I can’t figure out what’s more disturbing—a man humping a dead deer [Marmot's Hole] or his lawyer quoting “The Princess Bride” in his motion to dismiss [The Smoking Gun]. (HT to Ledtim)
-
English Books on Korea... and More!
-
Visit My Brother's Film Review Site
10 Comments
Brendon Carr should have represented the Deer Humper™ with his “animals got no soul” defense
But don’t introduce Bambi as an expert witness 
It’s the people who dye their dog’s fur pink that should do hard time!
uh…as disturbing as dyeing one’s dog pink is, uh, having sex with a deer…a dead deer, is more disturbing.
Wow, that hadn’t occurred to me! Thanks!
The More You Know *cue* NBC theme~
I’m glad to see his defense attorney is taking the right tack on the absurdity of deeming a carcass to be an animal. Is a pound of hamburger the same as an animal?
Funnier than the tomato ruling, which also consulted Webster’s Dictionary.
You know, Korea punishes people who have sex with the chicken.
We call this crime 계간(鷄姦)죄. 鷄姦 is chicken and sex.
What a funny country Korea is!
Anyway, we have the Animal Protection Act.
Off the topic.
Mr. Brendon, congratulations.
My friend sent me this file,
http://law4u.net/tech/data/boa.....3540-1.pdf
, seeing you.
姦 is my favorite character. Three women. Fond memories. Of Chinese class.
They should charge the guy with public indecency. Defense would have a tougher time arguing that one.
Yes, public indecency is possible, assuming the deer humping took place out in public. If he took the carcass somewhere out of the way, no dice.
Story says the humping took place in a road side ditch. The lawyers can argue how out of the way that is. Someone obviously saw him. If only he dragged the carcass to his bedroom…
Brendon, how were classes at the “University of Washing”?
I’ll bet they soaked you on tuition.