The Dong-A Ilbo ran a series of pieces today on Korea’s latest export to the United States—prostitutes.
The English section was kind enough to translate one of them, but alas only one.
The most moving one—and the one that was translated, talks with 15 Koreans women locked up in a detention center in Albuquerque, New Mexico. The women were busted during “Operation Cold Comfort,” a major crackdown on Korean sex shops on the East Coast.
Poor lasses seemed to have gotten a terrible fright with ‘dem scary U.S. cops with their guns and all busting in to raid their places of employment.
Why did they come to America, of all places, to peddle their asses? Well, according to the girls, once you’re past your mid-20s, it’s hard to make money whoring in Korea. But Americans, stupid creatures they are, couldn’t tell how old Asian women were, so they could make 20,000-30,000 U.S. dollars a month. Or so they’d heard.
One of the 15 enterprising women was a middle-aged woman who represented an intriguing synthesis of Korea’s hooker exports and Koreans’ craze for sending their children overseas for study. The 40-year-old woman with a middle-school daughter came to the United States —alone— in May on a tourist visa to prepare to send her kid to a U.S. school. She went to centers specializing in overseas study, but heard it cost more than 30 million won a year. So our entrepreneurial mother set out to make a bit of coin before bringing her daughter over.
One of the 15, a 58-year-old woman who did the girls’ cooking and cleaning, died of late-stage cancer while in custody.
Another of the 15, a 62-year-old woman who also did cooking and cleaning, was there to help her son, who was studying music at a U.S. university. Having come to the country 5 years ago, she theoretically lived in a one-room apartment with her son, but was so busy she only went home once or twice a month.
Three of the girls engaged in sex trade-related work prior to coming to the United States. Most of the girls claimed they got into the business after failing to find legal work in the country. They did say, however, that they’d seen many girls around them who’d come to the United States to flee Korea’s two-year-old Special Law on Prostitution. But not them, of course.
Only one of the girls claimed her passport had been taken by the pimp after her arrival in the United States, and none of the girls claimed to have been locked up or confined. The girls made varying amounts of money, although one made 20 million won a month (to put that into perspective, I make somewhere between 2 and 3 million a month). Some of the girls had sent the bulk of their earnings to their families in Korea.
A spirited and clearly merchantalist-minded 35-year-old working girl said, “I know people curse us for disgracing the country. But poverty was incurable. With the Korean economy a mess, each of the girls here remitted some 10,000-20,000 U.S. dollars a month.”
Well, at least they’re bringing in more foreign exchange than Daewoo.
The biggest tear-jerker was a 38-year-old woman. She ran a business in Korea, but when trouble struck, she came to the United States on her lonesome. She began peddling her ass to earn money for a plane ticket so she could go to Korea for the Chuseok holiday. Crying, she said, “I promised my husband and son that I would prepare with my own two hands the ancestral rites ceremony for my parents-in-law this Chuseok…”
No, I didn’t make that up. It’s in the Dong-A Ilbo.
Another 40-year-old ho lent to people around her some 20,000 of the 30,000 U.S. dollars she’d made, but now facing forced deportation, the likelihood of her getting paid back was growing slimmer and slimmer.
Meanwhile, it looks like some of the newer forms of prostitution in Korea are already being exported to the United States. Among these is the bangseokjip, a form of prostitution that took hold in Korea following the Special Law on Prostitution. Girls rent an small apartment in residential areas, and clients visit for booze and sexual services.
Besides the bangseokjip, there are the trusty massage parlors fronting for prostitution. According to the Korean embassy in the United States, 90 percent of these places are owned by Koreans.
According to the Polaris Project, a U.S. civic group dedicated to eradicating human trafficking, there were some 85 massage parlors in the DC area alone, and about 1,000 places nationwide employing Korean prostitutes.
Cal State professor Timothy Lim, quoting U.S. government figures putting the number of Korean women who enter the country through Canada at 400-500 a month, claimed there were some 5,000 Korean women engaging in prostitution in the United States.
A Korean-American who lives in Los Angeles said that if you go to public phone booths in Koreatown, you can often find fliers with the phone numbers of Korean women written on them.
