<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: U.S. recognized Japanese claims on Dokdo!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rjkoehler.com/2006/03/27/us-recognized-japanese-claims-on-dokdo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2006/03/27/us-recognized-japanese-claims-on-dokdo/</link>
	<description>Korea... in Blog Format</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 23:14:43 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: john</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2006/03/27/us-recognized-japanese-claims-on-dokdo/#comment-185418</link>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 13:05:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/?p=2615#comment-185418</guid>
		<description>야! 독도 우리 거야! 일본 간나새끼들~
no offense but japanese are full of lies. They dont know the fact that dokdo is not takishima and dokdo belongs to korea and will forever be the korean territory. The japanese goverment should agree with my opinion and should apoligize to the korean goverment!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>야! 독도 우리 거야! 일본 간나새끼들~<br />
no offense but japanese are full of lies. They dont know the fact that dokdo is not takishima and dokdo belongs to korea and will forever be the korean territory. The japanese goverment should agree with my opinion and should apoligize to the korean goverment!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JK</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2006/03/27/us-recognized-japanese-claims-on-dokdo/#comment-102835</link>
		<dc:creator>JK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 14:04:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/?p=2615#comment-102835</guid>
		<description>"I only responded to JK because I found his rambling post so childish and silly that I could not resist."


Hm, coming from a guy who tends to get personal and call people like Frogmouth, who uses sound arguments, facts, and logic as opposed to you, "childish" and "silly" and "goofball", you're really not one to talk.

I mean, did Frogmouth or anyone else decide to get so intense about this topic with an anti-Korea vendetta....all while living and working in Korea?  Nope.  Only you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I only responded to JK because I found his rambling post so childish and silly that I could not resist.&#8221;</p>
<p>Hm, coming from a guy who tends to get personal and call people like Frogmouth, who uses sound arguments, facts, and logic as opposed to you, &#8220;childish&#8221; and &#8220;silly&#8221; and &#8220;goofball&#8221;, you&#8217;re really not one to talk.</p>
<p>I mean, did Frogmouth or anyone else decide to get so intense about this topic with an anti-Korea vendetta&#8230;.all while living and working in Korea?  Nope.  Only you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JK</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2006/03/27/us-recognized-japanese-claims-on-dokdo/#comment-102701</link>
		<dc:creator>JK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 05:11:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/?p=2615#comment-102701</guid>
		<description>slim, thanks for keeping this thread alive with your latest comment.

Now, go soil yourself with some interesting discussion about how Koreans ruined your life.  Or discuss this on your own blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>slim, thanks for keeping this thread alive with your latest comment.</p>
<p>Now, go soil yourself with some interesting discussion about how Koreans ruined your life.  Or discuss this on your own blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: slim</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2006/03/27/us-recognized-japanese-claims-on-dokdo/#comment-102693</link>
		<dc:creator>slim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 04:18:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/?p=2615#comment-102693</guid>
		<description>Before you guys (especially JK, in this case) soil yourselves further, I repeat my original plea: Please retire this subject or start a blog devoted to it that we can all avoid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Before you guys (especially JK, in this case) soil yourselves further, I repeat my original plea: Please retire this subject or start a blog devoted to it that we can all avoid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JK</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2006/03/27/us-recognized-japanese-claims-on-dokdo/#comment-102686</link>
		<dc:creator>JK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 03:23:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/?p=2615#comment-102686</guid>
		<description>Well, gbevers, if that's the case....according to the US view (which is NOT the view of most Americans) Korea just took Japanese territory....and neither the US NOR Japan did anything about it.  Thanks for reminding ME of that, gbevers. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, gbevers, if that&#8217;s the case&#8230;.according to the US view (which is NOT the view of most Americans) Korea just took Japanese territory&#8230;.and neither the US NOR Japan did anything about it.  Thanks for reminding ME of that, gbevers. <img src='http://www.rjkoehler.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gbevers</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2006/03/27/us-recognized-japanese-claims-on-dokdo/#comment-102685</link>
		<dc:creator>gbevers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 03:12:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/?p=2615#comment-102685</guid>
		<description>By the way, JK, thanks for reminding people that the US recognized Japanese claims on Dokdo (Takeshima).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By the way, JK, thanks for reminding people that the US recognized Japanese claims on Dokdo (Takeshima).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hugh</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2006/03/27/us-recognized-japanese-claims-on-dokdo/#comment-102681</link>
		<dc:creator>Hugh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 02:55:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/?p=2615#comment-102681</guid>
		<description>Loved this line from the post:
 "but the United States turned down the Korean request, believing it to run contrary to the principle of international law, which Washington was trying to support at the time."

Ah, what hath Cheney wrought!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Loved this line from the post:<br />
 &#8220;but the United States turned down the Korean request, believing it to run contrary to the principle of international law, which Washington was trying to support at the time.&#8221;</p>
<p>Ah, what hath Cheney wrought!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gbevers</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2006/03/27/us-recognized-japanese-claims-on-dokdo/#comment-102674</link>
		<dc:creator>gbevers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 01:35:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/?p=2615#comment-102674</guid>
		<description>Slim &#38; Sonagi,

I find it odd that both of you claim not to be interested in "Dokdo," yet both of you clicked on this tread, which is clearly marked with the word "Dokdo"? At any rate, neither of you have to worry. I do not plan to write about the Dokdo/Takeshima dispute here. I only responded to JK because I found his rambling post so childish and silly that I could not resist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Slim &amp; Sonagi,</p>
<p>I find it odd that both of you claim not to be interested in &#8220;Dokdo,&#8221; yet both of you clicked on this tread, which is clearly marked with the word &#8220;Dokdo&#8221;? At any rate, neither of you have to worry. I do not plan to write about the Dokdo/Takeshima dispute here. I only responded to JK because I found his rambling post so childish and silly that I could not resist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JK</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2006/03/27/us-recognized-japanese-claims-on-dokdo/#comment-102664</link>
		<dc:creator>JK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 21:54:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/?p=2615#comment-102664</guid>
		<description>Slim @97, if you don't want to read something, don't read it.  Stick to the threads you prefer like about how Koreans are sooooo bad....or Japanese soooo good....or how Him Hye-Soo looks sooooo good....or how some church looks sooooo bad....or whatever.  No one is forcing you to open this thread.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Slim @97, if you don&#8217;t want to read something, don&#8217;t read it.  Stick to the threads you prefer like about how Koreans are sooooo bad&#8230;.or Japanese soooo good&#8230;.or how Him Hye-Soo looks sooooo good&#8230;.or how some church looks sooooo bad&#8230;.or whatever.  No one is forcing you to open this thread.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sonagi</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2006/03/27/us-recognized-japanese-claims-on-dokdo/#comment-102660</link>
		<dc:creator>Sonagi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 20:26:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjkoehler.com/?p=2615#comment-102660</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;"Please retire this subject or start a blog devoted to it that we can all avoid."&lt;/i&gt;

I second that with an addendum for the Sea of Peace.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>&#8220;Please retire this subject or start a blog devoted to it that we can all avoid.&#8221;</i></p>
<p>I second that with an addendum for the Sea of Peace.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
