs. Smith and Wesson were called upon to provide the Lord with an ‘assist’ in this matter”.)
http://newsbloggers.aol.com/20.....uis-plays/
Listening to hours of radio and tv coverage, Sonagi’s right about the mass media discourse here ignoring Cho’s ethnicity and passport beyond the necessary biographical facts and elements, such as the legality of his gun purchases, that bear on the investigation. The gun control argument is taking a back seat to questions about the school’s handling of the crisis and missed signs that this particular creepy dude was more than just a creepy dude.
There will still be stupid and probably vile things said about and to Koreans by Americans, but the general cluelessness of the wider American public may help that kind of thing peter out pretty quickly. How many times has the artist formerly known as bluejives matter-of-factly reminded us that he has been and still is mistaken as Chinese? What’s more, despite the considerable energy both the ROK and the DPRK have in opposite ways expended to get and keep world attention, I’m sure a not insignificant fraction of the American population regularly confuses the two Koreas (I’m not counting long-time Korea watchers who wonder what’s up with that Sunshine movement.) I’ve seen this mistake, in the benign way people outside North America might confuse the Dakotas.
@Ledtim:
Your translation is more accurate, but it does not change the fact that news reports identifying the killer as possibly Korean had already leaked out by the first post “한국계가 사실이라면 조회 138추천 02007/04/17 22:21 ”
You noted correctly that “no one praised the cartoonist.” They mostly condemned his for sullying Korea’s international face after his cartoon started appearing in US and Japanese websites.
@Paul:
It was Starbucks who first propagated the term “barista” in the US, but my local joint is independently owned.
Richardson, all due respect, while you have great insights into the DPRK on your blog, your argument with Baduk on gun control was a bit pat.
This isn’t really the place for a gun control debate, and I wouldn’t call for a total ban on civilians owning firearms anyway, but I do want to make a couple points.
There is certainly ample cause in the U.S. for stricter regulation of firearms. I find more “pure emotion rather than logic” coming from the NRA, which is already “gunning” for Clinton and Obama in their fundraising because the two have called for such legislation.
The U.K. might have been a poor choice for comaprison: “In 2005/06 there were 766 offences initially recorded as homicide by the police in England and Wales (including the 52 victims of the 7 July 2005 London bombings), a rate of 1.4 per 100,000 of population. Only 50 (6.6%) were committed with firearms, one being with an air weapon. The homicide rate for London was 2.4 per 100,000 in the same year (1.7 when excluding the 7 July bombings).
By comparison, 5.5 murders per 100,000 of population were reported by police in the United States in 2000, of which 70% involved the use of firearms (75% of which were illegally obtained).”
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G.....arms_crime
I’d rather take my chances on a beating than be shot to death. There is cause for concern about gun violence in the U.S. and I’d like to see some action on it.
here now, I’ll tell you something truthful that just happenned over dinner.
A friend of mine asked me,
“So, do you know that guy from V-Tech?”
He was smiling as he said it, but it pissed me off and I waited in silence until he apologized.
Would I have asked him,
“So, do you know that bomber dude from Okalahoma, or the Uni Bomber, or Buford, etc?”
Uh, NO.
Anyone know if this guy, the shooter, had a Cyworld page? Market penetration for Cyworld is pretty high for his age group.. might shed some light on what the heck was going on in his head…
[DELETED for one or more of the following reasons:
(1) off topic
(2) personal attack
(3) used inappropriate language or tone
(4) ongoing personal conflict
(5) took issue with commenter (qualifications, etc) instead of actual comment content
(6) quotes rumor in a manner that is inflammatory (regarding race, etc)
(7) was reaction to any of the above
NOTE:
(A) Repeatedly responding (6) to inappropriate comments is no less grounds for banning.
(b) We're sorry if a few comments are being deleted on accident as we attempt to weed out a recent series of inappropriate comments. Our intention is to err on the side of leniency, as comments that are borderline should not hurt the comment section atmosphere if they are responded to in a deliberately appropriate manner. However, one way to avoid having a well-intended comment be deleted in the course of a cleanup action is to consciously make sure it does not push the limits of what can be seen as appropriate.
(C) Take into account that some comments deemed appropriate may address comments deleted for inappropriate language.
(D) Responses to this moderation action are off topic if made in this comment section.]
The NYT has some interesting stuff today, like two of Cho’s plays:
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04.....ref=slogin
And this:
“Ian MacFarlane, who now works for AOL and graduated from Virginia Tech in 2006, according to his Facebook profile, introduced the plays in gripping fashion:
When I first heard about the multiple shootings at Virginia Tech yesterday, my first thought was about my friends, and my second thought was “I bet it was Seung Cho.”
