<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gwanghwamun reconstruction</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rjkoehler.com/2006/01/25/gwanghwamun-reconstruction/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2006/01/25/gwanghwamun-reconstruction/</link>
	<description>Korea... in Blog Format</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 10:54:36 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: frogmouth</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2006/01/25/gwanghwamun-reconstruction/#comment-29408</link>
		<dc:creator>frogmouth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2006 15:20:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjkoehler.com/?p=2342#comment-29408</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Why not fix up some of the backwater areas in Chollanamdo a little more instead&lt;/b&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Why not fix up some of the backwater areas in Chollanamdo a little more instead</b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oranckay</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2006/01/25/gwanghwamun-reconstruction/#comment-28584</link>
		<dc:creator>oranckay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2006 01:31:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjkoehler.com/?p=2342#comment-28584</guid>
		<description>Funny thing is how that's a nat'l governmnet project and the Seoul city government is expressing worry about what it will do to traffic. A legitimate short-term concern for sure, but given what Seoul did over the past few years with city hall plaza and Cheonggyecheon it is hardly in any position to complain. Almost wonder if mayor and presidential candidate Lee Myung Bak is trying to look good by making the city sound concerned... or if he's worried about looking bad since traffic will get blamed on the city. 
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny thing is how that&#8217;s a nat&#8217;l governmnet project and the Seoul city government is expressing worry about what it will do to traffic. A legitimate short-term concern for sure, but given what Seoul did over the past few years with city hall plaza and Cheonggyecheon it is hardly in any position to complain. Almost wonder if mayor and presidential candidate Lee Myung Bak is trying to look good by making the city sound concerned&#8230; or if he&#8217;s worried about looking bad since traffic will get blamed on the city.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2006/01/25/gwanghwamun-reconstruction/#comment-28583</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2006 22:51:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjkoehler.com/?p=2342#comment-28583</guid>
		<description>It's too bad they're thinking of opening up Bugaksan, it's going to get trashed like the other hiking areas around Seoul. It would be good though if they ran the traffic in front of the gate underground, like they are talking about doing with Namdaemun. I always thought having the traffic that close to the gate looked bad and put a lot of pollution on it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s too bad they&#8217;re thinking of opening up Bugaksan, it&#8217;s going to get trashed like the other hiking areas around Seoul. It would be good though if they ran the traffic in front of the gate underground, like they are talking about doing with Namdaemun. I always thought having the traffic that close to the gate looked bad and put a lot of pollution on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
