Your daily Hwang Woo-suk update

UPDATE 3: Gord over at eclexys has a lot of intelligent things to say (as always) about Hwang and stem cell research.

UPDATE 2: Don’t pin this scandal on Confucianism, says the Useless Tree.

UPDATE 1: The Hwang Woo-suk Cult of Personality lives on!

ORIGINAL POST: I’m getting a little sick blogging about the Hwang Woo-suk saga, as intiguing as it may be.  But if it’s all the media over here is talking about, why should I be any different?

  • The results of DNA reports are scheduled to come out next week, but there are already media reports that DNA analysis revealed that there were no patient-tailored stem cells when Hwang submitted his paper to Science.  Anyway, we’ll still have to wait to see whether Hwang managed to develop any core technologies.
  • Quoting an SNU official, KBS reported that Prof. Gerald Schatten demanded several times a professorial position at SNU’s School of Medicine.  He also demanded the directorship of the World Stem Cell Hub.  KBS reported that the U.S. scientist had drawn up an organizational plan and management plan designed to leak patient-tailored stem cell technology to the United States.  SNU said it came up with its own plan that would bring foreign technology into Korea while still maintaining control of the World Stem Cell Hub, but several negotiation efforts with Schatten failed to achieve an agreement.  A government official, meanwhile, said that when SNU refused Schatten’s demands, Schatten tried–through Hwang–to get SNU Medical Center officials sacked.  The hospital is reportedly considering legal action against Schatten.
  • The Munhwa Ilbo ran an analysis piece pointing to six reasons why the Hwang scandal could happen.  They were 1) lack of a thesis-verification system in Korea; 2) lack of a democratic lab room culture (namely, no one willing to raise objections to the boss; 3) to get research grants, you need to produce results in fields deemed industrially useful, so scientists can get caught up in chasing the money; 4) Hwang’s let the fame get to his head, and he grew obsessed with the hard-pressing Brits, especially after Great Britain’s Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority approved research on human embryonic stem cells.  He also felt pressed due to the passage of Korea’s bio-ethics law, which would make obtaining eggs more difficult; 5) the central and regional governments gave Hwang full backing and encouragement–including broad financial support–without implementing any sort of oversight mechanisms; 6) experts remained silent despite widespread suspicions about his research.  This was mostly due to fears that thanks to all the praise being showered on Hwang, raising suspicions would have been condemned as professional jealousy.

Oh, and someone kindly sent my this blast from the past from the JoongAng Ilbo’s editorial section–read the whole thing to bring back warm and fuzzy memories.

A world-renowned bioengineering scientist who recently visited Dr. Hwang’s laboratory reportedly exclaimed, "Korea has become the prima donna of the world [in bioengineering]. Humanity will bow before Korea."

The more you use your hands, the smarter your head gets. If we really
want to push our exports up to $200 billion per year, we might consider
teaching how to use chopsticks, needlework and traditional cooking in
schools. If we do, we should soon find ourselves the world’s prima
donna of not only bioengineering but informational technology and
nanotechnology as well.

And speaking of chopsticks, someone posting over at DC Inside claimed that the "Chopsticks Method" (i.e., the Squeezing Method) was not developed by Hwang, but was in fact published in a Japanese university journal back in 1991.

Sphere: Related Content

6 Comments

  1. Posted December 27, 2005 at 1:53 am | Permalink

    The six factors mentioned in the MunHwaIlbo are true in the US as well. The very same factors could easily produce, and have produced, liars in the western society.

    Wilmut only sent the DNA from the beaker, allegedly Dolly’s mother’s blood, and Dolly’s for examination one year after the publication. He sent them to a Scottish Nobel lauriat, the same nationality as him and his choice for verification.

    When the telomere papers came out suggesting that the old cells have shorter DNA lengths, Wilmut said that he examined the Dolly’s DNA and that they were shorter. Nobody else was allowed to get anywhere near Dolly.

    A few years later, Jerry Yang, a Chinese immigrant scientist at Univ. of Connecticut, claimed that he cloned a cow. For his cow the telomere lengths were the same, not any shorter than other young cows.

    What is going on? At least one of the two guys are lying. I think the both are lying. However, no young scientists in either the US or England who can challenge these “established” liars. They have become institutions, too big for common men to challenge.

    Hwang could have survived. Media and politicians were still behind him. The investigation could have been fudged and rendered “inconclusive”. However, young scientists and enlightened Koreans kept at it. Kept on digging. They toppled Hwang’s kingdom that were built on lies, fabrications and deceits.

    I wish other countries would follow the Korean example. Get at Wilmut. Redo verification on Wilmut’s alleged cloning technique. In the US, blow cover off Jerry Yang and the Texas A&M cat cloning company. These liars have prospered too long.

  2. Posted December 27, 2005 at 9:09 am | Permalink

    Intelligent? Hey, thanks. I’m certainly indebted to your coverage, as tiring as it might now be.

  3. Gravatar Michael your flag
    Posted December 27, 2005 at 10:15 am | Permalink

    Useless Tree doesn’t make a very convincing case for confucianism not being a factor in the Hwang fiasco–in fact, this has all the classic traits of confucianism gone wrong in Korea: excessive veneration of a patriarch figure (”Supreme Scientist” Hwang), collective obedience over personal freedom (women researcher coerced into donating eggs), and so on. He (she?) is right that modern science’s instrumentalist ethics and rationality are un-Confucian, but remember that Hwang ceaselessly harped on “Korean science,” which definitely means hevy-duty confucianism (and metal chopsticks).

  4. Gravatar Daehan Miguk your flag
    Posted December 27, 2005 at 10:48 pm | Permalink

    “Our deftness in using computers or mobile phones and even online games…” Priceless.

  5. Posted December 29, 2005 at 3:01 am | Permalink

    love the blast from the past. it embodies everything wrong with attempts to veneer logical achievements with genetic superiority. total retardation, most especially coming from “a deputy managing editor” of a major newspaper. myopic journalism at its best!

  6. Posted January 15, 2006 at 4:00 am | Permalink

    Seems like they were all basking in past glory!.. But wait a minute!!… All of these quoted as “Mad Scientists at Work”…including Drs. Wilmut, Schatten, Hwang… Was all their research fake??..Hard to believe!!.. Ain’t it?? Would somebody also question Schatten about his first created transgenic monkey (non-human primate) ANDi, if it is REAL??

One Trackback

  1. By The Useless Tree on December 27, 2005 at 12:15 am

    Koeans, Stem Cells and Sincerity

    The news that Dr. Hwang Woo Suk, who appeared to be stem cell researcher extraordinaire, cheated, has cast a shadow over science generally (how could such fraud not be caught earlier?) and Korean science in particular. I have blogged

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*

Bad Behavior has blocked 13593 access attempts in the last 7 days.