A report by the NIS, the Korean intelligence agency, estimated the number of Korean prostitutes in the Los Angeles area at 200-300, although the number shoots up to 1,000 if you include women doing it part-time.
One NIS official, apparently taking off from tracking North Korean agents, said Korean girls with nowhere to go after the enactment of the Special Law on Prostitution were being lured to the United States by Internet cafes and word of mouth claiming they could make 20 million-30 million a month in the country. He said most start off their U.S. league careers on the west coast and then move east.
Great, New York gets the used hos. Go figure.
U.S. authorities look at the issue of Korean prostitution as one of human trafficking and human rights violations. They are particularly concerned about how the recruiting and smuggling of the girls have become organized. A recent report by U.S. immigration authorities summarized the process as follows:
- Recruiters in Korea and the United States recruit girls looking to take care of their families and provide them with transportation funds and money for other expenses;
- They provide the girls fake passports and smuggle them in to the United States through Canada or Mexico;
- In the process, the girls accumulate ten of thousands of dollars in debts;
- The girls get to work under the watchful eyes of the smugglers or pimps;
- Their passports are taken away, and the money the girls make is used to pay off their debts. To keep them from fleeing, they are threatened with being reported to immigration or having their families in Korea informed of their chosen profession.
The girls interviewed by the Dong-A Ilbo, however, said passports would be taken or girls confined only when recruiters/smugglers paid for their entire trip over, and they’d hardly seen such cases.
They also said that most of the clients at the so-called bangseokjip were Korean, but 95 percent of the massage parlor clients were locals.
BTW, the Korean consul general in Washington is apparently a very busy man thanks to this issue, which according to him not only tarnishes the reputation of the local Korean community, but could also be a roadblock to Korea being included in the U.S. visa-waiver program.
Sphere: Related Content









41 Comments
Robert, this could do without your sneering tone toward the women who work as prostitutes. Yes, it’s illegal — but it shouldn’t be. Whores, assuming they’re off the streetcorners, don’t bother anyone except for busybodies who can’t mind their own business. However, they are frequently themselves the victims of horrible crimes ranging from false imprisonment to murder. The hardships and indignities those women frequently endure (it’s hard to know what to make of the lack of reported abuses, except that on the lower rungs of the economic ladder Koreans are generally so horrible as employers the girls don’t know otherwise) — in the case of these Korean women, at the hands of their co-ethnic traffickers/slavers — could be abolished at a stroke by more states making prostitution legal and the Federal gummint authorizing short-term “guest worker” visas for prostitution work. Instead Americans get treated to the periodic “crackdown” of the sort which is so effective here in Korea.
And yes, I know that some of the women enter the game freely and make misrepresentations on their visa applications to come to America knowing that their objective is to become a prostitute and earn US$10,000-20,000 in tax-free cash per month. That’s wrong. However we can separate the visa and tax fraud questions from the other issues. I feel sorry for all these women who feel “used up” by 25. But America, what a country! You can get men to pay you for sex into your 60s!
Well…Korea could also adjust its attitude toward women in education and employment, although I realize that would entail an epochal shift in the ajossis’ mindset, and then maybe fewer women would go into prostitution.
Legalizing prostitution in Holland did nothing to end trafficking, since most women work illegally there (is the pimp going to file the paperwork) and it would probably be the same in the U.S.
“Operation Cold Comfort”. Considering resolution 759 concerning the comfort women is going before the congress soon, the name of that operation is both ironic and timely.
Alas, I have to agree with Brendon Carr. the article could have done with less sneering…have to remember that women read these articles too.
That being said, there are some surprising figures here.
I’d have to disagree. No sneering should be spared on someone who knowingly and willingly breaks the law, and then cries when they get caught.
Sneering tone? I wasn’t that sneering, just a tad sarcastic. Anyway, I was definitely a lot less sneering than I am when transmitting reports on English teachers.
BTW, Brendon, I happend to agree with you that prostitution should be legal, that crackdowns are a joke, and the girls should be allowed to work in the U.S. on legal visas. Heck, if they can improve the quality of service in that sector of the economy, the country should actively encourage them to come over like they are with Korean nurses.
