What U.S. ship fired the first U.S. shot on the high seas of WW I? Why, the USS Mongolia, of course! (HT to fellow blogger)
-
Sponsored Links
-
English Books on Korea... and More!
-
Visit My Brother's Film Review Site
-
Recent Comments
- Linkd on Excellent Commentary on Demonstrations
- Sperwer on Excellent Commentary on Demonstrations
- andy on Excellent Commentary on Demonstrations
- andy on Excellent Commentary on Demonstrations
- Mizar5 on Excellent Commentary on Demonstrations
- Sperwer on He Might Be UN General Secretary…
- Mizar5 on Excellent Commentary on Demonstrations
- Michael on Eva’s Music Video
- Brendon Carr (Korea Law Blog) on Eva’s Music Video
- cm on Eva’s Music Video
- pawikirogi on Eva’s Music Video
- Michael on Eva’s Music Video
- SusieQ on He Might Be UN General Secretary…
- captbbq on Eva’s Music Video
- shakuhachi on Eva’s Music Video
-
Contact
Want to drop me a line? Send your emails to Robert at marmotshole@gmail.com. -
My Flickr Photos


6 Comments
The USS Mongolia was not a member of the US Navy until taken over in April 1918 so she was still a civilian vessel when she fired on the German Submarine. If I was a pedant I’d note the S.S. Mongolia fired the opening shot for the US in 1917.
I couldn’t find a link to prove it, but if the US Navy followed the same pattern for arming civilian merchant ships in the WWI period as they did in WWII, then it would have been a US Navy guncrew manning the deck gun of the ship when it fired on the German submarine.
In World War II these USN gun crews assigned to merchant marine ships were known as the “Armed Guard”; I can’t prove that the same system and nomenclature was used during WWI but it seems likely. One or more USN officers and a crew of USN gunners would have been assigned to the ship to man the deck gun(s) (in WWII, both for surface and anti-aircraft fire, should have been only a surface gun in WWI).
One link I saw seemed to indicate that some USN personnel in WWII would have also been assigned for communications duty in ship’s radio room. All USN personnel assigned to the ship would have been subject to the final authority of the ship’s civilian master.
The fairly well-known WWII movie “Action in the North Atlantic” while a fictional account provides I think an accurate view of the relationship between a merchant marine ship’s crew and their assigned accompanying USN armed guard.
Who thought it was a good idea to name a naval ship after a land-locked nation?
If I had to guess, Admiral Horthy from Hungary.
You are correct Paul H - and I’ve got the link to prove it
This was from THE place to check about US Navy vessels, Department of the Navy — Naval Historical Center and is the link to USS Mongolia.
There are some neat photos of her as well as her sister ship, USS Manchuria (but you’ll need to search “USS Manchuria” to locate them).
Now to return to looking at the ships of the desert here
Oh, and Netizen Kim, Mongolia may be landlocked but it does have a navy - albeit a small one. It also has naval vessels - albeit a small one
I think the navy runs to about 7-10 officers and ratings and the vessel is a single boat that is based on Lake Huvsgol up towards the Russian border.
It also has a Maritime Administration that handles registration of vessels around the world (Flags of Convenience).
One Trackback
[...] By now most of the readers of my blog know that I have a particularly soft spot for Mongolia, the Land of the Endless Blue Sky. Most of you have not realised as well that I love ships … all of them … big buggers, small ones, sailing, steam, oar-powered, you name it. Then there is the other passion of mine … wargaming. Back on 7 April 2007 then, I was pleased to see a piece in The Marmot’s Hole concerning USS Mongolia. [...]