Comments on: Don’t have a Macau, man

By: Wedge

Wedge — Tue, 20 Mar 2007 04:22:33 +0000

Blueballs: You must be projecting, since I don’t see conservatives cutting W any slack. I’ve been accused of being a neocon and I think W is way off base in his new policy of appeasement. It didn’t work in ‘94 and it won’t work in ‘07.

By: snow

snow — Tue, 20 Mar 2007 02:22:01 +0000

Bush supporters are blaming this all on Clinton?? As far as I’ve heard, plenty of conservatives are up in arms about this crap, myself included. I don’t know what they’re thinking, but I’m worried the Norks are going to pretend to disarm and the US will pretend to believe them, as Hill said would not happen. Just like the US is pretending to believe that the money was gained legitimately and they’re pretending that the Norks will use the money for the benefit of Northerners and pretending to believe that the Norks are going to stop counterfeiting and dealing drugs, etc, etc. Downright disgusting. Especially since giving the money back BEFORE shutting down Yongbyon was not even a part of the deal.

How much more kowtowing to the appeasenix is Bush going to do?

By: Kunsanpcv

Kunsanpcv — Mon, 19 Mar 2007 23:40:08 +0000

Yet another example of the general cluelessness of Bush foreign policy.

By: Blood in the False Dawn : Left Flank

Blood in the False Dawn : Left Flank — Mon, 19 Mar 2007 12:04:35 +0000

[...] But then, nothing has changed for the GOP. The Blues make internecine warfare look like a microcosm of the nation’s politics; the Reds eat their own (via TMH). [...]

By: Andy Jackson

Andy Jackson — Sat, 17 Mar 2007 11:17:30 +0000

So is this Berthelsen guy a hardliner who wants to stick it to the Norks or is he just confused.

The bank has been barred from access to the American market. Unless we can send Treasury Department guys into Macao to cuff n’ stuff folks, what else can be done?

By: iheartblueballs

iheartblueballs — Sat, 17 Mar 2007 08:49:57 +0000

That’s odd. I just had dinner this week with one right-wing North Korea expert of some repute who gave me a whole list of reasons why the capitulation of “King George,” if you will, was much worse.

Thrilled to hear that some intellectual honesty is seeing the light of day on the Seoul cocktail circuit, as it’s noticeably absent otherwise. Maybe when that dinner gossip translates into an actual op-ed from the unnamed expert you’ll give us a link, although I won’t hold my breath.

And you may want to keep your voice down when repeating such treasonous accusations. You’re obviously undermining the troops and emboldening the enemy by even repeating criticism of the policies of the Bush administration.

At least that’s what I learned from Dick Cheney and all my favorite commentators on Fox News.

By: railwaycharm

railwaycharm — Sat, 17 Mar 2007 07:38:55 +0000

That

Sorry

By: railwaycharm

railwaycharm — Sat, 17 Mar 2007 07:38:34 +0000

I too felt the W should not have thrown in the towel however; we do not have the free hands to take on the Norks at this point. Let’s hope that KJI gets his when the mess in the desert is contained. Mr. Marmot can you share some of his points?

By: wjk

wjk — Sat, 17 Mar 2007 06:57:48 +0000

norks might get zero, if they insist on getting aid first without doing something first. Which is what is happening now. Wasn’t there suspicion that the nuke test might have been a failure?

The norks are playing their cards, but they might get nothing. This time, DC trickles aid after action.

By: Robert Koehler

Robert Koehler — Sat, 17 Mar 2007 06:47:08 +0000

Ask the nearest right-wing North Korean “expert” you can find. He’ll give you a thousand reasons why Slick Willie is to blame but can’t muster a single critical word of King George when he gets on his knees to service a dictator.

That’s odd. I just had dinner this week with one right-wing North Korea expert of some repute who gave me a whole list of reasons why the capitulation of “King George,” if you will, was much worse.