I’ll even go further and say that the girls are at least making money providing a valuable social service in which they are often highly skilled, which is more than I can say for a lot of foreigners in Korea, including myself.
As the article contains no information that these women were forced to come to the US and then engage in prostitution, should one feel sorry for them?
What these women did was illegal: they entered the country illegally, and they began working in an illegal trade. The article doesn’t mention that force was used to compel these women into prostitution. It does, however, refer to women who said that they felt that they could earn large sums of money for performance of their illegal services.
Sorry, but I have no compassion for the women whom the reporter interviewed. They’re criminals who got caught, and they don’t like it - well, boo-fucking-hoo.
I empathize with the girls. We’re in the same line of work.
Where are the zillion man march protests in the US demanding that we rid our society of crack/cocaine, heroin, etc..?
Fuck the Middle East! Let’s get rid of hard drugs in the USA. Where are all the peace-loving neo-hippies when it comes to the drug war?
Drugs in the US are like prostitutes in Korea; there’s a crackdown, a few arrests, and then things get shuffled around a bit. I can buy cocaine anywhere in the USA - it’s completely out of control. When is someone in charge going to eradicate illegal drug imports?
> When is someone in charge going to eradicate illegal drug imports?
I look forward to the day that someone around here find a way to link drug legalization, interracial sex and Dokdo. That will be the mother-of-all flame-war-threads-from-hell.
Prostitution is already legal in parts of Nevada. Is anyone aware of studies on how the working girls fare there?
Why do they need fake passports? Because they may have a criminal record under their real name? Or is it something else?
We can ship 150,000 soldiers over to the Middle East, spend millions of dollars a day to send troops up a road and establish a supply line, BUT we can’t take that same force and stop drugs from entering the US?
What would it take?
Why not take a 50 billion dollars and pay off the corruption? Set up contracts?
Obviously the US has the money to counteract the illegal pay-off. Obviously we can provide a better, secure, safe quality of life for our military and law enforcement than any cocaine drug lord.
So what’s the reason? Are we just keeping corruption at bay? We’re allowing drugs into the US. We encourage criminal activity.
Prostitution is not the problem!
It’s the solution!
Wow… “Operation Cold Comfort”… We do just have the best names for our operations, don’t we? It’s cute.
Jeebus… We can’t even keep semi-clueless illegal aliens from crossing the border, so how well do you think the gubment does against a sophisticated smuggling operation? Not too well. Anyhow, I’m sure there are plenty of drug pushers in the United States who are all in favor of increased border security. After all, it reduces competition (albeit very little) and keeps the price high.
Well… All the peace-loving neo-hippies are out there protesting the drug war. In case you’ve not noticed. And just the hard drugs?
Sorry Brendon - no sympathy from me. I at first wrote a long rebuttal to your comments - why we should care about women selling their bodies illegally in the United States but after rereading it I realized that I had just wasted my time. I remember going through class with you and I am sure that you probably heard the same talk that I did about the PI from the people around us.
As for the snide remarks - I thought Marmot was actually pretty laid back - far less witty than he normally is with the teachers.
Cold Comfort or Cold comport - was that an intentional error - a slight jab at Korean (Corean) pronunciation?
Both drugs and prostitution should be legalized. Having read this blog sporadically, I was a little taken aback by the editorialized translation of the article, ie, “Another 40-year-old ho”.
Although I admit that the woman selling herself so that she could prepare Chuseok rites for her in-laws is either funny or cringe inducing.
this is interesting. there are also large numbers of Taiwanese women doing the same thing in the US, maybe not as many as Koreans, but still very significant numbers.
Both drugs and prostitution should be legalized — and the money now wasted on busting and jailing the participants should be spent on education and health-care to ameliorate the resulting ill-effects — it’d be a LOT cheaper for the taxpayers of many nations…
Agree with legalizing prostitution and drugs, but not so high on spending tax-payer money to “ameliorate the resulting ill-effects” from doing something the participants know isn’t a healthy pursuit.
“The hardships and indignities those women frequently endure…could be abolished at a stroke by more states making prostitution legal and the Federal gummint authorizing short-term “guest worker” visas for prostitution work.”
