<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A waste of a perfectly good missile</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rjkoehler.com/2005/05/02/a-waste-of-a-perfectly-good-missile/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2005/05/02/a-waste-of-a-perfectly-good-missile/</link>
	<description>Korea... in Blog Format</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 17:33:30 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2005/05/02/a-waste-of-a-perfectly-good-missile/#comment-15825</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2005 03:22:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjkoehler.com/?p=1588#comment-15825</guid>
		<description>You know with all this talk ..if NK did this and NK did that.
The only country that gets away with using WMD is the US. They bombed the shit out of the North and other places , it is no wonder the North wants protection. After all look what happened to Iraq , they had no WMD so it was invaded. That is the real lesson from the invasion.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know with all this talk ..if NK did this and NK did that.<br />
The only country that gets away with using WMD is the US. They bombed the shit out of the North and other places , it is no wonder the North wants protection. After all look what happened to Iraq , they had no WMD so it was invaded. That is the real lesson from the invasion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nora sumi park</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2005/05/02/a-waste-of-a-perfectly-good-missile/#comment-15824</link>
		<dc:creator>nora sumi park</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2005 16:56:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjkoehler.com/?p=1588#comment-15824</guid>
		<description>kushibo wrote:
the French are very insistent about this particular name. They consider it a national insult to call it ?€œenglish?€? when only half of it belongs to us.
so, to the list of europe-related monikers for korea (e.g., 'the irish of asia' and 'the jews of asia') we should now add 'the french of asia'?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>kushibo wrote:<br />
the French are very insistent about this particular name. They consider it a national insult to call it ?€œenglish?€? when only half of it belongs to us.<br />
so, to the list of europe-related monikers for korea (e.g., &#8216;the irish of asia&#8217; and &#8216;the jews of asia&#8217;) we should now add &#8216;the french of asia&#8217;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kushibo</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2005/05/02/a-waste-of-a-perfectly-good-missile/#comment-15823</link>
		<dc:creator>Kushibo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2005 16:13:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjkoehler.com/?p=1588#comment-15823</guid>
		<description>Thorin wrote:
The French may call it La Manche but they don?€™t tell Englishmen what to call it.  Is there another example of a nation insisting on a foreign language place name?  Isn?€™t that like me saying I want Koreans to call me an Amerigook? 

I asked some British and continental European folks about the English Channel/La Manche issue in another forum. This is a paste-together of the relevant response. 

AMERICAN:
I thought they always called it La Manche ("The Sleeve") for the shape it resembles on a map.

BRIT:
That's right. The french *hate* the fact that it's called the english channel and refer to it by their traditional name whenever they can get away with it. 

The naming of things as other things isn't a particularly french thing, as Robin [a German geography major] pointed out, but the French are very insistent about this particular name. They consider it a national insult to call it "english" when only half of it belongs to us. :)  [emphasis mine]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thorin wrote:<br />
The French may call it La Manche but they don?€™t tell Englishmen what to call it.  Is there another example of a nation insisting on a foreign language place name?  Isn?€™t that like me saying I want Koreans to call me an Amerigook? </p>
<p>I asked some British and continental European folks about the English Channel/La Manche issue in another forum. This is a paste-together of the relevant response. </p>
<p>AMERICAN:<br />
I thought they always called it La Manche (&#8221;The Sleeve&#8221;) for the shape it resembles on a map.</p>
<p>BRIT:<br />
That&#8217;s right. The french *hate* the fact that it&#8217;s called the english channel and refer to it by their traditional name whenever they can get away with it. </p>
<p>The naming of things as other things isn&#8217;t a particularly french thing, as Robin [a German geography major] pointed out, but the French are very insistent about this particular name. They consider it a national insult to call it &#8220;english&#8221; when only half of it belongs to us. <img src='http://www.rjkoehler.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  [emphasis mine]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KimcheeGI</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2005/05/02/a-waste-of-a-perfectly-good-missile/#comment-15822</link>
		<dc:creator>KimcheeGI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2005 08:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjkoehler.com/?p=1588#comment-15822</guid>
		<description>Back to the missile:

North Korea fired a missile into the East Sea whose range is presumed to be ranging from 100 to 120 kilometers, and it is known to be a KN-02, an upgraded version of the Soviet (Russian) SS21," Kim Sung-il, a senior official at Seoul's Joint Chiefs of Staff, said in a closed-door parliamentary session, according to lawmakers who attended the session.

He said the missile launch is presumed to be for improving the performance of North Korea's surface-to-surface missiles and not attacking another country or mounting nuclear or chemical warheads onto the missile.

The KN-02 is known to be a portable surface-to-surface short-range ballistic missile, and its range is more expanded than that of the SS21 and its accuracy has been improved.

