<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Few moves left with North Korea?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rjkoehler.com/2006/06/23/few-moves-left-with-north-korea/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2006/06/23/few-moves-left-with-north-korea/</link>
	<description>Korea... in Blog Format</description>
	<pubDate>Fri,  5 Sep 2008 18:26:23 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: baduk</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2006/06/23/few-moves-left-with-north-korea/#comment-41252</link>
		<dc:creator>baduk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 00:56:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/?p=3105#comment-41252</guid>
		<description>Sam woke up when he heard noise coming from his garden.  "Poop", "Poop"..  He instantly knew what it was.  It's that mad woman from Korea.

He shooed her away.  But, damage was already done.  The mad woman had pooped all over his house.  She said she wanted to talk, but Sam wisely called her ex-hubby.

Sam: Your bitch was doing it again this morning.
Hu:  She is no longer my wife and I cannot do anything about her.

Sam:  Hey, where did that bitch eat yesterday?
Hu: My house.

Sam: Stop feeding the bitch.  If she has nothing in her stomach, then she wouldn't shit.
Hu: Why don't you talk to her?

Sam: She is YOUR bitch.  Stop feeding her.  Talk?  Does her behavior looks like some bitch you can reason with?  You talk to her!
Hu:  I have talked her several times not to go and shit on your house.

Sam: Obviously, you are not doing a good job.  Why don't you put your bitch on a leash.  Next time, she shit on my house, I am going to shit on your house.  Get that?
Hu:  I have no control over her.

Sam: Funking don't lie.  You are feeding her. Isn't that right?
Hu: Yes, but..

Sam: No buts.  Stop feeding (sending oil) her!
Hu: I cannot do that.

Sam: You mean "you won't".  Ok.  Got it.  I now know why that bitch was coming and shitting around my house.  You are behind it all.  I am going to shit all over YOUR house, you double-talking Chinese!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sam woke up when he heard noise coming from his garden.  &#8220;Poop&#8221;, &#8220;Poop&#8221;..  He instantly knew what it was.  It&#8217;s that mad woman from Korea.</p>
<p>He shooed her away.  But, damage was already done.  The mad woman had pooped all over his house.  She said she wanted to talk, but Sam wisely called her ex-hubby.</p>
<p>Sam: Your bitch was doing it again this morning.<br />
Hu:  She is no longer my wife and I cannot do anything about her.</p>
<p>Sam:  Hey, where did that bitch eat yesterday?<br />
Hu: My house.</p>
<p>Sam: Stop feeding the bitch.  If she has nothing in her stomach, then she wouldn&#8217;t shit.<br />
Hu: Why don&#8217;t you talk to her?</p>
<p>Sam: She is YOUR bitch.  Stop feeding her.  Talk?  Does her behavior looks like some bitch you can reason with?  You talk to her!<br />
Hu:  I have talked her several times not to go and shit on your house.</p>
<p>Sam: Obviously, you are not doing a good job.  Why don&#8217;t you put your bitch on a leash.  Next time, she shit on my house, I am going to shit on your house.  Get that?<br />
Hu:  I have no control over her.</p>
<p>Sam: Funking don&#8217;t lie.  You are feeding her. Isn&#8217;t that right?<br />
Hu: Yes, but..</p>
<p>Sam: No buts.  Stop feeding (sending oil) her!<br />
Hu: I cannot do that.</p>
<p>Sam: You mean &#8220;you won&#8217;t&#8221;.  Ok.  Got it.  I now know why that bitch was coming and shitting around my house.  You are behind it all.  I am going to shit all over YOUR house, you double-talking Chinese!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dogbertt</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2006/06/23/few-moves-left-with-north-korea/#comment-41245</link>
		<dc:creator>dogbertt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 00:29:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/?p=3105#comment-41245</guid>
		<description>OUR BADUK, OUR PIMPIN' FOOL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OUR BADUK, OUR PIMPIN&#8217; FOOL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: baduk</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2006/06/23/few-moves-left-with-north-korea/#comment-41229</link>
		<dc:creator>baduk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2006 21:45:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/?p=3105#comment-41229</guid>
		<description>The US should make it clear to China that, if anything harm comes to the US due to NK's actions, the US will hold China responsible.