If there’s such a thing as the “world’s oldest profession,” there’s also such a thing as ‘the world’s oldest excuse,’ namely, that legalizing prostitution (and drugs too), will suddenly and magically eliminate all of its ancillary problems and vices, including that damned statutory barrier that is apparently preventing people from B. Carr from truly having a great time.
Of course, this variety of logic is as ridiculous as it is cynical. (Hey, all we need to do is to take the “il” out of illegal.)
B. Carr, your aforementioned comment indicates that you are either a frequent user of such services, a trafficker, or a pimp/john yourself. whose intent is to pander to the vices, exploit, or prey upon such women for your own personal gain.
Accordingly, such a position is not helpful to the vast majority of law-abiding Korean-Americans whose aim is to protect their families and preserve dignity. Nor do your comments serve the public interest of the Korean public.
The trafficking, exploitation of and criminal acts of such women are destructive not only to these women themselves, but are ultimately disruptive to Asian-American communities in the U.S., as well as damaging to the reputation of those law-abiding Koreans who do travel abroad in the U.S. and elsewhere.
Of course, I’m not gonna let the johns and pimps off the hook either. They are fully culpable too.
I’m a libertarian. I don’t have to be a consumer (or provider) of prostitution services, or take drugs, or be a gun owner, or have an abortion, or marry some other dude, or curse on television, or be a wife-swapper (I was into it until they told me they were going to give her back!) to think such things should be legal even if some or all my neighbors think they may be immoral. Nobody’s forcing me to participate. If someone else wants to do so, that’s not my business and neither is it the government’s. But as you may know, H. Kim, because you’re smart, libertarians do have concern about other people’s liberties being infringed by government actors or by private actors — which makes human bondage more worthy of attention than a private transaction between consenting parties.
> Of course, this variety of logic is as ridiculous as it is cynical.
As opposed to the cynicism in declaring moral outrage without actually making any logical or factual points.
B. Carr,
If you can show me any evidence where these women are behaving as rational actors in a transaction 100% free of coercion, extortion, exploitation, manipulation, blackmail, fraud, deception, or threats of any kind extended directly or indirectly by a third party, I’ll buy into your libertarian argument and all that jazz about the government infringing upon the liberties of “consenting” parties.
Unfortunately though, these “private transactions” you’re referring aren’t really private at all. In fact, they’re rather public transactions where multiple parties, including johns, pimps, madams, traffickers, brokers, etc., are profitting illegally vis-a-vis the exploitation, manipulation and coercion of modern-day bond servants.
Last time I checked, indentured servitude and slavery are hardly legal, nor are they “consenting” statuses that require anyone’s justification or rationalization.
Btw, didn’t you watch Alex Haley’s “Roots” when you were growing up? C’mon now! Pull your head out of your ass! Whose rights and liberties are you going to defend? The rights of Kunta Kinte or the rights of the plantation owners, slave traders, traffickers, abusers, etc.? Do you really have the nerve to say that human trafficking is a victimless crime? I’m gonna say you’re smarter than that.
But how is that relevant to whether or not prostitution should be legal? Sure, you throw up a bunch of arguments about how prostitution is the equivalent to modern-day slavery, but isn’t that just a red herring? After all, human trafficking and slavery-like conditions exist in perfectly legal enterprises, as well as illegal ones. So does the fact that debt-slavery is utilized as a control on workers in (some) clothing manufacturers’ sweat shops mean that clothing should be outlawed? If you answer ‘no’ to that question, then I would ask you how, exactly, there’s a difference here. And I’m quite sure that nobody is advocating for the reestablishment of slavery in the USA, so since that’s already a crime, isn’t illegalizing prostitution just a means of punishing the enslaved in cases like this? Should picking cotton have been made illegal so that plantation slaves could be fined and thrown in jail after being freed?
I suppose if you’re really asking the question of how these women can best be protected from the types of exploitation that they’re now vulnerable to, why not also ask whether the current system of criminalization is having the intended effect at all? After all, if these women know that by coming forward, they risk jail time, substantial fines, and deportation, doesn’t that sort of provide a disincentive for them to come forward at all?
