<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Look Back at Kimsoft - &#8220;Japanese Militarism&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rjkoehler.com/2006/11/11/a-look-back-at-kimsoft-japanese-militarism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2006/11/11/a-look-back-at-kimsoft-japanese-militarism/</link>
	<description>Korea... in Blog Format</description>
	<pubDate>Tue,  2 Dec 2008 00:22:35 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: lirelou</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2006/11/11/a-look-back-at-kimsoft-japanese-militarism/#comment-55316</link>
		<dc:creator>lirelou</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2006 03:15:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/2006/11/11/a-look-back-at-kimsoft-japanese-militarism/#comment-55316</guid>
		<description>Agree with Michael #18. My problem with Kimsoft is that he never seems to synthesize the articles he includes, opting for the obvious ultra-nationalist hyperbole even when his cited evidence contradicts the very point he is pushing. I think the drug allusions detract from understanding "Lee Wha-rang" motivation, and suspect that he would make an interesting study of how someone who has benefitted greatly from his association with both the United States and Americans, can become so internally alienated that they take on the mantle of ultra-nationalism. It is a phenomenon that afflicts more than Koreans, as a perusal of any Puerto Rican, Chicano, or Yellow Power nationalist website will show. Except in Kimsoft's case, there is some worthwhile history included, though careful winnowing is required.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree with Michael #18. My problem with Kimsoft is that he never seems to synthesize the articles he includes, opting for the obvious ultra-nationalist hyperbole even when his cited evidence contradicts the very point he is pushing. I think the drug allusions detract from understanding &#8220;Lee Wha-rang&#8221; motivation, and suspect that he would make an interesting study of how someone who has benefitted greatly from his association with both the United States and Americans, can become so internally alienated that they take on the mantle of ultra-nationalism. It is a phenomenon that afflicts more than Koreans, as a perusal of any Puerto Rican, Chicano, or Yellow Power nationalist website will show. Except in Kimsoft&#8217;s case, there is some worthwhile history included, though careful winnowing is required.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: seouldout</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2006/11/11/a-look-back-at-kimsoft-japanese-militarism/#comment-55186</link>
		<dc:creator>seouldout</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2006 03:07:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/2006/11/11/a-look-back-at-kimsoft-japanese-militarism/#comment-55186</guid>
		<description>Stumbled across this &lt;a href="http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/943949/posts" rel="nofollow"&gt; paper&lt;/a&gt; by Kim Young-Sik, Ph.D (of the Korea WebWeekly, which appears to be also kimsoft).  Evidently used at a MeetKorea-sponsored event at the U of W.  Scroll down a bit and note that Kim cites Lee Wha Rang six times.  Lee's writings been used much by others?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stumbled across this <a href="http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/943949/posts" rel="nofollow"> paper</a> by Kim Young-Sik, Ph.D (of the Korea WebWeekly, which appears to be also kimsoft).  Evidently used at a MeetKorea-sponsored event at the U of W.  Scroll down a bit and note that Kim cites Lee Wha Rang six times.  Lee&#8217;s writings been used much by others?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Sheehan</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2006/11/11/a-look-back-at-kimsoft-japanese-militarism/#comment-55148</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Sheehan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Nov 2006 06:29:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/2006/11/11/a-look-back-at-kimsoft-japanese-militarism/#comment-55148</guid>
		<description>wjk wrote:

' ... Michael Sheehan. I thought a lot of what kimsoft covered were legit and made a lot of sense. That’s just me.'

