<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nobody hates America like&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rjkoehler.com/2006/06/11/nobody-hates-america-like/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2006/06/11/nobody-hates-america-like/</link>
	<description>Korea... in Blog Format</description>
	<pubDate>Fri,  5 Sep 2008 13:27:22 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Wedge</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2006/06/11/nobody-hates-america-like/#comment-37967</link>
		<dc:creator>Wedge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jun 2006 01:46:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/?p=2994#comment-37967</guid>
		<description>I have to confess I've only read Johnson's MITI book, none of the others, and thought it was a great tome. Thus, when I stumble on one of his op-eds it always stuns me. Now I know why. Thanks, BC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to confess I&#8217;ve only read Johnson&#8217;s MITI book, none of the others, and thought it was a great tome. Thus, when I stumble on one of his op-eds it always stuns me. Now I know why. Thanks, BC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Remort</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2006/06/11/nobody-hates-america-like/#comment-37937</link>
		<dc:creator>Remort</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jun 2006 20:07:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/?p=2994#comment-37937</guid>
		<description>Clinton maybe "smart", I honestly don't see how you can win an American presidential election without that qualification, but that isn't to say he has made "smart" decisions in his personal life.  :P

In any event, please keep hating America, we'll keep fighting your wars and providing welfare payments too.  America isn't perfect, but we're decent people that usually end up doing what's right and best for everyone involved.

--Remort</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clinton maybe &#8220;smart&#8221;, I honestly don&#8217;t see how you can win an American presidential election without that qualification, but that isn&#8217;t to say he has made &#8220;smart&#8221; decisions in his personal life.  <img src='http://www.rjkoehler.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>In any event, please keep hating America, we&#8217;ll keep fighting your wars and providing welfare payments too.  America isn&#8217;t perfect, but we&#8217;re decent people that usually end up doing what&#8217;s right and best for everyone involved.</p>
<p>&#8211;Remort</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MrChips</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2006/06/11/nobody-hates-america-like/#comment-37902</link>
		<dc:creator>MrChips</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jun 2006 10:37:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/?p=2994#comment-37902</guid>
		<description>I'm glad I'm not the only one that sees a disconnect between Chalmers Johnson's "MITI and the Japanese Miracle" and the stuff that has followed since. "Blowback" was one of the most eye-gouging exercices I've ever put myself through; and not learning my lesson I went on to "Sorrows of Empire" to convince myself that the man had indeed lost his grasp on reality.  Blowback seems to have gotten an epsecially warm reception by Political Economy academicians here in Korea.  The KDI guys just gush over him and think the world can't keep spinning without his insight.  I'm wondering if anyone familiar with these works can tell me what they think happened after MITI?  I thought it was a pretty thought provoking book and fairly sound economically.  What happened?  I'm open for ideas...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m glad I&#8217;m not the only one that sees a disconnect between Chalmers Johnson&#8217;s &#8220;MITI and the Japanese Miracle&#8221; and the stuff that has followed since. &#8220;Blowback&#8221; was one of the most eye-gouging exercices I&#8217;ve ever put myself through; and not learning my lesson I went on to &#8220;Sorrows of Empire&#8221; to convince myself that the man had indeed lost his grasp on reality.  Blowback seems to have gotten an epsecially warm reception by Political Economy academicians here in Korea.  The KDI guys just gush over him and think the world can&#8217;t keep spinning without his insight.  I&#8217;m wondering if anyone familiar with these works can tell me what they think happened after MITI?  I thought it was a pretty thought provoking book and fairly sound economically.  What happened?  I&#8217;m open for ideas&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: snow</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2006/06/11/nobody-hates-america-like/#comment-37896</link>
		<dc:creator>snow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jun 2006 09:05:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/?p=2994#comment-37896</guid>
		<description>The fact is that nobody who becomes the leader of a large and powerful country like the US is stupid (well, I don't know about Dan Quayle, though it wouldn't surprise me if he was just overly maligned by the left who seem to think that all Republicans are stupid). You can't be stupid to be the one in 300 million people to become the leader of the most powerful country on earth. Despite the fantasies of many a conspiracy theorist, it just doesn't work that way. 

Sorry, but playing the stupid card is for people who can't come up with any better arguments. It's little more than a kid's game of "You're stupid. No, I'm not. Yes, you are. etc." 