And goes on to describe how the rest of the class felt during peer-review sessions:
When we read Cho’s plays, it was like something out of a nightmare. The plays had really twisted, macabre violence that used weapons I wouldn’t have even thought of. Before Cho got to class that day, we students were talking to each other with serious worry about whether he could be a school shooter. I was even thinking of scenarios of what I would do in case he did come in with a gun, I was that freaked out about him. When the students gave reviews of his play in class, we were very careful with our words in case he decided to snap. Even the professor didn’t pressure him to give closing comments.”
http://thelede.blogs.nytimes.com/
If this is true (along with a professor saying there was “concern” about him based on his writing and classroom demeanor) why didn’t the school authorities talk to him earlier?
http://agoraplaza.media.daum.n.....rdNo=26899
[DELETED for one or more of the following reasons:
(1) off topic
(2) personal attack
(3) used inappropriate language or tone
(4) ongoing personal conflict
(5) took issue with commenter (qualifications, etc) instead of actual comment content
(6) quotes rumor in a manner that is inflammatory (regarding race, etc)
(7) was reaction to any of the above
NOTE:
(A) Repeatedly responding (6) to inappropriate comments is no less grounds for banning.
(b) We're sorry if a few comments are being deleted on accident as we attempt to weed out a recent series of inappropriate comments. Our intention is to err on the side of leniency, as comments that are borderline should not hurt the comment section atmosphere if they are responded to in a deliberately appropriate manner. However, one way to avoid having a well-intended comment be deleted in the course of a cleanup action is to consciously make sure it does not push the limits of what can be seen as appropriate.
(C) Take into account that some comments deemed appropriate may address comments deleted for inappropriate language.
(D) Responses to this moderation action are off topic if made in this comment section.]
Michael,
This is very relevant to the V-Tech case, as just last year a law that would have allowed concealed carry – by permit only – on school grounds was voted down.
The notion that more restrictive gun control laws and less availability of firearms equals a lower murder rate is a complete myth. Between 1959 and 2000 the correlation between ownership (availability) and the murder rate was 0.128448, which means weak to non-existent. I can post an Excel spreadsheet if requested (although I might not see such a request in this mess of comments, so the comment form at my site would be better).
It’s funny you mention emotion, since when an incident such as this occurs, what we get is pure emotion calling for more gun control. The numbers tell a different story, however.
Also, the UK – or the rest of Europe – didn’t have comparable murder rates before their gun control. Comparing apples to bowling balls.
Funny how all the other amendments are sacrosanct, huh? Or even made to say things they actually don’t.
But I know when things are futile to argue; the emotion vs. logic/facts deal.
Richardson, I appreciate your response–in fact, in real numbers, the murder rate in the U.S. has declined in recent years. That does not make the current level of gun violence acceptable however.
As I said, I wouldn’t call for a total ban on civilians owning firearms, nor is it neccessary to touch the Constitution in implementing some practical measures.
I see emotions runing high on all sides when these events occur, it’s just human nature. All I’m saying is that more can be done to curtail gun violence in the U.S., which is hardly a radical stance.
Why am I not surprised that we are already hearing the “yellow rage” excuse?
The Virginia 33 deserve better.
[DELETED for one or more of the following reasons:
(1) off topic
(2) personal attack
(3) used inappropriate language or tone
(4) ongoing personal conflict
(5) took issue with commenter (qualifications, etc) instead of actual comment content
(6) quotes rumor in a manner that is inflammatory (regarding race, etc)
(7) was reaction to any of the above
NOTE:
(A) Repeatedly responding (6) to inappropriate comments is no less grounds for banning.
(b) We're sorry if a few comments are being deleted on accident as we attempt to weed out a recent series of inappropriate comments. Our intention is to err on the side of leniency, as comments that are borderline should not hurt the comment section atmosphere if they are responded to in a deliberately appropriate manner. However, one way to avoid having a well-intended comment be deleted in the course of a cleanup action is to consciously make sure it does not push the limits of what can be seen as appropriate.
(C) Take into account that some comments deemed appropriate may address comments deleted for inappropriate language.
(D) Responses to this moderation action are off topic if made in this comment section.]
[DELETED for one or more of the following reasons:
(1) off topic
(2) personal attack
(3) used inappropriate language or tone
(4) ongoing personal conflict
(5) took issue with commenter (qualifications, etc) instead of actual comment content
(6) quotes rumor in a manner that is inflammatory (regarding race, etc)
(7) was reaction to any of the above
NOTE:
(A) Repeatedly responding (6) to inappropriate comments is no less grounds for banning.
