North Korean nuke crap, cynically written

  • The U.S. is floating around the Security Council a draft resolution that would place an embargo on anything North Korea could use for its nuclear and missile programs under Chapter 7 of the U.N. Charter. It would also call for inspecting cargo going in and out of North Korea—something the North Koreans are unlikely to willingly accept without at least a couple of shots fired.

    The Japanese were particularly harsh, calling for severe sanctions that would bar North Korean ships and planes from traveling outside the country, ban the import of North Korean goods and place an international travel ban on high-ranking North Korean officials.

    If I were a betting man, I’d place my money on some form of sanctions regime being placed on North Korea—at this point, it’s hard to imagine the Security Council failing to agree to punish North Korea in some way. But I don’t see China (or Russia) agreeing to an invasive and/or potentially destabilizing sanctions regime. Sure, there will be lots of verbal condemnation of North Korea, but it will be mixed with exhortations to keep a cool head and not back North Korea into a corner.

  • The Rohmeister met with political leaders and several former presidents today to discuss the fireworks up North. Most of what he said was fairly reasonable—Seoul needs to examine what impact the nuclear test will have on Korea’s drive to retake wartime operational command from the United States, and Cheong Wa Dae needs to ask whether an intra-Korean summit would be of any use in this situation. Understandably, he also defended his policy of engaging North Korea, saying that while North Korea’s nuclear test forces Seoul to reconsider its engagement policy, we shouldn’t jump to conclude that said engagement policy brought about North Korea’s nuclear test (less understandably, he added that the engagement policy had reduced public insecurity by reducing tensions with North Korea and helped economic vitality and faith in the country’s economic stability). He went on to say that the sky isn’t falling—yet—and that the situation was still manageable despite the increased threat.

    Perhaps more interesting was the discussion he had with ex-presidents Chun Doo-hwan, Kim Young-sam and Kim Dae-jung. Or the discussions said three presidents had between themselves. The two Kims, in particular, apparently ripped into each other—Kim YS called on Roh not only to officially declare the Sunshine Policy dead and buried and terminate several intra-Korean projects (Kaesong, Kumgangsan, etc.), but also to publicly apologize to the people for pursuing the policy. Kim DJ, of course, defended his baby, saying it had developed intra-Korean relations as it was supposed to and produced results. The lack of progress, said the Nobel Peace Prize winner, was due to poor relations between Pyongyang and Washington (to get a feel for DJ’s view of the world, click here).

    DJ further expounded on what Roh should do. He suggested three options: war, sanctions and direct talks between North Korea and the United States. War was unthinkable, and at any rate, the United States didn’t have the resources to fight one at the moment, he said. Sanctions were also problematic—they might hurt North Korea, he said, but Pyongyang might retaliate with provocations at the DMZ or NLL. If they were to do so, it would lead to the Korean economy contracting and foreign investors pulling out en masse. Finally, concerning direct talks between Pyongyang and Washington, he noted that even in the United States, the Democratic Party and former Secretary of State James Baker were calling for such talks.

    He then said a real funny, namely, that prior to the nuclear test, South Korea had actively led efforts to stop North Korea from testing a nuclear device (room erupts into hysterical laughter), but that after the test, things would be led at the UN or between the four great powers (the United States, China, Japan and Russia), so there was no need for Seoul to take the lead in sanctions.

    Strangely enough, it was left to Chun Doo-hwan—yes, the Butcher of Gwangju—to play the role of “mood maker,” and according to the PRESSian account, he was by far the most gracious geezer in the room. He was very respectful to President Roh, and tried his best to get the two Kims to play nice by changing conversation topics. As far as his advice went, he counseled Roh to work on strengthening the Korea-U.S. alliance and postpone—for a good while—moves to reassume wartime operation command from USFK.