I certainly don't think Roh is stupid (he's done some stupid things) but incompetent is more the operative word with him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The fact is that nobody who becomes the leader of a large and powerful country like the US is stupid (well, I don&#8217;t know about Dan Quayle, though it wouldn&#8217;t surprise me if he was just overly maligned by the left who seem to think that all Republicans are stupid). You can&#8217;t be stupid to be the one in 300 million people to become the leader of the most powerful country on earth. Despite the fantasies of many a conspiracy theorist, it just doesn&#8217;t work that way. </p>
<p>Sorry, but playing the stupid card is for people who can&#8217;t come up with any better arguments. It&#8217;s little more than a kid&#8217;s game of &#8220;You&#8217;re stupid. No, I&#8217;m not. Yes, you are. etc.&#8221; </p>
<p>I certainly don&#8217;t think Roh is stupid (he&#8217;s done some stupid things) but incompetent is more the operative word with him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brendon Carr</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2006/06/11/nobody-hates-america-like/#comment-37892</link>
		<dc:creator>Brendon Carr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jun 2006 08:37:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/?p=2994#comment-37892</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Back to the original article. It’s the usual leftist elitist position: "Those of us on the coasts are simply smarter than those boobs in the heartland. In fact, they’re not smart enough to deserve the right to vote." This is their calculus: candidate I agree with = intelligent; candidate I disagree with = shtoopid.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

And they are so desperate to believe that calculus, they ignore &lt;a href="http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2005/06/07/yale_grades_portray_kerry_as_a_lackluster_student?mode=PF" rel="nofollow"&gt;all evidence to the contrary&lt;/a&gt;. John Kerry's grades at Yale were just like that doofus Dubya's, but &lt;i&gt;Kerry&lt;/i&gt;'s somehow a genius. Suuuure. Get a load of that photo and then talk to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Back to the original article. It’s the usual leftist elitist position: &#8220;Those of us on the coasts are simply smarter than those boobs in the heartland. In fact, they’re not smart enough to deserve the right to vote.&#8221; This is their calculus: candidate I agree with = intelligent; candidate I disagree with = shtoopid.</p></blockquote>
<p>And they are so desperate to believe that calculus, they ignore <a href="http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2005/06/07/yale_grades_portray_kerry_as_a_lackluster_student?mode=PF" rel="nofollow">all evidence to the contrary</a>. John Kerry&#8217;s grades at Yale were just like that doofus Dubya&#8217;s, but <i>Kerry</i>&#8217;s somehow a genius. Suuuure. Get a load of that photo and then talk to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brendon Carr</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2006/06/11/nobody-hates-america-like/#comment-37891</link>
		<dc:creator>Brendon Carr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jun 2006 08:29:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/?p=2994#comment-37891</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;America has its own demographic disasters waiting in the wings. Read any Jared Diamond or Chalmers Johnson lately?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Jared Diamond is an engaging, if predictably lefty, light-science writer. &lt;i&gt;Guns, Germs, and Steel&lt;/i&gt; was a good read; so was the &lt;i&gt;The Third Chimpanzee&lt;/i&gt;. Presumably &lt;i&gt;Why is Sex Fun?&lt;/i&gt; is a good book too although I haven't gotten around to it. &lt;i&gt;Collapse&lt;/i&gt;, however, although I anticipated it quite hotly, was a letdown. The subtitle "How Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed" sets up all kinds of possibilities. But Diamond cannot get past the lefty refrain "Because they cut down all the TREEES!" I'm sure there's more to it than that, but the author dismisses all other factors. Thus, that book got tiring pretty quickly. I probably should have recognized the symptoms of Diamond's "America Bad" disease from &lt;i&gt;Guns, Germs, and Steel&lt;/i&gt;'s thesis that the supremacy of Western Civilization is all a big mistake. I'm going to give him another chance though.