My reply:

I think there is some confusion between Kimsoft's role as a portal for articles authored by others (whose sources were properly cited by Kimsoft and I found to be fairly distributed across the political spectrum) and the articles personally written by Lee Wha Rang which, in general, bordered on the delusional.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wjk wrote:</p>
<p>&#8216; &#8230; Michael Sheehan. I thought a lot of what kimsoft covered were legit and made a lot of sense. That’s just me.&#8217;</p>
<p>My reply:</p>
<p>I think there is some confusion between Kimsoft&#8217;s role as a portal for articles authored by others (whose sources were properly cited by Kimsoft and I found to be fairly distributed across the political spectrum) and the articles personally written by Lee Wha Rang which, in general, bordered on the delusional.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zonath</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2006/11/11/a-look-back-at-kimsoft-japanese-militarism/#comment-55141</link>
		<dc:creator>Zonath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Nov 2006 23:33:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/2006/11/11/a-look-back-at-kimsoft-japanese-militarism/#comment-55141</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Yup … this is what “smokin’ dat cheap shit” does to your brain.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

You mean crack, right?

&lt;blockquote&gt;His site has not been updated at least since last year. I think he might be in bad health.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Smothered by his own bullshit, perhaps?  Seriously, this guy has about as much credibility as &lt;a href="http://www.timecube.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;Gene Ray&lt;/a&gt;.  The lunatic fringers in the same class as the Kimsoft guy eventually do run out of steam...  After all, Kimsoft's been up for a decade or so, hasn't it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Yup … this is what “smokin’ dat cheap shit” does to your brain.</p></blockquote>
<p>You mean crack, right?</p>
<blockquote><p>His site has not been updated at least since last year. I think he might be in bad health.</p></blockquote>
<p>Smothered by his own bullshit, perhaps?  Seriously, this guy has about as much credibility as <a href="http://www.timecube.com/" rel="nofollow">Gene Ray</a>.  The lunatic fringers in the same class as the Kimsoft guy eventually do run out of steam&#8230;  After all, Kimsoft&#8217;s been up for a decade or so, hasn&#8217;t it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cm</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2006/11/11/a-look-back-at-kimsoft-japanese-militarism/#comment-55137</link>
		<dc:creator>cm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Nov 2006 21:38:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/2006/11/11/a-look-back-at-kimsoft-japanese-militarism/#comment-55137</guid>
		<description>"I wonder why _you_ voted with your feet."

Voted with my feet? I did no such thing.
You assume too much.

But you obviously did. Aren't you in Korea?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I wonder why _you_ voted with your feet.&#8221;</p>
<p>Voted with my feet? I did no such thing.<br />
You assume too much.</p>
<p>But you obviously did. Aren&#8217;t you in Korea?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cm</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2006/11/11/a-look-back-at-kimsoft-japanese-militarism/#comment-55136</link>
		<dc:creator>cm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Nov 2006 21:36:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/2006/11/11/a-look-back-at-kimsoft-japanese-militarism/#comment-55136</guid>
		<description>"I wonder why _you_ voted with your feet."

Voted with my feet? I did no such thing.
You assume too much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I wonder why _you_ voted with your feet.&#8221;</p>
<p>Voted with my feet? I did no such thing.<br />
You assume too much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wjk</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2006/11/11/a-look-back-at-kimsoft-japanese-militarism/#comment-55135</link>
		<dc:creator>wjk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Nov 2006 21:12:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/2006/11/11/a-look-back-at-kimsoft-japanese-militarism/#comment-55135</guid>
		<description>dogbertt, have you ever ran into a North Korean spy/sympathizer in the states?

Michael Sheehan.  I thought a lot of what kimsoft covered were legit and made a lot of sense.  That's just me.  

His site has not been updated at least since last year.  I think he might be in bad health.  Anyone else know of anything?  I wish him a long healthy life.  Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dogbertt, have you ever ran into a North Korean spy/sympathizer in the states?</p>
<p>Michael Sheehan.  I thought a lot of what kimsoft covered were legit and made a lot of sense.  That&#8217;s just me.  </p>
<p>His site has not been updated at least since last year.  I think he might be in bad health.  Anyone else know of anything?  I wish him a long healthy life.  Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Sheehan</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2006/11/11/a-look-back-at-kimsoft-japanese-militarism/#comment-55132</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Sheehan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Nov 2006 19:21:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/2006/11/11/a-look-back-at-kimsoft-japanese-militarism/#comment-55132</guid>
		<description>Lee Wha Rang?

