Comments on: Plunge returns! http://www.rjkoehler.com/2006/01/19/plunge-returns/ Korea... in Blog Format Sun, 7 Sep 2008 06:22:28 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1 By: shakuhachi http://www.rjkoehler.com/2006/01/19/plunge-returns/#comment-28534 shakuhachi Tue, 24 Jan 2006 19:58:35 +0000 http://rjkoehler.com/?p=2333#comment-28534 Interesting that this is bratwurstest's first post. Obviously just a troll with multiple accounts trying to drum up an illusion of support. By the way, the link he posted is also on my blog, so I am in no way busted for anything, and I would actually prefer that people view it to see the truth rather than the false way he has presented it. Interesting that this is bratwurstest’s first post. Obviously just a troll with multiple accounts trying to drum up an illusion of support. By the way, the link he posted is also on my blog, so I am in no way busted for anything, and I would actually prefer that people view it to see the truth rather than the false way he has presented it.

]]> By: kushibo http://www.rjkoehler.com/2006/01/19/plunge-returns/#comment-28533 kushibo Tue, 24 Jan 2006 19:36:23 +0000 http://rjkoehler.com/?p=2333#comment-28533 Bratwurstest, I'm in a public place, so I'm afraid to open what you linked, but let's give it a rest. Most of the last several posts have nothing to do with Plunge returning but they have gone dangerously close to public lynchings (figuratively speaking). Bratwurstest, I’m in a public place, so I’m afraid to open what you linked, but let’s give it a rest. Most of the last several posts have nothing to do with Plunge returning but they have gone dangerously close to public lynchings (figuratively speaking).

]]> By: bratwurstest http://www.rjkoehler.com/2006/01/19/plunge-returns/#comment-28532 bratwurstest Tue, 24 Jan 2006 18:23:07 +0000 http://rjkoehler.com/?p=2333#comment-28532 shakahoochi wants to come back korea and rape again shakahoochi wants to come back korea and rape again

]]> By: bratwurstest http://www.rjkoehler.com/2006/01/19/plunge-returns/#comment-28531 bratwurstest Tue, 24 Jan 2006 17:37:17 +0000 http://rjkoehler.com/?p=2333#comment-28531 I pulled off sora's panties and her top and stripped down myself. Sora seemed half there and half not. No matter, I mounted her to the cheers of our friends. <a href="http://kawama.tzo.com:1024/YDEssayArchive.nsf/0d201e0f32a95d0086256abb006dd9bd/65f763607dcc722086256c82005b8ded!OpenDocument" rel="nofollow">http://kawama.tzo.com:1024/YDEssayArchive.nsf/0d201e0f32a95d0086256abb006dd9bd/65f763607dcc722086256c82005b8ded!OpenDocument</a> I pulled off sora’s panties and her top and stripped down myself. Sora seemed half there and half not. No matter, I mounted her to the cheers of our friends.

http://kawama.tzo.com:1024/YDE.....82005b8ded!OpenDocument

]]> By: kushibo http://www.rjkoehler.com/2006/01/19/plunge-returns/#comment-28530 kushibo Tue, 24 Jan 2006 16:30:45 +0000 http://rjkoehler.com/?p=2333#comment-28530 This thread has deteriorated to the point where it is probably non-salvageable. I had hoped to see a spirited discussion of whether Plunge was worthy of being on the blog roll, but I guess that isn't going to happen. Anyway... Marmot took down the link to the pedophilic pedagogist, so maybe he'll do the same with Plunge if the case you're making is as you say. No, he did not. He drew a line through it, but if you hold your cursor over it and click, you will be taken to that site. Well, there must be some reason he linked to it and keeps the link there. Perhaps I didn't write clearly: he took down the link to the pedophilic pedagogist from the blog roll. The blog roll that appears every time you go down the Marmot's Hole (I get a lot of hits from the blog rolls). Yeah, in the original post the link is still there (and perhaps it should be, since it is the topic of discussion), but that would be for only for people who are looking for it, at this point; it's no longer there for someone to stumble across. Anyway, my point still remains: if a strong case is made against a blog listed in the blog roll, Marmot has taken these things into consideration in the past. This thread has deteriorated to the point where it is probably non-salvageable. I had hoped to see a spirited discussion of whether Plunge was worthy of being on the blog roll, but I guess that isn’t going to happen.