But who the devil, except for the book-buyers at Kyobo Bookstore's Noam Chomsky Department, would waste another minute on Chalmers Johnson? Good grief. Since &lt;i&gt;MITI and the Japanese Miracle&lt;/i&gt; in 1982 he's veered away from good scholarship and into crazytown. Although he's 75 years old and so by rights ought to be dead soon, the guy looks pretty healthy and I fear ten more years of conspiracy theories and "America Bad" thinking from Chalmers Johnson.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>America has its own demographic disasters waiting in the wings. Read any Jared Diamond or Chalmers Johnson lately?</p></blockquote>
<p>Jared Diamond is an engaging, if predictably lefty, light-science writer. <i>Guns, Germs, and Steel</i> was a good read; so was the <i>The Third Chimpanzee</i>. Presumably <i>Why is Sex Fun?</i> is a good book too although I haven&#8217;t gotten around to it. <i>Collapse</i>, however, although I anticipated it quite hotly, was a letdown. The subtitle &#8220;How Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed&#8221; sets up all kinds of possibilities. But Diamond cannot get past the lefty refrain &#8220;Because they cut down all the TREEES!&#8221; I&#8217;m sure there&#8217;s more to it than that, but the author dismisses all other factors. Thus, that book got tiring pretty quickly. I probably should have recognized the symptoms of Diamond&#8217;s &#8220;America Bad&#8221; disease from <i>Guns, Germs, and Steel</i>&#8217;s thesis that the supremacy of Western Civilization is all a big mistake. I&#8217;m going to give him another chance though.</p>
<p>But who the devil, except for the book-buyers at Kyobo Bookstore&#8217;s Noam Chomsky Department, would waste another minute on Chalmers Johnson? Good grief. Since <i>MITI and the Japanese Miracle</i> in 1982 he&#8217;s veered away from good scholarship and into crazytown. Although he&#8217;s 75 years old and so by rights ought to be dead soon, the guy looks pretty healthy and I fear ten more years of conspiracy theories and &#8220;America Bad&#8221; thinking from Chalmers Johnson.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richardson</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2006/06/11/nobody-hates-america-like/#comment-37888</link>
		<dc:creator>Richardson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jun 2006 06:34:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/?p=2994#comment-37888</guid>
		<description>mook, mook, mook, 

&lt;blockquote&gt;China and the world, actually. BRIC is just the start. America has its own demographic disasters waiting in the wings. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

The defining difference is that the U.S. has well established financial and other support systems in place; China has no hope of achieving anything near that level of development in that time. Additionally, no Western nation will face anything even remotely similar to the male/female imbalance that China will. I don’t think you recognize the significance of 30  percent of the male population with absolutely zero prospect of marriage in a nation like China. Apples and Oranges. 

&lt;blockquote&gt;Yup, and remember that the CIA staff from Clinton’s day warned Dubya something was coming, and he chose to ignore it. Read a good book lately&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Who was the CIA director during 9/11, what did he say, and who appointed him, genius?

&lt;blockquote&gt;The EU can defend themselves as well as any, after all the Brits invented the jet engine, and the Germans rockets. And they have nuclear weapons should they ever need them. The Brits, French and Germans having already presided over,lost, and learned the basic lessons of empire - overextension will lead to collapse. No economy = no military = buh-bye Empire. Oh well, you’ll learn the hard way I guess. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

Aren’t you the one who stated the futility of living on past accomplishments? Like inventing jet engines and rockets? Inconsistent, if not hypocritical. 

Your arguments are ridiculous, aside from the German/French economic angle (which is more hilarious); why you want to argue against such a well-known and established fact as &lt;a href="http://www.cceia.org/viewMedia.php/prmTemplateID/8/prmID/871" rel="nofollow"&gt;Europe’s relative militarily inferiority&lt;/a&gt; is beyond me. Do a little research rather than spouting what you prefer to be true. If nukes are what you mean, then I guess Russia’s military is equal to America’s, which is equally ridiculous. 

&lt;blockquote&gt;Confucious say, Using many letters to impress man is like using many millimeters to impress his wife. Still, I betcha Dubya cain’t spell that doozy! &lt;/blockquote&gt;

Uh, ‘Floccinaucinihilipilification’ is one of those very well know, often used ‘many letter’ed words. 

Follow the ‘The Korea Liberator’ pingback below to the refutation of your Europe delusions, including ridiculous assertions about ‘progressive’ taxes, etc. 