You're kidding ... right?

Please ... tell me that you're not publishing his 'trash'!!

Originally, I'd thought his articles were tongue-in-cheek spoofs of the Korean situation ... turns out that the guy was completely serious.

Yup ... this is what "smokin' dat cheap shit" does to your brain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lee Wha Rang?</p>
<p>You&#8217;re kidding &#8230; right?</p>
<p>Please &#8230; tell me that you&#8217;re not publishing his &#8216;trash&#8217;!!</p>
<p>Originally, I&#8217;d thought his articles were tongue-in-cheek spoofs of the Korean situation &#8230; turns out that the guy was completely serious.</p>
<p>Yup &#8230; this is what &#8220;smokin&#8217; dat cheap shit&#8221; does to your brain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul H.</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2006/11/11/a-look-back-at-kimsoft-japanese-militarism/#comment-55129</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul H.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Nov 2006 15:29:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/2006/11/11/a-look-back-at-kimsoft-japanese-militarism/#comment-55129</guid>
		<description>Hmm, in the interest of fairness to Mr. Lee, evidently former Imperial navy minesweepers were used in Korean waters during 1950.   95 (!) of them according to this source; so much for my surmise that US Navy/Air Corps had sunk everything worthwhile and that all Japanese Imperial organized military forces had been disbanded by MacArthur.  

Maybe these craft had been based in bypassed central/south pacific islands, or Singapore/Dutch East Indies, or Chinese coast, don't know offhand how sizable these vessels were.  

http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/japan/auerohinterview.htm

This oral history is pretty abstruse and hard to read, mostly concerns Cold War history of the JMSDF, but if you can suppress your yawns enough to take a brief interest in military history, I skimmed it and found this (scroll down to Auer's 6th answer): 

"...Prior to being assigned as Political Adviser in Yokosuka, I was a PhD research student writing a history of the Maritime Self-Defense Force. I had done my Master's thesis under Professor Edwin O. Reischauer. I had been able to get declassified the fact that during the Korean War, a number of former Imperial Japanese Navy minesweepers, which had been kept on active duty to sweep mines, were sent to Korea under the order of the U.S. Occupation...." 

There's a bit more which you can see for yourself, I don't want to make the quote any longer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, in the interest of fairness to Mr. Lee, evidently former Imperial navy minesweepers were used in Korean waters during 1950.   95 (!) of them according to this source; so much for my surmise that US Navy/Air Corps had sunk everything worthwhile and that all Japanese Imperial organized military forces had been disbanded by MacArthur.  </p>
<p>Maybe these craft had been based in bypassed central/south pacific islands, or Singapore/Dutch East Indies, or Chinese coast, don&#8217;t know offhand how sizable these vessels were.  </p>
<p><a href="http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/japan/auerohinterview.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/j.....erview.htm</a></p>
<p>This oral history is pretty abstruse and hard to read, mostly concerns Cold War history of the JMSDF, but if you can suppress your yawns enough to take a brief interest in military history, I skimmed it and found this (scroll down to Auer&#8217;s 6th answer): </p>
<p>&#8220;&#8230;Prior to being assigned as Political Adviser in Yokosuka, I was a PhD research student writing a history of the Maritime Self-Defense Force. I had done my Master&#8217;s thesis under Professor Edwin O. Reischauer. I had been able to get declassified the fact that during the Korean War, a number of former Imperial Japanese Navy minesweepers, which had been kept on active duty to sweep mines, were sent to Korea under the order of the U.S. Occupation&#8230;.&#8221; </p>
<p>There&#8217;s a bit more which you can see for yourself, I don&#8217;t want to make the quote any longer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul H.</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2006/11/11/a-look-back-at-kimsoft-japanese-militarism/#comment-55128</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul H.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Nov 2006 14:52:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/2006/11/11/a-look-back-at-kimsoft-japanese-militarism/#comment-55128</guid>
		<description>The remainder of my just previous disappeared in the ether.  Maybe the ghost of Genghis Khan's Korean wife intercepted it. 

