Comments on: In the wake of Korean reunification

By: Scenarios of Reunification at ROK Drop

Scenarios of Reunification at ROK Drop — Wed, 19 Dec 2007 20:36:43 +0000

[...] out. It began with Lirelou’s post on Coming Anarchy and that post was picked up on by Robert over at the Marmot’s Hole. I gave my opinion on the topic over at Coming Anarchy that drew some discussion, but I will go [...]

By: Scenarios of Reunification «

Scenarios of Reunification « — Mon, 23 Oct 2006 21:20:47 +0000

[...] There is some good discussion about possible reunification scenarios between North and South Korea, currently being debated on a couple of high profile blogs that are worth checking out. It began with Lirelou’s post on Coming Anarchy and that post was picked up on by Robert over at the Marmot’s Hole. I gave my opinion on the topic over at Coming Anarchy that drew some discussion, but I will go ahead and expand on my possible reunification scenario here. [...]

By: Robert

Robert — Wed, 19 Apr 2006 15:09:59 +0000

Not just expats, Bluejives. But interesting that you put it that way, regardless.

By: bluejives

bluejives — Wed, 19 Apr 2006 14:26:02 +0000

WTF? Expats are now Monday morning quarterbacking the reunification even before it happens?

By: cm

cm — Tue, 18 Apr 2006 17:11:26 +0000

curzon is correct. This is a carefully laid out and calculated trap laid out by Koizumi and Japan to bait Korea into an International dispute. The last thing Korea should do is to take the Japanese ship forcibly, and play into Japan’s hands.

By: sewing

sewing — Tue, 18 Apr 2006 16:51:56 +0000

Coming up next: Baduk says Dr. Hwang had it all right after all, Dogbert professes his love of Koreans, and G. Bevers says Dokdo belongs unequivocally to Korea.

By: sunbin

sunbin — Tue, 18 Apr 2006 15:34:40 +0000

and chopping “quite some” into “some” is not faithful paraphrasing.

By: sunbin

sunbin — Tue, 18 Apr 2006 15:27:51 +0000

pawikirogi

hey, don’t take my words out of contexts. :).
it meant to say the goverment is not willing to make a position today, but it knows it cannot ignore such voice in the voters.

By: exkorling

exkorling — Tue, 18 Apr 2006 09:04:43 +0000

All this discussion is good. I tend to agree with GIKorea in that KJI cannot simply relinquish power and turn himself in. Lest we forget, the Korean war never officially ended and if KJI turned himself in he’d be held for war crimes. I believe that KJI tried to assassinate Chun Do-Hwan in Burma back in 1983 didn’t he? Well, not personally but he was in charge of the people that did the actual bombing I believe.

Whatever happens, it will be fun to watch.

By: Robert

Robert — Tue, 18 Apr 2006 09:01:04 +0000

that’s right, and that’s where the problem started. stupid koreans marching around in china proclaiming the land to be theirs. korea can forget about gando. seoul should make it very clear to beijing that it has no ambitions beyond present day korea.

Holy 굴욕외교, Batman!