Comments on: Well, that was wacky http://www.rjkoehler.com/2005/08/27/well-that-was-wacky/ Korea... in Blog Format Sun, 6 Jul 2008 22:57:14 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1 By: ????? ????? ????? http://www.rjkoehler.com/2005/08/27/well-that-was-wacky/#comment-22310 ????? ????? ????? Sat, 27 Aug 2005 16:34:58 +0000 http://rjkoehler.com/?p=1958#comment-22310 Well reinstalling appears to have fixed the problem for me. I was going to just update my links with the different path, but decided I'd give it one last try this morning. Well reinstalling appears to have fixed the problem for me. I was going to just update my links with the different path, but decided I’d give it one last try this morning.

]]> By: dda http://www.rjkoehler.com/2005/08/27/well-that-was-wacky/#comment-22309 dda Sat, 27 Aug 2005 14:35:12 +0000 http://rjkoehler.com/?p=1958#comment-22309 The average blog reader won't be offended because it will most probably fly a mile over their collective heads... The average blog reader won’t be offended because it will most probably fly a mile over their collective heads…

]]> By: oranckay http://www.rjkoehler.com/2005/08/27/well-that-was-wacky/#comment-22308 oranckay Sat, 27 Aug 2005 08:42:33 +0000 http://rjkoehler.com/?p=1958#comment-22308 The average Korean reader won't be offended by the words themselves, but I doubt many will appreciate the kind of humor that would want to see it on an English language blog. The average Korean reader won’t be offended by the words themselves, but I doubt many will appreciate the kind of humor that would want to see it on an English language blog.

]]> By: The Marmot http://www.rjkoehler.com/2005/08/27/well-that-was-wacky/#comment-22307 The Marmot Sat, 27 Aug 2005 08:30:17 +0000 http://rjkoehler.com/?p=1958#comment-22307 I think some might not appreciate the irony, but just to make it clear, the phrase was used during the late Joseon dynasty: ??????? ?????? ????(???????)?? ??????? ?? ?? ???????? ??????? ???????????? ??????? ????? ?????????? ????????? ??????????? ???????????? ?????????? ?????????? ?????????????. ???? ???????????(???????????)??????? ????. ???????? ??????? ????????(?????), ???????(???????), ?????(?????), ????????(??????), ???????(???????), ???????(???) ?????. ???????? ???????? ??????????????(?????????????)??? ???? ???????? ???? ???????? ????? ???? ? ????(??????)?????? ??? ???????? ??????. ?????????? ????? ???????? ????????? ???????????? ??????. <a href="http://100.naver.com/100.php?id=777299" rel="nofollow">http://100.naver.com/100.php?id=777299</a> I think some might not appreciate the irony, but just to make it clear, the phrase was used during the late Joseon dynasty:

??????? ?????? ????(???????)?? ??????? ?? ?? ???????? ??????? ???????????? ??????? ????? ?????????? ????????? ??????????? ???????????? ?????????? ?????????? ?????????????. ???? ???????????(???????????)??????? ????. ???????? ??????? ????????(?????), ???????(???????), ?????(?????), ????????(??????), ???????(???????), ???????(???) ?????.

???????? ???????? ??????????????(?????????????)??? ???? ???????? ???? ???????? ????? ???? ? ????(??????)?????? ??? ???????? ??????. ?????????? ????? ???????? ????????? ???????????? ??????.

http://100.naver.com/100.php?id=777299

]]> By: shakuhachi http://www.rjkoehler.com/2005/08/27/well-that-was-wacky/#comment-22306 shakuhachi Sat, 27 Aug 2005 08:20:57 +0000 http://rjkoehler.com/?p=1958#comment-22306 Why are you using ???????? for the slogan of your blog? Arent you afraid it will offend Korean readers? Why are you using ???????? for the slogan of your blog? Arent you afraid it will offend Korean readers?

]]>