B. Carr, your aforementioned comment indicates that you are either a frequent user of such services, a trafficker, or a pimp/john yourself. whose intent is to pander to the vices, exploit, or prey upon such women for your own personal gain.
That is an extremely presumptuous statement, Mr. Kim. A number of commentators from a variety of backgrounds have expressed the same opinions as Mr. Carr. I am a woman who has never used or offered such services.
Nowhere on earth has prostitution been abolished, Mr. Kim, not even in the Islamic Republic of Iran or Saudi Arabia, where women take advantage of the provision of temporary contractual marriages to avoid being charged with a crime. The abolition of slavery has nearly eradicated the institution in the West. I say “nearly” because many undocumented workers toil in slave-like conditions. It is their illegal status that makes them vulnerable to being economically exploited. Legalized status offers more protection from exploitation than making sex workers criminals. Women who walk the cold, dark streets and endanger their lives by getting into cars with strangers could at least work inside in a safer and more comfortable environment.
Google “sex workers” and you will find links like this one - http://www3.estart.com/india/news/sexwokers.html and this one - http://www.sexworkeurope.org/website/conforg.htm - about sex workers organizing to demand legal recognition. In fact, “sex workers” is preferred to “prostitute,” with its strongly negative connotation.
Sorry Zonath and Sonagi — interesting comments — but we’re not even talking about the same thing. I’m not talking about prostitution in general; I’m specifically talking about the spate of human trafficking between Seoul and North America that has resulted in a dramatic increase of Korean prostitutes entering the U.S. illegally within the past 2-3 years since the passage of the 2004 anti-prostitution law by the National Assembly here in Korea. This is not just run-of-the-mill prostitution and trafficking that you might encounter in say, Europe, where many of the participants willingly and knowingly engage in the business. This is more like a bait-and-switch operation, where fraud, deceit, extortion and coercion are the name of the game — an M.O. that is characteristically Korean. Check these out:
http://www.dallasnews.com/shar.....c3ba4.html
http://www.dallasnews.com/shar.....0d677.html
http://www.dallasnews.com/shar.....67ba9.html
ps: Drop the “Mr. Kim” reference. It makes you sound like a dork.
http://www.dallasnews.com/shar.....ae7bb.html
Sorry Zonath and Sonagi — interesting comments — but we’re not even talking about the same thing. I’m not talking about prostitution in general; I’m specifically talking about the spate of human trafficking between Seoul and North America that has resulted in a dramatic increase of Korean prostitutes entering the U.S. illegally within the past 2-3 years since the passage of the 2004 anti-prostitution law by the National Assembly here in Korea.
But you rebutted Brendon Carr’s assertion that legalization of prostitution in the US and the issuance of guest visas for sex workers with this comment, which talks about prostitution, not human trafficking:
If there’s such a thing as the “world’s oldest profession,” there’s also such a thing as ‘the world’s oldest excuse,’ namely, that legalizing prostitution (and drugs too), will suddenly and magically eliminate all of its ancillary problems and vices, including that damned statutory barrier that is apparently preventing people from B. Carr from truly having a great time.
Drop the “Mr. Kim” reference. It makes you sound like a dork.
I’m being a lot more polite than you have been on this thread, H. Kim.
Uh huh… And so offering guest-worker-style visas to these women would ensure the continuance of this sort of coercive transaction exactly how? What service (”bait”) would human traffickers be able to offer if the need for the women to be smuggled into the country was diminished or abolished altogether? It seems to me that a lot of wind would be taken out of the human traffickers’ sails if the women in question could get into the United States on their own with legitimate documentation. After all, even with all the purported ‘enforcement efforts’, there are still enough human traffickers for this sort of thing to be considered a problem. Maybe it’s time for the government to start looking towards alternatives.