(b) We're sorry if a few comments are being deleted on accident as we attempt to weed out a recent series of inappropriate comments. Our intention is to err on the side of leniency, as comments that are borderline should not hurt the comment section atmosphere if they are responded to in a deliberately appropriate manner. However, one way to avoid having a well-intended comment be deleted in the course of a cleanup action is to consciously make sure it does not push the limits of what can be seen as appropriate.
(C) Take into account that some comments deemed appropriate may address comments deleted for inappropriate language.
(D) Responses to this moderation action are off topic if made in this comment section.]
The term “gun violence” is an emotionally charged term itself. Guns don’t commit any acts, only people do.
I find it sadly ironic that the facts suggest that more legally armed people lead to less crime, and the places with the most gun “control” have the highest crime rates, but when something like this occurs, many still call for yet more control.
But this is largely (Baduk excepted) a left/right divide, just like taxes. The knee-jerk reaction is “more gun control will equal less crime,” but the reality is that’s a myth. With taxes it’s, “we need more revenue, so let’s tax the ‘rich’ more,” which (over time) actually leads to much smaller tax revenues and slower growth.
A never ending cycle.
Diversity.
The shooters parents have committed suicide.
http://www.occidentalism.org/?p=595
[DELETED for one or more of the following reasons:
(1) off topic
(2) personal attack
(3) used inappropriate language or tone
(4) ongoing personal conflict
(5) took issue with commenter (qualifications, etc) instead of actual comment content
(6) quotes rumor in a manner that is inflammatory (regarding race, etc)
(7) was reaction to any of the above
NOTE:
(A) Repeatedly responding (6) to inappropriate comments is no less grounds for banning.
(b) We're sorry if a few comments are being deleted on accident as we attempt to weed out a recent series of inappropriate comments. Our intention is to err on the side of leniency, as comments that are borderline should not hurt the comment section atmosphere if they are responded to in a deliberately appropriate manner. However, one way to avoid having a well-intended comment be deleted in the course of a cleanup action is to consciously make sure it does not push the limits of what can be seen as appropriate.
(C) Take into account that some comments deemed appropriate may address comments deleted for inappropriate language.
(D) Responses to this moderation action are off topic if made in this comment section.]
I think I found that wall of Jews Rhie Won Bok was talking about.
[DELETED for one or more of the following reasons:
(1) off topic
(2) personal attack
(3) used inappropriate language or tone
(4) ongoing personal conflict
(5) took issue with commenter (qualifications, etc) instead of actual comment content
(6) quotes rumor in a manner that is inflammatory (regarding race, etc)
(7) was reaction to any of the above
NOTE:
(A) Repeatedly responding (6) to inappropriate comments is no less grounds for banning.
(b) We're sorry if a few comments are being deleted on accident as we attempt to weed out a recent series of inappropriate comments. Our intention is to err on the side of leniency, as comments that are borderline should not hurt the comment section atmosphere if they are responded to in a deliberately appropriate manner. However, one way to avoid having a well-intended comment be deleted in the course of a cleanup action is to consciously make sure it does not push the limits of what can be seen as appropriate.
(C) Take into account that some comments deemed appropriate may address comments deleted for inappropriate language.
(D) Responses to this moderation action are off topic if made in this comment section.]
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid warned against a rush to judgement on gun control:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/vir.....ub3eWs0NUE
I was wondering if anyone currently in the U.S. can tell me what public sentiment is like over there regarding the identity of the killer?
In my office here in Korea, the issue has taken on a very racial and ethnicity related turn when it comes up in conversation. No one is seeing this as an act done by a disturbed individual but as a Korean whose actions will provoke anti-Korean feelings in the U.S. by Americans and whose actions will put Koreans currently in the U.S. at risk.
I suppose it is an understandable concern but I want to know if there is any indication that that is the direction things are going in over there right now.
Judging from the reports I’m reading in the news, the racial and ethnic identity of the killer is simply a fact and nothing else. But being that I feel so far removed from what is being said in the States offline and not to the media, I am curious if the killer’s race and ethinicity are being treated as anything more than just facts at this point? Have there been hints of anti-Korean sentiments over there?
Thanks.
Richardson, it’s a cultural thing, many nations have high gun ownership and low murder rates, like the Swiss and Canadians, while our country has gun homicide through the roof. Are you saying the status quo is acceptable?
Also, I don’t particularly have “emotional” associations with guns–my father was a Marine and I have shot/hunted with pistols and rifles and have a healthy respect for their proper use.
