Comments on: The Neglect in a Title http://www.rjkoehler.com/2006/10/04/the-neglect-in-a-title/ Korea... in Blog Format Sun, 7 Sep 2008 05:52:13 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1 By: Sperwer http://www.rjkoehler.com/2006/10/04/the-neglect-in-a-title/#comment-50830 Sperwer Wed, 04 Oct 2006 10:54:16 +0000 http://www.rjkoehler.com/2006/10/04/the-neglect-in-a-title/#comment-50830 <blockquote>now we hear that the Kwanghwa gate is to be moved and reduced in size - correcting the nefarious activities of the Japanese when they owned (illegally) Korea </blockquote> That bullshit - playing the Japan card to distract attention from the fact that the only reason the gate is going to be moved is to realign it wth Sejongno, which is going to be cropped of four lanes. It's bad enough that they're going to fuck up the traffic pattern; now they're going to destroy the symmetry of the refurbished palace

now we hear that the Kwanghwa gate is to be moved and reduced in size - correcting the nefarious activities of the Japanese when they owned (illegally) Korea

That bullshit - playing the Japan card to distract attention from the fact that the only reason the gate is going to be moved is to realign it wth Sejongno, which is going to be cropped of four lanes. It’s bad enough that they’re going to fuck up the traffic pattern; now they’re going to destroy the symmetry of the refurbished palace

]]> By: captbbq http://www.rjkoehler.com/2006/10/04/the-neglect-in-a-title/#comment-50823 captbbq Wed, 04 Oct 2006 09:38:13 +0000 http://www.rjkoehler.com/2006/10/04/the-neglect-in-a-title/#comment-50823 <blockquote>...have been left untouched ...</blockquote> As if this is insufficient. If they lasted since the Shilla Kingdom was in style they'll last until the US pulls out or moves the base. Not ***king with things ought to be enough.

…have been left untouched …

As if this is insufficient. If they lasted since the Shilla Kingdom was in style they’ll last until the US pulls out or moves the base. Not ***king with things ought to be enough.

]]> By: SomeguyinKorea http://www.rjkoehler.com/2006/10/04/the-neglect-in-a-title/#comment-50798 SomeguyinKorea Wed, 04 Oct 2006 01:02:41 +0000 http://www.rjkoehler.com/2006/10/04/the-neglect-in-a-title/#comment-50798 "I think the title could have been a little better and a little less misleading….." Yes and no. I think the title is refering to the findings of the report. A big problem with the article is that isn't cohesive. Worse yet, it mentions the renovation of the palace, as if to show that Koreans are doing something to protect Korean heritage, but the USFK isn't. “I think the title could have been a little better and a little less misleading…..”

Yes and no. I think the title is refering to the findings of the report. A big problem with the article is that isn’t cohesive. Worse yet, it mentions the renovation of the palace, as if to show that Koreans are doing something to protect Korean heritage, but the USFK isn’t.

]]>