Any pimp knows he is responsible for his bitch's shits.  Any pimp knows.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The US should make it clear to China that, if anything harm comes to the US due to NK&#8217;s actions, the US will hold China responsible.</p>
<p>Any pimp knows he is responsible for his bitch&#8217;s shits.  Any pimp knows.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: baduk</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2006/06/23/few-moves-left-with-north-korea/#comment-41227</link>
		<dc:creator>baduk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2006 21:41:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/?p=3105#comment-41227</guid>
		<description>The US should never, never talk to NK.  As any gangsta knows there is nothing to be gained by talking to somebody's bitch.

NK is China's bitch.

Kick Hu's ass. Don't waste time talking to his bitch.  The bitch don't know nothing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The US should never, never talk to NK.  As any gangsta knows there is nothing to be gained by talking to somebody&#8217;s bitch.</p>
<p>NK is China&#8217;s bitch.</p>
<p>Kick Hu&#8217;s ass. Don&#8217;t waste time talking to his bitch.  The bitch don&#8217;t know nothing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MrChips</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2006/06/23/few-moves-left-with-north-korea/#comment-41201</link>
		<dc:creator>MrChips</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2006 18:18:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/?p=3105#comment-41201</guid>
		<description>ignoring the situation might not be the best way to put it...  don't give credence to the NK threat as they want it to be perceived.  I think they know threats, carried out, carry consequences for their existence.  The way to counter their threats is to assume, rightfully, that they are full of shit, or ready to meet their maker, without their citizenry's consent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ignoring the situation might not be the best way to put it&#8230;  don&#8217;t give credence to the NK threat as they want it to be perceived.  I think they know threats, carried out, carry consequences for their existence.  The way to counter their threats is to assume, rightfully, that they are full of shit, or ready to meet their maker, without their citizenry&#8217;s consent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MrChips</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2006/06/23/few-moves-left-with-north-korea/#comment-41199</link>
		<dc:creator>MrChips</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2006 18:14:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/?p=3105#comment-41199</guid>
		<description>"limited options" I believe was the chosen expression for the US' alternatives in dealing with NK's missile/nuclear threat.  The more I've thought about it the more I've come to agree with Dr. Lankov; however, I think that in "ignoring" the situation a host of alternatives will be presented.  I'm trying to think of the last time NK was confronted with either a firm stance or with complete shunning.  To break them out of their comfort zone when it comes to negotiations will at once present options that might not have been perceptible before.  The North Korean leadership understands that it is entering unchartered territory and in the absence of a US administration that falls back on negotations I think the KN leadership will come up with options.  Out of nowhere they will come up with ways to compromise...for survival's sake.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;limited options&#8221; I believe was the chosen expression for the US&#8217; alternatives in dealing with NK&#8217;s missile/nuclear threat.  The more I&#8217;ve thought about it the more I&#8217;ve come to agree with Dr. Lankov; however, I think that in &#8220;ignoring&#8221; the situation a host of alternatives will be presented.  I&#8217;m trying to think of the last time NK was confronted with either a firm stance or with complete shunning.  To break them out of their comfort zone when it comes to negotiations will at once present options that might not have been perceptible before.  The North Korean leadership understands that it is entering unchartered territory and in the absence of a US administration that falls back on negotations I think the KN leadership will come up with options.  Out of nowhere they will come up with ways to compromise&#8230;for survival&#8217;s sake.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Remort</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2006/06/23/few-moves-left-with-north-korea/#comment-40370</link>
		<dc:creator>Remort</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jun 2006 22:01:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/?p=3105#comment-40370</guid>
		<description>Go ahead North Korea and launch it.  We'll shoot it down and then drop one our &lt;STRONG&gt;PROVEN&lt;/STRONG&gt; nuclear weapons on you.