  • Leave it to the Grand National Party to be unhelpful. A parliamentary resolution to condemn yesterday’s nuclear test by North Korea didn’t even see the Assembly floor when it died in committee thanks to sharp differences between ruling Uri Party and opposition GNP lawmakers. The Uri Party wanted a joint ruling party-opposition party-government condemnation, while the GNP wanted the resolution to include a suspension of the Kaesong Industrial Park project and a basic change in the government’s North Korea policies. For the record, I happened to support what the GNP wants regarding Kaesong and a shift in North Korea policy. But there are times to be a dick and this wasn’t one of them.
  • OK, so what does Unification Minister Lee Jong-seok think? Well, because they knew you wanted to know, Yonhap reports that Lee doesn’t believe the Sunshine Policy to be completely flawed, nor does he believe the government should completely abandon engagement with the North. He did admit, however, that because of the new situation, there needed to be some changes in Seoul’s North Korea policies.

    Prior to addressing the National Assembly, however, Lee was harangued by GNP lawmaker Kim Yong-kap, the man Oranckay once referred to as “John Birch Society Korea Branch posterboy.” Kim called Lee and his boss “people who have substantively helped North Korea’s nuclear development.” He then demanded that prior to issuing his report to parliament, Lee should apologize for failing to stop North Korea from conducting a nuclear test. Kim added that if he were Lee, he would have “jumped in the Han River.”

    Yes, he actually said that. To Lee’s face. During a parliamentary session.

    The piece (by left-wing Internet newspaper PRESSian) also cites several Uri Party lawmakers as saying that despite the nuclear test, engagement and economic exchanges must go on. This is something we should probably watch as we discuss enforcing sanctions on North Korea.

    Oh, more on Kim Yong-kap being Kim Yong-kap here.

  • OK, now this could be of interest—Vice Foreign Minister Yoo Myung-hwan told the National Assembly today that Korea would participate in the PSI on a case-by-case basis.
  • North Korea conducted more missile tests today, with a North Korean soldier chucking rocks at photojournalists across the Yalu River. The intelligence community is in disagreement, however, over whether the North will be able to place warheads on the stones in the near future, although there is general agreement they can place them in snowballs should an emergency break out in the winter months.

12 Comments

  1. Posted October 10, 2006 at 7:23 pm | Permalink

    “Sanctions were also problematic—they might hurt North Korea, he said, but Pyongyang might retaliate with provocations at the DMZ or NLL. If they were to do so, it would lead to the Korean economy contracting and foreign investors pulling out en masse”

    It’s all about the economy, isn’t it…Michael Breen mentioned just that fact in his piece:
    Nuclear Test Stabs Seoul’s Unrequited Love

  2. Haisan your flag
    Posted October 10, 2006 at 7:23 pm | Permalink

    I’d be more impressed by the Japanese if they cut off the hundreds of millions of dollars and other support being sent to North Korea by the various Korean pachinko parlors and other pro-North organizations in Japan.

  3. Posted October 10, 2006 at 7:53 pm | Permalink

    Chun always does seem to be Korea’s best former president.

  4. Posted October 10, 2006 at 8:05 pm | Permalink

    Oranckay, I assume that you’re emphasizing the whole ‘former’ part in your last comment.

  5. Posted October 10, 2006 at 8:29 pm | Permalink

    Strangely enough, it was left to Chun Doo-hwan—yes, the Butcher of Gwangju—to play the role of “mood maker,” and according to the PRESSian account, he was by far the most gracious geezer in the room. He was very respectful to President Roh, and tried his best to get the two Kims to play nice by changing conversation topics. As far as his advice went, he counseled Roh to work on strengthening the Korea-U.S. alliance and postpone—for a good while—moves to reassume wartime operation command from USFK.

    This should not come strangely at all, since his generation gave the technology to North Korea with instructions to save it for a rainy day in the first place…oops, maybe we shouldn’t let that cat out of the bag yet.

  6. Posted October 10, 2006 at 9:31 pm | Permalink

    Nice summary of the events and discussions, Robert … and amusing, too, despite the topic.

