I’m shocked, I tell ya! Shocked!

The Korean Teachers Union? Quoting North Korean history textbooks? Tell me it ain’t so!

9 Comments

  1. Gray Hat your flag
    Posted July 26, 2006 at 10:27 am | Permalink

    The article implies, but does not explicitly say, that the “quotations” contained in the teaching materials were made without attribution. Apart from the political aspect — to which I gather much of South Korean society has been, well, de-sensitized — doesn’t anybody there have a problem with educators plagiarizing?

  2. michael your flag
    Posted July 26, 2006 at 10:35 am | Permalink

    “Doesn’t anybody there have a problem with educators plagiarizing?”

    Education Minister Refutes Plagiarism Allegations
    http://times.hankooki.com/lpag.....110510.htm

  3. Gray Hat your flag
    Posted July 26, 2006 at 10:54 am | Permalink

    Thanks, Michael, I hadn’t heard about the story involving the Education Minister. The newspaper account seems a confusing, though: for example, the reference to a 1985 paper is unexplained. But what strikes me is that one of the arguments which the Education Minister’s spokesman offers in his defense is that the student was actually using the minister’s work, with his consent (instead of vice versa). However, the student’s paper didn’t say so! I interpret that to mean that the Education Minister’s defense is: “I didn’t plagiarize; I encouraged my student to plagiarize.”

  4. ul your flag
    Posted July 26, 2006 at 10:56 am | Permalink

    About the whole plagiarism thing. It is crazy the amount that happens in the level of academia, at least within Korea. I suppose one could say that it is a natural progression of what happens in secondary, and university level education, where copying is rampant. Academics also plagiarize. They don’t really enforce/teach the concept of referencing. Academics who have worked more internationally are aware of this and are careful about referencing when it comes to international publications, etc. (I guess to protect the image of Korea - [shrug] ).

  5. Gray Hat your flag
    Posted July 26, 2006 at 11:01 am | Permalink

    One other observation: the headline of the Korea Times article. Not many people I know would characterize this rather muddled set of assertions and excuses, put out through a spokesman, as a “refutation.” Was this a poor translation into English or did the newspaper really judge that the Education Minister had laid the matter to rest?

  6. michael your flag
    Posted July 26, 2006 at 11:20 am | Permalink

    Don’t take the KT too seriously Gray Hat, it’s considered a joke here. I just posted it for the rich inherent irony of the education minister being accused of plagiarism….

  7. Posted July 26, 2006 at 11:54 am | Permalink

    I wouldn’t necessarily say the KTU is considered a “joke” in Korea…

  8. montclaire your flag
    Posted July 26, 2006 at 12:08 pm | Permalink

    We shouldn’t underestimate the extent to which SK people swallow NK history simply because it tastes better. It’s much nicer to believe that a Korean Revolutionary Army was giving the Japanese hell during the colonial era than to believe the truth, i.e. almost unanimous collaboration to the nth degree. Even the fact that the Norks themselves didn’t claim most of that nonsense until the mid-1960s doesn’t seem to faze any of those “teachers”.

  9. R. Elgin your flag
    Posted July 26, 2006 at 12:19 pm | Permalink

    I simply wonder why instead of attempting to publish a list of people who collaborated with the Japanese way back when, why doesn’t the government disband and fire every alleged educator connected to the KTU since they are so clearly promoting a policital agenda that is at the expense of South Korean democracy. The fact that they are allowed to do as they have done is disgraceful since it is clearly subversion of fact with an alterior motive.

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*