<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More on Princeton and Asians</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/01/29/more-on-princeton-and-asians/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/01/29/more-on-princeton-and-asians/</link>
	<description>Korea... in Blog Format</description>
	<pubDate>Wed,  9 Jul 2008 15:54:13 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: railwaycharm</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/01/29/more-on-princeton-and-asians/#comment-70528</link>
		<dc:creator>railwaycharm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 15:30:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://64.13.224.44/2007/01/29/more-on-princeton-and-asians/#comment-70528</guid>
		<description>(That same factor also allows gives whites a relatively easy shot at getting into historically black universities.)

Simple solution: Put the whites in the back of the class. People of color will get better seats and it will prevent cheating on exams.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(That same factor also allows gives whites a relatively easy shot at getting into historically black universities.)</p>
<p>Simple solution: Put the whites in the back of the class. People of color will get better seats and it will prevent cheating on exams.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Jackson</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/01/29/more-on-princeton-and-asians/#comment-70520</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Jackson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 15:12:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://64.13.224.44/2007/01/29/more-on-princeton-and-asians/#comment-70520</guid>
		<description>Response to #8,

JW,
Can I assume then that your first comment was NOT a joke?

Your take on the professor's argument can only work if she is ignorant of how affirmative action works (I doubt she is.)

Set-asides are illegal:  You can't say, for example, that Princeton will take 11% black and 12% Hispanic students each year.  So the idea there are two tiers of admission, one for blacks and Hispanics and another for whites and Asians, is simply false.

But you can take make race a factor in selecting students if those students are from underrepresented groups.  (That same factor also allows gives whites a relatively easy shot at getting into historically black universities.)  Those gains for underrepresented groups must come from overrepresented groups and nobody is more overrepresented at Princeton than Asians (as I noted, whites are actually a little underrepresented there).

The only way to say that Asians are competing with non-Hispanic whites but not blacks or Hispanics would be to count Asians as white (in other words, to administratively erase the distinction between whites and Asians and count them as one group).

In summery, her basic argument seems to be that taking race into consideration is good if it means that you are taking places away from non-Hispanic whites and giving it to blacks and Hispanics but bad if you are taking it away from Asians.

(BTW, sorry about the late reply.  I am still on vacation.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Response to #8,</p>
<p>JW,<br />
Can I assume then that your first comment was NOT a joke?</p>
<p>Your take on the professor&#8217;s argument can only work if she is ignorant of how affirmative action works (I doubt she is.)</p>
<p>Set-asides are illegal:  You can&#8217;t say, for example, that Princeton will take 11% black and 12% Hispanic students each year.  So the idea there are two tiers of admission, one for blacks and Hispanics and another for whites and Asians, is simply false.</p>
<p>But you can take make race a factor in selecting students if those students are from underrepresented groups.  (That same factor also allows gives whites a relatively easy shot at getting into historically black universities.)  Those gains for underrepresented groups must come from overrepresented groups and nobody is more overrepresented at Princeton than Asians (as I noted, whites are actually a little underrepresented there).</p>
<p>The only way to say that Asians are competing with non-Hispanic whites but not blacks or Hispanics would be to count Asians as white (in other words, to administratively erase the distinction between whites and Asians and count them as one group).</p>
<p>In summery, her basic argument seems to be that taking race into consideration is good if it means that you are taking places away from non-Hispanic whites and giving it to blacks and Hispanics but bad if you are taking it away from Asians.</p>
<p>(BTW, sorry about the late reply.  I am still on vacation.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/01/29/more-on-princeton-and-asians/#comment-66460</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 11:20:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://64.13.224.44/2007/01/29/more-on-princeton-and-asians/#comment-66460</guid>
		<description>Matt, Mark, who cares?  All white people are the same, aren't they?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt, Mark, who cares?  All white people are the same, aren&#8217;t they?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JK</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/01/29/more-on-princeton-and-asians/#comment-66367</link>
		<dc:creator>JK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 03:12:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://64.13.224.44/2007/01/29/more-on-princeton-and-asians/#comment-66367</guid>
		<description>My bad...my comment was addressed to Mark, not Matt.  Sorry for the error.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My bad&#8230;my comment was addressed to Mark, not Matt.  Sorry for the error.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JK</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/01/29/more-on-princeton-and-asians/#comment-66366</link>
		<dc:creator>JK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 03:10:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://64.13.224.44/2007/01/29/more-on-princeton-and-asians/#comment-66366</guid>
		<description>"There weren’t any gyopos in the room when I took the SAT, so who am I to judge your cheating skills?"