Off to the airport . . .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mook, mook, mook, </p>
<blockquote><p>China and the world, actually. BRIC is just the start. America has its own demographic disasters waiting in the wings. </p></blockquote>
<p>The defining difference is that the U.S. has well established financial and other support systems in place; China has no hope of achieving anything near that level of development in that time. Additionally, no Western nation will face anything even remotely similar to the male/female imbalance that China will. I don’t think you recognize the significance of 30  percent of the male population with absolutely zero prospect of marriage in a nation like China. Apples and Oranges. </p>
<blockquote><p>Yup, and remember that the CIA staff from Clinton’s day warned Dubya something was coming, and he chose to ignore it. Read a good book lately</p></blockquote>
<p>Who was the CIA director during 9/11, what did he say, and who appointed him, genius?</p>
<blockquote><p>The EU can defend themselves as well as any, after all the Brits invented the jet engine, and the Germans rockets. And they have nuclear weapons should they ever need them. The Brits, French and Germans having already presided over,lost, and learned the basic lessons of empire - overextension will lead to collapse. No economy = no military = buh-bye Empire. Oh well, you’ll learn the hard way I guess. </p></blockquote>
<p>Aren’t you the one who stated the futility of living on past accomplishments? Like inventing jet engines and rockets? Inconsistent, if not hypocritical. </p>
<p>Your arguments are ridiculous, aside from the German/French economic angle (which is more hilarious); why you want to argue against such a well-known and established fact as <a href="http://www.cceia.org/viewMedia.php/prmTemplateID/8/prmID/871" rel="nofollow">Europe’s relative militarily inferiority</a> is beyond me. Do a little research rather than spouting what you prefer to be true. If nukes are what you mean, then I guess Russia’s military is equal to America’s, which is equally ridiculous. </p>
<blockquote><p>Confucious say, Using many letters to impress man is like using many millimeters to impress his wife. Still, I betcha Dubya cain’t spell that doozy! </p></blockquote>
<p>Uh, ‘Floccinaucinihilipilification’ is one of those very well know, often used ‘many letter’ed words. </p>
<p>Follow the ‘The Korea Liberator’ pingback below to the refutation of your Europe delusions, including ridiculous assertions about ‘progressive’ taxes, etc. </p>
<p>Off to the airport . . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: snow</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2006/06/11/nobody-hates-america-like/#comment-37879</link>
		<dc:creator>snow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jun 2006 03:16:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/?p=2994#comment-37879</guid>
		<description>"I suggest you shout it to the millions of American workers being handed their pink slips."

The US economy has created millions of jobs in the last few years and the employment rate is lower than the average of the last few decades. 

"Read any Jared Diamond or Chalmers Johnson lately?"

Diamond sounds interesting, but I don't think I'd bother with such leftist drivel from Chalmers Johnson. 

"I’d start with massive investment in the education system, universal health care, diversification of industries, job-skills training, daycare, and progressive taxation to help pay for it."

Uh, the US already has almost all of these things and spends a major amount of money on them, besides nearly universal healthcare and no national daycare. How is pouring massive more piles of money into these areas going to help? We can already see what such policies have wrought in Europe-stagnant economies, high unemployment, rigid labor markets and excessively high taxes on a decreasing number of workers. No thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I suggest you shout it to the millions of American workers being handed their pink slips.&#8221;</p>
<p>The US economy has created millions of jobs in the last few years and the employment rate is lower than the average of the last few decades. </p>
<p>&#8220;Read any Jared Diamond or Chalmers Johnson lately?&#8221;</p>
<p>Diamond sounds interesting, but I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;d bother with such leftist drivel from Chalmers Johnson. </p>
<p>&#8220;I’d start with massive investment in the education system, universal health care, diversification of industries, job-skills training, daycare, and progressive taxation to help pay for it.&#8221;</p>
<p>Uh, the US already has almost all of these things and spends a major amount of money on them, besides nearly universal healthcare and no national daycare. How is pouring massive more piles of money into these areas going to help? We can already see what such policies have wrought in Europe-stagnant economies, high unemployment, rigid labor markets and excessively high taxes on a decreasing number of workers. No thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Iceberg</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2006/06/11/nobody-hates-america-like/#comment-37877</link>
		<dc:creator>Iceberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jun 2006 02:53:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/?p=2994#comment-37877</guid>
		<description>It goes both ways.  Those in the heartland: candidate I agree with = moral; candidate I disagree with = immoral.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It goes both ways.  Those in the heartland: candidate I agree with = moral; candidate I disagree with = immoral.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wedge</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2006/06/11/nobody-hates-america-like/#comment-37874</link>
		<dc:creator>Wedge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jun 2006 02:03:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/?p=2994#comment-37874</guid>
		<description>Back to the original article. It's the usual leftist elitist position: "Those of us on the coasts are simply smarter than those boobs in the heartland. In fact, they're not smart enough to deserve the right to vote." This is their calculus: candidate I agree with = intelligent; candidate I disagree with = shtoopid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Back to the original article. It&#8217;s the usual leftist elitist position: &#8220;Those of us on the coasts are simply smarter than those boobs in the heartland. In fact, they&#8217;re not smart enough to deserve the right to vote.&#8221; This is their calculus: candidate I agree with = intelligent; candidate I disagree with = shtoopid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
