<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The China-North Korea relationship</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rjkoehler.com/2006/07/13/the-china-north-korea-relationship/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2006/07/13/the-china-north-korea-relationship/</link>
	<description>Korea... in Blog Format</description>
	<pubDate>Wed,  3 Dec 2008 06:53:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: thegoodbubba</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2006/07/13/the-china-north-korea-relationship/#comment-43491</link>
		<dc:creator>thegoodbubba</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jul 2006 13:13:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/2006/07/13/the-china-north-korea-relationship/#comment-43491</guid>
		<description>Sonagi, I think you are perhaps misreading this. The author of the piece is not saying North Korea is creating stability, but instead is saying that is what the North claims they are doing. From a neo-realist perspective by making themselves and China stronger in comparison to the US that is what they are doing. To some extent it is the same theory as MAD. Again according to a neo realist perspective not neccisarily the perspective of someone from the center for non-proliferation studies</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sonagi, I think you are perhaps misreading this. The author of the piece is not saying North Korea is creating stability, but instead is saying that is what the North claims they are doing. From a neo-realist perspective by making themselves and China stronger in comparison to the US that is what they are doing. To some extent it is the same theory as MAD. Again according to a neo realist perspective not neccisarily the perspective of someone from the center for non-proliferation studies</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sonagi</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2006/07/13/the-china-north-korea-relationship/#comment-43483</link>
		<dc:creator>Sonagi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jul 2006 12:13:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/2006/07/13/the-china-north-korea-relationship/#comment-43483</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote cite=""&gt; “The North Koreans are developing a much more realist approach to their foreign policy,” Pinkston says. “They’re saying imbalances of power are dangerous and the United States has too much power—so by increasing their own power they’re helping to balance out world stability. It’s neo-realism straight out of an International Relations textbook.”&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Ah, so the Norks launched the missiles towards Japan to help balance world stability. Peace through arms development.  Truly ironic words from a man who works for a place called The Center for Non-proliferation Studies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite=""><p> “The North Koreans are developing a much more realist approach to their foreign policy,” Pinkston says. “They’re saying imbalances of power are dangerous and the United States has too much power—so by increasing their own power they’re helping to balance out world stability. It’s neo-realism straight out of an International Relations textbook.”</p></blockquote>
<p>Ah, so the Norks launched the missiles towards Japan to help balance world stability. Peace through arms development.  Truly ironic words from a man who works for a place called The Center for Non-proliferation Studies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: snow</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2006/07/13/the-china-north-korea-relationship/#comment-43481</link>
		<dc:creator>snow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jul 2006 12:08:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/2006/07/13/the-china-north-korea-relationship/#comment-43481</guid>
		<description>"Most of the nations involved in the crisis will try to bring North Korea back to the Six-Party Talks."

Who really thinks the six-party talks are ever going to happen? Seems that they're deader than a doornail at this point. Myabe they'll be on again if a Democrat gets in in 2008. Still won't change the fact that any agreement will likely be worthless.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Most of the nations involved in the crisis will try to bring North Korea back to the Six-Party Talks.&#8221;</p>
<p>Who really thinks the six-party talks are ever going to happen? Seems that they&#8217;re deader than a doornail at this point. Myabe they&#8217;ll be on again if a Democrat gets in in 2008. Still won&#8217;t change the fact that any agreement will likely be worthless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