Anyway…
Marmot took down the link to the pedophilic pedagogist, so maybe he’ll do the same with Plunge if the case you’re making is as you say.

No, he did not. He drew a line through it, but if you hold your cursor over it and click, you will be taken to that site. Well, there must be some reason he linked to it and keeps the link there.

Perhaps I didn’t write clearly: he took down the link to the pedophilic pedagogist from the blog roll. The blog roll that appears every time you go down the Marmot’s Hole (I get a lot of hits from the blog rolls).

Yeah, in the original post the link is still there (and perhaps it should be, since it is the topic of discussion), but that would be for only for people who are looking for it, at this point; it’s no longer there for someone to stumble across.

Anyway, my point still remains: if a strong case is made against a blog listed in the blog roll, Marmot has taken these things into consideration in the past.

]]> By: Jing http://www.rjkoehler.com/2006/01/19/plunge-returns/#comment-28529 Jing Tue, 24 Jan 2006 14:22:11 +0000 http://rjkoehler.com/?p=2333#comment-28529 Damn Cracka, Nulji's pet name sure doesn't apply here. You sir are no pink, you are as white bread as they come. I've got some advice for you Casper, get away from the computer for at least 30 minutes a day. I totally dig the girly pictures though, but ditch the suit; it makes you look like a total Charisma man. Damn Cracka, Nulji’s pet name sure doesn’t apply here. You sir are no pink, you are as white bread as they come. I’ve got some advice for you Casper, get away from the computer for at least 30 minutes a day. I totally dig the girly pictures though, but ditch the suit; it makes you look like a total Charisma man.

]]> By: shakuhachi http://www.rjkoehler.com/2006/01/19/plunge-returns/#comment-28528 shakuhachi Tue, 24 Jan 2006 14:04:34 +0000 http://rjkoehler.com/?p=2333#comment-28528 Stalking now nig? You are sick! Stalking now nig? You are sick!

]]> By: nig http://www.rjkoehler.com/2006/01/19/plunge-returns/#comment-28527 nig Tue, 24 Jan 2006 13:36:08 +0000 http://rjkoehler.com/?p=2333#comment-28527 Here is the cyworld page if anyone is interested. <a href="http://cyworld.nate.com/matt1977" rel="nofollow">http://cyworld.nate.com/matt1977</a> Here is the cyworld page if anyone is interested.

http://cyworld.nate.com/matt1977

]]> By: nig http://www.rjkoehler.com/2006/01/19/plunge-returns/#comment-28526 nig Tue, 24 Jan 2006 13:18:14 +0000 http://rjkoehler.com/?p=2333#comment-28526 Never trust a man who names himself after a Japanese slang word for a phallus. Words to live by. Never trust a man who names himself after a Japanese slang word for a phallus. Words to live by.

]]> By: juan http://www.rjkoehler.com/2006/01/19/plunge-returns/#comment-28525 juan Tue, 24 Jan 2006 00:16:51 +0000 http://rjkoehler.com/?p=2333#comment-28525 My mistake, I forgot the saying "Don't teach pigs to sing." And guys my name's Juan in English/Spanish and ? in Korean. Don't belive this slander about ? ;-) But I do wish I had some more ?(W)s in my pocket. Maybe if I had the talent like shak to just "assume" that there were loads of ? in my pocket. My mistake, I forgot the saying “Don’t teach pigs to sing.”

And guys my name’s Juan in English/Spanish and ? in Korean. Don’t belive this slander about ? ;-) But I do wish I had some more ?(W)s in my pocket. Maybe if I had the talent like shak to just “assume” that there were loads of ? in my pocket.

]]>