Comments on: I have a very good friend named Biggus Dickus

By: dogbertt

dogbertt — Mon, 29 Jan 2007 00:22:21 +0000

기소독점권을 가진 검찰 측에서 기소를 하지 않은 거에요. 그러니까, 명예훼손죄의 구성요건에 ‘포섭되는’ 행위라고 생각하지 않은 거죠. 그리고 그러한 행위를 처벌할 법이 없다고 판단한 거구요. 해당법규 찾아서 법을 screening하잖아요. 아휴, 설명 어려워. 그러니까 법원 가기 전에 기소여부에서, 검찰에서 불기소처분 때려서 끝났다구요.

The Public Prosecutor’s Office, which has the sole power of indictment, did not indict. Therefore, they did not think that (the accused’s) action constituted “connotation”, an essential element of the crime of defamation. Also, they judged that there is no law under which this action can be punished. After all, they look at the relevant statutes, “screening” the laws. Oh, this is difficult to explain. Anyway, before going to court, there has to be a decision whether or not to indict. Because the Public Prosecutor’s Office disposed of this matter by not issuing an indictment, that was the end of it.

By: Arghaeri

Arghaeri — Sun, 28 Jan 2007 08:05:19 +0000

Well there we have it, the answer to communications problems everywhere, learn Apache Configuration Files and you too can fully understand crap English, and of course if you don’t learn Apache then its entirely your fault that the person you’re trying to understand can’t write in English.

By: Sperwer

Sperwer — Sun, 28 Jan 2007 00:47:36 +0000

.~*:

Don’t call us; we’ll call you.

By: colontos

colontos — Sat, 27 Jan 2007 18:41:10 +0000

I see another one of those meteoric “rise and ban” stories coming on. Just like ZiggyStardust69.

By: ●~*

●~* — Sat, 27 Jan 2007 14:33:27 +0000

Again to Arghaeri,
don’t refer to “we”. It seems to be YOUR problem on the ground of the mentioned reason above.

By: ●~*

●~* — Sat, 27 Jan 2007 14:29:53 +0000

I’ll correct the last Englsh sentence to this:

If you say about the word “dismissal” in the reoporter’s sentence , no fine was imposed, for no indictment was done.

Ms. or Mr. Arghaeri,
I don’t think the misleading is caused by my English but the lack of your knowledge.
If you lack in BASIC knowledge, you’ll not understand what is said even if it is written in easy & clear way.

Let’s test you.
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/1.3/configuring.html

This document is written in too easy English. Of course, for me, it’s easy to figure out. How about you? Easy? If so, I’ll give you a test.

By: Arghaeri

Arghaeri — Sat, 27 Jan 2007 14:10:38 +0000

I think the problem is we need a trnalsation of your english!!

By: Arghaeri

Arghaeri — Sat, 27 Jan 2007 14:07:22 +0000

I think the problem is we can’t understand your english!!

By: ●~*

●~* — Sat, 27 Jan 2007 11:26:12 +0000

Dogbertt, I need your translation if Sperwer caanot read Korean.

By: ●~*

●~* — Sat, 27 Jan 2007 11:24:55 +0000

Sperwer,
?????????
It’s my turn to say “What is it you’re trying to say?
“.

Of course, Twist Kim’s case crossed the threshold of the court and the court ruled. OK?
And the punishment is fine of 10mil won.

You wondered the last sentence of the reporter, didn’t it?
And I wrote the reporter was not correct.

Don’t you know hearsay knowledge? Gosh!
I know it by bla bla. OK?

Which case are you pointing out? ?????
You know that I was not writing about Twist Kim’s case.

If you say about the “dismissal” form , no fine was imposed, for no indictment was done. 기소독점권을 가진 검찰 측에서 기소를 하지 않은 거에요. 그러니까, 명예훼손죄의 구성요건에 ‘포섭되는’ 행위라고 생각하지 않은 거죠. 그리고 그러한 행위를 처벌할 법이 없다고 판단한 거구요. 해당법규 찾아서 법을 screening하잖아요. 아휴, 설명 어려워. 그러니까 법원 가기 전에 기소여부에서, 검찰에서 불기소처분 때려서 끝났다구요. OK?