Keep digging your own hole and showing your own ignorance.

BTW, studying for the SATs DOES help and is highly recommended.  In my 11th grade English class, our teacher attempted to teach us the vocabulary words in the Barron's study guide SOLD IN PUBLIC BOOKSTORES that were recommended study material for SAT takers.  I already knew all the words.  I had already studied and memorized them during the previous two summer vacations.  While the rest of my classmates spent their vacations just staying home watching TV or goofing around outside, I studied an hour a day under the watchful eye of my parents and THEN played, and I am glad I did it.  My older brother, who went through the same regimen as me, got a near perfect score on the SATs (I think he missed two questions), and it was because he studied PLUS had a thorough knowledge of Latin to derive the meaning of words and because he retained everything he read, including the meaning of new vocabulary words.  Plus, they didn't have enough math classes at our high school for us to continue to learn, so my brother actually had to attend the university nearby as a senior in high school in order to continue to learn.  The American schools we attended couldn't keep up with the studying we did in our own time.  No one in our community was surprised at my family's academic success because everyone knew we studied and worked hard.  Plus, to the white and black members of the community, perhaps there was the prejudice (rightfully or wrongfully) they had that Asians were just brighter academically.  I doubt we were "brighter"....we just studied harder.  It got to the point that we knew more calculus than the calculus teacher, which says a lot about the American education system at that time.

So I have cheating skills because I'm a kyopo, huh?  You're pathetic.

And exactly how DOES one cheat for the SATs in America?  It's virtually impossible.  Maybe, just MAYBE Matt, we kicked *ss in school and on our college boards because we studied.  Does this truth hurt too much for you to accept?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;There weren’t any gyopos in the room when I took the SAT, so who am I to judge your cheating skills?&#8221;</p>
<p>Keep digging your own hole and showing your own ignorance.</p>
<p>BTW, studying for the SATs DOES help and is highly recommended.  In my 11th grade English class, our teacher attempted to teach us the vocabulary words in the Barron&#8217;s study guide SOLD IN PUBLIC BOOKSTORES that were recommended study material for SAT takers.  I already knew all the words.  I had already studied and memorized them during the previous two summer vacations.  While the rest of my classmates spent their vacations just staying home watching TV or goofing around outside, I studied an hour a day under the watchful eye of my parents and THEN played, and I am glad I did it.  My older brother, who went through the same regimen as me, got a near perfect score on the SATs (I think he missed two questions), and it was because he studied PLUS had a thorough knowledge of Latin to derive the meaning of words and because he retained everything he read, including the meaning of new vocabulary words.  Plus, they didn&#8217;t have enough math classes at our high school for us to continue to learn, so my brother actually had to attend the university nearby as a senior in high school in order to continue to learn.  The American schools we attended couldn&#8217;t keep up with the studying we did in our own time.  No one in our community was surprised at my family&#8217;s academic success because everyone knew we studied and worked hard.  Plus, to the white and black members of the community, perhaps there was the prejudice (rightfully or wrongfully) they had that Asians were just brighter academically.  I doubt we were &#8220;brighter&#8221;&#8230;.we just studied harder.  It got to the point that we knew more calculus than the calculus teacher, which says a lot about the American education system at that time.</p>
<p>So I have cheating skills because I&#8217;m a kyopo, huh?  You&#8217;re pathetic.</p>
<p>And exactly how DOES one cheat for the SATs in America?  It&#8217;s virtually impossible.  Maybe, just MAYBE Matt, we kicked *ss in school and on our college boards because we studied.  Does this truth hurt too much for you to accept?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/01/29/more-on-princeton-and-asians/#comment-66345</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 23:42:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://64.13.224.44/2007/01/29/more-on-princeton-and-asians/#comment-66345</guid>
		<description>Maybe it did, maybe not.  I didn't study one iota, so I don't know how it would have mattered if I had studied.