The missile, if fired from near the inter-Korean border, can strike the city of Pyeongtaek, which is scheduled to host most American soldiers stationed in South Korea in few years, in addition to thousands of troops currently stationed there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Back to the missile:</p>
<p>North Korea fired a missile into the East Sea whose range is presumed to be ranging from 100 to 120 kilometers, and it is known to be a KN-02, an upgraded version of the Soviet (Russian) SS21,&#8221; Kim Sung-il, a senior official at Seoul&#8217;s Joint Chiefs of Staff, said in a closed-door parliamentary session, according to lawmakers who attended the session.</p>
<p>He said the missile launch is presumed to be for improving the performance of North Korea&#8217;s surface-to-surface missiles and not attacking another country or mounting nuclear or chemical warheads onto the missile.</p>
<p>The KN-02 is known to be a portable surface-to-surface short-range ballistic missile, and its range is more expanded than that of the SS21 and its accuracy has been improved.</p>
<p>The missile, if fired from near the inter-Korean border, can strike the city of Pyeongtaek, which is scheduled to host most American soldiers stationed in South Korea in few years, in addition to thousands of troops currently stationed there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kushibo</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2005/05/02/a-waste-of-a-perfectly-good-missile/#comment-15821</link>
		<dc:creator>Kushibo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2005 09:06:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjkoehler.com/?p=1588#comment-15821</guid>
		<description>Thorin,

How about the Greeks telling Macedonia (formerly part of Yugoslavia) what they can call themselves? 

The situation and repurcussions there make Korea's East Sea business look like a friendly parlor room discussion.

I'm sure that the international naming organizations have a few other examples.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thorin,</p>
<p>How about the Greeks telling Macedonia (formerly part of Yugoslavia) what they can call themselves? </p>
<p>The situation and repurcussions there make Korea&#8217;s East Sea business look like a friendly parlor room discussion.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure that the international naming organizations have a few other examples.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thorin</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2005/05/02/a-waste-of-a-perfectly-good-missile/#comment-15820</link>
		<dc:creator>Thorin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2005 04:01:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjkoehler.com/?p=1588#comment-15820</guid>
		<description>The French may call it La Manche but they don't tell Englishmen what to call it.  Is there another example of a nation insisting on a foreign language place name?  Isn't that like me saying I want Koreans to call me an Amerigook?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The French may call it La Manche but they don&#8217;t tell Englishmen what to call it.  Is there another example of a nation insisting on a foreign language place name?  Isn&#8217;t that like me saying I want Koreans to call me an Amerigook?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kushibo</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2005/05/02/a-waste-of-a-perfectly-good-missile/#comment-15819</link>
		<dc:creator>Kushibo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2005 21:25:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjkoehler.com/?p=1588#comment-15819</guid>
		<description>I personally think it?€™s ok to call it the Sea of Japan, since it?€™s not like we see armed French students demanding name change of the English Channel.

Don't the French call the English Channel "La Manche"?

The French are too busy protesting les Americains and getting upset about losing their French language to English vocabulary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I personally think it?€™s ok to call it the Sea of Japan, since it?€™s not like we see armed French students demanding name change of the English Channel.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t the French call the English Channel &#8220;La Manche&#8221;?</p>
<p>The French are too busy protesting les Americains and getting upset about losing their French language to English vocabulary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thorin</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2005/05/02/a-waste-of-a-perfectly-good-missile/#comment-15818</link>
		<dc:creator>Thorin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2005 17:49:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjkoehler.com/?p=1588#comment-15818</guid>
		<description>Huh?  What missle?
&lt;a href="http://english.chosun.com/w21data/html/news/200505/200505020014.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://english.chosun.com/w21data/html/news/200505/200505020014.html&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Huh?  What missle?<br />
<a href="http://english.chosun.com/w21data/html/news/200505/200505020014.html" rel="nofollow">http://english.chosun.com/w21d.....20014.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2005/05/02/a-waste-of-a-perfectly-good-missile/#comment-15817</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2005 16:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjkoehler.com/?p=1588#comment-15817</guid>
		<description>Marmot, thanks for providing a venue for education.  Today I've learned what bona fide and philistine really mean, thanks to Paul H., as well as a kindly math lesson from Nora. 

Kudos to Charlie for the excellent research.  I was thinking this was the usual silkworm/seersucker launch, but it may be much more.  I imagine fitting a cruise missile with a small plutonium weapon would be a heck of a way to get one's neighbor's attention.  Considering the range of these missiles, however, the blast would also affect the folks launching it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marmot, thanks for providing a venue for education.  Today I&#8217;ve learned what bona fide and philistine really mean, thanks to Paul H., as well as a kindly math lesson from Nora. </p>
<p>Kudos to Charlie for the excellent research.  I was thinking this was the usual silkworm/seersucker launch, but it may be much more.  I imagine fitting a cruise missile with a small plutonium weapon would be a heck of a way to get one&#8217;s neighbor&#8217;s attention.  Considering the range of these missiles, however, the blast would also affect the folks launching it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kim Jong-Il</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2005/05/02/a-waste-of-a-perfectly-good-missile/#comment-15816</link>
		<dc:creator>Kim Jong-Il</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2005 16:31:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjkoehler.com/?p=1588#comment-15816</guid>
		<description>Ahem ahem, "outpost of tranny", *please*!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahem ahem, &#8220;outpost of tranny&#8221;, *please*!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