--Remort</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Go ahead North Korea and launch it.  We&#8217;ll shoot it down and then drop one our <strong>PROVEN</strong> nuclear weapons on you.</p>
<p>&#8211;Remort</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: usinkorea</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2006/06/23/few-moves-left-with-north-korea/#comment-40340</link>
		<dc:creator>usinkorea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jun 2006 17:46:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/?p=3105#comment-40340</guid>
		<description>"Even if they do test a missile, there isn’t a whole lot they can do with it."

That is a point that most miss - because of the power of the ferver in the international community over a launch.

The every popular, "Something must be done."

The thing to be done by the US is to turn the ferver away from, "Bush (president X) must come up with a plan that works" ----- into "China and SK must do something" with that something being a strong behind the scenes and up front hints that they need to get tougher with NK for an extended, real period of time (5 years or so).

However, I do disagree about the market for the missiles ----

Oil rich Iran--------

If I were Europe, I'd be worried about where the proven missiles will be going next ---- and that would be Iran - and what leverage that gives Iran.

Will Iran thus be moved a significant step toward becoming Europe's NK?

NK's style of dimplomacy is blessed by being in a neighborhood powerful nations care about.

Iran is situated in the oil heart of the world, but it does not have the same threat-factor NK does which NK has used well over the years.

If Iran gains the capability to hit Europe with a nuke warhead, how much does it matter?????</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Even if they do test a missile, there isn’t a whole lot they can do with it.&#8221;</p>
<p>That is a point that most miss - because of the power of the ferver in the international community over a launch.</p>
<p>The every popular, &#8220;Something must be done.&#8221;</p>
<p>The thing to be done by the US is to turn the ferver away from, &#8220;Bush (president X) must come up with a plan that works&#8221; &#8212;&#8211; into &#8220;China and SK must do something&#8221; with that something being a strong behind the scenes and up front hints that they need to get tougher with NK for an extended, real period of time (5 years or so).</p>
<p>However, I do disagree about the market for the missiles &#8212;-</p>
<p>Oil rich Iran&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>If I were Europe, I&#8217;d be worried about where the proven missiles will be going next &#8212;- and that would be Iran - and what leverage that gives Iran.</p>
<p>Will Iran thus be moved a significant step toward becoming Europe&#8217;s NK?</p>
<p>NK&#8217;s style of dimplomacy is blessed by being in a neighborhood powerful nations care about.</p>
<p>Iran is situated in the oil heart of the world, but it does not have the same threat-factor NK does which NK has used well over the years.</p>
<p>If Iran gains the capability to hit Europe with a nuke warhead, how much does it matter?????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: slim</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2006/06/23/few-moves-left-with-north-korea/#comment-40279</link>
		<dc:creator>slim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jun 2006 12:08:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/?p=3105#comment-40279</guid>
		<description>Pawi's favored style of comment is the straw man argument, and yet he seems never to prevail over the straw men. I'm starting to miss the cogency of mahatir_fan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pawi&#8217;s favored style of comment is the straw man argument, and yet he seems never to prevail over the straw men. I&#8217;m starting to miss the cogency of mahatir_fan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GI Korea</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2006/06/23/few-moves-left-with-north-korea/#comment-40265</link>
		<dc:creator>GI Korea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jun 2006 09:51:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/?p=3105#comment-40265</guid>
		<description>The current North Korea missile test fire debate is turning into the perfect issue for people to demagogue.  Mostly Democrats so far are able to come out and act tough on the North Korea issue knowing full well that President Bush has little options on this issue and provoking a war is definitely not one of them.  

Democrats are perceived by the American public as being soft on defense and this issue they can demagogue all day long on in order to show how "tough" on defense they really are.  It must be an election year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The current North Korea missile test fire debate is turning into the perfect issue for people to demagogue.  Mostly Democrats so far are able to come out and act tough on the North Korea issue knowing full well that President Bush has little options on this issue and provoking a war is definitely not one of them.  </p>
<p>Democrats are perceived by the American public as being soft on defense and this issue they can demagogue all day long on in order to show how &#8220;tough&#8221; on defense they really are.  It must be an election year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
