<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Well, at least the template is functional</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rjkoehler.com/2006/08/29/well-at-least-the-template-is-functional/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2006/08/29/well-at-least-the-template-is-functional/</link>
	<description>Korea... in Blog Format</description>
	<pubDate>Wed,  9 Jul 2008 13:29:43 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: sewing</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2006/08/29/well-at-least-the-template-is-functional/#comment-47673</link>
		<dc:creator>sewing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2006 17:40:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/2006/08/29/well-at-least-the-template-is-functional/#comment-47673</guid>
		<description>I tried changing the default fonts on my side to see if it would make a difference, but no such luck.  It's not a &lt;i&gt;big&lt;/i&gt; issue in and of itself, but it is minorly distracting, and may be symptomatic of bigger issues.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tried changing the default fonts on my side to see if it would make a difference, but no such luck.  It&#8217;s not a <i>big</i> issue in and of itself, but it is minorly distracting, and may be symptomatic of bigger issues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sewing</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2006/08/29/well-at-least-the-template-is-functional/#comment-47672</link>
		<dc:creator>sewing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2006 17:37:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/2006/08/29/well-at-least-the-template-is-functional/#comment-47672</guid>
		<description>This latest iteration looks okay: sans-serif font, Taegeuk in the background...but the comment box still expands when I start typing in in it.  At a resolution of 1024 x 768, it's still overlapping with the blogroll, although at a higher (? 11xx x whatever) resolution, it doesn't overlap.

It's weird...I don't know if it's something specified in the CSS?  It would appear to expand because the box is defaulting to 12-point Courier&#8212;or something similar&#8212;for text entry, thus forcing the box to expand to accomodate the necessary line width.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This latest iteration looks okay: sans-serif font, Taegeuk in the background&#8230;but the comment box still expands when I start typing in in it.  At a resolution of 1024 x 768, it&#8217;s still overlapping with the blogroll, although at a higher (? 11xx x whatever) resolution, it doesn&#8217;t overlap.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s weird&#8230;I don&#8217;t know if it&#8217;s something specified in the CSS?  It would appear to expand because the box is defaulting to 12-point Courier&mdash;or something similar&mdash;for text entry, thus forcing the box to expand to accomodate the necessary line width.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richardson</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2006/08/29/well-at-least-the-template-is-functional/#comment-47665</link>
		<dc:creator>Richardson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2006 15:21:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/2006/08/29/well-at-least-the-template-is-functional/#comment-47665</guid>
		<description>We had the CPU quota issue with TKL hosted on LunarPages. 

In the process of moving to Bluehost, I discovered that a plug-in had increased the SQL DB size to over 100 mb, which was queried each time a post was viewed (and googlebot was basically spamming us at the same time. 

The WP-Cache program and reducing the DB size was the cure, although we’d already left LunarPages.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We had the CPU quota issue with TKL hosted on LunarPages. </p>
<p>In the process of moving to Bluehost, I discovered that a plug-in had increased the SQL DB size to over 100 mb, which was queried each time a post was viewed (and googlebot was basically spamming us at the same time. </p>
<p>The WP-Cache program and reducing the DB size was the cure, although we’d already left LunarPages.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: littlebrownasian</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2006/08/29/well-at-least-the-template-is-functional/#comment-47628</link>
		<dc:creator>littlebrownasian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2006 06:18:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/2006/08/29/well-at-least-the-template-is-functional/#comment-47628</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;"This Account Has Exceeded Its CPU Quota"&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Not as frequent as before, from my end here. Only got this one once (today, that is).

Nice layout, Robert. Would be nicer if you could have that WYTIWYG feature like the one in Nomad's blog. Not really necessary, just a suggestion. =)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>&#8220;This Account Has Exceeded Its CPU Quota&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Not as frequent as before, from my end here. Only got this one once (today, that is).</p>
<p>Nice layout, Robert. Would be nicer if you could have that WYTIWYG feature like the one in Nomad&#8217;s blog. Not really necessary, just a suggestion. =)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shakuhachi</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2006/08/29/well-at-least-the-template-is-functional/#comment-47622</link>
		<dc:creator>shakuhachi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2006 05:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/2006/08/29/well-at-least-the-template-is-functional/#comment-47622</guid>
		<description>Robert, I agree with Cat. There are a number of bluehost hosted sites with the CPU usage problem. I dont think its your fault.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robert, I agree with Cat. There are a number of bluehost hosted sites with the CPU usage problem. I dont think its your fault.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cat</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2006/08/29/well-at-least-the-template-is-functional/#comment-47614</link>
		<dc:creator>Cat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2006 03:55:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/2006/08/29/well-at-least-the-template-is-functional/#comment-47614</guid>
		<description>Actually, have you checked with your host? It may not be a template issue. 

I use Bluehost they sent out an email yesterday explaining that some large sites were seeing CPU overload errors, and that it was a hosting problem that they were trying to correct.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, have you checked with your host? It may not be a template issue. </p>
<p>I use Bluehost they sent out an email yesterday explaining that some large sites were seeing CPU overload errors, and that it was a hosting problem that they were trying to correct.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Koehler</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2006/08/29/well-at-least-the-template-is-functional/#comment-47604</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Koehler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2006 00:58:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/2006/08/29/well-at-least-the-template-is-functional/#comment-47604</guid>
		<description>Might be one of the scripts, too.  Not sure which one it could be, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Might be one of the scripts, too.  Not sure which one it could be, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sewing</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2006/08/29/well-at-least-the-template-is-functional/#comment-47603</link>
		<dc:creator>sewing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2006 00:55:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/2006/08/29/well-at-least-the-template-is-functional/#comment-47603</guid>
		<description>...By the way, that "This Account Has Exceeded Its CPU Quota" page is still coming up periodically (about the same rate as before)...but maybe that's just because you're tinkering with the blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;By the way, that &#8220;This Account Has Exceeded Its CPU Quota&#8221; page is still coming up periodically (about the same rate as before)&#8230;but maybe that&#8217;s just because you&#8217;re tinkering with the blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sewing</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2006/08/29/well-at-least-the-template-is-functional/#comment-47600</link>
		<dc:creator>sewing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2006 00:47:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/2006/08/29/well-at-least-the-template-is-functional/#comment-47600</guid>
		<description>Robert, I sent you a note via the comment form on your "About" page.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robert, I sent you a note via the comment form on your &#8220;About&#8221; page.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Koehler</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2006/08/29/well-at-least-the-template-is-functional/#comment-47598</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Koehler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2006 00:35:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/2006/08/29/well-at-least-the-template-is-functional/#comment-47598</guid>
		<description>No, thanks for all the comments, Sewing.  I need all the feedback I can get.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, thanks for all the comments, Sewing.  I need all the feedback I can get.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