“Roots” contributed a lot to my — and I would expect many others’ — appreciation for liberty as a basic and universal human value. But I haven’t argued human trafficking is a victimless crime. So no, I don’t have that nerve. In fact, the comparative bright-line wrongfulness of compulsory work of any stripe is precisely what makes me argue in favor of legalization of prostitution. To my view, it’s more wrong for a pimp or trafficker to hold a woman prisoner and force her to have sex with strangers for money — and then take away her money — than it is for the woman to freely choose to do the same thing. (The same principle applies to work in a coal mine, English institute, law firm, or garment factory.) Freeing scarce public resources from periodic “enforcement” of prostitution’s basic illegality would, in theory, allow greater monitoring and enforcement of workplace standards. As Zonath cogently noted above, prostitutes would therefore be free to complain to public authorities for help, because the unjust legal “hammer” over their own heads would be removed. That is New Zealand’s experience.
Dude, it’s true. Anyone seen Miami Vice? (Nominated by me as worst movie of this century.) Why the fuck did they put Gong Li in that film? I saw the wrinkles on her neck and I almost shat a fucking brick. She is 45 FUCKING YEARS OLD AND LOOKS EVERY YEAR OF IT! Only a dumbass American would cast her in that role.
Curzon, to the Marmot them fightin’ words.
Curzon, even at 45, Gong Li is a fine, fine woman. And word on the street is that Colin Farrell agrees.
Actually, her bio states that she was born December 31, 1965. Which means she’s 40 fucking years old. And even if she does look 40, (or 45) so what? That’s a damn fine 40.
The seeds of contemporary, institutionalized Korean prostitution were sown over 50 years ago, by the sustained heavy presence of the US military. In fact, the same pattern repeats itself in almost every spot on the globe where the US military imposed itself as a significant presence: Europe, Asia, and even within the US mainland itself. Las Vegas started out as a holdover stop for troops being transported to the West Coast.
Now that modern Korea is attempting to shed itself of this particular legacy of the Korean War and the subsequent Cold War, where else are the prostitutes going to turn, except for the nation that caused the original source reason of the problem?
Curzon said
Why the fuck did they put Gong Li in that film? I saw the wrinkles on her neck and I almost shat a fucking brick. She is 45 FUCKING YEARS OLD AND LOOKS EVERY YEAR OF IT! Only a dumbass American would cast her in that role.
Why the fuck did they put Gong Li in that film? I saw the wrinkles on her neck and I almost shat a fucking brick. She is 45 FUCKING YEARS OLD AND LOOKS EVERY YEAR OF IT! Only a dumbass American would cast her in that role.
Curzon, I don’t think I’ve ever seen you use that sort of language at CA.
Wrinkles I can deal with. It’s unnaturally taut foreheads and cheeks and puffy lips that I hate. The faces of most actors over 40 look like frozen mannequins on screen. Gong Li has not only had injections to her face - which is why her wrinkled neck stands out in contrast - she’s pumped up her chest almost as big as Pamela Anderson’s.
http://www.awfulplasticsurgery.com has hilariously scary photos of major Hollywood stars who’ve had their faces and bodies mutilated by cosmetic surgeons. Looking at Meg Ryan’s tensely tight face and bee-stung lips, I can see why she’s not getting much work anymore. Paris Hilton has had everything altered but her chest.
If I ever tie the knot, I will put in our wedding vows a promise to grow old with dignity and not turn our faces into frozen masks.
Bluejives: I believe its fashionable nowadays to blame the Japanese for introducing contemporary, institutionalized prostitution to Korea. One of the more interesting aspects of my visit to Gunsan is that according to locals, there used to be two red-light districts, one for the Japanese (complete with its own geisha house) and one for the locals.
This probably means the Japanese are to blame for introducing Korean racialism as well. Those awful Japanese.
Again, aside from the debate over legalizing prostitution, Korea could put more effort toward supporting women in education and employment, and then maybe there wouldn’t be the insane number of prostitutes here, with a surplus to export to the U.S.
Just sayin’ is all.
Bluejives,
Not being American I’m perfectly happy to blame them for anything that they’re due but it take the biscuit to blame a country only a few hundred years old, for a profession thousands of years old. Even if they were influential in the contempary situation in korea, they can’t buy the service if there aren’t “traders” willing to sell.
PS Please remind me how many wifelets did the instution of the korean monarchy support long before america ever came to korea.?
One Trackback
[...] UPDATE: Head right on over to The Marmot’s Hole for the rest (and much more) of the story… [...]