[DELETED for one or more of the following reasons:
(1) off topic
(2) personal attack
(3) used inappropriate language or tone
(4) ongoing personal conflict
(5) took issue with commenter (qualifications, etc) instead of actual comment content
(6) quotes rumor in a manner that is inflammatory (regarding race, etc)
(7) was reaction to any of the above
NOTE:
(A) Repeatedly responding (6) to inappropriate comments is no less grounds for banning.
(b) We're sorry if a few comments are being deleted on accident as we attempt to weed out a recent series of inappropriate comments. Our intention is to err on the side of leniency, as comments that are borderline should not hurt the comment section atmosphere if they are responded to in a deliberately appropriate manner. However, one way to avoid having a well-intended comment be deleted in the course of a cleanup action is to consciously make sure it does not push the limits of what can be seen as appropriate.
(C) Take into account that some comments deemed appropriate may address comments deleted for inappropriate language.
(D) Responses to this moderation action are off topic if made in this comment section.]
“A Virginia Tech spokeswoman who appeared at the news conference denied that Cho’s parents, who live in Virginia, had committed suicide.
She said some media had erroneously reported that the couple, who moved to the U.S. in the 1990s, had killed themselves.
She emphasized that both are very much alive.”
http://ciproud.com/content/ful.....p;cid=1997
what’s so wrong about pointing out an American phenomenon that anyone can readily see outside the major US cities?
“What country are you from?”
“I mean your original country.”
“What’s your name?”
“I mean your REAL name.”
These folks get this awe strucken look when I ask them what country they are originally from. Then, they get puzzled and finally understand, and say things like Oh, mostly German, some Irish, blah, blah, etc.
Dude, it’s out there and it’s wrong.
Judging by the over represntation % wise of our group in US higher universities (it’s not 2% of the student body, like the population %), East Asians provide high intel service in society and still get the diss in some aspects.
So are you saying that what Cho did is payback?
I can’t believe you are comparing the insensitivity of someone asking where you’re from (which is done in good will) with this tragedy.
Can you not see how offensive that is?
I think now might be a good time to choose one’s words with a little care and empathy for the actual victims here (who are not Korean-American society, despite news reports to the contrary).
this is a tragic event and my prayers and condolences go out to the family. i haven’t read all the comments but shouldn’t politics (gun control issue) and petty arguments about race or who’s right/wrong be set aside for another day?
has there been any report about the parents of this guy?
I was wondering if anyone currently in the U.S. can tell me what public sentiment is like over there regarding the identity of the killer?
In my office here in Korea, the issue has taken on a very racial and ethnicity related turn when it comes up in conversation. No one is seeing this as an act done by a disturbed individual but as a Korean whose actions will provoke anti-Korean feelings in the U.S. by Americans and whose actions will put Koreans currently in the U.S. at risk.
Jodi, it seems that the only ones who are obsessing over the fact that he was Korean, Asian, or whatever are are kyopo and other Asian-Americans. All the usual “how will this make us look?” hand-wringing. Personally, I find it small-minded and pathetic. I say this as a kyopo myself.
I find it equally ridiculous that native Koreans in Korea are worried about how this might affect US-Korea relations and so forth. I understand that a Korean embassy even issued an apology. If they are so worried about the killer’s Korean-ness being a factor then they certainly aren’t helping matters any by deliberately emphasizing it by taking official responsibility for it.
The only problem I have is too many headlines do keep saying “South Korean” to describe the gunman, as if he were a fresh-off-the-boat foreigner who just arrived recently. This guy is a pure kyopo, who majored in English Literature and has been living in the US since an early age. Not an international student on a student visa or anything like that. But I guess that’s a subtle distinction that only a kyopo would know.
#193: “In my office here in Korea, the issue has taken on a very racial and ethnicity related turn when it comes up in conversation. No one is seeing this as an act done by a disturbed individual but as a Korean whose actions will provoke anti-Korean feelings in the U.S. by Americans and whose actions will put Koreans currently in the U.S. at risk.”
I think that’s what would here if a foreigner did the same (just look at the accident of 2002), so consider it as projection. Other than a few snide comments as mentioned above, I doubt there will be any backlash.
Robert, your note is gratuitous and unfair. I still have not seen any commentary anywhere that suggests that this incident happened because the shooter was a Korean. It is also wrong for you to try to defend Koreans by pointing the finger at another ethnic group. Whites happen to be the majority population in the US, and thus would make up the majority of these kinds of shootings in the US. Just like the majority of shooters in Korea would be Koreans. Anyway, I think that what you wrote is flawed an unhelpful. A more principled “Marmot’s Note” would simply be one of sadness for this unprecedented tragedy.