Well, you need to get the evidence somehow

Setting guidelines for cracking down on prostitution last March, the Supreme Prosecutors Office instructed its agents raiding businesses of ill repute to pretend to be customers and have sex with the working girls in order to secure evidence. Actually, one group would go in pretending to be customers, while the other would come in slightly later to bust the pimps after the other group had secured the evidence, so to speak. Agents were further encouraged to pay pre-arranged service fees on their credit cards for further evidence. Oddly enough, prosecutors suggested that as much as possible, crackdown teams be composed of civil servants other than cops.

Prosecutorial officials explain, however, that the advice was deleted from its later investigation manual put out in September, before the Special Law on Prostitution went into effect.

17 Comments

  1. troll your flag
    Posted June 7, 2005 at 6:38 am | Permalink

    How do you get a job like that? Any comment from those who know? How do you rate these girls, say from 1 to 10?

  2. Scott-in-Japan your flag
    Posted June 7, 2005 at 7:28 am | Permalink

    I *clearly* need to re-think working for the government. I mean, what other ‘law enforcement’ gig has those kinda perks?

    But seriously, does Korea really allow for entrapment like that? I’m not knocking it, just curious.

  3. James your flag
    Posted June 7, 2005 at 9:25 am | Permalink

    I wonder if our willing civil servants will draw hazardous duty pay for this type of assignment? Interesting that they want not policemen but regular civil servants to-ahem-gather evidence. I suppose it is an effort to try and reducce police graft. Becoming a civil servant just want up a couple of notches on the popularity scale.

  4. Posted June 7, 2005 at 11:02 am | Permalink

    Daily linklets 7th June

    A first hand account of Hong Kong’s brain drain. North Korea on the rebound, although they will have to do it without the internet, international calls or mobiles. Also a review of a book on the Kim dynasty with some revealing insights into North Kor…

  5. Iceberg your flag
    Posted June 7, 2005 at 2:07 pm | Permalink

    If I were in the group of “pretending” customers, I think I’d have to go back two or three times just to MAKE SURE that no further shenanigans were occuring. All in the name of decency, of course.

  6. Posted June 7, 2005 at 2:18 pm | Permalink

    I shouldn’t be surprised that this would occur in Korea, though I am surprised that it didn’t happen in Hong Kong or Singapore first. The chinese afterall single-handedly invented the concept of bureaucracy and the over-privileged mandarins to go with it.

  7. James your flag
    Posted June 7, 2005 at 2:20 pm | Permalink

    Just to be thorough-right-after you would hate to accuse some poor innocent girl of something so horrible-right?

  8. Posted June 7, 2005 at 7:18 pm | Permalink

    So the Korean taxpayer is willing to fund these sexcapades rather than fund USFK to employ Korean civilians? Perhaps the civil servants we lay off can find employment with the Supreme Prosecutor. Unfuckingbelievable.

  9. Posted June 7, 2005 at 7:37 pm | Permalink

    Mark wrote:So the Korean taxpayer is willing to fund these sexcapades rather than fund USFK to employ Korean civilians?When did we make the jump from the Korean-language (tabloid?) media reporting this to the Korean taxpayer willing to fund this?

    It is in the Korean news because it’s probably as much of a surprise to most Korean taxpayers as it is to us.

  10. Posted June 7, 2005 at 7:37 pm | Permalink

    And many of us are Korean taxpayers, I might add.

  11. Wedge your flag
    Posted June 7, 2005 at 7:38 pm | Permalink

    Sounds like a job for the censor bureaucracy - after all, they’d know what to look for.

  12. kimbob your flag
    Posted June 7, 2005 at 7:39 pm | Permalink

    “I shouldn?€™t be surprised that this would occur in Korea”

    If you mean new regulation for police to have sex with hookers to find out if they are having sex or not, no it didn’t occur.

    “So the Korean taxpayer is willing to fund these sexcapades”

    Obviously not. That’s why it was deleted out, after those boys who made the boo boo, thought about the public consequences. If you can read Korean, read the comments to the Marmot’s article. That would have been the public reaction that would have occured, if they actually went ahead.

    “Unfuckingbelievable”

    That’s why it made the news.

  13. Wedge your flag
    Posted June 7, 2005 at 7:43 pm | Permalink

    I stand corrected: What better activity could there be for the Explorer Scouts? They get used by the cops to buy beer underage at the Kwickie Mart in the U.S., so why not use them for kwickies at Miari?

  14. Posted June 7, 2005 at 8:10 pm | Permalink

    Oops…sorry Kushibo and Kimbob. I fell into the pitfall of jumping to conclusions without checking the linked article…. :(

  15. iwshim your flag
    Posted June 7, 2005 at 8:20 pm | Permalink

    Looking for a story.

    There was an article in one of the newspapers detailing a US soldier studying Japanese’s before WW2 who was paid to go to a Japanese geisha house. So that he could look out the window at the Japanese naval dockyards to spy.
    Anyone remember this story?

  16. kimbob your flag
    Posted June 7, 2005 at 8:38 pm | Permalink

    “Unfuckingbelievable”

    That’s what I would say about anything that the Korean media prints. A healthy skepticsm is in order here.

    “Anyone remember this story?”

    You never know which stories are distortions of facts designed to sell stories and whip up public controversy.

  17. iwshim your flag
    Posted June 8, 2005 at 9:44 pm | Permalink

    Shall you wish to wager? Put your money where you’re mouth is or shut up (no need for profanity).
    My Canuck colleague shall I suggest 1,000,000 won if I show the story to be true?
    The puck is in your zone…, mon ami.

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*