There weren't any &lt;i&gt;gyopos&lt;/i&gt; in the room when I took the SAT, so who am I to judge your cheating skills?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe it did, maybe not.  I didn&#8217;t study one iota, so I don&#8217;t know how it would have mattered if I had studied.</p>
<p>There weren&#8217;t any <i>gyopos</i> in the room when I took the SAT, so who am I to judge your cheating skills?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JK</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/01/29/more-on-princeton-and-asians/#comment-66327</link>
		<dc:creator>JK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 13:08:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://64.13.224.44/2007/01/29/more-on-princeton-and-asians/#comment-66327</guid>
		<description>I know I was one of the few Asians in my high school (in America) and I was one of the FEW to take out a study guide and study YEARS before taking the standardized test, the SAT.  My parents, native Korean immigrants, saw to it that I did my studying during my summer days each year.....and used a legimate study guide bought at a book store.  And I was hardly an unusual Asian-American.  Needless to say, I and the few other Asians in my class did better than most of the other students, both white and black, in my high school.  

So....you're saying I and other Americans of Korean descent who did well on our standardized tests relative to the rest of our American peers did so because we CHEATED?  Unbelievable.  Maybe STUDYING had something to do with it!  Ever thought about that??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know I was one of the few Asians in my high school (in America) and I was one of the FEW to take out a study guide and study YEARS before taking the standardized test, the SAT.  My parents, native Korean immigrants, saw to it that I did my studying during my summer days each year&#8230;..and used a legimate study guide bought at a book store.  And I was hardly an unusual Asian-American.  Needless to say, I and the few other Asians in my class did better than most of the other students, both white and black, in my high school.  </p>
<p>So&#8230;.you&#8217;re saying I and other Americans of Korean descent who did well on our standardized tests relative to the rest of our American peers did so because we CHEATED?  Unbelievable.  Maybe STUDYING had something to do with it!  Ever thought about that??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/01/29/more-on-princeton-and-asians/#comment-66290</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 23:15:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://64.13.224.44/2007/01/29/more-on-princeton-and-asians/#comment-66290</guid>
		<description>It &lt;i&gt;might&lt;/i&gt; be because of &lt;a href="http://metropolitician.blogs.com/scribblings_of_the_metrop/2007/01/on_the_korean_o.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;lying and cheating&lt;/a&gt;.  Ever thought of that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It <i>might</i> be because of <a href="http://metropolitician.blogs.com/scribblings_of_the_metrop/2007/01/on_the_korean_o.html" rel="nofollow">lying and cheating</a>.  Ever thought of that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JK</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/01/29/more-on-princeton-and-asians/#comment-66284</link>
		<dc:creator>JK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 18:39:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://64.13.224.44/2007/01/29/more-on-princeton-and-asians/#comment-66284</guid>
		<description>Someguy wrote: "I’m sure oversease students make the difference. It just shows that fewer Westerners are in awe of the Ivy League schools than Asians."

I'm not sure how you drew such a quick conclusion like that.  It MIGHT be because those of Asian descent (be they American or living in Asia) study harder for the SATs and in high school to GET into Princeton and other Ivy League schools.  Ever thought of that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Someguy wrote: &#8220;I’m sure oversease students make the difference. It just shows that fewer Westerners are in awe of the Ivy League schools than Asians.&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure how you drew such a quick conclusion like that.  It MIGHT be because those of Asian descent (be they American or living in Asia) study harder for the SATs and in high school to GET into Princeton and other Ivy League schools.  Ever thought of that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sumo294</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/01/29/more-on-princeton-and-asians/#comment-66283</link>
		<dc:creator>sumo294</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 18:01:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://64.13.224.44/2007/01/29/more-on-princeton-and-asians/#comment-66283</guid>
		<description>Sonagi, inequality starts in the family.  Mothers don't even love their children equally.  If a child shows some talent, parents invest in the talent and if not--then you out of luck.  State intervention to what level?  All the way to how a family should be run--who the hell are you--the state secretariat of family planning.  You allowed those dumb a*s sensitive educators get to you.  The ideal right of man is the right to earn a living in peace you pony tailed, wonder bread eating, liberal hippie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sonagi, inequality starts in the family.  Mothers don&#8217;t even love their children equally.  If a child shows some talent, parents invest in the talent and if not&#8211;then you out of luck.  State intervention to what level?  All the way to how a family should be run&#8211;who the hell are you&#8211;the state secretariat of family planning.  You allowed those dumb a*s sensitive educators get to you.  The ideal right of man is the right to earn a living in peace you pony tailed, wonder bread eating, liberal hippie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