Anyway, from my quoted example of Lee Wha Rang's paper, I surmise (without doing any research) that the second to the last sentence is true (ie the quote from the Japanese univ professor).  Lee provides no footnotes for the other quoted "facts", and they certainly don't jive with any military history I remember.  

But I suppose that if you're going to just make up history out of whole cloth for a gullible audience, it's a good idea to hang the invented history on at least one framework of fact. 

Between the end of the battle for Okinawa (May? 1945) and the Japanese surrender on 15 August, numerous US carrier task forces (also at least one British one too I think) swept up and down the Japanese home islands and (I suspect) sank every remaining Imperial Navy ship larger than a patrol craft.  There was one Japanese battleship left above water (the Nagoya?); a picture exists of it after the surrender, it's still roughly recognizable as a battleship only because it had been sunk at dockside.  It was later fixed up enough to be towed and used as a US atomic bomb target.  

During the US occupation period (45-52), I doubt if MacArthur and his successor Ridgeway allowed the Japanese to have any naval vessels larger than coastal patrol boats.   The Imperial Navy was formally dissolved in 1947 and the Japanese Maritime self-defense force was created in 1954 with surplus US WWII destroyers.  

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imperial_Japanese_Navy
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japan_Maritime_Self-Defense_Force

Maybe Lee Wha Rang just decided to do a little creative "projection" in time and space for a potential Korean audience.   The whole thing seems rather unreal, like seeing a statue suddenly come to life and begin to speak, but maybe that's just because I'm an American and therefore lack the mystic ethnic bond that automatically unites all Koreans in a common understanding without any words needing to be exchanged.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The remainder of my just previous disappeared in the ether.  Maybe the ghost of Genghis Khan&#8217;s Korean wife intercepted it. </p>
<p>Anyway, from my quoted example of Lee Wha Rang&#8217;s paper, I surmise (without doing any research) that the second to the last sentence is true (ie the quote from the Japanese univ professor).  Lee provides no footnotes for the other quoted &#8220;facts&#8221;, and they certainly don&#8217;t jive with any military history I remember.  </p>
<p>But I suppose that if you&#8217;re going to just make up history out of whole cloth for a gullible audience, it&#8217;s a good idea to hang the invented history on at least one framework of fact. </p>
<p>Between the end of the battle for Okinawa (May? 1945) and the Japanese surrender on 15 August, numerous US carrier task forces (also at least one British one too I think) swept up and down the Japanese home islands and (I suspect) sank every remaining Imperial Navy ship larger than a patrol craft.  There was one Japanese battleship left above water (the Nagoya?); a picture exists of it after the surrender, it&#8217;s still roughly recognizable as a battleship only because it had been sunk at dockside.  It was later fixed up enough to be towed and used as a US atomic bomb target.  </p>
<p>During the US occupation period (45-52), I doubt if MacArthur and his successor Ridgeway allowed the Japanese to have any naval vessels larger than coastal patrol boats.   The Imperial Navy was formally dissolved in 1947 and the Japanese Maritime self-defense force was created in 1954 with surplus US WWII destroyers.  </p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imperial_Japanese_Navy" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I.....anese_Navy</a><br />
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japan_Maritime_Self-Defense_Force" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J.....ense_Force</a></p>
<p>Maybe Lee Wha Rang just decided to do a little creative &#8220;projection&#8221; in time and space for a potential Korean audience.   The whole thing seems rather unreal, like seeing a statue suddenly come to life and begin to speak, but maybe that&#8217;s just because I&#8217;m an American and therefore lack the mystic ethnic bond that automatically unites all Koreans in a common understanding without any words needing to be exchanged.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