    Jeffery Hodges

    * * *

  7. Posted October 10, 2006 at 11:06 pm | Permalink

    This should not come strangely at all, since his generation gave the technology to North Korea with instructions to save it for a rainy day in the first place…oops, maybe we shouldn’t let that cat out of the bag yet.

    Pray tell!

  8. Posted October 11, 2006 at 8:00 am | Permalink

    Sperwer, I can’t. It’s a long story, and everyone will think I’m crazy (that is if they don’t already).

    Just think of Corea as one [machi]nation, under god (money), with fine killing liberty and injustice for all.

    Then you may have the epiphany and will never fall for a Korean lie again.

  9. Posted October 11, 2006 at 9:15 am | Permalink

    Mark:

    I had the Korean epiphany a long time ago, and I can imagine the broad outlines. The detailed dirt would be interesting, though. My email is sperwer@sperwerslog.com; my lips are sealed.

  10. Posted October 11, 2006 at 9:38 am | Permalink

    Sperwer, I’ll take that as a tasker…it will take me awhile to weave the truth together and filter out the lies in some sort of concise, cogent fashion, but since you’ve shown interest, I’ll let you know when I do.

  11. Posted October 11, 2006 at 9:43 am | Permalink

    By the way, all you field grades aghast that I’m commenting during duty hours, for your information I am patiently awaiting orders for the sandbox so I can clear and there is absolutely nothing else productive I may be doing now, so don’t get your pants in a bind over it. Go ahead and call JAG or the King if you want.

    Thank you.

  12. Posted October 11, 2006 at 10:35 am | Permalink

    Sperwer, I’ve stumbled across this group of erudite scholars who have already done most of the work, so I’ll leave you with the Nuclear Threat Initiative. What you must do now is get a big scrapboard like Mel Gibson in Conspiracy Theory. Print out the South Korean chronology during the 70s and compare with the North Korean chronology during the same time period. Pay particular attention to Jimmy Carter’s plan to withdraw USFK over 4 years beginning in 78-79.

    Presto! Corea…playing us like a fiddle for decades, and they’re about to do it again.

    Will this suffice?

2 Trackbacks

  1. [...] For today’s developments on the DPRK nuke test issue, read TMV and Infidel Links (either in the sidebar or at the top). Arms Control Wonk concludes the spectacle was a dud. Sun Bin also has some impressive technical data. Jodi at The Asia Pages has a true pearl on Busanite’s real views on the nuke test. Michael Breen (via Lost Nomad) takes a stab at South Korean myopia. Robert at TMH digs for some South orean wisdom and finds nothing new. Liz Mair at GOP Progress explains why sanctions are not a viable policy (but then places her hopes with Beijing). Professor Drezner opts for sanctions, and so much more. Sean Aqui at Midtopia (via Donklephant) has some valuable considerations: [...]

  2. By Blogs on North Korea’s Nuke Test at DPRK Studies on October 11, 2006 at 1:40 am

    [...] Of course Robert’s ‘breaking news’ post and this update are required reading, as is this from Joshua (now at OneFreeKorea) on a possible embargo. Yohaeng Ilgi looks at the options, and USinKorea goes out on a limb with a prediction; no North Korea within two years. Gypsy Scholar posts on bluffing vs. baffling, and Kevin sums up the situation for his Dad. For some humor, see Beloved Leader and The Yangpa. But Kevin’s post on student reactions to the test demands a quote: One student surprised me with her take on Kim Jong Il. “I sort of liked him until today,” she said, “But now I hate him.” I kept a poker face, but my guts were writhing and my testicles kept popping in and out of my body like turtle heads. My asshole started shrieking ultrasonically; little edible dogs screamed in response and then exploded outside our building (NB: I’ve decided to name any future canine pet “Yummy”). Liked Kim Jong Il? [...]

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*

Bad Behavior has blocked 23387 access attempts in the last 7 days.